Skip to content

48 Weeks, Study to Evaluate Overall Safety and Tolerability of Co-administration of Tesofensine and Metoprolol in Subjects With Hypothalamic Injury-induced Obesity (HIO)

A 24-week Phase 2, Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo- Controlled, Single-center Safety and Efficacy Study to Evaluate Overall Safety and Tolerability of Co-administration of Tesofensine and Metoprolol in Subjects With Hypothalamic Injury-induced Obesity (HIO), and With a 24-week Open-label Extension, in Total 48 Weeks

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03845075
Enrollment
21
Registered
2019-02-19
Start date
2019-02-25
Completion date
2020-10-16
Last updated
2024-02-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hypothalamic Injury-induced Obesity (HIO)

Brief summary

Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, single- center study followed by an open-label extension period. • The study will have two parts: * Part 1: 24 weeks double-blind treatment (DB), followed by * Part 2: 24 weeks open-label extension (OLE) - all subjects still participating at the end of Part 1 will be given an option to continue for additional 24 weeks on the active drug if evaluated eligible by the Investigator

Detailed description

Part 1 - the double-blind (DB) part: The active medication arm will be given co-administration of 0.5 mg tesofensine/50 mg metoprolol daily for 24 weeks. The placebo arm will receive matching placebo tablets. Part 2 - the open-label extension (OLE) part: All active participants at the end of the double-blind part will be given the active medication 0.5 mg tesofensine/50 mg metoprolol daily for 24 weeks.

Interventions

During Part 1 subjects will be randomized to treatment with co-administration of 0.5 mg tesofensine/50mg metoprolol (active medication)

DRUGPlacebo

During Part 1 subjects will be randomized to matching placebo tesofensine and placebo metoprolol

Sponsors

Saniona
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Informed consent obtained before any trial-related activities * Males and females, aged 18-75 * Confirmed diagnosis of HIO * BMI ≥27 kg/m2 (where overweight is related to the HIO)

Exclusion criteria

* Blood Pressure (BP) ≥160/90 mmHg * Heart rate (HR) ≥ 90, \<50 bpm * Type 1 diabetes, Cushings disease, acromegaly, hypophysitis, infiltrative diseases or Prader-Willi syndrome * Heart failure New York Heart Association (NYHA) level II or greater, decompensated heart failure * Previous myocardial infarction or stroke within the last 5 years

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Eventsfrom Baseline to week 24Number and percentage of participants with adverse events in each of the two treatment arms
Number of Participants With at Least One Mild, Moderate or Severe Adverse Eventfrom Baseline to week 24Number and percentage of participants with mild, moderate or severe adverse events in each of the two treatment arms.
Participants (Number and Percentage) With and Type of Serious Adverse Eventsfrom Baseline to week 24Number and percentage of participants with at least one serious adverse event, indicating type, in each of the two treatment arms
Safety as Assessed by Systolic Blood Pressure [mmHg]from Baseline to week 24Systolic blood pressure in mmHg measured at each visit in each of the two treatment arms
Safety as Assessed by Diastolic Blood Pressure [mmHg]from Baseline to week 24Diastolic blood pressure in mmHg measured at each visit in each of the two treatment arms
Safety as Assessed by Heart Rate [Bpm]from Baseline to week 24Heart rate measured in beats per minute (bpm) at each visit in each of the two treatment arms
Safety as Assessed by Hematology Parametersfrom Baseline to week 24Number and percentage of deviations from normal range (as defined by the investigational site's laboratory) for hemoglobin, platelet counts, white cells count, differential counts at baseline, week 12 and week 24 in each of the two treatment arms
Safety as Assessed by Electrolytes and Creatininefrom Baseline to week 24Number and percentage of deviations from normal range (as defined by the investigational site's laboratory) for sodium, potassium, creatinine at each visit in each of the two treatment arms
Safety as Assessed by Liver and Kidney Function Testsfrom Baseline to week 24Number and percentage of deviations from normal range (as defined by the investigational site's laboratory) for gamma glutamyl transferase (GGT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), glomerular filtration rate (GFR), and urea at baseline, week 12, and week 24 in each of the two treatment arms

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Lipid Profilefrom baseline to week 24, from baseline to week 48 and from week 24 to week 48Change in lipid profile from baseline to week 24, from baseline to week 48, and from week 24 to week 48. mITT observed values.
Quality of Life - SF-36from baseline to week 24, from baseline to week 48 and from week 24 to week 48Change in quality of life by use of the Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) scores from baseline to week 24, from baseline to week 48, and from week 24 to week 48 The physical component summary score includes the aggregated scores for scales of physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, and general health. The mental health component summary score includes the aggregated scores for scales of vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. Scores range from 0 to 100; higher score indicates better health. mITT observed values.
Number of Participants With Adverse Event(s) and/or Serious Adverse Event(s) - Open-label Extensionfrom week 24 to week 48Number of participants with adverse event(s) and/or serious adverse event(s) reported from week 24 to week 48
Blood Pressure (Change)from baseline to week 24, from baseline to week 48 and from week 24 to week 48Change in blood pressure from baseline to week 24, from baseline to week 48, and from week 24 to week 48. mITT observed values.
Composite Satiety Score (CSS)from baseline to week 24, from baseline to week 48 and from week 24 to week 48Change in satiety and appetite using the CSS from Baseline to week 24, from Baseline to week 48 and from week 24 to week 48 measured at each visit for each of the two treatment arms Full name of the scale: composite satiety score (CSS), sometimes referred to as appetite suppression score. Range of values is 0-100; lower the value, hungrier a person is. CSS = (satiety + fullness + \[100 - hunger\] + \[100 - prospective food consumption\]) / 4. The four variables included are measured by visual analog scales (0-100 mm)
Plasma Trough Concentrationsbaseline to week 48Plasma trough concentrations of tesofensine, metabolite NS2360 and metoprolol for the active arm (the first 24 weeks and then continuously up to week 48) and placebo arm (start of treatment at week 25 and then continuously up to week 48). mITT observed values.
48 Hours Heart Rate and QT Interval at Baseline, Week 12 and Week 24baseline, week 12 and week 24For Part 1, 48 hours HR and QT interval from week 12 to week 24 were not recorded in the database and analysis of changes not evaluated. Instead, abnormal findings over visits were summarized. Abnormal ECG findings detected in the three Tesomet treated subjects are: * QTc prolongation (466 ms) * Bradycardia (56 bpm) * QTc prolongation (460 ms) All were considered not clinically significant.
Heart Rate (Change)from baseline to week 24, from baseline to week 48 and from week 24 to week 48Change in heart rate from baseline to week 24, from baseline to week 48, and from week 24 to week 48. mITT observed values.
24 Hours Blood Pressurefrom baseline to week 12 and baseline to week 24Changes in 24 hours blood pressure from baseline to week 12 and baseline to week 24
Body Weightfrom baseline to week 24, from baseline to week 48 and from week 24 to week 48Change in body weight from baseline to week 24, from baseline to 48 and from week 24 to week 48 measured at each visit for each of the two treatment arms
Body Composition - Fat Massfrom baseline to week 24, from baseline to week 48 and from week 24 to week 48Change in body fat mass as measured in kg by DXA scan measured at baseline, week 24 and week 48 for each of the two treatment arms. mITT observed values.
Body Composition - Lean Body Massfrom baseline to week 24, from baseline to week 48 and from week 24 to week 48Change in lean body mass as measured in kg by DXA scan measured at baseline, week 24 and week 48 for each of the two treatment arms. mITT observed values.
Glycemic Control - HbA1cfrom baseline to week 24, from baseline to week 48 and from week 24 to week 48Change in HbA1c from baseline to week 24, baseline to week 48 and week 24 to week 48 for each of the two treatment arms. mITT observed values.
Glycemic Control - Fasting Plasma Glucosefrom baseline to week 24, from baseline to week 48 and from week 24 to week 48Change in fasting plasma glucose from baseline to week 24, baseline to week 48 and week 24 to week 48 measured at each visit for each of the two treatments arms. mITT observed values.
Craving for Something Sweet, Salty, Meat/Fish, or Fattyfrom baseline to week 24, from baseline to week 48 and from week 24 to week 48Change in craving for something sweet, salty, meat/fish, or fatty by the use of visual analogue scales (VAS) from baseline to week 24, from baseline to week 48, and from week 24 to week 48 The VAS consisted of a 100-mm horizontal line; subjects placed a vertical line on the VAS to indicate the level of intensity of their food craving. The VAS value is the distance in mm (0-100 mm) from the left end of the line to the subject's vertical line (higher value represents less craving). mITT observed values.
Thirstfrom baseline to week 24, from baseline to week 48 and from week 24 to week 48Change in thirst by the use of a visual analog scale (VAS) from baseline to week 24, from baseline to week 48, and from week 24 to week 48 The VAS consisted of a 100-mm horizontal line; subjects placed a vertical line on the VAS to indicate the level of intensity of their thirst. The VAS value is the distance in mm (0-100 mm) from the left end of the line to the subject's vertical line (higher value represents an increase in perception of thirst). mITT observed values.
Waist Circumferencefrom baseline to week 24, from baseline to week 48 and from week 24 to week 48Change in waist circumference from baseline to week 24, from baseline to week 48, and from week 24 to week 48. mITT observed values.

Countries

Denmark

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

A total of 35 subjects with HIO were screened; 13 subjects were screen failures. A total of 21 unique subjects were assigned 22 randomization numbers. One subject was a screen failure who was randomized in error, and withdrawn after receiving 1 dose of tesofensine/metoprolol; this subject was later rescreened and rerandomized to placebo. This subject is summarized for both tesofensine/metoprolol and placebo (ie, considered as 2 independent subjects).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Tesofensine/Metoprolol
Subjects were randomized to receive co-administration of 0.5 mg tesofensine/50 mg metoprolol (active medication) once daily for 24 weeks during Part 1.
14
Placebo
Subjects were randomized to receive matching placebo tablets once daily for 24 weeks during Part 1.
8
Total22

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Part 1 - DBAdverse Event0100
Part 1 - DBScreen failure, but received 1 dose of study drug in error1000
Part 1 - DBWithdrawal by Subject1100

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTesofensine/MetoprololPlaceboTotal
Age, Continuous45.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.3
44.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.3
45.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.9
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
14 Participants8 Participants22 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Denmark
14 Participants8 Participants22 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
11 Participants6 Participants17 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
3 Participants2 Participants5 Participants
Weight114.34 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.14
112.16 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 27.04
113.55 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 21.18

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 140 / 80 / 110 / 6
other
Total, other adverse events
12 / 147 / 811 / 116 / 6
serious
Total, serious adverse events
2 / 141 / 81 / 110 / 6

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants With at Least One Mild, Moderate or Severe Adverse Event

Number and percentage of participants with mild, moderate or severe adverse events in each of the two treatment arms.

