Skip to content

Subject´s Preference Regarding Hearing Performance and Functionality Using a New Sound Processor

Subject´s Preference Regarding Hearing Performance and Functionality Using a New Sound Processor

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03848910
Enrollment
11
Registered
2019-02-21
Start date
2019-02-19
Completion date
2019-04-23
Last updated
2021-10-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Conductive Hearing Loss, Deafness; Sensoneural Single Sided, Mixed Hearing Loss

Brief summary

The aim of this clinical investigation is to investigate the subject´s overall preference, hearing performance and self-reported assessments with the Investigational device and its precursor Sound Processor (Comparator) after 6 weeks in subjects with conductive/mixed hearing loss or Single Sided Deafness, (SSD).

Interventions

DEVICEInvestigational device - Sound Processor

At visit 1 the subjects will complete self-reported assessments with respect to pre-study experience using precursor Sound Processor (comparator). At visit 1 the subjects will then receive the Investigational device (Sound Processor) which should be used during the following 6 weeks. At visit 3 the subjects will complete self-reported assessments regarding Investigational device and participate in audiology tests regarding both Sound Processors, comparator and Investigational device. The subject shall decide their preferred choice made by selection between Investigational device and the comparator.

Sponsors

Cochlear
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Completed clinical investigation CBAS5539, and an active user of the Osia System. * Signed Informed consent. * Subject with conductive or mixed hearing loss in the implanted ear. Bone conduction thresholds with pure tone average (PTA4; mean of 0.5, 1, 2 and 4 kHz) of ≤ 55 dB HL. OR subject with single-sided sensorineural deafness. Air conduction thresholds with a pure tone average PTA4 of ≤ 20 dB (decibel) HL (Hearing Level) (mean of 0.5, 1, 2 and 3 kHz) in the good ear. \- Optimally fitted with Osia Sound processor, according to subject's experience prior to inclusion.

