Skip to content

Study in Cat-Allergic Patients With Asthma to Evaluate the Efficacy of a Single Dose of REGN1908-1909 to Reduce Bronchoconstriction Upon Cat Allergen Challenge

A Phase 2, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group Study in Cat-Allergic Patients With Asthma to Evaluate the Efficacy of a Single Dose of REGN1908-1909 to Reduce Bronchoconstriction Upon Cat Allergen Challenge

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03838731
Enrollment
56
Registered
2019-02-12
Start date
2019-02-12
Completion date
2020-04-06
Last updated
2021-07-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cat Allergy, Mild Asthma

Brief summary

The primary objective is to evaluate the prophylactic efficacy of REGN1908-1909 (anti-Fel d 1) administered as a single dose on day 1 in cat-allergic asthmatic patients not living with a cat in the prevention of a Controlled Cat Allergen Challenge-induced early asthmatic response (EAR) assessed by measures of lung function (FEV1) compared to placebo-treated patients. Secondary Efficacy Objectives: * To evaluate the prophylactic efficacy of REGN1908-1909 administered as a single dose on day 1 in cat-allergic asthmatic patients not living with a cat, in the prevention of a Controlled Cat Allergen Challenge-induced: Allergic rhinitis and Ocular symptoms * To evaluate the prophylactic efficacy of REGN1908-1909 administered as a single dose on day 1 in cat-allergic asthmatic patients not living with a cat to increase the exposure to cat allergen, measured as a product of minute ventilation and time, required to induce EAR in a Controlled Cat Allergen Challenge as compared to placebo patients Secondary Safety Objective: * To evaluate the safety and tolerability of REGN1908-1909 vs. placebo in patients with cat allergen-triggered asthma

Interventions

Single subcutaneous (SC) dose of REGN1908 and REGN1909

DRUGPlacebo

Single subcutaneous (SC) dose of matching placebo

Sponsors

Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria: * Documented or patient reported history (for at least 2 years) of symptomatic cat allergen-triggered asthma with rhinitis with or without conjunctivitis * No cat exposure at home for the past year and must continue having no exposure at home during the study; cat exposure outside of the home shall be avoided for at least one week prior to any Cat Allergen Challenge and during the defined follow-up period * Less than 10 pack-years of smoking history Key

Exclusion criteria

* Positive human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) test * Positive hepatitis test (HBsAg and hepatitis C antibody) * History of significant multiple and/or severe allergies (including latex gloves) or has had an anaphylactic reaction or significant intolerability to prescription or nonprescription drugs or food * Participation in a prior REGN1908-1909 clinical trial * History of severe anaphylactic or severe asthmatic reactions to cat exposure * Active lung disease other than asthma * Treatment with an investigational drug within 2 months or within 5 half-lives (if known), whichever is longer, prior to screening * Persistent chronic or recurring acute infection requiring treatment with antibiotics, antivirals, or antifungals, or any untreated respiratory infections within 4 weeks prior to screening * History of life-threatening asthma, defined as an asthma episode that required intubation and/or was associated with hypercapnia, respiratory arrest, and/or hypoxic seizures * Treatment of asthma requiring systemic (oral or parenteral) corticosteroid treatment more than twice within 12 months or once within 3 months prior to screening or has been hospitalized or has attended the ER/Urgent Care facility for asthma more than twice in prior 12 months before screening. * History of hypersensitivity to corticosteroids or antihistamines, or drug treatment excipient Note: Other protocol defined Inclusion/