Time frame: from Baseline to week 24

Population: Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who took at least one dose of the IMPs (active substances or placebos)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Tesofensine/MetoprololNumber of Participants With at Least One Mild, Moderate or Severe Adverse EventAt least one mild AE11 Participants
Tesofensine/MetoprololNumber of Participants With at Least One Mild, Moderate or Severe Adverse EventAt least one moderate AE10 Participants
Tesofensine/MetoprololNumber of Participants With at Least One Mild, Moderate or Severe Adverse EventAt least one severe AE2 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With at Least One Mild, Moderate or Severe Adverse EventAt least one mild AE7 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With at Least One Mild, Moderate or Severe Adverse EventAt least one moderate AE5 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With at Least One Mild, Moderate or Severe Adverse EventAt least one severe AE2 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events

Number and percentage of participants with adverse events in each of the two treatment arms

Time frame: from Baseline to week 24

Population: Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who took at least one dose of the IMPs (active substances or placebos)

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Tesofensine/MetoprololNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events12 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events7 Participants
Primary

Participants (Number and Percentage) With and Type of Serious Adverse Events

Number and percentage of participants with at least one serious adverse event, indicating type, in each of the two treatment arms

Time frame: from Baseline to week 24

Population: Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who took at least one dose of the IMPs (active substances or placebos)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Tesofensine/MetoprololParticipants (Number and Percentage) With and Type of Serious Adverse EventsPreferred Term: Anxiety1 Participants
Tesofensine/MetoprololParticipants (Number and Percentage) With and Type of Serious Adverse EventsPreferred Term: Hyponatraemia0 Participants
Tesofensine/MetoprololParticipants (Number and Percentage) With and Type of Serious Adverse EventsPreferred Term: Craniopharyngioma1 Participants
Tesofensine/MetoprololParticipants (Number and Percentage) With and Type of Serious Adverse EventsPreferred Term: Post procedural complication1 Participants
Tesofensine/MetoprololParticipants (Number and Percentage) With and Type of Serious Adverse EventsAt least one SAE2 Participants
PlaceboParticipants (Number and Percentage) With and Type of Serious Adverse EventsPreferred Term: Post procedural complication0 Participants
PlaceboParticipants (Number and Percentage) With and Type of Serious Adverse EventsAt least one SAE1 Participants
PlaceboParticipants (Number and Percentage) With and Type of Serious Adverse EventsPreferred Term: Anxiety0 Participants
PlaceboParticipants (Number and Percentage) With and Type of Serious Adverse EventsPreferred Term: Craniopharyngioma0 Participants
PlaceboParticipants (Number and Percentage) With and Type of Serious Adverse EventsPreferred Term: Hyponatraemia1 Participants
Primary

Safety as Assessed by Diastolic Blood Pressure [mmHg]

Diastolic blood pressure in mmHg measured at each visit in each of the two treatment arms

Time frame: from Baseline to week 24

Population: Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who took at least one dose of the IMPs (active substances or placebos). Subjects with an assessment at given timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tesofensine/MetoprololSafety as Assessed by Diastolic Blood Pressure [mmHg]Week 884.5 mmHgStandard Deviation 9
Tesofensine/MetoprololSafety as Assessed by Diastolic Blood Pressure [mmHg]Week 1681.4 mmHgStandard Deviation 9
Tesofensine/MetoprololSafety as Assessed by Diastolic Blood Pressure [mmHg]Week 484.2 mmHgStandard Deviation 8
Tesofensine/MetoprololSafety as Assessed by Diastolic Blood Pressure [mmHg]Week 2084.3 mmHgStandard Deviation 9
Tesofensine/MetoprololSafety as Assessed by Diastolic Blood Pressure [mmHg]Week 1281.5 mmHgStandard Deviation 10
Tesofensine/MetoprololSafety as Assessed by Diastolic Blood Pressure [mmHg]Week 2483.1 mmHgStandard Deviation 9
Tesofensine/MetoprololSafety as Assessed by Diastolic Blood Pressure [mmHg]Baseline83.2 mmHgStandard Deviation 14
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by Diastolic Blood Pressure [mmHg]Week 2484.2 mmHgStandard Deviation 13
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by Diastolic Blood Pressure [mmHg]Baseline85.9 mmHgStandard Deviation 8
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by Diastolic Blood Pressure [mmHg]Week 486.8 mmHgStandard Deviation 8
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by Diastolic Blood Pressure [mmHg]Week 886.0 mmHgStandard Deviation 9
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by Diastolic Blood Pressure [mmHg]Week 1286.5 mmHgStandard Deviation 8
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by Diastolic Blood Pressure [mmHg]Week 1680.3 mmHgStandard Deviation 13
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by Diastolic Blood Pressure [mmHg]Week 2085.7 mmHgStandard Deviation 9
Comparison: Week 4; Safety set; LOCFp-value: 0.654395% CI: [-7.33, 4.72]ANCOVA
Comparison: Week 8; Safety set; LOCFp-value: 0.794195% CI: [-6.5, 8.38]ANCOVA
Comparison: Week 12; Safety set; LOCFp-value: 0.593795% CI: [-9.72, 5.73]ANCOVA
Comparison: Week 16; Safety set; LOCFp-value: 0.542395% CI: [-6.11, 11.23]ANCOVA
Comparison: Week 20; Safety set; LOCFp-value: 0.722695% CI: [-5.77, 8.16]ANCOVA
Comparison: Week 24; Safety set; LOCFp-value: 0.791295% CI: [-7.85, 10.16]ANCOVA
Primary

Safety as Assessed by Electrolytes and Creatinine

Number and percentage of deviations from normal range (as defined by the investigational site's laboratory) for sodium, potassium, creatinine at each visit in each of the two treatment arms

Time frame: from Baseline to week 24

Population: Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who took at least one dose of the IMPs (active substances or placebos). Subjects with an assessment at given timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Tesofensine/MetoprololSafety as Assessed by Electrolytes and CreatinineSodium: Week 20 - Low0 Participants
Tesofensine/MetoprololSafety as Assessed by Electrolytes and CreatinineSodium: Baseline - High2 Participants
Tesofensine/MetoprololSafety as Assessed by Electrolytes and CreatinineSodium: Week 4 - Low0 Participants
Tesofensine/MetoprololSafety as Assessed by Electrolytes and CreatinineSodium: Week 4 - High0 Participants
Tesofensine/MetoprololSafety as Assessed by Electrolytes and CreatinineSodium: Week 8 - Low0 Participants
Tesofensine/MetoprololSafety as Assessed by Electrolytes and CreatinineSodium: Week 8 - High1 Participants
Tesofensine/MetoprololSafety as Assessed by Electrolytes and CreatinineSodium: Week 12 - Low0 Participants
Tesofensine/MetoprololSafety as Assessed by Electrolytes and CreatinineSodium: Week 12 - High1 Participants
Tesofensine/MetoprololSafety as Assessed by Electrolytes and CreatinineSodium: Week 16 - Low0 Participants
Tesofensine/MetoprololSafety as Assessed by Electrolytes and CreatinineSodium: Week 16 - High1 Participants
Tesofensine/MetoprololSafety as Assessed by Electrolytes and CreatinineSodium: Baseline - Low0 Participants
Tesofensine/MetoprololSafety as Assessed by Electrolytes and CreatinineSodium: Week 20 - High2 Participants
Tesofensine/MetoprololSafety as Assessed by Electrolytes and CreatinineSodium: Week 24 - Low1 Participants
Tesofensine/MetoprololSafety as Assessed by Electrolytes and CreatinineSodium: Week 24 - High0 Participants
Tesofensine/MetoprololSafety as Assessed by Electrolytes and CreatininePotassium: Baseline - Low0 Participants
Tesofensine/MetoprololSafety as Assessed by Electrolytes and CreatininePotassium: Baseline - High0 Participants
Tesofensine/MetoprololSafety as Assessed by Electrolytes and CreatininePotassium: Week 4 - Low2 Participants
Tesofensine/MetoprololSafety as Assessed by Electrolytes and CreatininePotassium: Week 4 - High0 Participants
Tesofensine/MetoprololSafety as Assessed by Electrolytes and CreatininePotassium: Week 8 - Low2 Participants
Tesofensine/MetoprololSafety as Assessed by Electrolytes and CreatininePotassium: Week 8 - High0 Participants
Tesofensine/MetoprololSafety as Assessed by Electrolytes and CreatininePotassium: Week 12 - Low1 Participants
Tesofensine/MetoprololSafety as Assessed by Electrolytes and CreatininePotassium: Week 12 - High0 Participants
Tesofensine/MetoprololSafety as Assessed by Electrolytes and CreatininePotassium: Week 16 - Low1 Participants
Tesofensine/MetoprololSafety as Assessed by Electrolytes and CreatininePotassium: Week 16 - High0 Participants
Tesofensine/MetoprololSafety as Assessed by Electrolytes and CreatininePotassium: Week 20 - Low1 Participants
Tesofensine/MetoprololSafety as Assessed by Electrolytes and CreatininePotassium: Week 20 - High0 Participants
Tesofensine/MetoprololSafety as Assessed by Electrolytes and CreatininePotassium: Week 24 - Low0 Participants
Tesofensine/MetoprololSafety as Assessed by Electrolytes and CreatininePotassium: Week 24 - High0 Participants
Tesofensine/MetoprololSafety as Assessed by Electrolytes and CreatinineCreatinine: Baseline - Low3 Participants
Tesofensine/MetoprololSafety as Assessed by Electrolytes and CreatinineCreatinine: Baseline - High0 Participants
Tesofensine/MetoprololSafety as Assessed by Electrolytes and CreatinineCreatinine: Week 4 - Low2 Participants
Tesofensine/MetoprololSafety as Assessed by Electrolytes and CreatinineCreatinine: Week 4 - High0 Participants
Tesofensine/MetoprololSafety as Assessed by Electrolytes and CreatinineCreatinine: Week 8 - Low2 Participants
Tesofensine/MetoprololSafety as Assessed by Electrolytes and CreatinineCreatinine: Week 8 - High0 Participants
Tesofensine/MetoprololSafety as Assessed by Electrolytes and CreatinineCreatinine: Week 12 - Low2 Participants
Tesofensine/MetoprololSafety as Assessed by Electrolytes and CreatinineCreatinine: Week 12 - High0 Participants
Tesofensine/MetoprololSafety as Assessed by Electrolytes and CreatinineCreatinine: Week 16 - Low3 Participants
Tesofensine/MetoprololSafety as Assessed by Electrolytes and CreatinineCreatinine: Week 16 - High0 Participants
Tesofensine/MetoprololSafety as Assessed by Electrolytes and CreatinineCreatinine: Week 20 - Low4 Participants
Tesofensine/MetoprololSafety as Assessed by Electrolytes and CreatinineCreatinine: Week 20 - High0 Participants
Tesofensine/MetoprololSafety as Assessed by Electrolytes and CreatinineCreatinine: Week 24 - Low3 Participants
Tesofensine/MetoprololSafety as Assessed by Electrolytes and CreatinineCreatinine: Week 24 - High0 Participants
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by Electrolytes and CreatinineCreatinine: Week 4 - High0 Participants
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by Electrolytes and CreatinineSodium: Baseline - Low0 Participants
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by Electrolytes and CreatininePotassium: Week 12 - High0 Participants
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by Electrolytes and CreatinineSodium: Baseline - High2 Participants
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by Electrolytes and CreatinineCreatinine: Week 20 - High0 Participants
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by Electrolytes and CreatinineSodium: Week 4 - Low0 Participants
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by Electrolytes and CreatininePotassium: Week 16 - Low0 Participants
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by Electrolytes and CreatinineSodium: Week 4 - High0 Participants
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by Electrolytes and CreatinineCreatinine: Week 8 - Low3 Participants
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by Electrolytes and CreatinineSodium: Week 8 - Low0 Participants
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by Electrolytes and CreatininePotassium: Week 16 - High1 Participants
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by Electrolytes and CreatinineSodium: Week 8 - High1 Participants
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by Electrolytes and CreatinineCreatinine: Week 16 - High0 Participants
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by Electrolytes and CreatinineSodium: Week 12 - Low0 Participants
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by Electrolytes and CreatininePotassium: Week 20 - Low0 Participants
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by Electrolytes and CreatinineSodium: Week 12 - High0 Participants
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by Electrolytes and CreatinineCreatinine: Week 8 - High0 Participants
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by Electrolytes and CreatinineSodium: Week 16 - Low0 Participants
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by Electrolytes and CreatininePotassium: Week 20 - High0 Participants
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by Electrolytes and CreatinineSodium: Week 16 - High0 Participants
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by Electrolytes and CreatinineCreatinine: Week 24 - High0 Participants
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by Electrolytes and CreatinineSodium: Week 20 - Low0 Participants
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by Electrolytes and CreatininePotassium: Week 24 - Low1 Participants
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by Electrolytes and CreatinineSodium: Week 20 - High2 Participants
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by Electrolytes and CreatinineCreatinine: Week 12 - Low2 Participants
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by Electrolytes and CreatinineSodium: Week 24 - Low0 Participants
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by Electrolytes and CreatininePotassium: Week 24 - High0 Participants
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by Electrolytes and CreatinineSodium: Week 24 - High1 Participants
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by Electrolytes and CreatinineCreatinine: Week 20 - Low2 Participants
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by Electrolytes and CreatininePotassium: Baseline - Low0 Participants
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by Electrolytes and CreatinineCreatinine: Baseline - Low2 Participants
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by Electrolytes and CreatininePotassium: Baseline - High1 Participants
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by Electrolytes and CreatinineCreatinine: Week 12 - High0 Participants
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by Electrolytes and CreatininePotassium: Week 4 - Low1 Participants
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by Electrolytes and CreatinineCreatinine: Baseline - High0 Participants
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by Electrolytes and CreatininePotassium: Week 4 - High1 Participants
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by Electrolytes and CreatinineCreatinine: Week 24 - Low1 Participants
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by Electrolytes and CreatininePotassium: Week 8 - Low0 Participants
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by Electrolytes and CreatinineCreatinine: Week 4 - Low4 Participants
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by Electrolytes and CreatininePotassium: Week 8 - High0 Participants
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by Electrolytes and CreatinineCreatinine: Week 16 - Low2 Participants
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by Electrolytes and CreatininePotassium: Week 12 - Low0 Participants
Primary