Exclusion criteria

* Any ongoing soft tissue complication that could significantly affect the use of the Osia 2 Sound Processor during the 6 weeks period * Use of ototoxic drugs that could be harmful to the hearing, as judged by the investigator * Unable to follow investigational procedures and instructions, e.g. inability to complete quality of life scales or audiological testing as described in the Clinical Investigation Plan (CIP). * Participation in another clinical investigation with pharmaceutical and/or device.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB)Day 0 (Visit 1) and after 6 weeks (Visit 3)Measuring of subscales Ease of communication, Reverberation, Background noise, Aversiveness and a Global score with the precursor sound processor at Day 0 and with the Investigational device after 6 weeks with a questionnaire. All subscales range from 0-100%, total score is the average of all subscales 0-100%, where 0% indicates no problems and 100% indicates always problem. A decrease in the APHAB values indicates an improvement. The change from visit 1 with the precursor sound processor to visit 3 with the Investigational device is presented. A positive value indicates an improvement with the Investigational device, a negative value an impairment.
Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ)Day 0 and after 6 weeksMeasuring speech, spatial and hearing experiences with the precursor sound processor at Day 0 (Visit 1) and with Investigational device after 6 weeks (Visit 3) with a questionnaire. The Total score summarizes the parameters speech, spatial and hearing. A scale from 0 to 10, where 0 represents can not hear at all, and 10 hear perfectly is used. An increase of a SSQ value reflects an improvement. The change from visit 1 with the precursor sound processor to visit 3 with the Investigational device is presented. A positive value indicates an improvement and a negative value an impairment.
Self-reported Assessment Regarding Satisfaction and Usability (QUEST Version 2)Day 0 and after 6 weeksMeasuring QUEST (Self-reported assessment regarding satisfaction and usability) using a questionnaire, with the precursor sound processor at Day 0 (Visit 1) and with the Investigational device after 6 weeks (Visit 3). The QUEST form displays the scoring of 8 satisfaction items. The satisfaction items related to the characteristics of the device are: 1) dimensions, 2) weight, 3) adjustments, 4) safety, 5) durability, 6) simplicity of use, 7) comfort and 8) effectiveness. A scale from 1 to 5, where 1 represent not satisfied at all, 2 not very satisfied, 3 more or less satisfied, 4 quiet satisfied and 5 represents very satisfied. The three most important items of 1) dimensions, 2) weight, 3) adjustments, 4) safety, 5) durability, 6) simplicity of use, 7) comfort and 8) effectiveness were listed by each participant.
Audiometric Thresholds in Freefield, Pure Tone Average 4 (PTA4)Baseline at visit 1, 6 weeks after study start at visit 3To measure threshold audiometry PTA4 (mean of 500, 1000, 2000 and 4000 Hz) with both the precursor sound processor and the Investigational device. The units reported for PTA4 are decibels (dB). The change from visit 1 with the precursor sound processor to visit 3 with the Investigational device is presented. As such, a lower or more negative score is more desirable and reflects a better ability to hear softer sounds.
Audiometric Thresholds in Freefield, Individual Frequencies6 weeks after study startTo measure threshold audiometry at individual frequencies 250, 500, 1000, 2000, 3000, 4000, 6000 Hz with both the precursor sound processor and the Investigational device. The units reported for threshold audiometry are decibels (dB). The change from visit 1 with the precursor sound processor to visit 3 with the Investigational device is presented. As such, a lower or more negative score is more desirable and reflects a better ability to hear softer sounds.
Adaptive Speech Recognition in Noise RatioBaseline at visit 1, 6 weeks after study start at visit 3To measure Adaptive speech recognition in noise with the precursor sound processor and the Investigational device. Measured as signal to noise ratio The adaptive speech test in noise was conducted using validated lists of phonetically balanced sentences, with speech and noise presented from the front (0 degrees azimuth). The speech is kept constant at 65 dB Sound Pressure Level (SPL) and the noise is adapted in dB steps to establish the speech-to-noise ratio (SNR) providing a 50% level of understanding. A ratio of 1 reflects the ability to correctly hear sentences at 65 dB, in the presence of 65 dB background noise. A lower ratio than 1 reflects the ability to correctly hear sentences below 65 dB. A ratio higher than 1 reflects the ability to correctly hear sentences presented above 65 dB. A lower or more negative score is more desirable and represent a better hearing in a noisy environment.
Speech in QuietBaseline at visit 1, 6 weeks after study start at visit 3To measure Speech in quiet at 50, 65 and 80 dB with the precursor sound processor and the Investigational device. Speech in Quiet presents a list of words in a quiet environment at three different presentations levels, 50, 65 and 80 dB (decibel). The number of correct words perceived at each presentation level are counted and the percentage in relation to the total presented amount of words is calculated. A higher score reflects a higher percentage of correct words perceived, i.e. better hearing in a quiet environment.
To Compare the Subject´s Overall Preference Regarding the Investigational Device and the Precursor Sound Processor6 weeks after study startThe test subject will be asked a question regarding preferred choice made by selection between Investigational device and the precursor sound processor (comparator). Three boxes can be ticked; Precursor Sound Processor, Investigational Device, No preference.
To Assess the Subject's Experience Regarding ComfortBaseline at visit 1, 6 weeks after study start at visit 3Measure Comfort by a visual analogue scale (VAS) 100 mm at Day 0 regarding the precursor sound processor and after 6 weeks regarding the Investigational device. Subject will be asked to put a line where they find most appropriate where 0 mm represents Not comfortable at all and 100 represents Most comfortable imaginable. The distance will be measured with a ruler and presented as a value between 0 and 100. A higher score reflects higher comfort.
To Assess the Subject's Experience Regarding Usage; Magnet Choice6 weeks after study startMagnet choice will be entered; four boxes are available, 1, 2, 3 and 4, the box with the strength chosen by the patient will be ticked. Magnet strength 1 is the weakest and 4 is the strongest.
To Assess the Subject's Experience Regarding Usage; Battery Life Time6 weeks after study startThe patient will be asked a question regarding battery life; How often was the battery changed. A free text field is available for answer.
To Assess the Subject's Experience Regarding Usage; Softwear Pad6 weeks after study startThe patient will be asked a question Did you use a SoftWear Pad in the last 6 weeks. The patient can tick a Yes or No box.
To Assess the Subject's Experience Regarding Usage; Safety Line6 weeks after study startThe patient will be asked a question Did you use a safety line in the last 6 weeks. The patient can tick a Yes or No box.
To Assess the Subject's Experience Regarding Usage; Wireless Accessories6 weeks after study startThe patient will be asked a question Did you use a Wireless accessory during the last 6 weeks. The patient can tick a Yes or No box.

