Skip to content

A Clinical Effectiveness Study Examining the Efficacy and Safety of ONS-5010 in Subjects With Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration (AMD)

A Clinical Effectiveness, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-masked, Controlled Study of the Efficacy and Safety of ONS-5010 in Subjects With Subfoveal Choroidal Neovascularization (CNV) Secondary to Age-related Macular Degeneration

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03844074
Enrollment
61
Registered
2019-02-18
Start date
2018-10-01
Completion date
2020-08-13
Last updated
2025-03-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Age-related Macular Degeneration, Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration, Wet Macular Degeneration

Keywords

Subfoveal Choroidal Neovascularization

Brief summary

This research study will examine the safety and effectiveness of ONS-5010 in participants with AMD. The goal is to prevent vision loss by evaluating the effectiveness of ONS-5010 as compared with ranibizumab.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALbevacizumab

1.25 mg, intravitreal injection

BIOLOGICALranibizumab

0.5mg, intravitreal injection

Sponsors

Outlook Therapeutics, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Active primary or recurrent Subfoveal Choroidal Neovascularization lesions secondary to Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) in the study eye * Best corrected visual acuity of 20/40 to 20/320 * Study eye must: * Have active leakage on Fluorescein Angiogram involving the fovea * Have edema involving the fovea * Be free of foveal scarring * Be free of foveal atrophy

Exclusion criteria

* Previous use of anti-VEGF or bevacizumab within 6 weeks * Previous subfoveal focal laser photocoagulation in the study eye * Laser photocoagulation (juxtafoveal or extrafoveal) in the study eye within 1-month preceding randomization * Any concurrent intraocular condition in the study eye that may require medical or surgical intervention or contribute to vision loss within 1 year * Active intraocular inflammation (grade trace or above) in the study eye * Current vitreous haemorrhage in the study eye * Polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV) confirmed by indocyanine green angiography (ICGA) * History of idiopathic or autoimmune-associated uveitis in either eye * Infectious conjunctivitis, keratitis, scleritis, or endophthalmitis in either eye * Uncontrolled glaucoma in the study eye (defined as intraocular pressure ≥30 mmHg despite treatment with anti-glaucoma medication) * Premenopausal women not using adequate contraception * Current treatment for active systemic infection * Known allergy to any component of the study drug or history of allergy to fluorescein or indocyanine green, not amenable to treatment

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of subjects who gain 15 or more letters in the best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) scoreBaseline, 11 monthsBCVA to be assessed as letters read using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) charts. A positive change represents an improvement in visual acuity.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of participants who gain at least 10 letters in the best corrected visual acuity scoreBaseline, 11 monthsBCVA to be assessed as letters read using the ETDRS charts. A positive change represents an improvement in visual acuity.
Proportion of participants who gain at least 5 letters in the best corrected visual acuity scoreBaseline, 11 monthsBCVA to be assessed as letters read using the ETDRS charts. A positive change represents an improvement in visual acuity.
Mean change in the best corrected visual acuity over timeBaseline, monthly to 11 monthsBCVA to be assessed as letters read using the ETDRS charts. A positive change represents an improvement in visual acuity.
Proportion of participants with visual-acuity Snellen equivalent of 20/200 or worseBaseline, 11 months
Percentage of participants with ocular adverse events, non-ocular adverse events, grade 3 and above laboratory abnormalities, and vital sign abnormalities11 months, 12 months
Proportion of participants who lose fewer than 15 letters in the best corrected visual acuity scoreBaseline, 11 monthsBCVA to be assessed as letters read using the ETDRS charts. A negative change represents a decrease in visual acuity.

Countries

Australia

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026