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to Early Asthmatic Response (EAR) Upon Controlled Cat Allergen Challenge in an Environmental Exposure Unit (EEU) on Day 8Day 8Time to EAR was defined as the time to a ≥20% reduction in FEV1 or when the participant voluntarily departed the EEU due to clinically significant allergic and/or asthmatic symptoms.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to EAR Upon Controlled Cat Allergen Challenge in an EEU on Days 29, 57, and 85Days 29, 57 and 85Time to EAR was defined as the time to a ≥20% reduction in FEV1 or when the participant voluntarily departed the EEU due to clinically significant allergic and/or asthmatic symptoms
Percent Change in Normalized Area Under the Curve (AUC) of Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Induced by a Controlled Cat Allergen Challenge Over Exposure Interval From Baseline to Controlled Cat Allergen Challenge on Days 8, 29, 57, and 85Days 8, 29, 57, and 85The AUC was analyzed by mixed-effect model repeated measures (MMRM) with the treatment, time, treatment-by-time interaction, and day of challenge as factors and baseline FEV1 AUC as a continuous covariate.
Change in Normalized Area Under the Curve (AUC) of Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Induced by a Controlled Cat Allergen Challenge Over Exposure Interval From Baseline to Controlled Cat Allergen Challenge on Days 8, 29, 57, and 85Days 8, 29, 57, and 85The AUC was analyzed by mixed-effect model repeated measures (MMRM) with the treatment, time, treatment-by-time interaction, and day of challenge as factors and baseline FEV1 AUC as a continuous covariate.
Change From Baseline in the Normalized AUC of Patient-Assessed Nasal Symptoms Induced by a Controlled Cat Allergen Challenge Over the Exposure Interval to the Controlled Cat Allergen Challenge on Days 8, 29, 57, and 85Days 8, 29, 57 and 85Individual nasal symptoms, including rhinorrhea, nasal congestion, nasal itching, and sneezing were evaluated on a 4-point Likert scale (0, none; 1, mild; 2, moderate; and 3, severe) and combined to give the Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS) with a maximum score of 12. Scale range is 0-12. The higher the score, the more severe the symptoms.
Change From Baseline in the Normalized AUC in Patient-Assessed Ocular Symptoms Induced by a Controlled Cat Allergen Challenge Over the Exposure Interval to the Controlled Cat Allergen Challenge on Days 8, 29, 57, and 85Days 8, 29, 57 and 85Individual ocular symptoms for itching/burning, redness, swelling/puffiness, and tearing/watery eyes were evaluated on a 4-point Likert scale (0, none; 1, mild; 2, moderate; and 3, severe) and combined to give the TOSS, with a maximum score of 12. Score range is 0-12. The higher the score, the more severe the symptoms.
Mean Change From Baseline in Cat Allergen Quantity as Experienced by Participants During Exposure on Days 8, 29, 57, and 85Days 8, 29, 57 and 85Cat Allergen Exposure Tolerated in ng = Minute Ventilation (L/min) x Allergen Concentration (ng/m3) x Time in EEU (minutes), where 1 L/min = 0.001 m3/min. The change in cat allergen quantity (tolerated exposure) from the baseline Cat Allergen Challenge, will be analyzed using a similar MMRM model with treatment, visit and treatment by-visit interaction as factors and the cat allergen quantity tolerated in the baseline Controlled Cat Allergen Challenge as a covariate.
Percent Change in Cat Allergen Quantity as Experienced by Participants During Exposure on Days 8, 29, 57, and 85Days 8, 29, 57 and 85Cat Allergen Exposure Tolerated in ng = Minute Ventilation (L/min) x Allergen Concentration (ng/m3) x Time in EEU (minutes), where 1 L/min = 0.001 m3/min. The change in cat allergen quantity (tolerated exposure) from the baseline Cat Allergen Challenge, will be analyzed using a similar MMRM model with treatment, visit and treatment by-visit interaction as factors and the cat allergen quantity tolerated in the baseline Controlled Cat Allergen Challenge as a covariate.
Number of Non-Serious and Serious Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Through End of StudyBaseline to 16 weeksAdverse events and serious adverse events were collected from the time of informed consent signature and then at each visit until the end of the study with the exception of symptoms that occurred in response to the EEU within 24 hours following the EEU.

Countries

France

Participant flow

Recruitment details

A total of 130 participants were screened for study eligibility. Screen failures were mostly attributed to eligibility criteria not being met. The study was conducted at one site in France.

