Skip to content

Nanofat on Wound Healing and Scar Formation

Nanofat on Wound Healing and Scar Formation: a Randomized, Split-scar, Double Blind Trial

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03850119
Acronym
NFWHSF
Enrollment
15
Registered
2019-02-21
Start date
2019-03-01
Completion date
2022-03-01
Last updated
2019-02-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Delayed Wound Healing, Donor Site Complication, Hypertrophic Scar, Post Inflammatory Hyperpigmentation, Scars

Keywords

adipose derived stem cells, stromal vascular fraction, wound healing, scar formation, donor site morbidity, nanofat

Brief summary

This study will evaluate the effectiveness and safety of intradermal injection of Nanofat on wound healing and scar formation.

Detailed description

In this monocentric, randomized, controlled, double-blinded prospective interventional study, twenty patients will be included. Each patient will be his/her own control. Patients undergoing DIEPflap breast reconstruction will be included in this study. During the surgery, the abdominal incision will be divided in two equal sides with the umbilicus as midline reference. The sides will be randomized in a treatment side and control side. The treatment side will receive intradermal nanofat injections after the subcutaneous and right before the intradermal sutures. The patient and investigators will be blinded for the treatment protocol. The effects on wound healing, adverse events, scar formation and pigmentation will be evaluated up to one year after the surgery.

Interventions

Lipoaspirate, harvested during the surgery, is centrifuged for 1 minute at 2000 rpm to discard infiltration fluid. The residual fat is passed back and forth between two 10cc syringes interlocked with Tulip connecting pieces (2.4, 1.4 and 1.2 diameter, each 10 passes for a total of 30 passes). This is injected intradermally before the intradermal sutures are placed. The donor site is always entirely sutured (both sides) by the same person.

Sponsors

Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Patient, investigator, outcome assessor will be blinded for which side of the scar was treated and which was a control. Only the surgeon, who will not be involved in the assessment, will not be blinded.

Intervention model description

monocentric randomized controlled double-blinded prospective interventional study

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

\- scheduled for DIEP-flap breast reconstruction surgery at our department

Exclusion criteria

* smokers * use of cortisone or other immunsuppressants * diabetes mellitus type 1 or 2 * age * connective tissue disease

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Clinical outcome of the abdominal scar by the use of Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scaleone yearThe abdominal scar will be evaluated clinically by the patient and observer scar assessment scale, starting from one month after the surgery
Clinical assessment of the time to healing of the abdominal woundone monthThe time for the abdominal wound to heal will be registered. Wound healing is considered a closed and non-dehiscent wound witout signs of inflammation or infection.
Evaluation of histological parameters on tissue biopsy from both sides of the abdominal scar.six monthsEvaluation of the histological differences of the treatment arm vs. control, by evaluating scar properties on tissue biopsy. Scar thickness, collagen arrangement and angiogenesis will be evaluated.
Pigmentation Index of the two sides of the scar, measured with a Mexameterone yearEvaluation of the Pigmentation Index difference in the treatment arm vs. control arm will be measured by the use of a mexameter, starting from one month after the procedure (after wound healing is complete).
Patient satisfaction of abdominal scar appearance measured by a Visual Analog Scaleone yearEvaluation of patient satisfaction over the entire course of the study by filling in a Visual Analog Scale, with 1 being very unsatisfied and 10 being very satisfied.
Rate of adverse eventsOne yearRegistration of the rate of adverse events appearing at the abdominal wound/abdominal scar

Contacts

Primary ContactMoustapha Hamdi, MD, PhD
moustapha.hamdi@uzbrussel.be+ 32 24749400
Backup ContactLisa E Ramaut, MD
ramaut.lisa@gmail.com+ 32 484 15 89 01

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026