Skip to content

Comparison Study: Ligasure Versus Conventional Hemorrhoidectomy in III and IV Degree Hemorrhoids.

Comparison Study: Ligasure Versus Conventional Hemorrhoidectomy in III and IV Degree Hemorrhoids.

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03848468
Enrollment
100
Registered
2019-02-20
Start date
2014-04-01
Completion date
2014-09-30
Last updated
2019-02-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hemorrhoidectomy, Hemorrhoids Fourth Degree, Hemorrhoids Third Degree, Operative Time, Pain, Postoperative, Return to Work, Wound Healing

Keywords

Visual Analogue pain score, conventional Hemorrhoidectomy, Ligasure Hemorrhoidectomy

Brief summary

A comparison study was performed between Ligasure and Milligan morgan hemorrhoidectomy to find out the outcome between these two techniques in 3rd and 4th degree hemorrhoids.This advance vessel sealing device is used to seal the pedicle of the vessel and does not burn the surrounding tissues , so the outcome was monitored in terms of operative time, post operative pain pain, duration of wound healing in 3 weeks and return to normal activities

Detailed description

INTRODUCTION: Milligan Morgan hemorrhoidectomy is conventional procedure in 3rd and 4th degree hemorrhoids but recent advances in ligasure hemorrhoidectomy have shown to produce favorable results. Comparison of these two is studied in terms of pain outcome as patient perceives, operative time, wound healing and return to normal activities. OBJECTIVES: To compare the outcome of ligasure hemorrhoidectomy with conventional hemorrhoidectomy in III and IV degree hemorrhoids. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial STUDY SETTING: The study was conducted in surgical unit 1, Services hospital, Lahore. DURATION OF STUDY: Study was completed in six months after the approval of synopsis i.e. from 1st April 2014 to 30th September 2014. DATA COLLECTION PROCEDURE: After approval from hospital ethical committee, 100 patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria has been recruited from outdoor and emergency department. A detailed history had been taken including demographic data (age, address) and all patients had been clinically examined .Patients was divided in two groups randomly using random number tables. Group A: Conventional hemorrhoidectomy. Group B: Ligasure hemorrhoidectomy. Patients had been requested to sign an informed consent. They had been assured regarding confidentiality and expertise used for the procedure. All procedures have been performed by a single surgical operating team to control bias. Preoperatively operative time was noted. Post operatively pain had been assessed after 6 hours, 24 hours, and 48 hours, wound has been assessed in 2nd and 3rd postoperative week to assess epithelization and return to normal activities in days. All data had been collected and recorded on the Proforma

Interventions

PROCEDUREHemorrhoidectomy

excision of 3rd and 4th degree hemorrhoids

Sponsors

Services Hospital, Lahore
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Covidien 5mm ligasure

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
19 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* patients with III and IV degree hemorrhoids assessed on proctoscopy had been included in this study.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with permanently prolapsed hemorrhoids limited to one quadrant only and had been assessed on per rectal examination and proctoscopy * Any other anorectal pathology on history and per rectal examination * Previous anal surgery assessed by history and per rectal examination * Inability to give informed consent * ASA(American Society of Anesthesiologists) grade III/IV on detailed history, clinical examination and laboratory findings e.g. deranged hepatic and renal profile and evidence of ischemic heart disease

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
operative timeeach participant was measured from the start of operation till the dressing i.e duration of 20 minutes to 60 minuteswas measured from start of incision to the dressing in minutes
mean postoperative paineach participant was individually assessed after operation in 6 hours,24 hours and 48 hours post-operative and changes noted in 48 hourson Visual analogue scale,a scale to assess the post operative pain ,8-10 as maximum pain, 5-7 as moderate pain, 2-4 minimum pain, 1-0 as no pain and change in final outcome has been assessed after 48 hours
wound healingto assess change in the parameter in 3 weeksassessed in scheduled appointment every week and has been defined as complete epithelization on physical examination .Wound was graded as 1-sloughy, 2-no granulation, 3-granulation, 4-epithelizing , 5-completely epithelized
Return to workassessed individually from the day of surgery to resume of daily activities i.e 1 to 7 dayshas been defined as day of discharge till resume of work that is patient is able to perform daily routine activities normally as before operation.

Countries

Pakistan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026