Pre-assignment details

A total of 56 participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive a single dose of either 600 milligrams (mg) of REGN1908-1909 or matching placebo.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo
Participants received a single dose of matching placebo
27
REGN1908-1909 600 mg
Participants received a single 600 mg dose of REGN1908-1909
29
Total56

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyPregnancy01
Overall StudyWithdrawal of consent10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicREGN1908-1909 600 mgTotalPlacebo
Age, Continuous28.4 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.1
29.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8
30.2 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.8
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
1 Participants2 Participants1 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
28 Participants54 Participants26 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
0 Participants3 Participants3 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
27 Participants51 Participants24 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
18 Participants35 Participants17 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
11 Participants21 Participants10 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 270 / 29
other
Total, other adverse events
19 / 2722 / 29
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 270 / 29

Outcome results

Primary

Time to Early Asthmatic Response (EAR) Upon Controlled Cat Allergen Challenge in an Environmental Exposure Unit (EEU) on Day 8

Time to EAR was defined as the time to a ≥20% reduction in FEV1 or when the participant voluntarily departed the EEU due to clinically significant allergic and/or asthmatic symptoms.

Time frame: Day 8

Population: Full analysis set: included all randomized participants who received any investigational product and had completed the Day 8 Cat Allergen Challenge.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
PlaceboTime to Early Asthmatic Response (EAR) Upon Controlled Cat Allergen Challenge in an Environmental Exposure Unit (EEU) on Day 851 Minutes
REGN1908-1909 600 mgTime to Early Asthmatic Response (EAR) Upon Controlled Cat Allergen Challenge in an Environmental Exposure Unit (EEU) on Day 8NA Minutes
p-value: =0.008395% CI: [0.17, 0.77]Cox Proportional Hazard
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Normalized AUC in Patient-Assessed Ocular Symptoms Induced by a Controlled Cat Allergen Challenge Over the Exposure Interval to the Controlled Cat Allergen Challenge on Days 8, 29, 57, and 85

Individual ocular symptoms for itching/burning, redness, swelling/puffiness, and tearing/watery eyes were evaluated on a 4-point Likert scale (0, none; 1, mild; 2, moderate; and 3, severe) and combined to give the TOSS, with a maximum score of 12. Score range is 0-12. The higher the score, the more severe the symptoms.

Time frame: Days 8, 29, 57 and 85

Population: Full analysis set; Here 'n' = number of evaluable participants analyzed at each time point. For each participant at each controlled cat allergen challenge, AUC was calculated over the time period of 0 to 2 hours, with last observation carried forward used to impute values out to 2 hours if participants remained in EEU for less than 2 hours. AUCs were calculated using trapezoidal rule and were normalized by dividing by the length of time (2 hours).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Normalized AUC in Patient-Assessed Ocular Symptoms Induced by a Controlled Cat Allergen Challenge Over the Exposure Interval to the Controlled Cat Allergen Challenge on Days 8, 29, 57, and 85Day 8-0.37 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.17
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Normalized AUC in Patient-Assessed Ocular Symptoms Induced by a Controlled Cat Allergen Challenge Over the Exposure Interval to the Controlled Cat Allergen Challenge on Days 8, 29, 57, and 85Day 29-0.43 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.15
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Normalized AUC in Patient-Assessed Ocular Symptoms Induced by a Controlled Cat Allergen Challenge Over the Exposure Interval to the Controlled Cat Allergen Challenge on Days 8, 29, 57, and 85Day 57-0.40 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.15
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Normalized AUC in Patient-Assessed Ocular Symptoms Induced by a Controlled Cat Allergen Challenge Over the Exposure Interval to the Controlled Cat Allergen Challenge on Days 8, 29, 57, and 85Day 85-0.36 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.11
REGN1908-1909 600 mgChange From Baseline in the Normalized AUC in Patient-Assessed Ocular Symptoms Induced by a Controlled Cat Allergen Challenge Over the Exposure Interval to the Controlled Cat Allergen Challenge on Days 8, 29, 57, and 85Day 85-0.51 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.1
REGN1908-1909 600 mgChange From Baseline in the Normalized AUC in Patient-Assessed Ocular Symptoms Induced by a Controlled Cat Allergen Challenge Over the Exposure Interval to the Controlled Cat Allergen Challenge on Days 8, 29, 57, and 85Day 8-0.23 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.17
REGN1908-1909 600 mgChange From Baseline in the Normalized AUC in Patient-Assessed Ocular Symptoms Induced by a Controlled Cat Allergen Challenge Over the Exposure Interval to the Controlled Cat Allergen Challenge on Days 8, 29, 57, and 85Day 57-0.34 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.15
REGN1908-1909 600 mgChange From Baseline in the Normalized AUC in Patient-Assessed Ocular Symptoms Induced by a Controlled Cat Allergen Challenge Over the Exposure Interval to the Controlled Cat Allergen Challenge on Days 8, 29, 57, and 85Day 29-0.43 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.14
Comparison: Day 8p-value: =0.57295% CI: [-0.35, 0.63]MMRM
Comparison: Day 29p-value: =0.99795% CI: [-0.41, 0.41]MMRM
Comparison: Day 57p-value: =0.75695% CI: [-0.36, 0.49]MMRM
Comparison: Day 85p-value: =0.33395% CI: [-0.46, 0.16]MMRM
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Normalized AUC of Patient-Assessed Nasal Symptoms Induced by a Controlled Cat Allergen Challenge Over the Exposure Interval to the Controlled Cat Allergen Challenge on Days 8, 29, 57, and 85