Countries

Australia

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Investigational Device - Sound Processor
Investigational device - Sound Processor: At visit 1 the subjects completed self-reported assessments with respect to pre-study experience using precursor Sound Processor (comparator). At visit 1 the subjects then received the Investigational device (Sound Processor) which was used during the following 6 weeks. At visit 3 the subjects completed self-reported assessments regarding Investigational device and participated in audiology tests regarding both Sound Processors, comparator and Investigational device. The subject decided their preferred choice made by selection between Investigational device and the comparator.
11
Total11

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicInvestigational Device - Sound Processor
Age, Continuous48.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.7
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
10 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Australia
11 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
6 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 11
other
Total, other adverse events
4 / 11
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 11

Outcome results

Primary

Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB)

Measuring of subscales Ease of communication, Reverberation, Background noise, Aversiveness and a Global score with the precursor sound processor at Day 0 and with the Investigational device after 6 weeks with a questionnaire. All subscales range from 0-100%, total score is the average of all subscales 0-100%, where 0% indicates no problems and 100% indicates always problem. A decrease in the APHAB values indicates an improvement. The change from visit 1 with the precursor sound processor to visit 3 with the Investigational device is presented. A positive value indicates an improvement with the Investigational device, a negative value an impairment.

Time frame: Day 0 (Visit 1) and after 6 weeks (Visit 3)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorAbbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB)Ease of communication6.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.1
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorAbbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB)Background noise7.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.6
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorAbbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB)Reverberation5.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.3
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorAbbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB)Aversiveness3.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.5
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorAbbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB)Global6.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.5
Primary

Adaptive Speech Recognition in Noise Ratio

To measure Adaptive speech recognition in noise with the precursor sound processor and the Investigational device. Measured as signal to noise ratio The adaptive speech test in noise was conducted using validated lists of phonetically balanced sentences, with speech and noise presented from the front (0 degrees azimuth). The speech is kept constant at 65 dB Sound Pressure Level (SPL) and the noise is adapted in dB steps to establish the speech-to-noise ratio (SNR) providing a 50% level of understanding. A ratio of 1 reflects the ability to correctly hear sentences at 65 dB, in the presence of 65 dB background noise. A lower ratio than 1 reflects the ability to correctly hear sentences below 65 dB. A ratio higher than 1 reflects the ability to correctly hear sentences presented above 65 dB. A lower or more negative score is more desirable and represent a better hearing in a noisy environment.

Time frame: Baseline at visit 1, 6 weeks after study start at visit 3

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorAdaptive Speech Recognition in Noise RatioVisit 1-1.3 SNRStandard Deviation 1.2
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorAdaptive Speech Recognition in Noise RatioVisit 3-1.2 SNRStandard Deviation 1.4
Primary

Audiometric Thresholds in Freefield, Individual Frequencies

To measure threshold audiometry at individual frequencies 250, 500, 1000, 2000, 3000, 4000, 6000 Hz with both the precursor sound processor and the Investigational device. The units reported for threshold audiometry are decibels (dB). The change from visit 1 with the precursor sound processor to visit 3 with the Investigational device is presented. As such, a lower or more negative score is more desirable and reflects a better ability to hear softer sounds.

Time frame: 6 weeks after study start

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorAudiometric Thresholds in Freefield, Individual Frequencies4000 Hz-0.9 dBStandard Deviation 5.4
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorAudiometric Thresholds in Freefield, Individual Frequencies250 Hz-2.3 dBStandard Deviation 4.7
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorAudiometric Thresholds in Freefield, Individual Frequencies500 Hz-3.6 dBStandard Deviation 5.1
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorAudiometric Thresholds in Freefield, Individual Frequencies750 Hz-6.4 dBStandard Deviation 3.9
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorAudiometric Thresholds in Freefield, Individual Frequencies1000 Hz-3.6 dBStandard Deviation 3.9
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorAudiometric Thresholds in Freefield, Individual Frequencies1500 Hz-3.6 dBStandard Deviation 6
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorAudiometric Thresholds in Freefield, Individual Frequencies2000 Hz-1.2 dBStandard Deviation 3.4
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorAudiometric Thresholds in Freefield, Individual Frequencies3000 Hz-4.1 dBStandard Deviation 3.8
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorAudiometric Thresholds in Freefield, Individual Frequencies6000 Hz-4.6 dBStandard Deviation 4.2
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorAudiometric Thresholds in Freefield, Individual Frequencies8000 Hz-1.8 dBStandard Deviation 14.7
Primary

Audiometric Thresholds in Freefield, Pure Tone Average 4 (PTA4)

To measure threshold audiometry PTA4 (mean of 500, 1000, 2000 and 4000 Hz) with both the precursor sound processor and the Investigational device. The units reported for PTA4 are decibels (dB). The change from visit 1 with the precursor sound processor to visit 3 with the Investigational device is presented. As such, a lower or more negative score is more desirable and reflects a better ability to hear softer sounds.