Safety as Assessed by Heart Rate [Bpm]

Heart rate measured in beats per minute (bpm) at each visit in each of the two treatment arms

Time frame: from Baseline to week 24

Population: Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who took at least one dose of the IMPs (active substances or placebos). Subjects with an assessment at given timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tesofensine/MetoprololSafety as Assessed by Heart Rate [Bpm]Week 872.7 bpmStandard Deviation 8
Tesofensine/MetoprololSafety as Assessed by Heart Rate [Bpm]Week 1673.8 bpmStandard Deviation 13
Tesofensine/MetoprololSafety as Assessed by Heart Rate [Bpm]Week 471.9 bpmStandard Deviation 9
Tesofensine/MetoprololSafety as Assessed by Heart Rate [Bpm]Week 2074.8 bpmStandard Deviation 11
Tesofensine/MetoprololSafety as Assessed by Heart Rate [Bpm]Week 1274.2 bpmStandard Deviation 10
Tesofensine/MetoprololSafety as Assessed by Heart Rate [Bpm]Week 2473.6 bpmStandard Deviation 10
Tesofensine/MetoprololSafety as Assessed by Heart Rate [Bpm]Baseline75.5 bpmStandard Deviation 8
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by Heart Rate [Bpm]Week 2471.5 bpmStandard Deviation 9
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by Heart Rate [Bpm]Baseline78.9 bpmStandard Deviation 11
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by Heart Rate [Bpm]Week 475.9 bpmStandard Deviation 12
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by Heart Rate [Bpm]Week 876.0 bpmStandard Deviation 13
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by Heart Rate [Bpm]Week 1273.3 bpmStandard Deviation 8
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by Heart Rate [Bpm]Week 1674.8 bpmStandard Deviation 6
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by Heart Rate [Bpm]Week 2077.2 bpmStandard Deviation 13
Comparison: Week 4; Safety set; LOCFp-value: 0.702395% CI: [-8.67, 5.97]ANCOVA
Comparison: Week 8; Safety set; LOCFp-value: 0.901295% CI: [-8.58, 7.61]ANCOVA
Comparison: Week 12; Safety set; LOCFp-value: 0.613895% CI: [-6.63, 10.92]ANCOVA
Comparison: Week 16; Safety set; LOCFp-value: 0.788995% CI: [-8.26, 10.72]ANCOVA
Comparison: Week 20; Safety set; LOCFp-value: 0.953695% CI: [-10.34, 10.94]ANCOVA
Comparison: Week 24; Safety set; LOCFp-value: 0.555195% CI: [-6.72, 12.12]ANCOVA
Primary

Safety as Assessed by Hematology Parameters

Number and percentage of deviations from normal range (as defined by the investigational site's laboratory) for hemoglobin, platelet counts, white cells count, differential counts at baseline, week 12 and week 24 in each of the two treatment arms

Time frame: from Baseline to week 24

Population: Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who took at least one dose of the IMPs (active substances or placebos). Subjects with an assessment at given timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Tesofensine/MetoprololSafety as Assessed by Hematology ParametersNeutrophils: Baseline - Low1 Participants
Tesofensine/MetoprololSafety as Assessed by Hematology ParametersPlatelets: Week 12 - High1 Participants
Tesofensine/MetoprololSafety as Assessed by Hematology ParametersNeutrophils: Baseline - High1 Participants
Tesofensine/MetoprololSafety as Assessed by Hematology ParametersHemoglobin: Week 12 - Low0 Participants
Tesofensine/MetoprololSafety as Assessed by Hematology ParametersNeutrophils: Week 12 - Low0 Participants
Tesofensine/MetoprololSafety as Assessed by Hematology ParametersPlatelets: Week 24 - Low0 Participants
Tesofensine/MetoprololSafety as Assessed by Hematology ParametersNeutrophils: Week 12 - High4 Participants
Tesofensine/MetoprololSafety as Assessed by Hematology ParametersHemoglobin: Week 24 - High0 Participants
Tesofensine/MetoprololSafety as Assessed by Hematology ParametersNeutrophils: Week 24 - Low1 Participants
Tesofensine/MetoprololSafety as Assessed by Hematology ParametersPlatelets: Week 24 - High1 Participants
Tesofensine/MetoprololSafety as Assessed by Hematology ParametersNeutrophils: Week 24 - High1 Participants
Tesofensine/MetoprololSafety as Assessed by Hematology ParametersHemoglobin: Baseline - High0 Participants
Tesofensine/MetoprololSafety as Assessed by Hematology ParametersMonocytes: Baseline - Low0 Participants
Tesofensine/MetoprololSafety as Assessed by Hematology ParametersWBC: Baseline - Low0 Participants
Tesofensine/MetoprololSafety as Assessed by Hematology ParametersMonocytes: Baseline - High0 Participants
Tesofensine/MetoprololSafety as Assessed by Hematology ParametersPlatelets: Baseline - Low0 Participants
Tesofensine/MetoprololSafety as Assessed by Hematology ParametersMonocytes: Week 12 - Low0 Participants
Tesofensine/MetoprololSafety as Assessed by Hematology ParametersWBC: Baseline - High3 Participants
Tesofensine/MetoprololSafety as Assessed by Hematology ParametersMonocytes: Week 12 - High1 Participants
Tesofensine/MetoprololSafety as Assessed by Hematology ParametersHemoglobin: Week 12 - High0 Participants
Tesofensine/MetoprololSafety as Assessed by Hematology ParametersMonocytes: Week 24 - Low0 Participants
Tesofensine/MetoprololSafety as Assessed by Hematology ParametersWBC: Week 12 - Low0 Participants
Tesofensine/MetoprololSafety as Assessed by Hematology ParametersMonocytes: Week 24 - High1 Participants
Tesofensine/MetoprololSafety as Assessed by Hematology ParametersPlatelets: Baseline - High1 Participants
Tesofensine/MetoprololSafety as Assessed by Hematology ParametersLymphocytes: Baseline - Low0 Participants
Tesofensine/MetoprololSafety as Assessed by Hematology ParametersWBC: Week 12 - High5 Participants
Tesofensine/MetoprololSafety as Assessed by Hematology ParametersLymphocytes: Baseline - High1 Participants
Tesofensine/MetoprololSafety as Assessed by Hematology ParametersHemoglobin: Baseline - Low0 Participants
Tesofensine/MetoprololSafety as Assessed by Hematology ParametersLymphocytes: Week 12 - Low0 Participants
Tesofensine/MetoprololSafety as Assessed by Hematology ParametersWBC: Week 24 - Low0 Participants
Tesofensine/MetoprololSafety as Assessed by Hematology ParametersLymphocytes: Week 12 - High0 Participants
Tesofensine/MetoprololSafety as Assessed by Hematology ParametersPlatelets: Week 12 - Low0 Participants
Tesofensine/MetoprololSafety as Assessed by Hematology ParametersLymphocytes: Week 24 - Low0 Participants
Tesofensine/MetoprololSafety as Assessed by Hematology ParametersWBC: Week 24 - High0 Participants
Tesofensine/MetoprololSafety as Assessed by Hematology ParametersLymphocytes: Week 24 - High1 Participants
Tesofensine/MetoprololSafety as Assessed by Hematology ParametersHemoglobin: Week 24 - Low1 Participants
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by Hematology ParametersLymphocytes: Week 24 - High0 Participants
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by Hematology ParametersHemoglobin: Baseline - High1 Participants
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by Hematology ParametersHemoglobin: Week 12 - Low0 Participants
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by Hematology ParametersHemoglobin: Week 12 - High0 Participants
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by Hematology ParametersHemoglobin: Week 24 - Low0 Participants
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by Hematology ParametersHemoglobin: Week 24 - High0 Participants
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by Hematology ParametersPlatelets: Baseline - Low0 Participants
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by Hematology ParametersPlatelets: Baseline - High0 Participants
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by Hematology ParametersPlatelets: Week 12 - Low0 Participants
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by Hematology ParametersPlatelets: Week 12 - High0 Participants
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by Hematology ParametersPlatelets: Week 24 - Low0 Participants
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by Hematology ParametersPlatelets: Week 24 - High0 Participants
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by Hematology ParametersWBC: Baseline - Low0 Participants
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by Hematology ParametersWBC: Baseline - High2 Participants
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by Hematology ParametersWBC: Week 12 - Low0 Participants
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by Hematology ParametersWBC: Week 12 - High1 Participants
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by Hematology ParametersWBC: Week 24 - Low0 Participants
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by Hematology ParametersWBC: Week 24 - High1 Participants
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by Hematology ParametersNeutrophils: Baseline - Low0 Participants
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by Hematology ParametersNeutrophils: Baseline - High1 Participants
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by Hematology ParametersNeutrophils: Week 12 - Low0 Participants
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by Hematology ParametersNeutrophils: Week 12 - High1 Participants
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by Hematology ParametersNeutrophils: Week 24 - Low0 Participants
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by Hematology ParametersNeutrophils: Week 24 - High1 Participants
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by Hematology ParametersMonocytes: Baseline - Low0 Participants
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by Hematology ParametersMonocytes: Baseline - High0 Participants
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by Hematology ParametersMonocytes: Week 12 - Low0 Participants
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by Hematology ParametersMonocytes: Week 12 - High0 Participants
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by Hematology ParametersMonocytes: Week 24 - Low0 Participants
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by Hematology ParametersMonocytes: Week 24 - High0 Participants
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by Hematology ParametersLymphocytes: Baseline - Low1 Participants
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by Hematology ParametersLymphocytes: Baseline - High2 Participants
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by Hematology ParametersLymphocytes: Week 12 - Low1 Participants
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by Hematology ParametersLymphocytes: Week 12 - High0 Participants
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by Hematology ParametersLymphocytes: Week 24 - Low0 Participants
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by Hematology ParametersHemoglobin: Baseline - Low0 Participants
Primary