Individual nasal symptoms, including rhinorrhea, nasal congestion, nasal itching, and sneezing were evaluated on a 4-point Likert scale (0, none; 1, mild; 2, moderate; and 3, severe) and combined to give the Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS) with a maximum score of 12. Scale range is 0-12. The higher the score, the more severe the symptoms.

Time frame: Days 8, 29, 57 and 85

Population: Full analysis set; Here 'n' = number of evaluable participants analyzed at each time point. For each participant at each controlled cat allergen challenge, AUC was calculated over the time period of 0 to 2 hours, with last observation carried forward used to impute values out to 2 hours if participants remained in EEU for less than 2 hours. AUCs were calculated using trapezoidal rule and were normalized by dividing by the length of time (2 hours).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Normalized AUC of Patient-Assessed Nasal Symptoms Induced by a Controlled Cat Allergen Challenge Over the Exposure Interval to the Controlled Cat Allergen Challenge on Days 8, 29, 57, and 85Day 8-0.71 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.38
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Normalized AUC of Patient-Assessed Nasal Symptoms Induced by a Controlled Cat Allergen Challenge Over the Exposure Interval to the Controlled Cat Allergen Challenge on Days 8, 29, 57, and 85Day 29-0.70 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.37
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Normalized AUC of Patient-Assessed Nasal Symptoms Induced by a Controlled Cat Allergen Challenge Over the Exposure Interval to the Controlled Cat Allergen Challenge on Days 8, 29, 57, and 85Day 57-0.93 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.43
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Normalized AUC of Patient-Assessed Nasal Symptoms Induced by a Controlled Cat Allergen Challenge Over the Exposure Interval to the Controlled Cat Allergen Challenge on Days 8, 29, 57, and 85Day 85-0.49 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.43
REGN1908-1909 600 mgChange From Baseline in the Normalized AUC of Patient-Assessed Nasal Symptoms Induced by a Controlled Cat Allergen Challenge Over the Exposure Interval to the Controlled Cat Allergen Challenge on Days 8, 29, 57, and 85Day 85-1.37 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.41
REGN1908-1909 600 mgChange From Baseline in the Normalized AUC of Patient-Assessed Nasal Symptoms Induced by a Controlled Cat Allergen Challenge Over the Exposure Interval to the Controlled Cat Allergen Challenge on Days 8, 29, 57, and 85Day 8-0.49 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.38
REGN1908-1909 600 mgChange From Baseline in the Normalized AUC of Patient-Assessed Nasal Symptoms Induced by a Controlled Cat Allergen Challenge Over the Exposure Interval to the Controlled Cat Allergen Challenge on Days 8, 29, 57, and 85Day 57-0.83 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.43
REGN1908-1909 600 mgChange From Baseline in the Normalized AUC of Patient-Assessed Nasal Symptoms Induced by a Controlled Cat Allergen Challenge Over the Exposure Interval to the Controlled Cat Allergen Challenge on Days 8, 29, 57, and 85Day 29-1.39 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.34
Comparison: Day 8p-value: =0.67595% CI: [-0.85, 1.29]MMRM
Comparison: Day 29p-value: =0.18295% CI: [-1.7, 0.33]MMRM
Comparison: Day 57p-value: =0.86695% CI: [-1.12, 1.32]MMRM
Comparison: Day 85p-value: =0.14695% CI: [-2.08, 0.32]MMRM
Secondary

