Skip to content

The Deep Sedation for Ablation Study

DExmEdetomidine Sedation Versus Propofol SEDATION FOR Catheter ABLATION of Atrial Fibrillation Under a Cardiologist Supervision: A Randomized Controlled Pilot STUDY

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03844841
Enrollment
160
Registered
2019-02-19
Start date
2019-07-01
Completion date
2020-12-31
Last updated
2021-01-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Ablation, Atrial Fibrillation, Dexmedetomidine, Propofol, Sedation

Keywords

Atrial Fibrillation, Ablation, Sedation, Anesthesia, Propofol, Dexmedetomidine

Brief summary

Catheter ablation (CA) is an established therapeutic option for patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF). During the procedure, patients are usually sedated and analgesized, most commonly by administration of Propofol combined with opioids under the supervision of the electrophysiologist. However, due to the depressive effect of Propofol on the respiratory system, this regimen is not without risk. Dexmedetomidine is a highly selective alpha 2 agonist that demonstrates both analgesic and hypnotic properties with only weak effect on the respiratory system. The pharmacological profile of Dexmedetomidine may be advantageous for sedation during CA of AF. The aim of this randomized trial is to test this hypothesis and explore the safety and efficacy of Dexmedetomidine during CA of AF.

Detailed description

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia. In symptomatic patients, electroanatomic mapping aided catheter ablation (CA) is an established therapeutic option. The intervention may last several hours, during which patients are required to lie as still as possible, as inadequate patient movements disturb the electroanatomic map, prolong the intervention and increase its complication risks. Therefore patients are usually sedated and analgesized, most commonly by administration of Propofol combined with opioids under the supervision of the electrophysiologist. Despite its wide use, this regimen is not without risk, as Propofol has a pronounced depressive effect on the respiratory system. Dexmedetomidine is a highly selective alpha 2 agonist that demonstrates both analgesic and hypnotic properties with only weak respiratory depression. By reducing sympathetic activity it also reduces the stress response to an intervention. For these reasons, Dexmedetomidine is commonly used in intensive care units, where it has been shown to be well tolerated. Consequently, its range of application has been increasingly widened and good experience has been made with its use in transfemoral valve replacement procedures or gastroenterological interventions. The pharmacological profile of dexmedetomidine may be also advantageous for sedation during CA of AF. The aim of this randomized trial is to test this hypothesis and explore the safety and efficacy of Dexmedetomidine during CA of AF.

Interventions

DRUGPropofol

At minimum 5 minutes before start of sedation for atrial fibrillation ablation a bolus of fentanyl (20-50 µg) will be administered. Thereafter, sedation is induced via the continuous infusion of propofol using a target-controlled infusion (TCI) pump. The effect-site propofol concentration will be initially set to 1.5 µg/ml, unless the patient is already sedated by fentanyl. Subsequently, an effect-site propofol concentration of 1 µg/ml will be chosen adjusted stepwise (using steps of 0.3 µg/ml) to reach a target score of 2-3 on the MOAA/S scale. In case of pain fentanyl can be administered bolus-wise (10-30 µg) at the cardiologists discretion.

DRUGDexmedetomidine

At minimum 5 minutes before start of sedation for atrial fibrillation ablation a bolus of fentanyl (20-50 µg) will be administered. Thereafter, sedation is induced with a loading dose of dexmedetomidine (0.8 µg/kg) over 10 minutes. The maintenance dexmedetomidine dose is adjusted to the appropriate sedation criteria for CA (0.4 µg/kg/h) and for a target score of 2-3 on the MOAA/S scale. In case of pain, additional fentanyl can be administered bolus-wise (10-30 µg) at the cardiologists discretion.

Sponsors

Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age ≥18 years * Informed consent as documented by signature * Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation at the Department of Cardiology, Inselspital Bern

Exclusion criteria

* Contraindication to sedation by the electrophysiologist * Contraindications to either propofol or dexmedetomidine sedation * Contraindication for targeted controlled propofol infusion (BMI \> 35) * American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification \> III * Advanced heart block (second or third degree), if no pacemaker or internal cardioverter defibrillator is implanted * Arterial hypotension (mean \< 80 mmHg) * Severe heart failure (LVEF ≤ 30%) * Indication for general anaesthesia * Pregnant or breast-feeding women

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Combined Incidence of Sedation-Emergent Adverse Events (Combined Safety Endpoint)within 24 hours after completion of procedure* Number of participants with sustained bradycardia necessitating cardiac pacing * Number of participants with Hypercapnia, defined as rise of transcutaneously measured carbon dioxide levels (tcCO2) \> 20mmHg * Number of participants with Oxygen desaturation (\<90%) necessitating assisted ventilation or further airway management in any form (including chin lift, oropharyngeal airway, bag, and mask ventilation or intubation) * Number of participants with Hypotension necessitating termination of sedation or vasopressor administration * Number of participants with necessity of termination or change of sedation protocol * Number of participants with aborted procedure due to sedation issues

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence of Sedation-Emergent Adverse Events (Individual Safety Endpoints)within 24 hours after completion of procedureAll single components of the primary endpoint
Other complicationsfrom start until end of ablation procedureNumber of complications not related to sedation (cardiac tamponade, stroke/transient ischemic attack, pericardial effusion necessitating therapeutic intervention, bleeding necessitating therapeutic intervention, others) \[number of events\]
Opiod dosefrom start until end of ablation procedureOpiod dose required for analgesia \[ug\]
Procedure durationfrom start until end of ablation procedureTotal duration of the procedure \[minutes\]
Fluoroscopy timefrom start until end of ablation procedureDuration of fluoroscopy \[minutes\]
General sedation efficacy: occurrence and number of shiftingsfrom start until end of ablation procedureGeneral sedation efficacy assessed by the occurrence and number of shiftings of the acquired 3D map due to patient movements, necessitating remapping \[number of events\]
Patient satisfaction: Patient Satisfaction with Sedation Instrument (PSSI) [score]within 24 hours after completion of procedurePatient satisfaction as assessed by the Patient Satisfaction with Sedation Instrument (PSSI) \[score\]
Blood pressurefrom start until end of ablation procedureMean systolic, diastolic and mean blood pressure during sedation and mean drop of blood pressure (pre-procedural blood pressure minus mean blood pressure during sedation) \[mmHg\]
Heart ratefrom start until end of ablation procedureMean heart rate during sedation and mean drop of heart rate (pre-procedural heart rate minus mean heart rate during sedation) \[beats per minute\]
Refractory periodfrom start until end of ablation procedureEffective refractory period of the atria and atrioventricular node \[ms\]
Wenckebach pointfrom start until end of ablation procedureWenckebach point of the atrioventricular node \[ms\]
Arrhythmia inducibilityfrom start until end of ablation procedureRate of inducibility of supraventricular arrhythmias during pacing manoeuvres (number of successful/number of attempts) \[%\]
Cardiologist satisfaction: Clinician Satisfaction with Sedation Instrument (CSSI) [score]within 24 hours after completion of procedureCardiologist satisfaction as assessed by the Clinician Satisfaction with Sedation Instrument (CSSI) \[score\]
Sedation depthfrom start until end of ablation procedureDepth of sedation assessed by the Modified Observer's Alertness/Sedation (MOAA/S) scale \[mean score\]

Countries

Switzerland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 5, 2026