Safety as Assessed by Liver and Kidney Function Tests

Number and percentage of deviations from normal range (as defined by the investigational site's laboratory) for gamma glutamyl transferase (GGT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), glomerular filtration rate (GFR), and urea at baseline, week 12, and week 24 in each of the two treatment arms

Time frame: from Baseline to week 24

Population: Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who took at least one dose of the IMPs (active substances or placebos). Subjects with an assessment at given timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Tesofensine/MetoprololSafety as Assessed by Liver and Kidney Function TestsALP: Baseline - Low0 Participants
Tesofensine/MetoprololSafety as Assessed by Liver and Kidney Function TestsGGT: Week 24 - High4 Participants
Tesofensine/MetoprololSafety as Assessed by Liver and Kidney Function TestsALP: Baseline - High1 Participants
Tesofensine/MetoprololSafety as Assessed by Liver and Kidney Function TestsAST: Week 24 - Low0 Participants
Tesofensine/MetoprololSafety as Assessed by Liver and Kidney Function TestsALP: Week 12 - Low0 Participants
Tesofensine/MetoprololSafety as Assessed by Liver and Kidney Function TestsGGT: Week 12 - High5 Participants
Tesofensine/MetoprololSafety as Assessed by Liver and Kidney Function TestsALP: Week 12 - High2 Participants
Tesofensine/MetoprololSafety as Assessed by Liver and Kidney Function TestsAST: Week 24 - High0 Participants
Tesofensine/MetoprololSafety as Assessed by Liver and Kidney Function TestsALP: Week 24 - Low0 Participants
Tesofensine/MetoprololSafety as Assessed by Liver and Kidney Function TestsAST: Baseline - Low0 Participants
Tesofensine/MetoprololSafety as Assessed by Liver and Kidney Function TestsALP: Week 24 - High1 Participants
Tesofensine/MetoprololSafety as Assessed by Liver and Kidney Function TestsALT: Baseline - Low0 Participants
Tesofensine/MetoprololSafety as Assessed by Liver and Kidney Function TestsGFR: Baseline - Low0 Participants
Tesofensine/MetoprololSafety as Assessed by Liver and Kidney Function TestsGGT: Week 12 - Low0 Participants
Tesofensine/MetoprololSafety as Assessed by Liver and Kidney Function TestsGFR: Baseline - High0 Participants
Tesofensine/MetoprololSafety as Assessed by Liver and Kidney Function TestsALT: Baseline - High0 Participants
Tesofensine/MetoprololSafety as Assessed by Liver and Kidney Function TestsGFR: Week 12 - Low0 Participants
Tesofensine/MetoprololSafety as Assessed by Liver and Kidney Function TestsAST: Baseline - High0 Participants
Tesofensine/MetoprololSafety as Assessed by Liver and Kidney Function TestsGFR: Week 12 - High0 Participants
Tesofensine/MetoprololSafety as Assessed by Liver and Kidney Function TestsALT: Week 12 - Low0 Participants
Tesofensine/MetoprololSafety as Assessed by Liver and Kidney Function TestsGFR: Week 24 - Low0 Participants
Tesofensine/MetoprololSafety as Assessed by Liver and Kidney Function TestsGGT: Week 24 - Low0 Participants
Tesofensine/MetoprololSafety as Assessed by Liver and Kidney Function TestsGFR: Week 24 - High0 Participants
Tesofensine/MetoprololSafety as Assessed by Liver and Kidney Function TestsALT: Week 12 - High1 Participants
Tesofensine/MetoprololSafety as Assessed by Liver and Kidney Function TestsUrea: Baseline - Low1 Participants
Tesofensine/MetoprololSafety as Assessed by Liver and Kidney Function TestsAST: Week 12 - Low0 Participants
Tesofensine/MetoprololSafety as Assessed by Liver and Kidney Function TestsUrea: Baseline - High0 Participants
Tesofensine/MetoprololSafety as Assessed by Liver and Kidney Function TestsALT: Week 24 - Low0 Participants
Tesofensine/MetoprololSafety as Assessed by Liver and Kidney Function TestsUrea: Week 12 - Low2 Participants
Tesofensine/MetoprololSafety as Assessed by Liver and Kidney Function TestsGGT: Baseline - High5 Participants
Tesofensine/MetoprololSafety as Assessed by Liver and Kidney Function TestsUrea: Week 12 - High0 Participants
Tesofensine/MetoprololSafety as Assessed by Liver and Kidney Function TestsALT: Week 24 - High0 Participants
Tesofensine/MetoprololSafety as Assessed by Liver and Kidney Function TestsUrea: Week 24 - Low1 Participants
Tesofensine/MetoprololSafety as Assessed by Liver and Kidney Function TestsAST: Week 12 - High0 Participants
Tesofensine/MetoprololSafety as Assessed by Liver and Kidney Function TestsUrea: Week 24 - High0 Participants
Tesofensine/MetoprololSafety as Assessed by Liver and Kidney Function TestsGGT: Baseline - Low0 Participants
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by Liver and Kidney Function TestsUrea: Week 24 - High0 Participants
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by Liver and Kidney Function TestsGGT: Baseline - Low0 Participants
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by Liver and Kidney Function TestsGGT: Baseline - High1 Participants
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by Liver and Kidney Function TestsGGT: Week 12 - Low1 Participants
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by Liver and Kidney Function TestsGGT: Week 12 - High2 Participants
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by Liver and Kidney Function TestsGGT: Week 24 - Low0 Participants
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by Liver and Kidney Function TestsGGT: Week 24 - High0 Participants
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by Liver and Kidney Function TestsAST: Baseline - Low0 Participants
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by Liver and Kidney Function TestsAST: Baseline - High0 Participants
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by Liver and Kidney Function TestsAST: Week 12 - Low0 Participants
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by Liver and Kidney Function TestsAST: Week 12 - High0 Participants
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by Liver and Kidney Function TestsAST: Week 24 - Low0 Participants
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by Liver and Kidney Function TestsAST: Week 24 - High0 Participants
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by Liver and Kidney Function TestsALT: Baseline - Low0 Participants
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by Liver and Kidney Function TestsALT: Baseline - High0 Participants
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by Liver and Kidney Function TestsALT: Week 12 - Low0 Participants
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by Liver and Kidney Function TestsALT: Week 12 - High0 Participants
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by Liver and Kidney Function TestsALT: Week 24 - Low0 Participants
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by Liver and Kidney Function TestsALT: Week 24 - High0 Participants
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by Liver and Kidney Function TestsALP: Baseline - Low0 Participants
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by Liver and Kidney Function TestsALP: Baseline - High0 Participants
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by Liver and Kidney Function TestsALP: Week 12 - Low0 Participants
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by Liver and Kidney Function TestsALP: Week 12 - High0 Participants
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by Liver and Kidney Function TestsALP: Week 24 - Low0 Participants
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by Liver and Kidney Function TestsALP: Week 24 - High0 Participants
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by Liver and Kidney Function TestsGFR: Baseline - Low0 Participants
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by Liver and Kidney Function TestsGFR: Baseline - High0 Participants
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by Liver and Kidney Function TestsGFR: Week 12 - Low0 Participants
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by Liver and Kidney Function TestsGFR: Week 12 - High0 Participants
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by Liver and Kidney Function TestsGFR: Week 24 - Low0 Participants
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by Liver and Kidney Function TestsGFR: Week 24 - High0 Participants
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by Liver and Kidney Function TestsUrea: Baseline - Low1 Participants
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by Liver and Kidney Function TestsUrea: Baseline - High0 Participants
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by Liver and Kidney Function TestsUrea: Week 12 - Low0 Participants
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by Liver and Kidney Function TestsUrea: Week 12 - High0 Participants
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by Liver and Kidney Function TestsUrea: Week 24 - Low0 Participants
Primary

Safety as Assessed by Systolic Blood Pressure [mmHg]

Systolic blood pressure in mmHg measured at each visit in each of the two treatment arms

Time frame: from Baseline to week 24

Population: Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who took at least one dose of the IMPs (active substances or placebos). Subjects with an assessment at given timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tesofensine/MetoprololSafety as Assessed by Systolic Blood Pressure [mmHg]Week 8129.2 mmHgStandard Deviation 17
Tesofensine/MetoprololSafety as Assessed by Systolic Blood Pressure [mmHg]Week 16123.9 mmHgStandard Deviation 14
Tesofensine/MetoprololSafety as Assessed by Systolic Blood Pressure [mmHg]Week 4126.6 mmHgStandard Deviation 12
Tesofensine/MetoprololSafety as Assessed by Systolic Blood Pressure [mmHg]Week 20127.3 mmHgStandard Deviation 12
Tesofensine/MetoprololSafety as Assessed by Systolic Blood Pressure [mmHg]Week 12126.3 mmHgStandard Deviation 13
Tesofensine/MetoprololSafety as Assessed by Systolic Blood Pressure [mmHg]Week 24125.3 mmHgStandard Deviation 16
Tesofensine/MetoprololSafety as Assessed by Systolic Blood Pressure [mmHg]Baseline124.0 mmHgStandard Deviation 9
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by Systolic Blood Pressure [mmHg]Week 24130.5 mmHgStandard Deviation 22
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by Systolic Blood Pressure [mmHg]Baseline134.5 mmHgStandard Deviation 16
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by Systolic Blood Pressure [mmHg]Week 4131.8 mmHgStandard Deviation 17
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by Systolic Blood Pressure [mmHg]Week 8126.3 mmHgStandard Deviation 23
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by Systolic Blood Pressure [mmHg]Week 12126.2 mmHgStandard Deviation 14
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by Systolic Blood Pressure [mmHg]Week 16126.0 mmHgStandard Deviation 17
PlaceboSafety as Assessed by Systolic Blood Pressure [mmHg]Week 20129.2 mmHgStandard Deviation 18
Comparison: Week 4; Safety set; LOCFp-value: 0.467195% CI: [-6.58, 13.78]ANCOVA
Comparison: Week 8; Safety set; LOCFp-value: 0.180895% CI: [-5.14, 25.36]ANCOVA
Comparison: Week 12; Safety set; LOCFp-value: 0.417195% CI: [-7.08, 16.33]ANCOVA
Comparison: Week 16; Safety set; LOCFp-value: 0.311695% CI: [-5.43, 16.1]ANCOVA
Comparison: Week 20; Safety set; LOCFp-value: 0.235395% CI: [-4.12, 15.72]ANCOVA
Comparison: Week 24; Safety set; LOCFp-value: 0.303795% CI: [-5.76, 17.48]ANCOVA
Secondary

