Skip to content

Comparation Analgesia Efficiency With Propofol Combine Sevoflurane vs Propofol

Comparation Analgesia Efficiency With Propofol Combine Sevoflurane vs Propofol Using Index of Nociception (NOX)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03841812
Enrollment
146
Registered
2019-02-15
Start date
2020-01-20
Completion date
2020-07-01
Last updated
2020-10-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Analgesic Adverse Reaction, Inhalant Use, Nociceptive Pain

Brief summary

This study purpose to compare analgesia efficiency of propofol combine with sevoflurane with propofol only using index of Nociception (NOX)

Detailed description

1. Recently study found sevoflurane plays an important role through spinal nerve peptide receptor (NK.1R), glycine receptor (GlyR), neuron nicotinic receptor (nnAChRs), Methyl-1-methyl-1-day aspartate (NMDA receptor), and TRPV1 receptor (TRPV1 receptor) produce the analgesic efficiency. 2. propofol was traditional sedation reagent. 3. index of Nociception (NOX) was the objective index for analgesia This study purpose to compare analgesia efficiency of Only Propofol and sevoflurane combine with propofol using index of Nociception (NOX)

Interventions

DRUG5mg/kg/h Propofol

5mg/kg/h Propofol continuously infused during intre-operation

DRUGSevoflurane

1% Sevoflurane continuously using during intre-operation.

DRUG2 mg/kg/h Propofol

2mg/kg/h Propofol continuously infused during intre-operation

Sponsors

China International Neuroscience Institution
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Participants were aged 18-65 years old, * American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I, II or III * scheduled to have urological surgery(would last longer than 1 h) * requiring general anesthesia.

Exclusion criteria

* refused to participate in this study; * Unable to communicate normally because of consciousness alterations; * a history of allergy to opioids * contraindications to inhalational anesthesia * a family history of malignant hyperthermia * a history of alcohol or drug abuse * received central nervous system-active drugs * super obese as defined by a body mass index ≥40 kg/m2 * conditions liable to alter the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic behaviors of the intravenous and inhalation anesthetics * previous head injury * neurologic * psychiatric disease * any disabling central nervous * cerebrovascular disease * using psychoactive * anti-convulsive medications at the time * unstable angina * manifested congestive heart failure * expected difficulty airway management

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
qNOX changeduring operationNociception of index (qNOX) difference between two groups. The nociception index (NOX) derived from electroencephalogram (EEG) signals has been proposed as a noninvasive guide to indicate anesthesia depth. The neurological processing of noxious stimuli is defined as nociception. NOX ranges from 0-99, and the lower the index, the deeper the state of analgesia. NOX lower than 20 represents deep analgesia, and higher than 80 represents inadequate analgesia.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
PACU duration24 hoursPost anesthesia care unit duration(PACU duration). The longer PACU duration indicate the worse situation of the patients
PONV difference between two groups24 hourspostoperative nausea and vomiting ratio(PONV) difference between two groups. The more frequency of PONV, the worst comfortable outcome of the patients
Post- operative pain difference between two groups24 hoursPost- operative pain difference between two groups using VAS(Visual analogue rating) Score evaluation. Pain was assessed 24 h post operation using a 0-10 numeric pain rating scale (VAS scale), where zero meant no pain and 10 meant the worst imaginable pain.VAS score (Post-operation 24 h) (0-1 VAS indicate None pain; 2-5 VAS indicate Moderate pain; 6-10 VAS indicate severe pain)

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026