Skip to content

Can a Pulmonologist Reliably Assess the Tumor Burden on ROSE Slides Obtained From Pulmonary Nodules and Lymphadenopathy

Interobserver Agreement Between Pulmonologist, Pathologist and Molecular Pathologist in the Assessment of Tumor Burden on ROSE Slides Obtained With Endoscopic Procedures From Pulmonary Nodules and Intrathoracic Lymphadenopathy

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03845764
Enrollment
164
Registered
2019-02-19
Start date
2019-02-18
Completion date
2019-07-30
Last updated
2019-08-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Lung Cancer

Brief summary

The study is aimed at verifying if a pulmonologist can reliably assess the tumor burden for the extractive molecular analysis in ROSE samples obtained with endoscopic sampling procedures from intrathoracic lymphadenopathy and pulmonary nodules.

Interventions

Specimens obtained with endoscopic sampling procedures are stained with a rapid method (i.e., Diff Qui) and submitted to on-site cytologic review

Sponsors

Maggiore Bellaria Hospital, Bologna
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

* Age \> 18 years * Indication for endoscopic sampling of suspected malignant lymphadenopathy or pulmonary lesion * Written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* High risk conditions for the performance of bronchoscopy and/or EBUS-TBNA * High risk condition for deep sedation (ASA 4) * Pregnancy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Accuracy with which a pulmonologist can assess the tumor burden on ROSE slidesThe time frame is the duration of each bronchoscopy with endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) for each patient enrolledThe outcome 1 will be measured by verifying the agreement between the pulmonologist judgment and the molecular pathologist judgment, the latter being the gold standard

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Interobserver agreement between pulmonologist, pathologist and molecular pathologist in then assessment of the tumor burden on ROSE slidesThe time frame is the duration of each bronchoscopy with endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) for each patient enrolledThe outcome 2 will be measured by verifying the agreement between the 3 professionals, using the judgment of the molecular pathologist as gold standard
Accuracy with which a pulmonologist can identify malignancy on ROSE samplesThe time frame is the duration of each bronchoscopy endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) for each patient enrolledThe outcome 3 will be measured by verifying the agreement between pulmonologist and pathologist, the latter being the gold standard

Countries

Italy

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026