Skip to content

Simultaneous Portal and Hepatic Vein Versus Portal Vein Embolizations for Hypertrophy of the Future Liver Remnant

Simultaneous Portal and Hepatic Vein Embolization Versus Portal Vein Embolization for Hypertrophy of the Future Liver Remnant Before Major Hepatectomy of Non-cirrhotic Liver : a Multicentric Comparative Randomized Phase II Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03841305
Acronym
HYPER-LIV01
Enrollment
64
Registered
2019-02-15
Start date
2019-04-29
Completion date
2024-10-10
Last updated
2025-01-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Liver Metastasis Colon Cancer

Keywords

Liver, Interventional radiology, Portal vein embolization, Portal and hepatic vein embolization, Future liver remnant, Surgery, Non-cirrhotic liver, Liver metastases, Colorectal cancer, Liver Regeneration, Liver resection

Brief summary

The hypothesis is that liver venous deprivation (LVD) could strongly improve hypertrophy of the future remnant liver (FRL) at 3 weeks, as compared to portal vein embolization (PVE) in patient with liver metastases from colo-rectal origin considered as resectable.

Detailed description

Portal vein embolization (PVE) has been widely used to generate hypertrophy of the nonembolized lobe in patients undergoing major hepatectomy in order to prevent small-for-size remnant liver resulting in post-operative liver insufficiency. Although PVE is a safe and effective procedure, it does not always induce sufficient hypertrophy of the future remnant liver (FRL) even after a long time. In case of insufficient liver regeneration following PVE, some authors suggested to embolize hepatic vein(s) (Hwang, Ann Surg 2009). Interestingly, the sequential right hepatic vein embolization (HVE) after right PVE demonstrated an incremental effect on the FRL. Although attractive, this approach requires two different procedures and does not spare time as compared to PVE alone. To shorten and optimize the phase of liver preparation before surgery,the so-called liver venous deprivation (LVD) technique that combines both PVE and HVE during the same procedure was developed. The aim of this randomized phase II trial is to compare the percentage of change in FRL volume at 3 weeks after LVD or PVE using MRI or CT-scan.

Interventions

PROCEDURELiver preparation before major hepatectomy

Simultaneous portal and hepatic vein embolization versus Portal vein embolization, also called venous deprivation OR portal vein embolization.

Sponsors

Federation Francophone de Cancerologie Digestive
CollaboratorOTHER
University Hospital, Montpellier
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Liver metastases from colo-rectal origin considered as resectable (as validated by a multidisciplinary committee with at least one senior hepatic surgeon) provided sufficient FRL volume * Percentage of FRL volume \< 30% * Age ≥ 18 years * General health status World Health Organisation 0,1 * Estimated life expectancy \> 3 months * Patients whose biological parameters are : * Platelets ≥100,000/mm3, * Polynuclear neutrophils ≥ 1000/mm3, * Hemoglobin≥ 9g/dL (even transfused patients can be included) * Creatininemia \< 1.5 times the normal value * Creatinine clearance \> 30 milliliters (mL)/min * Bilirubinemia ≤ 1,5 times the normal value * liver transaminases ≤ 5 times the normal value * prothrombin rate \> 70% * Reference liver CT-Scan or MRI done during the 30 days preceding PVE or LVD. * Written informed consent * National health insurance cover

Exclusion criteria

* Patient with cirrhosis * Presence of clinical ascites * Ongoing participation or participation within the 21 days prior to inclusion in the study in another therapeutic trial with an experimental drug * Serious non-stabilized disease, active uncontrolled infection or other serious underlying disorder likely to prevent the patient from receiving the treatment * Pregnancy (betaHCG positive), breast-feeding or the absence of effective contraception for women of child-bearing age * Contraindication for the MRI : Pacemaker or neurosensorial stimulator or implantable defibrillator, cochlear implant, ferromagnetic foreign body similar to the nervous structure. * Allergy or contra-indication to iodine contrast agents (thyrotoxicosis, allergy to the active substance or excipients) * Treatment with anticoagulants (heparin or AVK) that cannot be interrupted for 48 hours * Treatment with anti-platelets that cannot be interrupted for 5 days for aspirin or Plavix * Legal incapacity (persons in custody or under guardianship) * Deprived of liberty Subject (by judicial or administrative decision) * Impossibility to sign the informed consent document or to adhere to the medical follow-up of the trial for geographical, social or psychological reasons

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
increase in volume of the future remnant liver (FRL)at 3 weeks after liver venous deprivation (LVD) or portal vein embolization (PVE) using MRI or CT-scanThe primary outcomes is to compare the increase in volume of the future remnant liver (FRL)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Post-operative mortality90 days after surgeryPost-operative mortality defined as any death within 90 days after surgery or within the hospital stay
Post-operative morbidity90 days after surgeryPost-operative morbidity defined as the percentages of grade I/II/III/IV/V complications according to Clavien-Dindo classification within the 90 days after surgery or within the hospital stay.
Post-hepatectomy liver failurebetween the day of the surgery and 90 days after surgeryPost-hepatectomy liver failure defined according to the 50-50 criteria or peak bilirubin \>7mg/dL.
Rate of non-resectability due to insufficient FRLbetween the day of the treatment and the day of the surgeryRate of non-resectability due to insufficient FRL defined as the percentage of patients for whom resection will be not attempted due to insufficient FRL
Rate of non-resectability due to tumor progressionbetween the day of the treatment and the day of the surgeryRate of non-resectability due to tumor progression defined as the percentage of patients for whom resection will not be attempted due to tumor progression.
Rate of per-operative difficultiesbetween the day of the surgery and 90 days after surgeryRate of per-operative difficulties defined as the percentage of patients for whom per-operative difficulties are encountered by the surgeon
Blood loos, operating time, transfusionthe day of the surgeryBlood loss are evaluated in mL. Operating time avec evaluated in minutes and transfusion are evaluated by number of packed red blood cells
Tolerancebetween the day of liver preparation and 90 days after surgeryToxicities are evaluated according to NCI-CTCAE version 4.03 published 14 June 2010
R1 resection ratethe day of the surgeryRate of R1 resection defined as the percentage of patients resected with margin \<1mm
Pre and post-operative liver volumesBaseline, week 1, week 3 then every 2 weeks until surgery or week 7 and 4 weeks after surgeryPre and post-operative liver volumes will be evaluated through CT or MRI acquisitions by calculating whole liver, tumor and FRL volumes
Recurrence-free survival90 days after surgeryRecurrence-free survival defined as the time from date of randomization to date of recurrence or death from their tumor. Patients alive will be censored at the date of last news.
Overall survivalBetween the liver preparation and 90 days after surgeryOverall survival defined as the time from date of randomization to date of death from any cause. Patients alive will be censored at the date of last news.
Evaluation of pre and post-operative liver functionBaseline, week 1, week 3 then every 2 weeks until surgery or week 7 and 4 weeks after surgeryEvaluation of pre and post-operative liver function will be evaluated using 99mTc mebrofenine scintigraphy through SPECT/CT acquisitions by calculating mebrofenin clearance in %/min/m² of whole liver and FRL at the same time points as CT/MRI
To search for biomarkers predictive of liver hypertrophy/regeneration and immune cell responseThe day of liver preparation, on day 1, day 2 and day 3 after liver preparation and the day of surgeryBiomarkers predictive of liver hypertrophy/regeneration are evaluated by blood samples and liver biopies
R0 resection ratethe day of the surgeryRate of R0 resection defined as no microscopic tumor residual

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 27, 2026