Skip to content

A Clinical Trial of Chidamide in the Management of Refractory ITP

A Prospective, Multicenter Clinical Trial of Chidamide in the Management of Refractory Immune Thrombocytopenia

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03838354
Enrollment
61
Registered
2019-02-12
Start date
2021-06-01
Completion date
2023-09-01
Last updated
2025-08-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Thrombocytopenia

Keywords

ITP, Chidamide

Brief summary

Primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an autoimmune bleeding disorder. Increased macrophage phagocytosis of antibody-coated platelet as well as decreased number and/or impaired function of CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ regulatory T (Treg) cells have been shown to participate in the pathogenesis of ITP. Our preclinical data revealed that chidamide, a histone deacetylase inhibitor (HDACi), could attenuate macrophage phagocytosis of antibody-coated platelets, stimulate production of natural Foxp3+ Tregs, and upregulate CTLA4 expression through modulation of histone H3K27 acetylation. The project was undertaking by Qilu Hospital of Shandong University in China. In order to evaluate the efficacy and safety of chidamide at two different dosage regimens in adult patients with refractory ITP.

Detailed description

In this prospective, open-label, multicenter, randomized clinical trial, refractory ITP adult patients will be enrolled from five medical centers in China. Eligible participants will be randomly assigned 1:1 to receive chidamide at either 2.5 or 5 mg twice per week. The primary endpoint is the overall response at week 12. Complete response was defined as a platelet count at or above 100×10\^9/L and an absence of bleeding. Partial response was defined as a platelet count at or above 30×10\^9/L but less than 100×10\^9/L and at least a doubling of the baseline platelet count and an absence of bleeding. No response was defined as a platelet count of less than 30×10\^9 cells per L, or less than two-times increase from baseline platelet count, or bleeding. The secondary enpoints included 6-month sustained response, time to response (TTR), duration of response, bleeding scores, health-related quality of life assessment and adverse events (AEs). This study will compare the efficacy and safety of chidamide in two different dosage regimens in adult patients with refractory.

Interventions

DRUGChidamide

In the 2.5 mg group, chidamide will be administered orally at an initial dose of 2.5 mg twice per week for 12 weeks. If an initial response was achieved by week 12, the allocated treatment could continue. Patients in 2.5 mg group were allowed to increase dose to 5 mg if platelet counts were less than 30×10\^9 cells per L or less than two-times increase from baseline platelet count at week 12 according to investigators' advice and the patients' decision.

Sponsors

Shandong University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Participant must be at least 18 years of age at the time of the screening. * Participant may be male or female. * Participant has a confirmed diagnosis of ITP according to the 2019 International Working Group assessment for more than 6 months at screening. * Participant who didn't respond or relapsed after previous first-line treatment, and lack of response to rituximab, TPO agents, or splenectomy. * Bone marrow biopsy is performed in participants over 60 years to exclude hematological malignancies.

Exclusion criteria

* Participant has evidence of a secondary cause of immune thrombocytopenia or to drug treatments or participant has a multiple immune cytopenia, e.g. Evan's syndrome. * Participant with the following conditions:severe dysfunction of the heart, kidney, liver, or lung; severe immunodeficiency; malignancy; HIV; hepatitis B or C virus infection; pregnancy or lactation.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall response at week 12week 12The primary endpoint was the overall response at week 12.Complete response was defined as a platelet count at or above 100×10\^9/L and an absence of bleeding. Partial response was defined as a platelet count at or above 30×109/L but less than 100×10\^9/L and at least a doubling of the baseline platelet count and an absence of bleeding. No response was defined as a platelet count of less than 30×10\^9 cells per L, or less than two-times increase from baseline platelet count, or bleeding.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Sustained response6 monthsA response lasting for at least 6 months was defined as a sustained response.
Time to response12 weeksTime to response was defined as the time from treatment initiation to achieve a complete response or a partial response, whichever came first, assessed up to week 12.
Therapy associated adverse eventsup to 1 year per subjectThe number and frequency of therapy associated adverse events
Bleeding scores12 monthsBleeding symptoms were graded according a standardized bleeding scale specific to primary immune thrombocytopenia on the basis of site and severity of bleeding by Khellaf et al (PMID: 15951296). A modification was made to exclude age from the original scale so that only bleeding symptoms were described. At each visit, we recorded bleeding scores. Routine visits were scheduled once a week for the first 4 weeks and once a month thereafter. Scores ranged from 0 to 59, with higher values indicating higher bleeding risk.
Health-related quality of life assessment12 weeksHealth-related quality of life was assessed using a self-administered immune thrombocytopenia Patient Assessment Questionnaire (ITP-PAQ) at baseline and at week 12. Scores ranged from 0 to 100, with higher values indicating better quality of life.
Duration of response12 monthsDuration of response was defined as the time from achievement of a complete response or a partial response to the loss of response.

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026