Skip to content

Scapulothoracic and Glenohumeral Stabilization Exercises in Boulderers

Effectiveness of a Program of Scapulothoracic and Glenohumeral Stabilization Exercises in Boulderers. A Randomized Pilot Study.

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03847805
Enrollment
40
Registered
2019-02-20
Start date
2019-02-01
Completion date
2019-04-20
Last updated
2019-03-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Sports Physical Therapy

Keywords

Bouldering, Exercise, Shoulder, Stability, Performance

Brief summary

Introduction. In the block climbing, the fluidity with which the athlete climbs a certain route is fundamental. The speed with which the movements are executed and the number of grippers of upper limbs is related to sports performance. Shoulder injuries are very prevalent in this sport. The inhibition of the stabilizing musculature can alter joint positioning and its normal biomechanics. Objective. To evaluate the efficacy of a program of stability exercises, scapulothoracic and glenohumeral, in the improvement of shoulder stability and sports performance, in boulder climbers. Material and method. Forty randomized subjects will be recruit into two groups: experimental (scapulothoracic and glenohumeral stability exercises) and control (glenohumeral stabilization). The stability of the shoulder (Closed Kinetic Chain Upper Extremity Stability Test) and the sports performance (Climbing Test) will be evaluated. The intervention last 6 weeks, with two weekly sessions of 30 minutes each. Differences between evaluations will be analyzed with the t-sudent for related samples and the intra- and intersubject effect with the repeated measures ANOVA test.

Interventions

OTHERScapulothoracic and glenohumeral stabilization exercises

The experimental group followed a program that included three scapulothoracic stabilization exercises and three for glenohumeral stability, while subjects in the control group only performed the glenohumeral stabilization exercises. Two weekly sessions were carried out over a period of 6 weeks, and each session lasted 30 minutes. The intervention was conducted before starting the training session, to avoid muscle fatigue. Three series, with 10 repetitions of each exercise, with one minute rest between series.

OTHERGlenohumeral stability exercises

the control group only performed the glenohumeral stabilization exercises. Two weekly sessions were carried out over a period of 6 weeks, and each session lasted 30 minutes. The intervention was conducted before starting the training session, to avoid muscle fatigue.

Sponsors

Real Fundación Victoria Eugenia
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 40 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Being climbers * Between the ages of 18 and 40 years * Belonging to the Boulder Madrid Climbing Gym * Who climbed at least twice a week * Having at least 6 months of experience

Exclusion criteria

* Were participating in competitions at the time * Presented pathologies of the upper limb * Used any type of ergogenic aid * Had not signed the informed consent document.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change from baseline stability of the shoulder after treatment and at 6 weeksScreening visit, within the first seven days after treatment and after one month follow-up visitThe investigators used the Closed Kinetic Chain Upper Extremity Stability Test (CKCUEST). This scale evaluates the number of upper limb movements the subject is able to make during 15 seconds. A higher score represents better shoulder stability.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change from baseline time need to complete a given climbing route and number of grips during climbing after treatment and at 6 weeksScreening visit, within the first seven days after treatment and after one month follow-up visitBouldering test, replicating the demands of a competition. The test was carried out on a 4-meter-high wall and with a 20 degree inclination, having a route with 15 climbing holds: 3 small, 7 medium and 5 large. A start hold and an end hold were clearly identified. The climber had 5 minutes to visualize the route, in a familiarization process often used in competitions. Before the test participants was told that they should be as efficient as possible in their movements. The time taken by the climber to complete the route was recorded, and the number of grips for the route.

Countries

Spain

Contacts

Primary ContactRubén Cuesta-Barriuso, PhD
ruben.cuestab@gmail.com+34 607547274

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026