24 Hours Blood Pressure

Changes in 24 hours blood pressure from baseline to week 12 and baseline to week 24

Time frame: from baseline to week 12 and baseline to week 24

Population: Number of participants analyzed:~Tesofensine/Metoprolol - Baseline/Week 12/Week 24: 14/12/9 Placebo - Baseline/Week 12/Week24: 8/6/5

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tesofensine/Metoprolol24 Hours Blood PressureSystolic BP mean change from baseline to week 12-8.0 mmHgStandard Deviation 20
Tesofensine/Metoprolol24 Hours Blood PressureSystolic BP mean change from baseline to week 242.3 mmHgStandard Deviation 20
Tesofensine/Metoprolol24 Hours Blood PressureDiastolic BP mean change from baseline to week 243.7 mmHgStandard Deviation 8
Tesofensine/Metoprolol24 Hours Blood PressureDiastolic BP mean change from baseline to week 120.2 mmHgStandard Deviation 9
Placebo24 Hours Blood PressureDiastolic BP mean change from baseline to week 123.7 mmHgStandard Deviation 8
Placebo24 Hours Blood PressureSystolic BP mean change from baseline to week 120.7 mmHgStandard Deviation 14
Placebo24 Hours Blood PressureDiastolic BP mean change from baseline to week 24-2.8 mmHgStandard Deviation 9
Placebo24 Hours Blood PressureSystolic BP mean change from baseline to week 24-8.4 mmHgStandard Deviation 17
Comparison: From baseline to week 24; mITT LOCF. (Change in systolic blood pressure mean)p-value: 0.872895% CI: [-18.17, 21.18]ANCOVA
Comparison: From baseline to week 24; mITT LOCF. (Change in diastolic blood pressure mean)p-value: 0.571495% CI: [-6.61, 11.54]ANCOVA
Comparison: From baseline to week 12; mITT LOCF. (Change in systolic blood pressure mean)p-value: 0.232295% CI: [-27.51, 7.22]ANCOVA
Comparison: From baseline to week 12; mITT LOCF. (Change in diastolic blood pressure mean)p-value: 0.432195% CI: [-12.61, 5.68]ANCOVA
Secondary

48 Hours Heart Rate and QT Interval at Baseline, Week 12 and Week 24

For Part 1, 48 hours HR and QT interval from week 12 to week 24 were not recorded in the database and analysis of changes not evaluated. Instead, abnormal findings over visits were summarized. Abnormal ECG findings detected in the three Tesomet treated subjects are: * QTc prolongation (466 ms) * Bradycardia (56 bpm) * QTc prolongation (460 ms) All were considered not clinically significant.

Time frame: baseline, week 12 and week 24

Population: 21 sub. were assign. 22 randomization no.~1 sub. was screen failure received 1 dose of Tesomet prior to being withdrawn at baseline. Sub. was re-screened and randomized as new sub. receiving PBO. As this sub. was assigned 2 randomization no., 1 under each arm, the sub. is summarized for both arms. The 2 randomization no. are considered as 2 sub.~14 sub. were randomized to receive Tesomet and 8 sub. received PBO. 4 sub. (2 Tesomet, 2 PBO) terminated study before end of 24W DB period.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Tesofensine/Metoprolol48 Hours Heart Rate and QT Interval at Baseline, Week 12 and Week 24ECG interretation baselineNormal14 Participants
Tesofensine/Metoprolol48 Hours Heart Rate and QT Interval at Baseline, Week 12 and Week 24ECG interretation baselineAbnormal0 Participants
Tesofensine/Metoprolol48 Hours Heart Rate and QT Interval at Baseline, Week 12 and Week 24ECG interretation at week 12Normal9 Participants
Tesofensine/Metoprolol48 Hours Heart Rate and QT Interval at Baseline, Week 12 and Week 24ECG interretation at week 12Abnormal3 Participants
Tesofensine/Metoprolol48 Hours Heart Rate and QT Interval at Baseline, Week 12 and Week 24ECG interretation at week 24Normal11 Participants
Tesofensine/Metoprolol48 Hours Heart Rate and QT Interval at Baseline, Week 12 and Week 24ECG interretation at week 24Abnormal1 Participants
Tesofensine/Metoprolol48 Hours Heart Rate and QT Interval at Baseline, Week 12 and Week 2448 hour heart rate at baselineNormal13 Participants
Tesofensine/Metoprolol48 Hours Heart Rate and QT Interval at Baseline, Week 12 and Week 2448 hour heart rate at baselineAbnormal0 Participants
Tesofensine/Metoprolol48 Hours Heart Rate and QT Interval at Baseline, Week 12 and Week 2448 hour heart rate at week 12Normal10 Participants
Tesofensine/Metoprolol48 Hours Heart Rate and QT Interval at Baseline, Week 12 and Week 2448 hour heart rate at week 12Abnormal2 Participants
Tesofensine/Metoprolol48 Hours Heart Rate and QT Interval at Baseline, Week 12 and Week 2448 hour heart rate at week 24Normal12 Participants
Tesofensine/Metoprolol48 Hours Heart Rate and QT Interval at Baseline, Week 12 and Week 2448 hour heart rate at week 24Abnormal0 Participants
Placebo48 Hours Heart Rate and QT Interval at Baseline, Week 12 and Week 2448 hour heart rate at week 24Normal6 Participants
Placebo48 Hours Heart Rate and QT Interval at Baseline, Week 12 and Week 24ECG interretation baselineNormal8 Participants
Placebo48 Hours Heart Rate and QT Interval at Baseline, Week 12 and Week 2448 hour heart rate at baselineNormal8 Participants
Placebo48 Hours Heart Rate and QT Interval at Baseline, Week 12 and Week 24ECG interretation baselineAbnormal0 Participants
Placebo48 Hours Heart Rate and QT Interval at Baseline, Week 12 and Week 2448 hour heart rate at week 12Abnormal0 Participants
Placebo48 Hours Heart Rate and QT Interval at Baseline, Week 12 and Week 24ECG interretation at week 12Normal6 Participants
Placebo48 Hours Heart Rate and QT Interval at Baseline, Week 12 and Week 2448 hour heart rate at baselineAbnormal0 Participants
Placebo48 Hours Heart Rate and QT Interval at Baseline, Week 12 and Week 24ECG interretation at week 12Abnormal0 Participants
Placebo48 Hours Heart Rate and QT Interval at Baseline, Week 12 and Week 2448 hour heart rate at week 24Abnormal0 Participants
Placebo48 Hours Heart Rate and QT Interval at Baseline, Week 12 and Week 24ECG interretation at week 24Normal6 Participants
Placebo48 Hours Heart Rate and QT Interval at Baseline, Week 12 and Week 2448 hour heart rate at week 12Normal6 Participants
Placebo48 Hours Heart Rate and QT Interval at Baseline, Week 12 and Week 24ECG interretation at week 24Abnormal0 Participants
Secondary

Blood Pressure (Change)

Change in blood pressure from baseline to week 24, from baseline to week 48, and from week 24 to week 48. mITT observed values.

Time frame: from baseline to week 24, from baseline to week 48 and from week 24 to week 48

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tesofensine/MetoprololBlood Pressure (Change)Change in Systolic BP from baseline to week 242.0 mmHgStandard Deviation 13
Tesofensine/MetoprololBlood Pressure (Change)Change in Systolic BP from baseline to week 485.8 mmHgStandard Deviation 14
Tesofensine/MetoprololBlood Pressure (Change)Change in Systolic BP from week 24 to wek 485.0 mmHgStandard Deviation 11
Tesofensine/MetoprololBlood Pressure (Change)Change in Diastolic BP from baseline to week 242.8 mmHgStandard Deviation 11
Tesofensine/MetoprololBlood Pressure (Change)Change in Diastolic BP from baseline to week 486.5 mmHgStandard Deviation 12
Tesofensine/MetoprololBlood Pressure (Change)Change in Diastolic BP from week 24 to week 484.2 mmHgStandard Deviation 9
PlaceboBlood Pressure (Change)Change in Diastolic BP from baseline to week 48-1.0 mmHgStandard Deviation 13
PlaceboBlood Pressure (Change)Change in Systolic BP from baseline to week 24-4.2 mmHgStandard Deviation 8
PlaceboBlood Pressure (Change)Change in Diastolic BP from baseline to week 24-2.0 mmHgStandard Deviation 11
PlaceboBlood Pressure (Change)Change in Systolic BP from baseline to week 48-9.7 mmHgStandard Deviation 13
PlaceboBlood Pressure (Change)Change in Diastolic BP from week 24 to week 481.0 mmHgStandard Deviation 10
PlaceboBlood Pressure (Change)Change in Systolic BP from week 24 to wek 48-5.5 mmHgStandard Deviation 14
Comparison: From baseline to week 24; safety set LOCF. (Change in systolic blood pressure)p-value: 0.303795% CI: [-5.76, 17.48]ANCOVA
Comparison: From baseline to week 24; safety set LOCF. (Change in diastolic blood pressure)p-value: 0.791295% CI: [-7.85, 10.16]ANCOVA
Comparison: From baseline to week 48; safety set LOCF. (Change in systolic blood pressure)p-value: 0.177395% CI: [-5.25, 25.83]ANCOVA
Comparison: From baseline to week 48; safety set LOCF. (Change in diastolic blood pressure)p-value: 0.79895% CI: [-9.55, 12.2]ANCOVA
Comparison: From week 24 to week 48; safety set LOCF. (Change in systolic blood pressure)p-value: 0.15895% CI: [-3.4, 18.94]ANCOVA
Comparison: From week 24 to week 48; safety set LOCF. (Change in diastolic blood pressure)p-value: 0.702195% CI: [-7.36, 10.64]ANCOVA
Secondary

Body Composition - Fat Mass

Change in body fat mass as measured in kg by DXA scan measured at baseline, week 24 and week 48 for each of the two treatment arms. mITT observed values.

