Skip to content

Efficacy of Augmented Feedback on Lumbar Postural and Movement Control During Physiotherapy and Home Exercise

Efficacy of Augmented Feedback on Lumbar Postural and Movement Control During Physiotherapy and Home Exercise - A Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03841552
Enrollment
20
Registered
2019-02-15
Start date
2012-10-01
Completion date
2013-04-30
Last updated
2019-02-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Low Back Pain

Keywords

Low Back Pain

Brief summary

Exercise therapy is effective in improving pain experience and disability in patients with non-specific low back pain (NSLBP) and movement/postural control impairments. However, patients often find traditional exercises monotonous and discontinue their execution. Augmented feedback tools (AF) might improve patient adherence and therapy outcomes, but evidence is currently lacking on their effects on movement/postural control. In a pilot randomised controlled trial (RCT) on a population of patients with NSLBP and movement control impairment, treatment with physiotherapy and home exercise supported by AF is compared to traditional physiotherapy and home exercise treatment without AF (control group). The primary outcomes are defined as lumbar movement control and postural control, measured using an inertial measurement system.

Interventions

An inertial measurement unit (IMU) system is the basis of the augmented feedback (AF) system, where the IMU-system communicates with a laptop using a bluetooth dongle. The corresponding software includes therapeutic games. Movements of the lower back and pelvis by the patient are used to control an avatars movement or the graphical interface in computer exercises. The AF-system provides real-time feedback regarding the patient's performance and helps to rectify incorrect execution of the exercises. The intervention took place at a physiotherapy clinic and in an home environment. In the physiotherapy clinic the patients exercised under the supervision of the physiotherapists. They continued the exercises at home as home exercises.

OTHERControl Group

Conventional impairment-specific physiotherapy exercises for low back pain patients.The control intervention took place at a physiotherapy clinic and in an home environment. In the physiotherapy clinic the patients exercised under the supervision of the physiotherapists. They continued the exercises at home as home exercises.

Sponsors

Danube University Krems
CollaboratorOTHER
MedBase Brunngasse Winterthur
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Zurich University of Applied Sciences
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

The investigators who collected the outcome data, as well as the statistician were blinded to group allocation.

Intervention model description

Randomized controlled pilot trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* non specific low back pain for at least four weeks * at least moderate disability (as indicated by an Oswestry disability index (ODI) \> 8% (Mannion et al., 2006)) * low levels of biopsychosocial risk factors (STarT Back Screening tool \> 4 points) (Hill et al., 2011) * at least two positive movement control impairment tests (Luomajoki et al., 2008, Sahrmann, 2002)

Exclusion criteria

* specific low back pain * pain in other areas of the body (e.g. neck, head, thoracic spine or arms) * vertigo or equilibrium disturbances * systemic diseases (e.g. tumours and diabetes) * injuries * surgeries of the legs within the last six months * medication affecting postural control * pregnancy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change from Baseline ratio of the range of motion (ROM) of the stabilized lumbar spine (ROMLS) over the moving body segment, the hip (ROMHip)From Baseline to the completion of nine physiotherapy sessions, which are completed after a maximum of five weeks (Swiss standard prescription)Movement control was quantified using the ratio of the range of motion (ROM) of the stabilized lumbar spine (ROMLS) over the moving body segment, the hip (ROMHip) during the movement control test (lumbar spine (LS) over the hip)
Changes from Baseline of the mean absolute deviation of lumbar agular displacementFrom Baseline to the completion of nine physiotherapy sessions, which are completed after a maximum of five weeks (Swiss standard prescription)Postural control was quantified using the mean absolute deviation of lumbar angular displacement (MAD)

Countries

Switzerland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026