Skip to content

Follow-up Using Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease

Tele Follow-up Using Patient-reported Outcomes (PRO) Measures in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease - the PROKID Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03847766
Acronym
PROKID
Enrollment
152
Registered
2019-02-20
Start date
2018-12-03
Completion date
2023-12-15
Last updated
2023-12-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Kidney Diseases

Keywords

PRO-based follow-up, TelePRO, Outpatients, Chronic Kidney Disease

Brief summary

This randomized controlled trial (RCT) will evaluate if PRO-based follow-up is at least as effective as usual outpatient follow-up in managing decline in renal function and maintaining patients' quality of life. Furthermore, we intend to characterize the target patient group that is suitable for PRO-based follow up in a group of patients suffering from renal insufficiency.

Detailed description

This randomized controlled trial investigates the use of Patient-reported Outcome (PRO) follow-up among patients with chronic kidney disease. Usual outpatient follow-up visits will be replaced with diagnosis-specific electronic questionnaires filled in by the patient at home. Participants in the PRO-based follow up will complete a disease specific questionnaire every 3 months. Patients with an estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) \< 40mL/min are randomized into three groups of follow-up 1. PRO-based follow-up (The clinicians use the PRO data to decide whether a patient needs a visit or not) 2. PRO-based telephone consultations (The clinician use the PRO-data to support the communication with the patient) 3. Usual outpatient follow-up visits (Patients are seen in the outpatient clinic) The aim of this study is to compare the effect on the clinical outcomes, the utilisation of resources, and patient-reported outcome in three types of follow-up in a non-inferiority randomised controlled trial.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALPRO-based follow-up

Diagnose specific questionnaires are used to screen patients in need of contact to the outpatient clinic

BEHAVIORALPRO-based telephone consultation

diagnose-specific questionnaires are used to support communication between clinician and patient during a phone consultation

Sponsors

Regional Hospital West Jutland
CollaboratorOTHER
Aarhus University Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
TrygFonden, Denmark
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Karen Elise Jensen Foundation
CollaboratorOTHER
Sygekassernes Helsefond
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Aarhus
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

The randomization will be done by the AmbuFlex-system (a generic on-line system for self-recorded patient reported outcomes) as a part of the inclusion process. Patients in the intervention arms will receive diagnosis specific questionnaires through a safe internet connection every third month. The responses are seen by the clinicians in the Electronic Health Record. Patients will receive 2 reminders if they do not answer the questionnaires and clinicians will call the patient

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Referred to the renal care services at Aarhus University Hospital or Regional Hospital Central Jutland, Viborg * Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) between 10-39 mL/min 1.73m2. * Aged ≥18 years old * Ability to provide fully informed written consent for participation in the study

Exclusion criteria

* Patients unwilling to participate in PRO-based follow-up * Patients who, in the opinion of the consenting professional, cannot speak, read or write Danish sufficiently well to complete the PRO questionnaire unaided * Patients with hearing disabilities * Patients with an eGFR \> 39mL/min 1.73m2 at their first visit at the hospital * Patients who have received (or have a scheduled date to receive) a kidney transplant * A terminal illness that, in the opinion of the consultant assessing eligibility, is likely to lead to the death of the patient within 6 months of starting participation in the study * Patients receiving chemotherapy, with end stage Chronic Obstructive Lung disease, or with heart failure with Ejection Fraction (EF)\< 15 %. * A projected risk of progression to end-stage renal failure within 6 months, determined from albumin/creatinine ratio

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change from baseline Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) at 18 monthsMeasured at baseline, 6, 12 and 18 months after randomisationMeasurement for renal function

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of contacts18 months after randomizationNumber of contacts includes all contacts with the outpatient clinic in the study follow-up period
Mortality18 months after randomizationOverall mortality
End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD)18 months after randomizationHas the patient initiated dialyses during follow-up, Hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis
Kidney transplantation18 months after randomizationHas the patient received a kidney transplant during follow-up
Hospital admissionFrom baseline at 18 months after randomizationDifference in number of admissions
General Health (SF36),Baseline, 6,12 and 18 months after randomizationGeneral health will be assessed by items from the SF-36 questionnaire
Quality of Life (EQ-5D)Baseline, 6,12 and 18 months after randomizationEQ-5D-5L measures individual generic health status using 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression, and each dimension has 5 levels depending on severity of symptoms (1 no problems, 5 extreme problems) and a VAS (visual analogue scale). The scores can then be converted into a single index number. The index value will be used for calculation of quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) for a health economic analysis of the intervention
Satisfaction with care6,12,18 months after randomizationSatisfaction will be assessed by one item from the Danish Cancer Society Patient reported experience measures PREM (Barometer) Questionnaire
Confidence6,12,18 months after randomizationConfidence will be assessed by one item from the Danish Cancer Society PREM (Barometer) Questionnaire
Treatment safety6,12,18 months after randomizationSafety will be assessed by one item from the Danish Cancer Society PREM (Barometer) Questionnaire
Patient involvementPatient involvement will be measured at 6,12 and18 monthsPatient involvement will be assessed by 5 questions from DEFACTUM (Central Denmark Region) Questionnaire
Illness perception (BIPQ)Baseline, 6,12 and 18 months after randomizationIllness perception will be assessed by the Brief Illness perception questionnaire

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Baseline questionnaires of non-participantsBaseline questionnairesAll patients who met the inclusion criteria will be asked to fill in a questionnaire. The questionnaire will include Health Literacy (subscale 4,6,9), Selfefficacy, General Health (SF-36) and 5 renal specific symptoms (KDQOL), Patient activation (2+12), education and employment status. The purpose is to identify baseline differences between participants and non-participants and thereby testing the PRO system for generalizability.

Countries

Denmark

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 2, 2026