Change in Normalized Area Under the Curve (AUC) of Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Induced by a Controlled Cat Allergen Challenge Over Exposure Interval From Baseline to Controlled Cat Allergen Challenge on Days 8, 29, 57, and 85

The AUC was analyzed by mixed-effect model repeated measures (MMRM) with the treatment, time, treatment-by-time interaction, and day of challenge as factors and baseline FEV1 AUC as a continuous covariate.

Time frame: Days 8, 29, 57, and 85

Population: Full analysis set; Here n = number of evaluable participants analyzed at each time point. For each participant at each controlled cat allergen challenge, AUC was calculated over the time period of 0 to 2 hours, with last observation carried forward used to impute values out to 2 hours if the patients remained in EEU for less than 2 hours. The AUCs were calculated using the trapezoidal rule and were normalized by dividing by the length of time (2 hours).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange in Normalized Area Under the Curve (AUC) of Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Induced by a Controlled Cat Allergen Challenge Over Exposure Interval From Baseline to Controlled Cat Allergen Challenge on Days 8, 29, 57, and 85Day 80.01 Liters (L)Standard Error 0.06
PlaceboChange in Normalized Area Under the Curve (AUC) of Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Induced by a Controlled Cat Allergen Challenge Over Exposure Interval From Baseline to Controlled Cat Allergen Challenge on Days 8, 29, 57, and 85Day 29-0.03 Liters (L)Standard Error 0.08
PlaceboChange in Normalized Area Under the Curve (AUC) of Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Induced by a Controlled Cat Allergen Challenge Over Exposure Interval From Baseline to Controlled Cat Allergen Challenge on Days 8, 29, 57, and 85Day 570.00 Liters (L)Standard Error 0.08
PlaceboChange in Normalized Area Under the Curve (AUC) of Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Induced by a Controlled Cat Allergen Challenge Over Exposure Interval From Baseline to Controlled Cat Allergen Challenge on Days 8, 29, 57, and 85Day 85-0.05 Liters (L)Standard Error 0.08
REGN1908-1909 600 mgChange in Normalized Area Under the Curve (AUC) of Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Induced by a Controlled Cat Allergen Challenge Over Exposure Interval From Baseline to Controlled Cat Allergen Challenge on Days 8, 29, 57, and 85Day 850.32 Liters (L)Standard Error 0.08
REGN1908-1909 600 mgChange in Normalized Area Under the Curve (AUC) of Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Induced by a Controlled Cat Allergen Challenge Over Exposure Interval From Baseline to Controlled Cat Allergen Challenge on Days 8, 29, 57, and 85Day 80.38 Liters (L)Standard Error 0.06
REGN1908-1909 600 mgChange in Normalized Area Under the Curve (AUC) of Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Induced by a Controlled Cat Allergen Challenge Over Exposure Interval From Baseline to Controlled Cat Allergen Challenge on Days 8, 29, 57, and 85Day 570.34 Liters (L)Standard Error 0.07
REGN1908-1909 600 mgChange in Normalized Area Under the Curve (AUC) of Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Induced by a Controlled Cat Allergen Challenge Over Exposure Interval From Baseline to Controlled Cat Allergen Challenge on Days 8, 29, 57, and 85Day 290.43 Liters (L)Standard Error 0.08
Comparison: Day 8p-value: <0.00195% CI: [0.21, 0.53]MMRM
Comparison: Day 29p-value: <0.00195% CI: [0.23, 0.68]MMRM
Comparison: Day 57p-value: =0.00295% CI: [0.13, 0.55]MMRM
Comparison: Day 85p-value: =0.00295% CI: [0.15, 0.47]MMRM
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in Cat Allergen Quantity as Experienced by Participants During Exposure on Days 8, 29, 57, and 85