Time frame: from baseline to week 24, from baseline to week 48 and from week 24 to week 48

Population: Modified Intention-to-treat (mITT) Population: all subjects who entered Part 2 (open-label extension) and had nonmissing baseline assessments and at least 1 post-Part 1 assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tesofensine/MetoprololBody Composition - Fat MassBaseline to Week 24-5.31 kgStandard Deviation 5.34
Tesofensine/MetoprololBody Composition - Fat MassBaseline to Week 48-4.87 kgStandard Deviation 5.31
Tesofensine/MetoprololBody Composition - Fat MassWeek 24 to Week 480.44 kgStandard Deviation 3.5
PlaceboBody Composition - Fat MassBaseline to Week 24-1.04 kgStandard Deviation 3.75
PlaceboBody Composition - Fat MassBaseline to Week 48-3.77 kgStandard Deviation 5.81
PlaceboBody Composition - Fat MassWeek 24 to Week 48-2.73 kgStandard Deviation 3.37
Comparison: Baseline to Week 24; mITT observed.p-value: 0.104895% CI: [-9.31, 0.98]ANCOVA
Comparison: Baseline to Week 48; mITT observed.p-value: 0.718995% CI: [-6.75, 4.77]ANCOVA
Comparison: Week 24 to Week 48; mITT observed.p-value: 0.105395% CI: [-0.73, 6.91]ANCOVA
Secondary

Body Composition - Lean Body Mass

Change in lean body mass as measured in kg by DXA scan measured at baseline, week 24 and week 48 for each of the two treatment arms. mITT observed values.

Time frame: from baseline to week 24, from baseline to week 48 and from week 24 to week 48

Population: Modified Intention-to-treat (mITT) Population: all subjects who entered Part 2 (open-label extension) and had nonmissing baseline assessments and at least 1 post-Part 1 assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tesofensine/MetoprololBody Composition - Lean Body MassBaseline to Week 24-2.85 kgStandard Deviation 1.88
Tesofensine/MetoprololBody Composition - Lean Body MassBaseline to Week 48-1.81 kgStandard Deviation 2.18
Tesofensine/MetoprololBody Composition - Lean Body MassWeek 24 to Week 481.04 kgStandard Deviation 1.18
PlaceboBody Composition - Lean Body MassBaseline to Week 240.55 kgStandard Deviation 1.32
PlaceboBody Composition - Lean Body MassBaseline to Week 48-1.87 kgStandard Deviation 3.36
PlaceboBody Composition - Lean Body MassWeek 24 to Week 48-2.42 kgStandard Deviation 3.51
Comparison: Baseline to Week 24; mITT observedp-value: 0.003395% CI: [-5.02, -1.21]ANCOVA
Comparison: Baseline to Week 48; mITT LOCFp-value: 0.666395% CI: [-2.24, 3.41]ANCOVA
Comparison: Week 24 to Week 48; mITT LOCFp-value: 0.005895% CI: [1.21, 5.98]ANCOVA
Secondary

Body Weight

Change in body weight from baseline to week 24, from baseline to 48 and from week 24 to week 48 measured at each visit for each of the two treatment arms

Time frame: from baseline to week 24, from baseline to week 48 and from week 24 to week 48

Population: Modified Intention-to-treat (mITT) Population: all subjects who entered Part 2 (open-label extension) and had nonmissing baseline assessments and at least 1 post-Part 1 assessment. Last observation carried forward (LOCF) approach.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tesofensine/MetoprololBody WeightBaseline to Week 24-7.93 kgStandard Deviation 6.59
Tesofensine/MetoprololBody WeightBaseline to Week 48-6.53 kgStandard Deviation 7.36
Tesofensine/MetoprololBody WeightWeek 24 to Week 481.40 kgStandard Deviation 4.05
PlaceboBody WeightBaseline to Week 24-0.15 kgStandard Deviation 4.74
PlaceboBody WeightBaseline to Week 48-5.65 kgStandard Deviation 8.9
PlaceboBody WeightWeek 24 to Week 48-5.50 kgStandard Deviation 6.2
Comparison: Baseline to Week 24p-value: 0.032595% CI: [-14.29, -0.71]ANCOVA
Comparison: Baseline to Week 48p-value: 0.939495% CI: [-9.04, 8.4]ANCOVA
Comparison: Week 24 to Week 28p-value: 0.013595% CI: [1.65, 12.18]ANCOVA
Secondary

Composite Satiety Score (CSS)

Change in satiety and appetite using the CSS from Baseline to week 24, from Baseline to week 48 and from week 24 to week 48 measured at each visit for each of the two treatment arms Full name of the scale: composite satiety score (CSS), sometimes referred to as appetite suppression score. Range of values is 0-100; lower the value, hungrier a person is. CSS = (satiety + fullness + \[100 - hunger\] + \[100 - prospective food consumption\]) / 4. The four variables included are measured by visual analog scales (0-100 mm)

Time frame: from baseline to week 24, from baseline to week 48 and from week 24 to week 48

Population: Modified Intention-to-treat (mITT) Population: all subjects who entered Part 2 (open-label extension) and had nonmissing baseline assessments and at least 1 post-Part 1 assessment. Last observation carried forward (LOCF) approach.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tesofensine/MetoprololComposite Satiety Score (CSS)Baseline to Week 244.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.6
Tesofensine/MetoprololComposite Satiety Score (CSS)Baseline to Week 484.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.1
Tesofensine/MetoprololComposite Satiety Score (CSS)Week 24 to Week 48-0.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.4
PlaceboComposite Satiety Score (CSS)Baseline to Week 246.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.3
PlaceboComposite Satiety Score (CSS)Baseline to Week 4811.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.3
PlaceboComposite Satiety Score (CSS)Week 24 to Week 484.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.5
Comparison: Baseline to Week 24p-value: 0.778295% CI: [-21.23, 16.2]ANCOVA
Comparison: Baseline to Week 48p-value: 0.31395% CI: [-22.09, 7.56]ANCOVA
Comparison: Week 24 to Week 48p-value: 0.403395% CI: [-19.92, 8.47]ANCOVA
Secondary

Craving for Something Sweet, Salty, Meat/Fish, or Fatty

Change in craving for something sweet, salty, meat/fish, or fatty by the use of visual analogue scales (VAS) from baseline to week 24, from baseline to week 48, and from week 24 to week 48 The VAS consisted of a 100-mm horizontal line; subjects placed a vertical line on the VAS to indicate the level of intensity of their food craving. The VAS value is the distance in mm (0-100 mm) from the left end of the line to the subject's vertical line (higher value represents less craving). mITT observed values.

Time frame: from baseline to week 24, from baseline to week 48 and from week 24 to week 48

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tesofensine/MetoprololCraving for Something Sweet, Salty, Meat/Fish, or FattyDesire for something sweet from baseline to week 249.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 36.6
Tesofensine/MetoprololCraving for Something Sweet, Salty, Meat/Fish, or FattyDesire for something sweet from baseline to week 482.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 35.8
Tesofensine/MetoprololCraving for Something Sweet, Salty, Meat/Fish, or FattyDesire for something sweet from week 24 to week 48-6.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.2
Tesofensine/MetoprololCraving for Something Sweet, Salty, Meat/Fish, or FattyDesire for something salty from baseline to week 24-2.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.9
Tesofensine/MetoprololCraving for Something Sweet, Salty, Meat/Fish, or FattyDesire for something salty from baseline to week 48-3.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.8
Tesofensine/MetoprololCraving for Something Sweet, Salty, Meat/Fish, or FattyDesire for something salty from week 24 to week 48-1.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.5
Tesofensine/MetoprololCraving for Something Sweet, Salty, Meat/Fish, or FattyDesire for meat/fish from baseline to week 247.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 42.6
Tesofensine/MetoprololCraving for Something Sweet, Salty, Meat/Fish, or FattyDesire for meat/fish from baseline to week 4814.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 44.1
Tesofensine/MetoprololCraving for Something Sweet, Salty, Meat/Fish, or FattyDesire for meat/fish from week 24 to week 486.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.6
Tesofensine/MetoprololCraving for Something Sweet, Salty, Meat/Fish, or FattyDesire for something fatty from baseline to week 2418.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.6
Tesofensine/MetoprololCraving for Something Sweet, Salty, Meat/Fish, or FattyDesire for something fatty from baseline to week 485.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.7
Tesofensine/MetoprololCraving for Something Sweet, Salty, Meat/Fish, or FattyDesire for something fatty from week 24 to week 48-13.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.6
PlaceboCraving for Something Sweet, Salty, Meat/Fish, or FattyDesire for something fatty from baseline to week 4822.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.3
PlaceboCraving for Something Sweet, Salty, Meat/Fish, or FattyDesire for something sweet from baseline to week 2416.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 30.8
PlaceboCraving for Something Sweet, Salty, Meat/Fish, or FattyDesire for meat/fish from baseline to week 248.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 34
PlaceboCraving for Something Sweet, Salty, Meat/Fish, or FattyDesire for something sweet from baseline to week 4835.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 32.9
PlaceboCraving for Something Sweet, Salty, Meat/Fish, or FattyDesire for something fatty from baseline to week 242.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.3
PlaceboCraving for Something Sweet, Salty, Meat/Fish, or FattyDesire for something sweet from week 24 to week 4819.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 30.7
PlaceboCraving for Something Sweet, Salty, Meat/Fish, or FattyDesire for meat/fish from baseline to week 4835.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 34.6
PlaceboCraving for Something Sweet, Salty, Meat/Fish, or FattyDesire for something salty from baseline to week 2413.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.5
PlaceboCraving for Something Sweet, Salty, Meat/Fish, or FattyDesire for something fatty from week 24 to week 4820.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 28
PlaceboCraving for Something Sweet, Salty, Meat/Fish, or FattyDesire for something salty from baseline to week 4833.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 30.9
PlaceboCraving for Something Sweet, Salty, Meat/Fish, or FattyDesire for meat/fish from week 24 to week 4826.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 34.2
PlaceboCraving for Something Sweet, Salty, Meat/Fish, or FattyDesire for something salty from week 24 to week 4820.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.7
Comparison: Baseline to week 24; mITT observed. (Like to eat something fatty)p-value: 0.090595% CI: [-2.85, 34.85]ANCOVA
Comparison: Baseline to Week 24; mITT observed. (Like some meat/fish)p-value: 0.628595% CI: [-22.05, 35.36]ANCOVA
Comparison: Baseline to Week 24; mITT observed. (Eat something salty).p-value: 0.588495% CI: [-33.05, 19.43]ANCOVA
Comparison: Baseline to Week 24; mITT observed. (Eat something sweet).p-value: 0.853395% CI: [-30.73, 36.68]ANCOVA
Comparison: Baseline to Week 48; mITT LOCF. (Like to eat something fatty).p-value: 0.152995% CI: [-41.87, 7.2]ANCOVA
Comparison: Baseline to Week 48; mITT LOCF. (Like some meat/fish).p-value: 0.339995% CI: [-37.15, 13.65]ANCOVA
Comparison: Baseline to Week 48; mITT LOCF. (Eat something salty).p-value: 0.067395% CI: [-49.84, 1.93]ANCOVA
Comparison: Baseline to Week 48; mITT LOCF. (Eat something sweet).p-value: 0.165795% CI: [-55.65, 10.46]ANCOVA
Comparison: Week 24 to week 48; mITT LOCF. (Like to eat something fatty).p-value: 0.010895% CI: [-52.31, -8.06]ANCOVA
Comparison: Week 24 to week 48; mITT LOCF. (Like some meat/fish).p-value: 0.17195% CI: [-36.71, 7.13]ANCOVA
Comparison: Week 24 to week 48; mITT LOCF. (Eat something salty).p-value: 0.008395% CI: [-33.8, -5.93]ANCOVA
Comparison: Week 24 to week 48; mITT LOCF. (Eat something sweet).p-value: 0.063195% CI: [-47.39, 1.43]ANCOVA
Secondary

Glycemic Control - Fasting Plasma Glucose

Change in fasting plasma glucose from baseline to week 24, baseline to week 48 and week 24 to week 48 measured at each visit for each of the two treatments arms. mITT observed values.

