Skip to content

General Versus Regional Anesthesia and Postoperative Sleep Quality

The Effect of General Versus Regional Anesthesia on Postoperative Sleep Quality

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03843645
Acronym
AnesthSleep
Enrollment
60
Registered
2019-02-18
Start date
2019-02-10
Completion date
2023-12-31
Last updated
2023-04-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anesthesia, Sleep, Sleep Disorder, Sleep Disorders, Circadian Rhythm, Sleep Disturbance, Sleep Fragmentation, Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders, Surgery

Keywords

anesthesia, general, anesthesia, regional, sleep disorder, REM stage

Brief summary

Major surgery can lead to postoperative disturbances in sleep patterns with subjective deterioration of sleep quality according to patients' reports as well as objective alterations of sleep architecture, as recorded by polysomnography Factors implicated in postoperative sleep disturbances include but are not limited to the severity of the surgical procedure, the neuroendocrine response to surgery, inadequate treatment of postoperative pain and external factors interfering with sleep, such as light, noise and therapeutic procedures There are no adequate data from current literature as to whether regional anesthesia is superior to general anesthesia regarding postoperative sleep quality in patients subjected to either mode of anesthesia. So, the aim of this study will be to assess the effect of two different anesthetic techniques (general versus regional) in patients subjected to similar operations Patients will be assessed with the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Questionnaire (PSQI), regarding preoperative and long term postoperative sleep quality and sleep diaries regarding early postoperative sleep quality

Detailed description

Major surgery can lead to postoperative disturbances in sleep patterns with subjective deterioration of sleep quality according to patients' reports as well as objective alterations of sleep architecture, as recorded by polysomnography. These disturbances include severe sleep fragmentation, rapid eye movement (REM) and slow wave sleep significant reductions in duration as well as an increase in non-REM sleep stages. Spontaneous awakenings are also frequently reported. After the third or fourth postoperative day, there is a substantial rebound in total REM activity, with frequent reports of vivid nightmares. Factors implicated in postoperative sleep disturbances include but are not limited to the severity of the surgical procedure, the neuroendocrine response to surgery, inadequate treatment of postoperative pain and external factors interfering with sleep, such as light, noise and therapeutic procedures. There are no adequate data from current literature as to whether regional anesthesia is superior to general anesthesia regarding postoperative sleep quality in patients subjected to either mode of anesthesia. There have been a few studies evaluating the effect of regional anesthesia on postoperative sleep quality after orthopedic procedures, without however comparing regional to general anesthesia in this setting. preliminary data from these studies suggest that regional anesthesia can also lead to postoperative sleep disturbances during the first postoperative nights, such as causing a reduction of REM stage. So, the aim of this study will be to assess the effect of two different anesthetic techniques (general versus regional) in patients subjected to a similar operative procedure (saphenectomy). Patients taking part in the study will be evaluated regarding their preoperative sleep quality by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Questionnaire (PSQI). The PSQI examines seven components of sleep quality retrospectively over a period of four weeks: subjective sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep duration, habitual sleep efficiency, sleep disturbances, use of sleeping medication, and daytime dysfunction over the last month. The patient self-rates each of these seven areas of sleep. Scoring of answers is based on a 0-3 scale, whereby '3' reflects the negative extreme on the Likert scale. The global score is generated by summing up all seven component scores and ranges from 0 to 21, with higher values corresponding to reduced sleep quality. Consequently, patients will be randomized to one of two groups: one group subjected to general anesthesia (maintenance with sevoflurane) and a second group subjected to combined spinal-epidural anesthesia Patients will be assessed postoperatively with sleep diaries regarding potential sleep disturbances while they will be subjected to a long-term assessment of sleep quality by the use of the PSQI one and three months postoperatively. The clinical implications of this study lie in the fact that postoperative sleep disturbances can lead to postoperative hemodynamic instability, episodic hypoxemia and mental status deterioration, which can all untowardly affect the short and long-term postoperative outcome. It would be interesting to determine whether one of the two anesthetic regimes is superior to the other as far as postoperative disturbances in sleep architecture are concerned

Interventions

PROCEDUREgeneral anesthesia

surgical procedure under general anesthesia

PROCEDUREregional anesthesia

surgical procedure under regional anesthesia

Sponsors

Aretaieion University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

The investigator completing the questionnaires will not be aware of patient group assignment

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adult patients, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) distribution I-III, scheduled for saphenectomy

Exclusion criteria

* Alcoholism * Mental disability * Psychiatric disease (depression, dementia) * Preoperative use of sleeping medication * Language barriers * Lack of informed consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
subjective sleep quality (evaluated by Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index)preoperative status, one month postoperativelychange from preoperative status of subjective sleep quality (evaluated by Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index) at one month postoperatively

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
sleep diaryfirst postoperative weeksubjective evaluation of sleep quality by patients, based on a sleep questionnaire (evaluation of sleep duration, number of nocturnal awakenings and marking of sleep quality)

Countries

Greece

Contacts

Primary ContactKassiani Theodoraki, PhD
ktheodoraki@hotmail.com+306974634162
Backup ContactAikaterini Liosi, MD
katerina_liosi@hotmail.com

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026