Cat Allergen Exposure Tolerated in ng = Minute Ventilation (L/min) x Allergen Concentration (ng/m3) x Time in EEU (minutes), where 1 L/min = 0.001 m3/min. The change in cat allergen quantity (tolerated exposure) from the baseline Cat Allergen Challenge, will be analyzed using a similar MMRM model with treatment, visit and treatment by-visit interaction as factors and the cat allergen quantity tolerated in the baseline Controlled Cat Allergen Challenge as a covariate.

Time frame: Days 8, 29, 57 and 85

Population: Full analysis set: included all randomized participants who received any investigational product and had completed the Day 8 Cat Allergen Challenge; Here n = number of evaluable participants analyzed at each time point

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in Cat Allergen Quantity as Experienced by Participants During Exposure on Days 8, 29, 57, and 85Day 819.55 Nanograms (ng)Standard Error 8.93
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in Cat Allergen Quantity as Experienced by Participants During Exposure on Days 8, 29, 57, and 85Day 2914.14 Nanograms (ng)Standard Error 8.67
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in Cat Allergen Quantity as Experienced by Participants During Exposure on Days 8, 29, 57, and 85Day 5721.94 Nanograms (ng)Standard Error 10.23
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in Cat Allergen Quantity as Experienced by Participants During Exposure on Days 8, 29, 57, and 85Day 8512.93 Nanograms (ng)Standard Error 9.29
REGN1908-1909 600 mgMean Change From Baseline in Cat Allergen Quantity as Experienced by Participants During Exposure on Days 8, 29, 57, and 85Day 8554.03 Nanograms (ng)Standard Error 8.94
REGN1908-1909 600 mgMean Change From Baseline in Cat Allergen Quantity as Experienced by Participants During Exposure on Days 8, 29, 57, and 85Day 859.05 Nanograms (ng)Standard Error 8.7
REGN1908-1909 600 mgMean Change From Baseline in Cat Allergen Quantity as Experienced by Participants During Exposure on Days 8, 29, 57, and 85Day 5755.38 Nanograms (ng)Standard Error 9.93
REGN1908-1909 600 mgMean Change From Baseline in Cat Allergen Quantity as Experienced by Participants During Exposure on Days 8, 29, 57, and 85Day 2968.21 Nanograms (ng)Standard Error 8.21
Comparison: Day 8p-value: =0.00395% CI: [14.36, 64.65]MMRM
Comparison: Day 29p-value: <0.00195% CI: [30.01, 78.12]MMRM
Comparison: Day 57p-value: =0.02395% CI: [4.79, 62.08]MMRM
Comparison: Day 85p-value: =0.00395% CI: [15.1, 67.09]MMRM
Secondary

Number of Non-Serious and Serious Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Through End of Study

Adverse events and serious adverse events were collected from the time of informed consent signature and then at each visit until the end of the study with the exception of symptoms that occurred in response to the EEU within 24 hours following the EEU.

Time frame: Baseline to 16 weeks

Population: Safety Analysis Set (SAF): included all participants who received any investigational product and were analyzed as treated.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboNumber of Non-Serious and Serious Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Through End of StudyNon-serious TEAEs66 Events
PlaceboNumber of Non-Serious and Serious Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Through End of StudySerious TEAEs0 Events
REGN1908-1909 600 mgNumber of Non-Serious and Serious Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Through End of StudyNon-serious TEAEs76 Events
REGN1908-1909 600 mgNumber of Non-Serious and Serious Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Through End of StudySerious TEAEs0 Events
Secondary

Percent Change in Cat Allergen Quantity as Experienced by Participants During Exposure on Days 8, 29, 57, and 85

Cat Allergen Exposure Tolerated in ng = Minute Ventilation (L/min) x Allergen Concentration (ng/m3) x Time in EEU (minutes), where 1 L/min = 0.001 m3/min. The change in cat allergen quantity (tolerated exposure) from the baseline Cat Allergen Challenge, will be analyzed using a similar MMRM model with treatment, visit and treatment by-visit interaction as factors and the cat allergen quantity tolerated in the baseline Controlled Cat Allergen Challenge as a covariate.

