Skip to content

Compare the Efficacy of Different Laryngeal Mask Size Selection Methods in General Anesthesia in Children

Compare the Efficacy of Different Laryngeal Mask Size Selection Methods in General Anesthesia in Children

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03845998
Enrollment
392
Registered
2019-02-19
Start date
2019-02-25
Completion date
2019-05-25
Last updated
2020-02-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Airway Management

Keywords

airway, anaesthesia, laryngeal mask airway, paediatric

Brief summary

The laryngeal mask is widely used in general anesthesia in children. Selection of an appropriately sized laryngeal mask airway (LMA) is critical to ensure safe and effective use of the device. In children, the appropriate size of the LMA to be used is usually determined by the patient's weight. Up to now, this is the gold standard method, but the weight-related technique is not always possible. The patient's weight is sometimes unknown or medical staff do not remember the relationship between weight and size. Moreover, there are no constant correlations between laryngeal airways and body indices such as height and weight, so that the standard method could cause an inappropriate size of laryngeal mask airway to be chosen. Researchers from Spain introduced a new technique to determine the size of the LMA in children by choosing the LMA that best matched the combined widths of the patient's index, middle and ring fingers, but needs to be formally evaluated in clinical application. In order to compare the application effects of two methods (weight-related and three-fingers), we designed a research plan.

Detailed description

The allocation sequence is generated by computer random number generation, and the allocation is placed in sequentially numbered opaque sealed envelopes by a non-investigator. Enrolment and data collection are performed by trained research staff who are not involved in the care of the patients. The treating clinicians are not blinded to the assignment group, but all other staff involved in both the collection and collation of data are blinded to group allocation. The primary measurement is the oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP) at the recommended intracuff pressure. The secondary measurements included insertion time, fibreoptic view grade, insufficient ventilation, and the occurrence of complications such as postoperative sore throat. The sample size was calculated to be 390 by a statistical software based on previous research results. The continuous variables were expressed as means ± standard deviation (SD) whereas categorical variables were expressed as frequency and percentage for data description. P \<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Interventions

PROCEDUREuse the three-finger method

The size of the laryngeal mask airway was determined by choosing the laryngeal mask that best matched the combined widths of the patient's index, middle and ring fingers.

PROCEDUREuse the weight-related method

The size of the laryngeal mask airway was determined by the patient's weight.

Sponsors

Eye & ENT Hospital of Fudan University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
3 Years to 14 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* children aged from 3 to 14yr, underwent elective ophthalmic surgery, had an American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status rating of I or II

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with lung disease, known airway problems, upper respiratory tract symptoms or any condition that may increase the risk of gastro-oesophageal regurgitation, or any anatomical abnormalities, especially those related to the head, neck or limbs.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP)The OLP was measured after the laryngeal mask was successfully inserted and fixed, and the cuff was inflated.With the child's head in a neutral position, OLP was measured by closing the expiratory valve of the circle system at a fixed gas flow of 3 l/minute, recording the airway pressure at which equilibrium was reached. Gas leakage was evaluated at the mouth (by detecting an audible sound) and stomach (by epigastric auscultation).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
insertion timeThe time to successful insertion was measured from the time of facemask removal until the time at which bilateral chest expansion was observed.The time to successful insertion was measured from the time of facemask removal until the time at which bilateral chest expansion was observed.
grade of fibreoptic viewThe grade of fibreoptic view was measured after the laryngeal mask was successfully inserted and fixed, and the cuff was inflated.The grade of fibreoptic view was assessed by fibreoptic bronchoscopy through the LMA and graded as follows: 1, full view of vocal cords; 2, partial view of vocal cords, including arytenoids; 3, epiglottis only; 4, other (e.g. LMA cuff, pharynx).
postoperative sore throatImmediately after the patient wakes up and 24 hours after surgeryThe patient said that he had sore throat after surgery

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026