Time frame: Baseline at visit 1, 6 weeks after study start at visit 3

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorAudiometric Thresholds in Freefield, Pure Tone Average 4 (PTA4)-2.5 dBStandard Deviation 2.4
Primary

Self-reported Assessment Regarding Satisfaction and Usability (QUEST Version 2)

Measuring QUEST (Self-reported assessment regarding satisfaction and usability) using a questionnaire, with the precursor sound processor at Day 0 (Visit 1) and with the Investigational device after 6 weeks (Visit 3). The QUEST form displays the scoring of 8 satisfaction items. The satisfaction items related to the characteristics of the device are: 1) dimensions, 2) weight, 3) adjustments, 4) safety, 5) durability, 6) simplicity of use, 7) comfort and 8) effectiveness. A scale from 1 to 5, where 1 represent not satisfied at all, 2 not very satisfied, 3 more or less satisfied, 4 quiet satisfied and 5 represents very satisfied. The three most important items of 1) dimensions, 2) weight, 3) adjustments, 4) safety, 5) durability, 6) simplicity of use, 7) comfort and 8) effectiveness were listed by each participant.

Time frame: Day 0 and after 6 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorSelf-reported Assessment Regarding Satisfaction and Usability (QUEST Version 2)Visit 1: Dimension; not satisfied at all0 Participants
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorSelf-reported Assessment Regarding Satisfaction and Usability (QUEST Version 2)Visit 1: Dimension; not very satisfied0 Participants
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorSelf-reported Assessment Regarding Satisfaction and Usability (QUEST Version 2)Visit 1: Dimension; more or less satisfied3 Participants
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorSelf-reported Assessment Regarding Satisfaction and Usability (QUEST Version 2)Visit 1: Dimension; quiet satisfied4 Participants
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorSelf-reported Assessment Regarding Satisfaction and Usability (QUEST Version 2)Visit 1: Dimension; very satisfied4 Participants
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorSelf-reported Assessment Regarding Satisfaction and Usability (QUEST Version 2)Visit 3: Dimension; not satisfied at all0 Participants
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorSelf-reported Assessment Regarding Satisfaction and Usability (QUEST Version 2)Visit 3: Dimension; not very satisfied0 Participants
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorSelf-reported Assessment Regarding Satisfaction and Usability (QUEST Version 2)Visit 3: Dimension; more or less satisfied0 Participants
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorSelf-reported Assessment Regarding Satisfaction and Usability (QUEST Version 2)Visit 3: Dimension; quiet satisfied3 Participants
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorSelf-reported Assessment Regarding Satisfaction and Usability (QUEST Version 2)Visit 3: Dimension; very satisfied8 Participants
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorSelf-reported Assessment Regarding Satisfaction and Usability (QUEST Version 2)Visit 1: Weight; not satisfied at all0 Participants
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorSelf-reported Assessment Regarding Satisfaction and Usability (QUEST Version 2)Visit 1: Weight; not very satisfied0 Participants
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorSelf-reported Assessment Regarding Satisfaction and Usability (QUEST Version 2)Visit 1: Weight; more or less satisfied0 Participants
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorSelf-reported Assessment Regarding Satisfaction and Usability (QUEST Version 2)Visit 1: Weight; quiet satisfied3 Participants
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorSelf-reported Assessment Regarding Satisfaction and Usability (QUEST Version 2)Visit 1: Weight; very satisfied8 Participants
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorSelf-reported Assessment Regarding Satisfaction and Usability (QUEST Version 2)Visit 3: Weight; not satisfied at all0 Participants
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorSelf-reported Assessment Regarding Satisfaction and Usability (QUEST Version 2)Visit 3: Weight; not very satisfied0 Participants
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorSelf-reported Assessment Regarding Satisfaction and Usability (QUEST Version 2)Visit 3: Weight; more or less satisfied0 Participants
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorSelf-reported Assessment Regarding Satisfaction and Usability (QUEST Version 2)Visit 3: Weight; quiet satisfied0 Participants
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorSelf-reported Assessment Regarding Satisfaction and Usability (QUEST Version 2)Visit 3: Weight; very satisfied11 Participants
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorSelf-reported Assessment Regarding Satisfaction and Usability (QUEST Version 2)Visit 1: Adjustment; not satisfied at all0 Participants
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorSelf-reported Assessment Regarding Satisfaction and Usability (QUEST Version 2)Visit 1: Adjustment; not very satisfied0 Participants
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorSelf-reported Assessment Regarding Satisfaction and Usability (QUEST Version 2)Visit 1: Adjustment; more or less satisfied2 Participants
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorSelf-reported Assessment Regarding Satisfaction and Usability (QUEST Version 2)Visit 1: Adjustment; quiet satisfied3 Participants
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorSelf-reported Assessment Regarding Satisfaction and Usability (QUEST Version 2)Visit 1: Adjustment; very satisfied6 Participants
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorSelf-reported Assessment Regarding Satisfaction and Usability (QUEST Version 2)Visit 3: Adjustment; not satisfied at all0 Participants
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorSelf-reported Assessment Regarding Satisfaction and Usability (QUEST Version 2)Visit 3: Adjustment; not very satisfied0 Participants
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorSelf-reported Assessment Regarding Satisfaction and Usability (QUEST Version 2)Visit 3: Adjustment; more or less satisfied1 Participants
