Skip to content

The Effect of Education and Counseling on Reducing Pain and Anxiety in Women Undergoing Hysterosalpingography

The Effect of Education and Counseling on Reducing Pain and Anxiety in Women Undergoing Hysterosalpingography

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03839147
Enrollment
105
Registered
2019-02-15
Start date
2016-05-01
Completion date
2017-01-01
Last updated
2020-03-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Women's Health

Keywords

hysterosalpingography, anxiety, pain, education, counseling

Brief summary

This study investigates the effect of education and counseling on anxiety and pain in women undergoing hysterosalpingography as part of the infertility process.

Detailed description

Fertility and having a child is a significant experience for most individuals; however, many struggle to achieve pregnancy. Infertility is defined as the inability of a couple to conceive after 12 months of regular unprotected sexual intercourse or to carry a pregnancy to term. It is estimated that 10-15 % of the couples globally experience infertility. In Turkey, it is estimated that 10-20% of the couples are diagnosed with infertility. In the evaluation of infertile couples, hysterosalpingography (HSG) is a simple, safe, and minimally invasive radiologic procedure to visualize uterine cavity and tubes after contrast enhancement. HSG plays an important diagnostic role in finding the cause of infertility and in deciding the line of management. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of education and counseling on anxiety and pain before the treatment of women who will have HSG procedure with the diagnosis of infertility. This randomized controlled study was conducted at Gulhane Training and Research Hospital, Obstetrics and Gynecology clinic between May 2016 and January 2017. Volunteer women undergoing HSG as part of infertility evaluation have been included. Participants were randomly assigned to the intervention or the control group using a computer-generated list. A data collection form including socio-demographic and obstetric characteristics such as age, educational status, duration of infertility, previous pregnancies, births, abortion/curettage numbers, Spielberger State Anxiety Scale and Visual Analog Scale scores was used for each patient. After obtaining written informed consent, the data collection form, Spielberger State Anxiety Scale and VAS scoring scale were applied to both groups by face to face interview during the day giving appointment for HSG. Immediately after the questionnaires were applied, the nurse gave individual education and counseling were giving by the nurse researcher to intervention group for 30 minutes. Participants in the control group received standard care (verbal information about procedure and a short written information about the procedure) and no intervention (education and counseling) was performed.The IBM SPSS (Statistical package for the Social Sciences) 22.0 package program was used to evaluate the data obtained in the study.

Interventions

After obtaining informed consent, the data collection form, Spielberger State Anxiety Scale and VAS scoring scale were applied to both groups by face to face interview during the day giving appointment for HSG. Immediately after the questionnaires were answered, individual education and counseling were giving by the nurse researcher to intervention group for 30 minutes. In addition, the education and counseling given to the participants by the researcher was repeated briefly on the morning of the HSG procedure and any questions of the patients were answered.

Sponsors

Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi Gulhane Tip Fakultesi
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Intervention model description

This randomized controlled study was conducted at Gulhane Training and Research Hospital, Obstetrics and Gynecology clinic between May 2016 and January 2017. The CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) guidelines for reporting randomised controlled trials (RCTs) has been used to describe the methods.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 45 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* being diagnosed with infertility * negative the result of the B-HCG testing * being able to understand, read and write in Turkish

Exclusion criteria

* not wanting to be included in the study * not accepting education/counseling * not knowing Turkish * having additional diseases related to pelvic pain

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Spielberger State Anxiety Scale30 minutesAfter completing the HSG procedure, participants filled out the Spielberger State Anxiety Scale. The Spielberger state anxiety scale was developed in 1964 by Spielberger. There are 20 statements in the scale that individuals can use to express their feelings. The State Scale measures the level of anxiety related to the situation and has been scored by four options for each expression. These are: None (1), Slightly (2), Many (3), Completely (4). The statements in this section are divided directly and reversed. Reversed statements are 1, 2, 5, 8, 10, 11, 15, 16, 19, and 20. The total score of the expressions which are reversed from the total score of the direct expressions and adding the number 50 which is the constant value of the state anxiety scale. Spielberger and his colleagues stated that 0-19 points obtained from the scale meant no anxiety, 20-39 points meant light, 40-59 points meant medium, 60-79 points meant heavy anxiety.
Visual Analog Scale for pain intensity10 minutesAfter completing the HSG procedure, participants were asked to evaluate their pain in order to characterize pain intensity using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Patients indicated the maximum pain intensity experienced during the HSG by making a vertical line on the VAS. A standard ten-point visual analogue scale (VAS) of 0 to 10 was designed and used to assess the patients' perceptions of discomfort during the procedure. A high score on the scale indicated a high level of discomfort and a score of 0 denoted no discomfort at all. Patients indicate the degree of pain they feel between 0-10.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026