Skip to content

Evaluation for the Effect of Smartphone Based Training on Chronic Ankle Instability Subjects

Development of a Smartphone-based System for Training Subjects With Chronic Ankle Instability and Training Effect Evaluation

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03849547
Enrollment
46
Registered
2019-02-21
Start date
2019-02-18
Completion date
2020-01-31
Last updated
2020-02-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Ankle Instability

Keywords

Chronic ankle instability, Smartphone

Brief summary

This study aims to verify the training effect of smartphone-based training for chronic ankle instability(CAI) subjects. By randomizing subjects to App training group, clinical training group and control group, the training effect will be compared among groups.

Detailed description

Postural control ability may be damaged after ankle sprains. Poor postural control ability is the risk factors of the ankle sprain, forming a vicious circle of recurrent sprains. Proper and early assessment is the key to breaking down the circle. Smartphones have been utilized in the medical field. With built-in sensors, utilizing smartphones as assessment tools can provide quantitative data of postural control performance. This study aims to verify the training effect of smartphone-based training for CAI subjects. CAI subjects were recruited and randomly assigned to App training group, Home training group and control group, receiving 6 weeks of intervention. Pre-test was conducted before the intervention, and the post-test was conducted after the 6-week intervention. The follow up assessment was conducted 4 weeks after the post-test.

Interventions

OTHERApp Balance training

Training specially designed for balance ability of chronic ankle instability groups. Guidance through smartphone application as home program.

OTHERHome Balance training

Training specially designed for balance ability of chronic ankle instability groups. Follow the usual home program provided in clinics.

Sponsors

National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* At least one ankle sprain history * At least 2 times of sprain and feeling unstable * Diagnosed as functional ankle instability * Full recovered from injury * Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool\<24 * Ankle Instability Instrument \>5 yes * Identification of Functional Ankle Instability \>11

Exclusion criteria

* Diagnosis as mechanical instability * Neurological deficits * Lower extremity injury within the past 6 wk * History of lower-extremity surgery * Other conditions known to affect balance

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Postural sway measurement30 secondsUsing smartphone application and force plate to record the postural sway during single leg stance.
Star Excursion Balance Test5 minutesTo assess the dynamic balance ability of subjects.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Foot and Ankle Outcome Score5 minutesAn ankle function assessment tool, with 5 dimensions includes symptoms, pain, activity, function and sport, and quality of life. The scale score ranges from 0% to 100%, the higher the percentage, the better ankle function. Subjects answer the questions by choosing different choices that describe their condition the best. The total score will be summed up and calculated as percentage.
Foot and Ankle Ability Measure-sport subscale5 minutesAn ankle function assessment tool. The scale score ranges from 0% to 100%, the higher the percentage, the better ankle function. Subjects answer the 7 questions by choosing different degree of difficulty to accomplish the activities. The total score will be summed up and calculated as percentage.

Countries

Taiwan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026