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorSelf-reported Assessment Regarding Satisfaction and Usability (QUEST Version 2)Visit 3: Adjustment; quiet satisfied2 Participants
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorSelf-reported Assessment Regarding Satisfaction and Usability (QUEST Version 2)Visit 3: Adjustment; very satisfied8 Participants
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorSelf-reported Assessment Regarding Satisfaction and Usability (QUEST Version 2)Visit 1: Safety; not satisfied at all0 Participants
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorSelf-reported Assessment Regarding Satisfaction and Usability (QUEST Version 2)Visit 1: Safety; not very satisfied0 Participants
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorSelf-reported Assessment Regarding Satisfaction and Usability (QUEST Version 2)Visit 1: Safety; more or less satisfied3 Participants
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorSelf-reported Assessment Regarding Satisfaction and Usability (QUEST Version 2)Visit 1: Safety; quiet satisfied1 Participants
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorSelf-reported Assessment Regarding Satisfaction and Usability (QUEST Version 2)Visit 1: Safety; very satisfied7 Participants
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorSelf-reported Assessment Regarding Satisfaction and Usability (QUEST Version 2)Visit 3: Safety; not satisfied at all0 Participants
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorSelf-reported Assessment Regarding Satisfaction and Usability (QUEST Version 2)Visit 3: Safety; not very satisfied1 Participants
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorSelf-reported Assessment Regarding Satisfaction and Usability (QUEST Version 2)Visit 3: Safety; more or less satisfied2 Participants
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorSelf-reported Assessment Regarding Satisfaction and Usability (QUEST Version 2)Visit 3: Safety; quiet satisfied2 Participants
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorSelf-reported Assessment Regarding Satisfaction and Usability (QUEST Version 2)Visit 3: Safety; very satisfied6 Participants
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorSelf-reported Assessment Regarding Satisfaction and Usability (QUEST Version 2)Visit 1: Durability; not satisfied at all0 Participants
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorSelf-reported Assessment Regarding Satisfaction and Usability (QUEST Version 2)Visit 1: Durability; not very satisfied0 Participants
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorSelf-reported Assessment Regarding Satisfaction and Usability (QUEST Version 2)Visit 1: Durability; more or less satisfied1 Participants
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorSelf-reported Assessment Regarding Satisfaction and Usability (QUEST Version 2)Visit 1: Durability; quiet satisfied4 Participants
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorSelf-reported Assessment Regarding Satisfaction and Usability (QUEST Version 2)Visit 1: Durability; very satisfied6 Participants
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorSelf-reported Assessment Regarding Satisfaction and Usability (QUEST Version 2)Visit 3: Durability; not satisfied at all0 Participants
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorSelf-reported Assessment Regarding Satisfaction and Usability (QUEST Version 2)Visit 3: Durability; not very satisfied0 Participants
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorSelf-reported Assessment Regarding Satisfaction and Usability (QUEST Version 2)Visit 3: Durability; more or less satisfied1 Participants
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorSelf-reported Assessment Regarding Satisfaction and Usability (QUEST Version 2)Visit 3: Durability; quiet satisfied4 Participants
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorSelf-reported Assessment Regarding Satisfaction and Usability (QUEST Version 2)Visit 3: Durability; very satisfied6 Participants
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorSelf-reported Assessment Regarding Satisfaction and Usability (QUEST Version 2)Visit 1: Easy of use; not satisfied at all0 Participants
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorSelf-reported Assessment Regarding Satisfaction and Usability (QUEST Version 2)Visit 1: Easy of use; not very satisfied0 Participants
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorSelf-reported Assessment Regarding Satisfaction and Usability (QUEST Version 2)Visit 1: Easy of use; more or less satisfied3 Participants
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorSelf-reported Assessment Regarding Satisfaction and Usability (QUEST Version 2)Visit 1: Easy of use; quiet satisfied3 Participants
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorSelf-reported Assessment Regarding Satisfaction and Usability (QUEST Version 2)Visit 1: Easy of use; very satisfied all5 Participants
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorSelf-reported Assessment Regarding Satisfaction and Usability (QUEST Version 2)Visit 3: Easy of use; not satisfied at all0 Participants
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorSelf-reported Assessment Regarding Satisfaction and Usability (QUEST Version 2)Visit 3: Easy of use; not very satisfied0 Participants
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorSelf-reported Assessment Regarding Satisfaction and Usability (QUEST Version 2)Visit 3: Easy of use; more or less satisfied1 Participants
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorSelf-reported Assessment Regarding Satisfaction and Usability (QUEST Version 2)Visit 3: Easy of use; quiet satisfied3 Participants
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorSelf-reported Assessment Regarding Satisfaction and Usability (QUEST Version 2)Visit 3: Easy of use; very satisfied all7 Participants
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorSelf-reported Assessment Regarding Satisfaction and Usability (QUEST Version 2)Visit 1: Comfort; not satisfied at all0 Participants
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorSelf-reported Assessment Regarding Satisfaction and Usability (QUEST Version 2)Visit 1: Comfort; not very satisfied0 Participants