Time frame: from baseline to week 24, from baseline to week 48 and from week 24 to week 48

Population: Modified Intention-to-treat (mITT) Population: all subjects who entered Part 2 (open-label extension) and had nonmissing baseline assessments and at least 1 post-Part 1 assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tesofensine/MetoprololGlycemic Control - Fasting Plasma GlucoseBaseline to Week 24-0.29 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.64
Tesofensine/MetoprololGlycemic Control - Fasting Plasma GlucoseBaseline to Week 48-0.11 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.53
Tesofensine/MetoprololGlycemic Control - Fasting Plasma GlucoseWeek 24 to Week 480.18 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.46
PlaceboGlycemic Control - Fasting Plasma GlucoseBaseline to Week 24-0.28 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.57
PlaceboGlycemic Control - Fasting Plasma GlucoseBaseline to Week 480.08 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.37
PlaceboGlycemic Control - Fasting Plasma GlucoseWeek 24 to Week 480.37 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.59
Comparison: Baseline to Week 24; mITT LOCFp-value: 0.792695% CI: [-0.42, 0.33]ANCOVA
Comparison: Baseline to Week 48; mITT LOCFp-value: 0.212495% CI: [-0.72, 0.17]ANCOVA
Comparison: Week 24 to Week 48; mITT LOCFp-value: 0.608495% CI: [-0.72, 0.43]ANCOVA
Secondary

Glycemic Control - HbA1c

Change in HbA1c from baseline to week 24, baseline to week 48 and week 24 to week 48 for each of the two treatment arms. mITT observed values.

Time frame: from baseline to week 24, from baseline to week 48 and from week 24 to week 48

Population: Modified Intention-to-treat (mITT) Population: all subjects who entered Part 2 (open-label extension) and had nonmissing baseline assessments and at least 1 post-Part 1 assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tesofensine/MetoprololGlycemic Control - HbA1cBaseline to Week 24-6.00 mmol/molStandard Deviation 15.39
Tesofensine/MetoprololGlycemic Control - HbA1cBaseline to Week 48-5.33 mmol/molStandard Deviation 14.79
Tesofensine/MetoprololGlycemic Control - HbA1cWeek 24 to Week 480.67 mmol/molStandard Deviation 1.3
PlaceboGlycemic Control - HbA1cWeek 24 to Week 480.00 mmol/molStandard Deviation 0.63
PlaceboGlycemic Control - HbA1cBaseline to Week 24-0.17 mmol/molStandard Deviation 2.4
PlaceboGlycemic Control - HbA1cBaseline to Week 48-0.17 mmol/molStandard Deviation 2.23
Comparison: Baseline to Week 24; mITT observedp-value: 0.071395% CI: [-6.34, 0.3]ANCOVA
Comparison: Baseline to Week 48; mITT LOCFp-value: 0.145795% CI: [-5.92, 0.96]ANCOVA
Comparison: Week 24 to Week 48; mITT LOCFp-value: 0.183795% CI: [-0.45, 2.15]ANCOVA
Secondary

Heart Rate (Change)

Change in heart rate from baseline to week 24, from baseline to week 48, and from week 24 to week 48. mITT observed values.

Time frame: from baseline to week 24, from baseline to week 48 and from week 24 to week 48

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tesofensine/MetoprololHeart Rate (Change)Change in Heart Rate from baseline to week 24-2.4 bpmStandard Deviation 11
Tesofensine/MetoprololHeart Rate (Change)Change in Heart Rate from baseline to week 480.1 bpmStandard Deviation 7
Tesofensine/MetoprololHeart Rate (Change)Change in Heart Rate from week 24 to week 484.2 bpmStandard Deviation 8
PlaceboHeart Rate (Change)Change in Heart Rate from baseline to week 24-7.0 bpmStandard Deviation 12
PlaceboHeart Rate (Change)Change in Heart Rate from baseline to week 480.7 bpmStandard Deviation 20
PlaceboHeart Rate (Change)Change in Heart Rate from week 24 to week 487.7 bpmStandard Deviation 10
Comparison: From baseline to week 24; safety set LOCF. (Change in heart rate)p-value: 0.555195% CI: [-6.72, 12.12]ANCOVA
Comparison: From baseline to week 48; safety set LOCF. (Change in heart rate)p-value: 0.725695% CI: [-14.88, 10.63]ANCOVA
Comparison: From week 24 to week 48; safety set LOCF. (Change in heart rate)p-value: 0.482295% CI: [-13.05, 6.48]ANCOVA
Secondary

Lipid Profile

Change in lipid profile from baseline to week 24, from baseline to week 48, and from week 24 to week 48. mITT observed values.

Time frame: from baseline to week 24, from baseline to week 48 and from week 24 to week 48

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tesofensine/MetoprololLipid ProfileChange in total cholesterol from baseline to week 24-0.17 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.46
Tesofensine/MetoprololLipid ProfileChange in total cholesterol from baseline to week 48-0.01 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.6
Tesofensine/MetoprololLipid ProfileChange in total cholesterol from week 24 to week 480.16 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.48
Tesofensine/MetoprololLipid ProfileChange in HDL cholesterol from baseline to week 240.04 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.21
Tesofensine/MetoprololLipid ProfileChange in HDL cholesterol from baseline to week 480.09 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.26
Tesofensine/MetoprololLipid ProfileChange in HDL cholesterol from week 24 to week 480.05 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.24
Tesofensine/MetoprololLipid ProfileChange in LDL cholesterol from baseline to week 24-0.23 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.39
Tesofensine/MetoprololLipid ProfileChange in LDL cholesterol from baseline to week 48-0.15 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.38
Tesofensine/MetoprololLipid ProfileChange in LDL cholesterol from week 24 to week 480.08 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.28
Tesofensine/MetoprololLipid ProfileChange in triglycerides from baseline to week 24-0.08 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.77
Tesofensine/MetoprololLipid ProfileChange in triglycerides from baseline to week 48-0.07 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.77
Tesofensine/MetoprololLipid ProfileChange in triglycerides from week 24 to week 480.01 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.69
PlaceboLipid ProfileChange in triglycerides from baseline to week 48-0.48 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.28
PlaceboLipid ProfileChange in total cholesterol from baseline to week 24-0.17 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.45
PlaceboLipid ProfileChange in LDL cholesterol from baseline to week 24-0.20 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.43
PlaceboLipid ProfileChange in total cholesterol from baseline to week 48-0.22 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.75
PlaceboLipid ProfileChange in triglycerides from baseline to week 24-0.30 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.76
PlaceboLipid ProfileChange in total cholesterol from week 24 to week 48-0.05 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.69
PlaceboLipid ProfileChange in LDL cholesterol from baseline to week 48-0.32 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.53
PlaceboLipid ProfileChange in HDL cholesterol from baseline to week 24-0.02 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.37
PlaceboLipid ProfileChange in triglycerides from week 24 to week 48-0.18 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.66
PlaceboLipid ProfileChange in HDL cholesterol from baseline to week 480.03 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.25
PlaceboLipid ProfileChange in LDL cholesterol from week 24 to week 48-0.12 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.45
PlaceboLipid ProfileChange in HDL cholesterol from week 24 to week 480.05 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.16
Comparison: Baseline to Week 24; mITT observed. (Change in total cholesterol)p-value: 0.862395% CI: [-0.59, 0.5]ANCOVA
Comparison: Baseline to Week 24; mITT observed. (Change in HDL cholesterol)p-value: 0.832795% CI: [-0.25, 0.3]ANCOVA
Comparison: Baseline to Week 24; mITT observed. (Change in LDL cholesterol)p-value: 0.80895% CI: [-0.53, 0.42]ANCOVA
Comparison: Baseline to Week 24; mITT observed. (Change in triglycerides)p-value: 0.579195% CI: [-0.62, 1.07]ANCOVA
Comparison: Baseline to Week 48; mITT LOCF. (Change in cholesterol)p-value: 0.933795% CI: [-0.71, 0.77]ANCOVA
Comparison: Baseline to Week 48; mITT LOCF. (Change in HDL cholesterol)p-value: 0.930595% CI: [-0.21, 0.23]ANCOVA
Comparison: Baseline to Week 48; mITT LOCF. (Change in LDL cholesterol)p-value: 0.69195% CI: [-0.4, 0.59]ANCOVA
Comparison: Baseline to Week 48; mITT LOCF. (Change in triglycerides)p-value: 0.268895% CI: [-0.3, 1.01]ANCOVA
Comparison: Week 24 to week 48; mITT LOCF. (Change in cholesterol)p-value: 0.826295% CI: [-0.54, 0.67]ANCOVA
Comparison: Week 24 to week 48; mITT LOCF. (Change in HDL cholesterol)p-value: 0.829395% CI: [-0.2, 0.17]ANCOVA
Comparison: Week 24 to week 48; mITT LOCF. (Change in LDL cholesterol)p-value: 0.548695% CI: [-0.27, 0.49]ANCOVA
Comparison: Week 24 to week 48; mITT LOCF. (Change in triglycerides)p-value: 0.322695% CI: [-0.26, 0.75]ANCOVA
Secondary

Number of Participants With Adverse Event(s) and/or Serious Adverse Event(s) - Open-label Extension

Number of participants with adverse event(s) and/or serious adverse event(s) reported from week 24 to week 48

