Skip to content

Feasibility of Stereotactic Image Guidance on the Lateral Skull Base

Feasibility of Stereotactic Image Guidance on the Lateral Skull Base

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03852329
Acronym
LSBN
Enrollment
3
Registered
2019-02-25
Start date
2020-01-01
Completion date
2020-12-31
Last updated
2023-02-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Otologic Disease

Keywords

Image-guidance, Lateral skull base surgery

Brief summary

A clinical trial to asses the accuracy, usefulness and usability of a stereotactic image-guidance system during lateral skull base surgery.

Detailed description

Stereotactic image guidance aims to provide for accurate and precise instrument localization in patient-specific image data. Image guidance is effectively used in various surgical domains such as neurosurgery, nose-surgery and orthopaedic surgery with benefits for patients such as less invasiveness and reduced surgery time. Its application for lateral skull base surgery was proposed and is considered an unmet clinical need. However, the small geometric scale (\ 0.5 mm) of the anatomical structures within the lateral skull base prevents the effective application of commercially available systems due to their insufficient guidance accuracy. Within the context of robotic cochlear implantation, stereotactic image guidance technology with a guidance accuracy \<0.5 mm was developed. The aim of this study is to apply the developed technology in lateral skull base surgery other than robotic cochlear implantation. This study primarily seeks to determine the effective end-to-end image guidance accuracy of the investigational device at predefined artificial landmarks on a task-specific registration device attached to the skull. The main secondary objective is to qualitatively assess the available accuracy at predefined anatomical landmarks by visual inspection through surgeons in the absence of quantifiable ground truth information.

Interventions

DEVICELateral skull base navigation

Patient preparation: The participant is prepared for the surgery according to clinical standards. System setup: The hardware components of the investigational device are set up Tripod fixation: The tripod with integrated registration fiducials is fixed on the participant's skull. CBCT imaging: A CBCT image of the participant is acquired Image processing: The CBCT data is loaded on the navigation platform. The registration fiducials are automatically detected in the image data and relevant anatomy is segmented using an otologic planning software. Measurements: The navigation software is started, and the fiducial positions and segmentations loaded. The measurements are conducted. Treatment: The surgery is conducted by the surgeon according to clinical standards

Sponsors

Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Prospective, single-arm, non-controlled

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients which are regularly scheduled for an otologic surgical procedure * Informed Consent as documented by signature * Age \>= 18 years

Exclusion criteria

* Other clinically condition or disease that would (as deemed by the operating surgeon) significantly increase the risk of surgery

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Quantitative accuracyUntil the end of the intervention, expected to be up to 4.5 hoursThe primary endpoint is the localization accuracy of predefined artificial target positions on the registration tripod measured in millimetres. The tracked instrument is positioned on the target positions. The Euclidean distance between the location of the instrument in the image data as indicated by the stereotactic image guidance system and to the true location of the target point in the image data is measured. The true location of the target points in the image data is determined by alignment of the 3D model of the tripod (including the known target positions on the tripod) with the image data.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Qualitative accuracyUntil the end of the intervention, expected to be up to 4.5 hoursThe main secondary endpoint is the qualitative assessment of the guidance accuracy at anatomical landmarks through user rating. While the tracked pointer is placed on a landmark, a screenshot of the microscope view is taken. Additionally, the pose of the pointer instrument in the image data indicated by the navigation system is stored. Postoperatively, the alignment of the pointer with the anatomical models compared to the microscope view is rated by multiple surgeons using a questionnaire. A five-level Likert scale (Strongly agree, Agree, Undecided, Disagree, Strongly disagree) is used to measure agreement with statements concerning * Accuracy: The position indicated in the navigation view is correct at a clinically relevant geometric scale * Usefulness: The information provided by the navigation view is useful to identify anatomical structures during the surgery * Usability: The application of the navigation system during the surgical procedure is straightforward.

Countries

Switzerland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 14, 2026