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorSelf-reported Assessment Regarding Satisfaction and Usability (QUEST Version 2)Visit 1: Comfort; more or less satisfied0 Participants
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorSelf-reported Assessment Regarding Satisfaction and Usability (QUEST Version 2)Visit 1: Comfort; quiet satisfied3 Participants
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorSelf-reported Assessment Regarding Satisfaction and Usability (QUEST Version 2)Visit 1: Comfort; very satisfied8 Participants
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorSelf-reported Assessment Regarding Satisfaction and Usability (QUEST Version 2)Visit 3: Comfort; not satisfied at all0 Participants
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorSelf-reported Assessment Regarding Satisfaction and Usability (QUEST Version 2)Visit 3: Comfort; not very satisfied0 Participants
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorSelf-reported Assessment Regarding Satisfaction and Usability (QUEST Version 2)Visit 3: Comfort; more or less satisfied0 Participants
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorSelf-reported Assessment Regarding Satisfaction and Usability (QUEST Version 2)Visit 3: Comfort; quiet satisfied2 Participants
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorSelf-reported Assessment Regarding Satisfaction and Usability (QUEST Version 2)Visit 3: Comfort; very satisfied9 Participants
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorSelf-reported Assessment Regarding Satisfaction and Usability (QUEST Version 2)Visit 1: Effectiveness; not satisfied at all0 Participants
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorSelf-reported Assessment Regarding Satisfaction and Usability (QUEST Version 2)Visit 1: Effectiveness; not very satisfied0 Participants
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorSelf-reported Assessment Regarding Satisfaction and Usability (QUEST Version 2)Visit 1: Effectiveness; more or less satisfied1 Participants
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorSelf-reported Assessment Regarding Satisfaction and Usability (QUEST Version 2)Visit 1: Effectiveness; quiet satisfied7 Participants
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorSelf-reported Assessment Regarding Satisfaction and Usability (QUEST Version 2)Visit 1: Effectiveness; very satisfied3 Participants
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorSelf-reported Assessment Regarding Satisfaction and Usability (QUEST Version 2)Visit 3: Effectiveness; not satisfied at all0 Participants
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorSelf-reported Assessment Regarding Satisfaction and Usability (QUEST Version 2)Visit 3: Effectiveness; not very satisfied0 Participants
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorSelf-reported Assessment Regarding Satisfaction and Usability (QUEST Version 2)Visit 3: Effectiveness; more or less satisfied1 Participants
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorSelf-reported Assessment Regarding Satisfaction and Usability (QUEST Version 2)Visit 3: Effectiveness; quiet satisfied3 Participants
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorSelf-reported Assessment Regarding Satisfaction and Usability (QUEST Version 2)Visit 3: Effectiveness; very satisfied7 Participants
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorSelf-reported Assessment Regarding Satisfaction and Usability (QUEST Version 2)Visit 1: Important item, Dimensions2 Participants
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorSelf-reported Assessment Regarding Satisfaction and Usability (QUEST Version 2)Visit 1: Important item, Weight1 Participants
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorSelf-reported Assessment Regarding Satisfaction and Usability (QUEST Version 2)Visit 1: Important item, Adjustments2 Participants
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorSelf-reported Assessment Regarding Satisfaction and Usability (QUEST Version 2)Visit 1: Important item, Safety0 Participants
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorSelf-reported Assessment Regarding Satisfaction and Usability (QUEST Version 2)Visit 1: Important item, Durability5 Participants
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorSelf-reported Assessment Regarding Satisfaction and Usability (QUEST Version 2)Visit 1: Important item, Easy of use5 Participants
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorSelf-reported Assessment Regarding Satisfaction and Usability (QUEST Version 2)Visit 1: Important item, Comfort7 Participants
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorSelf-reported Assessment Regarding Satisfaction and Usability (QUEST Version 2)Visit 1: Important item, Effectiveness11 Participants
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorSelf-reported Assessment Regarding Satisfaction and Usability (QUEST Version 2)Visit 3: Important item, Dimensions4 Participants
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorSelf-reported Assessment Regarding Satisfaction and Usability (QUEST Version 2)Visit 3: Important item, Weight0 Participants
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorSelf-reported Assessment Regarding Satisfaction and Usability (QUEST Version 2)Visit 3: Important item, Adjustments1 Participants
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorSelf-reported Assessment Regarding Satisfaction and Usability (QUEST Version 2)Visit 3: Important item, Safety1 Participants
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorSelf-reported Assessment Regarding Satisfaction and Usability (QUEST Version 2)Visit 3: Important item, Durability5 Participants
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorSelf-reported Assessment Regarding Satisfaction and Usability (QUEST Version 2)Visit 3: Important item, Easy of use4 Participants
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorSelf-reported Assessment Regarding Satisfaction and Usability (QUEST Version 2)Visit 3: Important item, Comfort7 Participants
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorSelf-reported Assessment Regarding Satisfaction and Usability (QUEST Version 2)Visit 3: Important item, Effectiveness11 Participants
Primary