Time frame: from week 24 to week 48

Population: One subject was excluded from safety analysis (in the Tesofensine/Metoprolol -\> Tesofensine/Metoprolol arm) since subject discontinued Tesomet treatment in Part 1 but continued in Part 2 without being dosed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Tesofensine/MetoprololNumber of Participants With Adverse Event(s) and/or Serious Adverse Event(s) - Open-label ExtensionInfections and infestations6 Participants
Tesofensine/MetoprololNumber of Participants With Adverse Event(s) and/or Serious Adverse Event(s) - Open-label ExtensionGastrointestinal disorders5 Participants
Tesofensine/MetoprololNumber of Participants With Adverse Event(s) and/or Serious Adverse Event(s) - Open-label ExtensionMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders7 Participants
Tesofensine/MetoprololNumber of Participants With Adverse Event(s) and/or Serious Adverse Event(s) - Open-label ExtensionNervous system disorders3 Participants
Tesofensine/MetoprololNumber of Participants With Adverse Event(s) and/or Serious Adverse Event(s) - Open-label ExtensionGeneral disorders and administration site conditions4 Participants
Tesofensine/MetoprololNumber of Participants With Adverse Event(s) and/or Serious Adverse Event(s) - Open-label ExtensionPsychiatric disorders2 Participants
Tesofensine/MetoprololNumber of Participants With Adverse Event(s) and/or Serious Adverse Event(s) - Open-label ExtensionCardiac disorders0 Participants
Tesofensine/MetoprololNumber of Participants With Adverse Event(s) and/or Serious Adverse Event(s) - Open-label ExtensionInjury, poisoning and procedural complications1 Participants
Tesofensine/MetoprololNumber of Participants With Adverse Event(s) and/or Serious Adverse Event(s) - Open-label ExtensionVascular disorders0 Participants
Tesofensine/MetoprololNumber of Participants With Adverse Event(s) and/or Serious Adverse Event(s) - Open-label ExtensionBlood and lymphatic system disorders1 Participants
Tesofensine/MetoprololNumber of Participants With Adverse Event(s) and/or Serious Adverse Event(s) - Open-label ExtensionInvestigations1 Participants
Tesofensine/MetoprololNumber of Participants With Adverse Event(s) and/or Serious Adverse Event(s) - Open-label ExtensionRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adverse Event(s) and/or Serious Adverse Event(s) - Open-label ExtensionInvestigations0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adverse Event(s) and/or Serious Adverse Event(s) - Open-label ExtensionInfections and infestations4 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adverse Event(s) and/or Serious Adverse Event(s) - Open-label ExtensionCardiac disorders3 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adverse Event(s) and/or Serious Adverse Event(s) - Open-label ExtensionGastrointestinal disorders3 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adverse Event(s) and/or Serious Adverse Event(s) - Open-label ExtensionBlood and lymphatic system disorders0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adverse Event(s) and/or Serious Adverse Event(s) - Open-label ExtensionMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adverse Event(s) and/or Serious Adverse Event(s) - Open-label ExtensionInjury, poisoning and procedural complications1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adverse Event(s) and/or Serious Adverse Event(s) - Open-label ExtensionNervous system disorders4 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adverse Event(s) and/or Serious Adverse Event(s) - Open-label ExtensionRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adverse Event(s) and/or Serious Adverse Event(s) - Open-label ExtensionGeneral disorders and administration site conditions0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adverse Event(s) and/or Serious Adverse Event(s) - Open-label ExtensionVascular disorders2 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adverse Event(s) and/or Serious Adverse Event(s) - Open-label ExtensionPsychiatric disorders2 Participants
Secondary

Plasma Trough Concentrations

Plasma trough concentrations of tesofensine, metabolite NS2360 and metoprolol for the active arm (the first 24 weeks and then continuously up to week 48) and placebo arm (start of treatment at week 25 and then continuously up to week 48). mITT observed values.

Time frame: baseline to week 48

Population: The Placebo -\> Tesofensine/Metoprolol group did not start treatment before week 25

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Tesofensine/MetoprololPlasma Trough ConcentrationsMetoprolol Week 1210.83 μg/LGeometric Coefficient of Variation 120.8
Tesofensine/MetoprololPlasma Trough ConcentrationsMetoprolol Week 249.07 μg/LGeometric Coefficient of Variation 281.4
Tesofensine/MetoprololPlasma Trough ConcentrationsMetoprolol Week 368.97 μg/LGeometric Coefficient of Variation 309.6
Tesofensine/MetoprololPlasma Trough ConcentrationsTesofensine Week 3611.01 μg/LGeometric Coefficient of Variation 54.4
Tesofensine/MetoprololPlasma Trough ConcentrationsMetoprolol Week 487.29 μg/LGeometric Coefficient of Variation 156.9
Tesofensine/MetoprololPlasma Trough ConcentrationsTesofensine Week 1212.03 μg/LGeometric Coefficient of Variation 38.6
Tesofensine/MetoprololPlasma Trough ConcentrationsNS2360 metab. Week 123.39 μg/LGeometric Coefficient of Variation 48.5
Tesofensine/MetoprololPlasma Trough ConcentrationsNS2360 metab. Week 243.96 μg/LGeometric Coefficient of Variation 71.9
Tesofensine/MetoprololPlasma Trough ConcentrationsNS2360 metab. Week 363.39 μg/LGeometric Coefficient of Variation 57.1
Tesofensine/MetoprololPlasma Trough ConcentrationsTesofensine Week 2412.34 μg/LGeometric Coefficient of Variation 55.4
Tesofensine/MetoprololPlasma Trough ConcentrationsNS2360 metab. Week 482.44 μg/LGeometric Coefficient of Variation 157.3
Tesofensine/MetoprololPlasma Trough ConcentrationsTesofensine Week 486.78 μg/LGeometric Coefficient of Variation 394.7
PlaceboPlasma Trough ConcentrationsMetoprolol Week 487.30 μg/LGeometric Coefficient of Variation 578.8
PlaceboPlasma Trough ConcentrationsTesofensine Week 3619.10 μg/LGeometric Coefficient of Variation 56.1
PlaceboPlasma Trough ConcentrationsTesofensine Week 4815.11 μg/LGeometric Coefficient of Variation 70.2
PlaceboPlasma Trough ConcentrationsNS2360 metab. Week 366.51 μg/LGeometric Coefficient of Variation 56.3
PlaceboPlasma Trough ConcentrationsNS2360 metab. Week 486.02 μg/LGeometric Coefficient of Variation 67.7
PlaceboPlasma Trough ConcentrationsMetoprolol Week 3610.62 μg/LGeometric Coefficient of Variation 206
Secondary

Quality of Life - SF-36

Change in quality of life by use of the Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) scores from baseline to week 24, from baseline to week 48, and from week 24 to week 48 The physical component summary score includes the aggregated scores for scales of physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, and general health. The mental health component summary score includes the aggregated scores for scales of vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. Scores range from 0 to 100; higher score indicates better health. mITT observed values.

Time frame: from baseline to week 24, from baseline to week 48 and from week 24 to week 48

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tesofensine/MetoprololQuality of Life - SF-36Physical component from baseline to week 240.90 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.59
Tesofensine/MetoprololQuality of Life - SF-36Physical component from baseline to week 480.70 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.98
Tesofensine/MetoprololQuality of Life - SF-36Physical component from week 24 to week 48-0.21 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.8
Tesofensine/MetoprololQuality of Life - SF-36Mental component from baseline to week 24-3.08 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.44
Tesofensine/MetoprololQuality of Life - SF-36Mental component from baseline to week 48-1.46 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.74
Tesofensine/MetoprololQuality of Life - SF-36Mental component from week 24 to week 481.62 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.46
PlaceboQuality of Life - SF-36Mental component from baseline to week 480.49 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.74
PlaceboQuality of Life - SF-36Physical component from baseline to week 241.36 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.74
PlaceboQuality of Life - SF-36Mental component from baseline to week 24-0.49 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.02
PlaceboQuality of Life - SF-36Physical component from baseline to week 482.41 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.82
PlaceboQuality of Life - SF-36Mental component from week 24 to week 480.98 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.29
PlaceboQuality of Life - SF-36Physical component from week 24 to week 481.05 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.64
Comparison: From baseline to week 24; mITT LOCF. (Physical component score)p-value: 0.84295% CI: [-5.55, 6.73]ANCOVA
Comparison: From baseline to week 24; mITT LOCF. (Mental component score)p-value: 0.669395% CI: [-10.15, 6.67]ANCOVA
Comparison: From baseline to week 48; mITT LOCF. (Physical component score)p-value: 0.544495% CI: [-8.12, 4.46]ANCOVA
Comparison: From baseline to week 48; mITT LOCF. (Mental component score)p-value: 0.559595% CI: [-8.47, 4.76]ANCOVA
Comparison: Week 24 to week 48; mITT LOCF. (Physical component score)p-value: 0.433195% CI: [-7.54, 3.41]ANCOVA
Comparison: Week 24 to week 48; mITT LOCF. (Mental component score)p-value: 0.642795% CI: [-7.9, 5.03]ANCOVA
Secondary

Thirst

Change in thirst by the use of a visual analog scale (VAS) from baseline to week 24, from baseline to week 48, and from week 24 to week 48 The VAS consisted of a 100-mm horizontal line; subjects placed a vertical line on the VAS to indicate the level of intensity of their thirst. The VAS value is the distance in mm (0-100 mm) from the left end of the line to the subject's vertical line (higher value represents an increase in perception of thirst). mITT observed values.

Time frame: from baseline to week 24, from baseline to week 48 and from week 24 to week 48

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tesofensine/MetoprololThirstFrom baseline to week 24-2.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.9
Tesofensine/MetoprololThirstFrom baseline to week 48-6.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.8
Tesofensine/MetoprololThirstFrom week 24 to week 48-3.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.5
PlaceboThirstFrom baseline to week 24-18.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.2
PlaceboThirstFrom baseline to week 48-16.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.8
PlaceboThirstFrom week 24 to week 482.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.5
Comparison: Baseline to Week 24; mITT observed.p-value: 0.808295% CI: [-24.65, 19.53]ANCOVA
Comparison: Baseline to Week 48; mITT LOCF.p-value: 0.903495% CI: [-25.94, 23.1]ANCOVA
Comparison: Week 24 to week 48; mITT LOCF.p-value: 0.465895% CI: [-26.93, 12.93]ANCOVA
Secondary

Waist Circumference

Change in waist circumference from baseline to week 24, from baseline to week 48, and from week 24 to week 48. mITT observed values.

Time frame: from baseline to week 24, from baseline to week 48 and from week 24 to week 48

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tesofensine/MetoprololWaist CircumferenceFrom baseline to week 24-7.08 cmStandard Deviation 6.93
Tesofensine/MetoprololWaist CircumferenceFrom baseline to week 48-5.75 cmStandard Deviation 5.26
Tesofensine/MetoprololWaist CircumferenceFrom week 24 to week 481.33 cmStandard Deviation 4.01
PlaceboWaist CircumferenceFrom baseline to week 24-1.17 cmStandard Deviation 4.4
PlaceboWaist CircumferenceFrom baseline to week 48-3.00 cmStandard Deviation 6.51
PlaceboWaist CircumferenceFrom week 24 to week 48-1.83 cmStandard Deviation 2.64
Comparison: Baseline to Week 24; mITT LOCF.p-value: 0.053795% CI: [-11.46, 0.1]ANCOVA
Comparison: Baseline to Week 48; mITT LOCF.p-value: 0.377295% CI: [-8.98, 3.61]ANCOVA
Comparison: Week 24 to week 48; mITT LOCF.p-value: 0.117195% CI: [-0.85, 6.91]ANCOVA

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 15, 2026