Skip to content

Evaluation of Renal Sodium Excretion After Salt Loading in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction

Evaluation of Renal Sodium Excretion After Salt Loading in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction

Status
Completed
Phases
Early Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03837470
Acronym
ERES-HFpEF
Enrollment
14
Registered
2019-02-12
Start date
2019-05-06
Completion date
2020-02-20
Last updated
2021-04-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction

Brief summary

Heart failure (HF) affects 2-3% of the population, and is characterized by impaired sodium balance which results in fluid overload. Ejection fraction, a measure of systolic function, is reduced in only about half of all HF patients. Incidence of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) has increased in the last 20 years making it a growing public health problem. Currently, most patients admitted to the hospital with heart failure have preserved rather than reduced ejection fractions. However, to date it remains unknown why patients with HFpEF retain salt and water. The hypothesis is that patients with clinical HFpEF have an impaired renal response to salt loading, intravascular expansion and diuretics. Characterization of the salt and water excretory renal response to intravascular salt, fluid and diuretic load in patients with HFpEF will provide insight into the pathophysiology of HFpEF, and may help in the development of novel strategies to target renal sodium handling in patients with HFpEF. This characterization is the primary objective of this pilot project.

Detailed description

In patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), poor renal perfusion and neuro-hormonal activation cause renal salt and water retention. In contrast to HFrEF, patients with HFpEF have blunted neuro-hormonal activation, and other mechanisms likely cause fluid overload. Investigators have proposed several mechanisms including inflammatory state, endothelial dysfunction, decreased vascular compliance, pulmonary hypertension, and reduced nitric oxide (NO) bioavailability. However, the etiology and pathophysiology of fluid overload in HFpEF patients remains controversial. Renal dysfunction is common in patients with HFpEF, and is associated with cardiac remodeling. HFpEF is associated with coronary microvascular endothelial activation and oxidative stress, which through reduction of NO dependent signaling contributes to the high cardiomyocyte stiffness and hypertrophy. Plasma sodium stiffens vascular endothelium and reduces NO release. Thus, renal sodium retention may play a pivotal role in the pathophysiology of HFpEF. Patients with HFrEF indeed have abnormal renal sodium excretion in response to salt load; however, it remains unclear if patients with HFpEF also have an impaired renal sodium excretion in response to a salt load, volume expansion or diuretics. Since (as noted above) renal sodium retention may play an important role in the pathophysiology of HFpEF, it may be critically important to characterize renal sodium handling in patients with clinical HFpEF in response to salt loading, intravascular expansion and diuretic challenge. Impaired sodium excretion has been previously demonstrated in response to volume expansion in pre-clinical systolic and diastolic dysfunction, but not in patients with clinical HFpEF. Further, it is of note that this impairment in renal sodium excretion is rescued by exogenous B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP), which is a natriuretic peptide that is increased in most patients with HFpEF. It is possible, although not reported, that baseline BNP \[which is commonly assessed by N-terminal prohormone of BNP (NT-proBNP)\] levels affect renal sodium handling in HFpEF patients in response to salt and volume load, or diuretic challenge. It is also unknown if baseline kidney function, measured by estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), affects natriuresis in patients with HFpEF after salt loading or diuretic challenge. Renal tubular function may also have important effects on salt retention in HF patients. Characterization of the natriuretic response to intravascular salt and volume load and diuretic challenge, and of tubular function, in patients with HFpEF will provide insight into the pathophysiology of HFpEF, and may help in the development of novel strategies to target renal sodium handling in patients with HFpEF.

Interventions

Bolus intravenous injection of 40 mg furosemide

DRUG0.9% Sodium Chloride

Intravenous infusion of 0.25ml/kg/min of 0.9% sodium chloride intravenously for a total of 60 minutes

Sponsors

University of Utah Center for Clinical and Translational Science
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Adhish Agarwal
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* History of chronic (\> 6 months) heart failure with current New York Heart Association II-III symptoms * Left ventricular ejection fraction \> 50% on a clinically indicated echocardiogram obtained within last 12 months * Clinical compensated heart failure * On constant medical therapy for heart failure; without changes in heart failure medication regimen (including diuretics) for previous 14 days and not expected to change in the next 2 days

Exclusion criteria

* Unable to comply with protocol or procedures * Uncontrolled severe hypertension: systolic blood pressure \> 160 mmHg * Significant renal impairment as defined by estimated glomerular filtration rate \< 30ml/min/1.73m\^2 determined by Chronic Kidney Disease - Epidemiology Collaboration equation * Significant proteinuria (\> 0.5 g protein/daily protein or equivalent) * Body Mass Index \> 40 kg/m\^2 * Acute coronary syndrome within last 4 weeks * Coronary revascularization procedures (percutaneous coronary intervention or cardiac artery bypass graft) or valve surgery within 30 days of screening * Cardiac resynchronization therapy, with or without implantable cardioverter defibrillator within 90 days of screening * Clinically relevant cardiac valvular disease * Hypertrophic or restrictive cardiomyopathy, constrictive pericarditis, active myocarditis, active endocarditis, or complex congenital heart disease * Cirrhosis of the liver * History of known hydronephrosis * History of adrenal insufficiency

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Urine Volume5 HoursVolume of urine collected following saline loading and diuretic challenge will be compared between HFpEF patients and controls
Urinary Sodium Excretion5 HoursAmount of sodium excretion following saline loading and diuretic challenge will be compared between HFpEF patients and controls

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Serum Aldosterone5 HoursSerum Aldosterone levels at baseline, after saline loading and after furosemide administration compared between HFpEF patients and controls
Plasma Nor-epinephrine5 HoursPlasma nor-epinephrine levels at baseline, after saline loading and after furosemide administration compared between HFpEF patients and controls
Plasma Renin Activity5 HoursPlasma renin activity levels at baseline, after saline loading and after furosemide administration compared between HFpEF patients and controls
Change in NT-proBNP5 HoursAverage change in NT-proBNP values before and after saline loading and diuretic challenge will be compared between HFpEF patients and controls

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Urinary Exosomes5 HoursSodium transporters in Urinary exosomes will be characterized and compared between HFpEF patients and controls

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026