Time frame: Days 8, 29, 57 and 85

Population: Full analysis set: included all randomized participants who received any investigational product and had completed the Day 8 Cat Allergen Challenge; Here n = number of evaluable participants analyzed at each time point

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPercent Change in Cat Allergen Quantity as Experienced by Participants During Exposure on Days 8, 29, 57, and 85Day 8119.86 Percentage of changeStandard Error 73.22
PlaceboPercent Change in Cat Allergen Quantity as Experienced by Participants During Exposure on Days 8, 29, 57, and 85Day 2993.62 Percentage of changeStandard Error 71.48
PlaceboPercent Change in Cat Allergen Quantity as Experienced by Participants During Exposure on Days 8, 29, 57, and 85Day 57118.08 Percentage of changeStandard Error 69.58
PlaceboPercent Change in Cat Allergen Quantity as Experienced by Participants During Exposure on Days 8, 29, 57, and 85Day 8576.75 Percentage of changeStandard Error 82.08
REGN1908-1909 600 mgPercent Change in Cat Allergen Quantity as Experienced by Participants During Exposure on Days 8, 29, 57, and 85Day 85317.76 Percentage of changeStandard Error 78.84
REGN1908-1909 600 mgPercent Change in Cat Allergen Quantity as Experienced by Participants During Exposure on Days 8, 29, 57, and 85Day 8325.29 Percentage of changeStandard Error 70.79
REGN1908-1909 600 mgPercent Change in Cat Allergen Quantity as Experienced by Participants During Exposure on Days 8, 29, 57, and 85Day 57301.11 Percentage of changeStandard Error 67.11
REGN1908-1909 600 mgPercent Change in Cat Allergen Quantity as Experienced by Participants During Exposure on Days 8, 29, 57, and 85Day 29338.22 Percentage of changeStandard Error 68.26
Comparison: Day 8p-value: =0.04995% CI: [0.69, 410.17]MMRM
Comparison: Day 29p-value: =0.01795% CI: [45.6, 443.59]MMRM
Comparison: Day 57p-value: =0.06495% CI: [-11.29, 377.35]MMRM
Comparison: Day 85p-value: =0.03995% CI: [12.44, 469.57]MMRM
Secondary

Percent Change in Normalized Area Under the Curve (AUC) of Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Induced by a Controlled Cat Allergen Challenge Over Exposure Interval From Baseline to Controlled Cat Allergen Challenge on Days 8, 29, 57, and 85

The AUC was analyzed by mixed-effect model repeated measures (MMRM) with the treatment, time, treatment-by-time interaction, and day of challenge as factors and baseline FEV1 AUC as a continuous covariate.

