Skip to content

Trigger Finger Treatment

Trigger Finger Treatment - An Outcomes Study. Comparing 6 Traditional Treatment Techniques

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03847935
Enrollment
86
Registered
2019-02-20
Start date
2007-12-10
Completion date
2012-12-08
Last updated
2019-02-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Stenosing Tenosynovitis, Trigger Digit, Trigger Finger

Keywords

treatment outcome, hand therapy, physical therapy, occupational therapy

Brief summary

Trigger finger is a common disorder of the hand which causes pain at the A1 pulley, inflammation, stiffness and/or snapping during movement. This observational study compared all of the possible treatments and combinations of treatments for trigger finger at the A1 pulley, including surgery, cortisone injections and hand therapy.

Detailed description

Trigger finger is a common disorder of the hand which causes pain at the A1 pulley, inflammation, stiffness or snapping during movement. This can be very debilitating. Current treatment includes local steroid injection, oral NSAIDS, resting orthoses, physical or occupational therapy and surgical intervention. The aim of this prospective study with an observational design was to determine the outcome between surgical, hand therapy rehabilitation, and corticosteroid injection interventions for trigger finger. There were 6 treatment groups: surgery, corticosteroid injection, 1 visit of hand therapy for orthosis fabrication and therapeutic exercise, hand therapy in combination with cortisone injection, Modality hand therapy alone (ongoing visits) or with corticosteroid injections.

Interventions

PROCEDUREsurgery

A1 pulley release of finger

corticosteroid injection to A1 pulley

orthosis fabrication, therapeutic exercise for range of motion to digits, ice massage, nodule massage, patient education,

OTHERModality Hand Therapy

orthosis fabrication, therapeutic exercise for range of motion to digits, ice massage, nodule massage, patient education, plus modalities such as ultrasound, iontophoresis

Sponsors

University of Massachusetts, Worcester
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Massachusetts, Lowell
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* trigger finger in digit 2-5

Exclusion criteria

* if prior treatment for trigger finger, or Trigger thumb

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Pain on a likert scale 6 months1 day, 6 monthsBaseline to 6 months pain on a 0-10 scale
Change in Functional use using Quick DASH 6 weeksDay 1, 6 weeksChange from baseline to 6 weeks Quick DASH
Change in Functional use using Quick DASH 3 monthsDay 1, 3 monthsChange from baseline to 3 months Quick DASH
Change in Functional use using Quick DASH 6 monthsDay 1, 6 monthsChange from baseline to 6 months Quick DASH
Change in Edema 6 weeksday 1, 6 weeksBaseline to 6 weeks Circumferential measurement in centimeters of the proximal phalanx
Change in Edema 3 monthsday 1, 3 monthsBaseline to 3 months weeks Circumferential measurement in centimeters of the proximal phalanx
Change in Edema 6 monthsday 1, 6 monthsBaseline to 6 months weeks Circumferential measurement in centimeters of the proximal phalanx
Change in Pain on a likert scale 6 weeks1 day, 6 weeksBaseline to 6 weeks pain on a 0-10 scale
Change in Pain on a likert scale 3 months1 day, 3 monthsBaseline to 3 months pain on a 0-10 scale
Change in Range of motion 6 weeks1 day, 6 weeksBaseline to 6 weeks flexion and extension range of motion at metacarpophalangeal (MCP), proximal interphalangeal (PIP) and distal interphalangeal (DIP) using a finger goniometer.
Change in Range of motion 3 months1 day, 3 monthsBaseline to 3 months flexion and extension range of motion at metacarpophalangeal (MCP), proximal interphalangeal (PIP) and distal interphalangeal (DIP) using a finger goniometer.
Change in Range of motion 6 months1 day, 6 monthsBaseline to 6 months flexion and extension range of motion at metacarpophalangeal (MCP), proximal interphalangeal (PIP) and distal interphalangeal (DIP) using a finger goniometer.
Change in Severity or Grade of triggering 6 weeks1 day, 6 weeksBaseline to 6 weeks Using the scale by Patel and Bassini to measure the amount of triggering 1=normal joint, 6=locked in flexion
Change in Severity or Grade of triggering 3 months1 day, 3 monthsBaseline to 3 months Using the scale by Patel and Bassini to measure the amount of triggering 1=normal joint, 6=locked in flexion
Change in Severity or Grade of triggering 6 months1 day, 6 monthsBaseline to 6 months Using the scale by Patel and Bassini to measure the amount of triggering 1=normal joint, 6=locked in flexion

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026