Speech in Quiet

To measure Speech in quiet at 50, 65 and 80 dB with the precursor sound processor and the Investigational device. Speech in Quiet presents a list of words in a quiet environment at three different presentations levels, 50, 65 and 80 dB (decibel). The number of correct words perceived at each presentation level are counted and the percentage in relation to the total presented amount of words is calculated. A higher score reflects a higher percentage of correct words perceived, i.e. better hearing in a quiet environment.

Time frame: Baseline at visit 1, 6 weeks after study start at visit 3

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorSpeech in Quiet50 dB visit 182.5 % correct perceived wordsStandard Deviation 6.8
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorSpeech in Quiet50 dB visit 383.3 % correct perceived wordsStandard Deviation 7.2
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorSpeech in Quiet65 dB visit 193.7 % correct perceived wordsStandard Deviation 2.4
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorSpeech in Quiet65 dB visit 396.9 % correct perceived wordsStandard Deviation 2.4
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorSpeech in Quiet80 dB visit 194.4 % correct perceived wordsStandard Deviation 4.1
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorSpeech in Quiet80 dB visit 396.9 % correct perceived wordsStandard Deviation 2.6
Primary

Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ)

Measuring speech, spatial and hearing experiences with the precursor sound processor at Day 0 (Visit 1) and with Investigational device after 6 weeks (Visit 3) with a questionnaire. The Total score summarizes the parameters speech, spatial and hearing. A scale from 0 to 10, where 0 represents can not hear at all, and 10 hear perfectly is used. An increase of a SSQ value reflects an improvement. The change from visit 1 with the precursor sound processor to visit 3 with the Investigational device is presented. A positive value indicates an improvement and a negative value an impairment.

