Skip to content

Development of the Palate in Bilateral Orofacial Cleft Newborns One Year After Early Neonatal Cheiloplasty

Three-dimensional Development of the Palate in Bilateral Orofacial Cleft Newborns One Year After Early Neonatal Cheiloplasty: Classic and Geometric Morphometric Evaluation

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03839290
Enrollment
137
Registered
2019-02-15
Start date
2016-09-30
Completion date
2019-05-31
Last updated
2019-02-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cleft Lip, Cleft Lip and Palate, Cleft Lip, Bilateral, Cleft Palate

Keywords

bilateral cleft lip and palate, unilateral cleft lip and palate, 3D geometric morphometrics, upper dental arch, classical morphometrics, early neonatal cheiloplasty

Brief summary

Early neonatal cheiloplasty is modified surgery protocol applied in the first week of newborn's life used for treating orofacial cleft patients. This prospective study analyzes the effects of early neonatal cheiloplasty on the growth and development of maxilla and palate during the observed period of one year.

Detailed description

Multidisciplinary treatment of patients with orofacial clefts begins immediately after birth. The first surgical procedure is early neonatal cheiloplasty applied in the first week of the newborn's life, which has been practiced in the Czech Republic for many years. It is a popular parental choice and has a lot of benefits compared to classic cheiloplasty performed between 3-6 months. Unrestricted growth of jaws is essential for the successful therapy of aesthetics and functions. Although there are known a lot of benefits to this surgery, its influence on facial growth is still being studied. The methodology of this study is based on modern three-dimensional imaging methods and will be evaluated by classic and geometric morphometric analysis of virtual dental models. The existing database includes 137 virtual dental casts (complete and incomplete bilateral or unilateral cleft lip and palate). The main aim is to verify that the effects of early neonatal cheiloplasty on the facial or palatal growth are minimal in affected individuals and therefore the subsequent development of these structures can be predicted at a later age. Other goals are to evaluate palatal morphology before and one year after early neonatal cheiloplasty, to assess growth of maxilla and palate using classic and geometric morphometry, to assess morphological differences between cleft types and to compare the results with previously published data of neonates operated by later operation protocol and noncleft control groups.

Interventions

PROCEDUREEarly neonatal cheiloplasty

Sponsors

Anthropology and Human Genetics
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Otorhinolaryngology, 2nd Faculty of Medicine
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Department of Newborns with Intensive Care Unit
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Charles University, Czech Republic
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
OTHER
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
No minimum to 1 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Nonsyndromic orofacial cleft * Czech origin * Operated by the same surgeon * Following same surgery protocol (modified Veau surgery protocol) * Excellent body temperature, blood pressure, oxygen saturation, heart function * Performing of early neonatal cheiloplasty

Exclusion criteria

* Poor health * Syndromic orofacial cleft * Operated by later operation protocol (3-6 months) * Non-Czech origin

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Growth changes during the first year of lifeT0 before early neonatal cheiloplasty (5 ± 5 days) and T1 before palatoplasty (12 ± 6 months).Analysis of palatal growth changes in individuals with orofacial clefts after neonatal cheiloplasty (5 ± 5 days) and before palatoplasty (12 ± 6 months).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Comparison of the palatal growth in orofacial cleft patients1 yearComparison of the growth of the palate in complete and incomplete cleft patients
Differences between cleft types1 yearMorphological differences between complete and incomplete cleft types

Countries

Czechia

Contacts

Primary ContactLenka Jaklová
jaklovale@natur.cuni.cz723899485

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026