Time frame: Days 8, 29, 57, and 85

Population: Full analysis set; Here 'n' = number of evaluable participants analyzed at each time point. For each participant at each controlled cat allergen challenge, AUC was calculated over the time period of 0 to 2 hours, with last observation carried forward used to impute values out to 2 hours if the patients remained in EEU for less than 2 hours. The AUCs were calculated using the trapezoidal rule and were normalized by dividing by the length of time (2 hours).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPercent Change in Normalized Area Under the Curve (AUC) of Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Induced by a Controlled Cat Allergen Challenge Over Exposure Interval From Baseline to Controlled Cat Allergen Challenge on Days 8, 29, 57, and 85Day 81.59 Percentage of changeStandard Error 2.58
PlaceboPercent Change in Normalized Area Under the Curve (AUC) of Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Induced by a Controlled Cat Allergen Challenge Over Exposure Interval From Baseline to Controlled Cat Allergen Challenge on Days 8, 29, 57, and 85Day 290.46 Percentage of changeStandard Error 3.6
PlaceboPercent Change in Normalized Area Under the Curve (AUC) of Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Induced by a Controlled Cat Allergen Challenge Over Exposure Interval From Baseline to Controlled Cat Allergen Challenge on Days 8, 29, 57, and 85Day 571.77 Percentage of changeStandard Error 3.55
PlaceboPercent Change in Normalized Area Under the Curve (AUC) of Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Induced by a Controlled Cat Allergen Challenge Over Exposure Interval From Baseline to Controlled Cat Allergen Challenge on Days 8, 29, 57, and 85Day 850.20 Percentage of changeStandard Error 3.28
REGN1908-1909 600 mgPercent Change in Normalized Area Under the Curve (AUC) of Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Induced by a Controlled Cat Allergen Challenge Over Exposure Interval From Baseline to Controlled Cat Allergen Challenge on Days 8, 29, 57, and 85Day 8512.73 Percentage of changeStandard Error 3.14
REGN1908-1909 600 mgPercent Change in Normalized Area Under the Curve (AUC) of Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Induced by a Controlled Cat Allergen Challenge Over Exposure Interval From Baseline to Controlled Cat Allergen Challenge on Days 8, 29, 57, and 85Day 815.15 Percentage of changeStandard Error 2.5
REGN1908-1909 600 mgPercent Change in Normalized Area Under the Curve (AUC) of Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Induced by a Controlled Cat Allergen Challenge Over Exposure Interval From Baseline to Controlled Cat Allergen Challenge on Days 8, 29, 57, and 85Day 5714.07 Percentage of changeStandard Error 3.43
REGN1908-1909 600 mgPercent Change in Normalized Area Under the Curve (AUC) of Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Induced by a Controlled Cat Allergen Challenge Over Exposure Interval From Baseline to Controlled Cat Allergen Challenge on Days 8, 29, 57, and 85Day 2916.67 Percentage of changeStandard Error 3.43
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [6.35, 20.77]MMRM
p-value: =0.00295% CI: [6.18, 26.24]MMRM
p-value: =0.01695% CI: [2.4, 22.2]MMRM
p-value: =0.00895% CI: [3.43, 21.65]MMRM
Secondary

Time to EAR Upon Controlled Cat Allergen Challenge in an EEU on Days 29, 57, and 85

Time to EAR was defined as the time to a ≥20% reduction in FEV1 or when the participant voluntarily departed the EEU due to clinically significant allergic and/or asthmatic symptoms

Time frame: Days 29, 57 and 85

Population: Full analysis set: included all randomized participants who received any investigational product and had completed the Day 8 Cat Allergen Challenge. Here n = number of evaluable participants analyzed at each time point

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
PlaceboTime to EAR Upon Controlled Cat Allergen Challenge in an EEU on Days 29, 57, and 85Day 2941 Minutes
PlaceboTime to EAR Upon Controlled Cat Allergen Challenge in an EEU on Days 29, 57, and 85Day 5756 Minutes
PlaceboTime to EAR Upon Controlled Cat Allergen Challenge in an EEU on Days 29, 57, and 85Day 8541 Minutes
REGN1908-1909 600 mgTime to EAR Upon Controlled Cat Allergen Challenge in an EEU on Days 29, 57, and 85Day 29NA Minutes
REGN1908-1909 600 mgTime to EAR Upon Controlled Cat Allergen Challenge in an EEU on Days 29, 57, and 85Day 57232 Minutes
REGN1908-1909 600 mgTime to EAR Upon Controlled Cat Allergen Challenge in an EEU on Days 29, 57, and 85Day 85NA Minutes
Comparison: Day 29p-value: <0.000195% CI: [0.12, 0.48]Cox Hazard Model
Comparison: Day 57p-value: =0.022295% CI: [0.22, 0.89]Cox Hazard Model
Comparison: Day 85p-value: =0.000395% CI: [0.13, 0.56]Cox Hazard Model

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 14, 2026