Time frame: Day 0 and after 6 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorSpeech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ)Spatial score1.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.6
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorSpeech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ)Quality score0.061 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.26
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorSpeech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ)Speech0.96 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.89
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorSpeech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ)Total0.68 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.62
Primary

To Assess the Subject's Experience Regarding Comfort

Measure Comfort by a visual analogue scale (VAS) 100 mm at Day 0 regarding the precursor sound processor and after 6 weeks regarding the Investigational device. Subject will be asked to put a line where they find most appropriate where 0 mm represents Not comfortable at all and 100 represents Most comfortable imaginable. The distance will be measured with a ruler and presented as a value between 0 and 100. A higher score reflects higher comfort.

Time frame: Baseline at visit 1, 6 weeks after study start at visit 3

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorTo Assess the Subject's Experience Regarding ComfortPrecursor sound processor84.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.8
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorTo Assess the Subject's Experience Regarding ComfortInvestigational device87.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.5
Primary

To Assess the Subject's Experience Regarding Usage; Battery Life Time

The patient will be asked a question regarding battery life; How often was the battery changed. A free text field is available for answer.

Time frame: 6 weeks after study start

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorTo Assess the Subject's Experience Regarding Usage; Battery Life TimeEvery day2 Participants
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorTo Assess the Subject's Experience Regarding Usage; Battery Life TimeTwo work days (16 hours)1 Participants
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorTo Assess the Subject's Experience Regarding Usage; Battery Life Time1.5 days2 Participants
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorTo Assess the Subject's Experience Regarding Usage; Battery Life TimeEvery 2 days3 Participants
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorTo Assess the Subject's Experience Regarding Usage; Battery Life TimeEvery 3 days1 Participants
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorTo Assess the Subject's Experience Regarding Usage; Battery Life TimeEvery 3-4 days1 Participants
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorTo Assess the Subject's Experience Regarding Usage; Battery Life Time1-2 times a week1 Participants
Primary

To Assess the Subject's Experience Regarding Usage; Magnet Choice

Magnet choice will be entered; four boxes are available, 1, 2, 3 and 4, the box with the strength chosen by the patient will be ticked. Magnet strength 1 is the weakest and 4 is the strongest.

Time frame: 6 weeks after study start

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorTo Assess the Subject's Experience Regarding Usage; Magnet ChoiceStrength 11 Participants
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorTo Assess the Subject's Experience Regarding Usage; Magnet ChoiceStrength 23 Participants
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorTo Assess the Subject's Experience Regarding Usage; Magnet ChoiceStrength 33 Participants
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorTo Assess the Subject's Experience Regarding Usage; Magnet ChoiceStrength 44 Participants
Primary

To Assess the Subject's Experience Regarding Usage; Safety Line

The patient will be asked a question Did you use a safety line in the last 6 weeks. The patient can tick a Yes or No box.

Time frame: 6 weeks after study start

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorTo Assess the Subject's Experience Regarding Usage; Safety LineYes9 Participants
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorTo Assess the Subject's Experience Regarding Usage; Safety LineNo2 Participants
Primary

To Assess the Subject's Experience Regarding Usage; Softwear Pad

The patient will be asked a question Did you use a SoftWear Pad in the last 6 weeks. The patient can tick a Yes or No box.

Time frame: 6 weeks after study start

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorTo Assess the Subject's Experience Regarding Usage; Softwear PadYes2 Participants
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorTo Assess the Subject's Experience Regarding Usage; Softwear PadNo9 Participants
Primary

To Assess the Subject's Experience Regarding Usage; Wireless Accessories

The patient will be asked a question Did you use a Wireless accessory during the last 6 weeks. The patient can tick a Yes or No box.

Time frame: 6 weeks after study start

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorTo Assess the Subject's Experience Regarding Usage; Wireless AccessoriesYes11 Participants
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorTo Assess the Subject's Experience Regarding Usage; Wireless AccessoriesNo0 Participants
Primary

To Compare the Subject´s Overall Preference Regarding the Investigational Device and the Precursor Sound Processor

The test subject will be asked a question regarding preferred choice made by selection between Investigational device and the precursor sound processor (comparator). Three boxes can be ticked; Precursor Sound Processor, Investigational Device, No preference.

Time frame: 6 weeks after study start

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorTo Compare the Subject´s Overall Preference Regarding the Investigational Device and the Precursor Sound ProcessorNo preference0 Participants
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorTo Compare the Subject´s Overall Preference Regarding the Investigational Device and the Precursor Sound ProcessorPrecursor sound processor0 Participants
Investigational Device - Sound ProcessorTo Compare the Subject´s Overall Preference Regarding the Investigational Device and the Precursor Sound ProcessorInvestigational device11 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026