Skip to content

tDCS to Decrease Opioid Relapse (UG3)

tDCS to Decrease Opioid Relapse

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03842137
Enrollment
62
Registered
2019-02-15
Start date
2019-06-04
Completion date
2023-08-31
Last updated
2024-10-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Craving, Opioid Dependence

Brief summary

In the current proposal, the investigators will measure behavioral and brain responses following transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) (anode on right DLPFC, cathode on the left DLPFC) delivered during cognitive control network (CCN) priming. Participants with opioid dependence, in the first month of prescribed buprenorphine or methadone, will be assessed twice using electroencephalographic (EEG), once prior to tDCS+CCN priming and again at the completion of 5 sessions of tDCS+CCN priming (one week later). EEG will provide validation of expected changes in these networks following tDCS stimulation of the DLPFC.

Detailed description

Investigators propose to use EEG to examine oscillatory brain changes as well as self-reported craving before and after administration of five sessions of tDCS+Cognitive Control Network (CCN) priming stimulation vs. sham tDCS+CCN priming (randomized control trial) in 60 opioid dependent participants who recently initiated buprenorphine or methadone. Participants in the first month of prescribed buprenorphine or methadone will be assessed EEG, once prior to tDCS and again one week later after completion of 5 sessions of tDCS+CCN priming. EEG will be expected to provide 1) validation of expected network and oscillatory changes from tDCS-targeting and 2) an effect size for DLPFC vs sham stimulation. Go/no go criteria for the UG3 phase will be demonstration of enhanced frontal theta power during a WM task AND greater change (at least 10% difference between conditions, controlling for baseline craving) in subjective craving following the tDCS+CCN priming intervention compared to sham tDCS+CCN priming.

Interventions

DEVICEtDCS

Each participant will undergo 5 consecutive (i.e., business days) sessions of active tDCS delivered to the DLPFC. During each session, participants are engaging in tasks that activate the cognitive control network.

DEVICEsham tDCS

Each participant will undergo 5 consecutive (i.e., business days) sessions of sham tDCS delivered to the DLPFC. During each session, participants are engaging in tasks that activate the cognitive control network.

Sponsors

National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
CollaboratorNIH
Butler Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* current opioid dependence * between 21-50 years of age * recent initiation of buprenorphine or methadone (\<30 days)

Exclusion criteria

* current criteria for a DSM-V diagnosis of bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, schizo-affective, schizophreniform, or paranoid disorder * current suicidality * evidence of neurocognitive dysfunction * contraindications for tDCS (e.g seizure disorder) * probation/parole requirements or an upcoming move that might interfere with protocol participation * planning to terminate buprenorphine in less than 3 months * scalp lesions near the tDCS electrode sites

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Opioid Craving2 weekPenn Alcohol Craving (Modified for Opioids). This is a 5-item measure, with each item scored 0 to 6. Items are summed for a total score from 0 to 30. Higher scores = more craving.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
EEG Theta Brainwave Activity2 weeksTheta event rate is examined as the number of times/second that brainwaves within the theta frequency range (4-7 Hz). Higher event rates reflect more activity during working memory task.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participant recruitment started June 4, 2019 and was completed on 2/21/23. Participants were recruited from both clinical settings and through community advertisements.

Pre-assignment details

Once enrolled, participants were randomized at the beginning of their first tDCS session. If they did not attend that session, they were never randomized/assigned to a condition.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
tDCS
Each participant will undergo 5 consecutive (i.e., business days) sessions of active tDCS delivered to the DLPFC. During each session, participants are engaging in tasks that activate the cognitive control network. tDCS: Each participant will undergo 5 consecutive (i.e., business days) sessions of active tDCS delivered to the DLPFC. During each session, participants are engaging in tasks that activate the cognitive control network.
27
Sham tDCS
Each participant will undergo 5 consecutive (i.e., business days) sessions of sham tDCS delivered to the DLPFC. During each session, participants are engaging in tasks that activate the cognitive control network. sham tDCS: Each participant will undergo 5 consecutive (i.e., business days) sessions of sham tDCS delivered to the DLPFC. During each session, participants are engaging in tasks that activate the cognitive control network.
27
Not Randomized
Participants were randomized at the beginning of their first tDCS session. Enrolled participants who did not attend their first session (n=8) were never randomized.
8
Total62

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotaltDCSSham tDCSNot Randomized
Age, Continuous34.08 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.96
33.19 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.44
34.48 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.91
35.75 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.38
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
7 Participants4 Participants3 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
55 Participants23 Participants24 Participants8 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Opioid Craving9.81 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.12
11.07 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.39
8.85 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.84
8.75 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.88
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
6 Participants1 Participants3 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
4 Participants2 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
2 Participants1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
50 Participants23 Participants22 Participants5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
62 participants27 participants27 participants8 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
25 Participants9 Participants14 Participants2 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
37 Participants18 Participants13 Participants6 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 270 / 27
other
Total, other adverse events
1 / 272 / 27
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 270 / 27

Outcome results

Primary

Opioid Craving

Penn Alcohol Craving (Modified for Opioids). This is a 5-item measure, with each item scored 0 to 6. Items are summed for a total score from 0 to 30. Higher scores = more craving.

Time frame: 2 week

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
tDCSOpioid Craving8.92 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1
Sham tDCSOpioid Craving8.32 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.12
p-value: 0.00895% CI: [-0.91, -0.15]Regression, Linear
Secondary

EEG Theta Brainwave Activity

Theta event rate is examined as the number of times/second that brainwaves within the theta frequency range (4-7 Hz). Higher event rates reflect more activity during working memory task.

Time frame: 2 weeks

Population: theta burst rate (per second) during the 2-back delay part of the working memory task

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
tDCSEEG Theta Brainwave Activity.38 events per secondStandard Deviation 0.06
Sham tDCSEEG Theta Brainwave Activity.33 events per secondStandard Deviation 0.05
p-value: 0.005ANCOVA

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026