Skip to content

Improved Motivation for Physical Activity in an Institutionalized Geriatric Population Through a Virtual Environment

Improvement of Motivation for Physical Activity in an Institutionalized Geriatric Population Thanks to a Virtual Environment: Comparison of Motivation Between Classic Bike and Bike With Virtual Environment

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03834545
Acronym
Cyclepad Pilot
Enrollment
12
Registered
2019-02-08
Start date
2018-04-01
Completion date
2018-06-30
Last updated
2022-10-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Fall, Motivation

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to test the interest of a virtual environment with cycling to increase the motivation of physical activity practice in institutionalized older adults.

Detailed description

The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends for people aged 65 years and over a weekly practice of at least 150 minutes of moderate-intensity endurance activities or at least 75 minutes of activity. endurance of sustained intensity, or an equivalent combination of moderate and sustained activity. However, the attractiveness for physical activity fades over the years limiting the practice of physical activity. Several types of unconventional approaches have already shown their effectiveness in the prevention of falls in the elderly but these practices find their limits in the lack of adherence to this type of exercise, especially in nursing homes. New virtual reality and gaming technologies have recently emerged and are being used as tools to prevent the risk of falling. The use of these new tools has advantages over conventional exercises: motivating. The investigators aimed to test the interest of a virtual environment with cycling to increase the motivation of physical activity practice in institutionalized older adults.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

University Hospital, Caen
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_CROSSOVER
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* age over 65 * ability to cycle

Exclusion criteria

* unstable cardiopathy * New York Heart Association classification III or IV * severe cognitive disorders with inability to follow simple orders (follow investigator, ride on the ergometric bicycles, pedal) * visual disturbance preventing counting fingers at 5m

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cycling distance in meters3 monthsPrimary outcome was the cycling distance measured at each session without encouragement

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The average speed in meters per second per session3 monthsMeasure of the average cycling speed per session without encouragement.
Mean pedaling cadence per session in revolutions per minute3 monthsMeasure of the average pedaling cadence per session without encouragement.
Time spent pedaling in seconds per session3 monthsMeasure of the time spent pedaling per session without encouragement
Mean pedaling power per session in Watts3 monthsMeasure of the pedaling power per session without encouragement
Closed-ended question to know which condition they would prefer for a futur exercise session.3 monthsParticipant were asked at the end of the third session, which condition they would prefer for a futur exercice session. Possible answers: Classic ergometric bicycle Kettler E3), Cycleo without virtual environment, Cycleo with virtual environment, None.
Borg rating of perceived exertion scale3 monthsMeasure of the perceived exertion after each cycling session with Borg rating of perceived exertion scale. Range 0-10. Ten corresponding to the maximal perceived exertion

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026