Skip to content

Tissue Flossing in Tennis Elbow Patients

The Effect of Tissue Flossing in Patients With Tennis Elbow

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03834077
Acronym
FLOSS
Enrollment
50
Registered
2019-02-07
Start date
2019-02-20
Completion date
2019-04-10
Last updated
2019-02-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Tennis Elbow

Keywords

physiotherapy

Brief summary

The aim of the present intervention is to determine the effectiveness of the application of tissue flossing in patients with tennis elbow

Detailed description

The application of tissue flossing has been deemed to provide beneficial results in patients with ankle range of motion limitation. Although, tissue flossing is widely extended among athletes due to its effectiveness in pain, function and range of motion, the evidence is limited. The aim of the present protocol is to determine the effectiveness of tissue flossing in patients with tennis elbow.

Interventions

Electrotherapy (transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation) and Ultrasound in addition to tissue flossing.

OTHERPlacebo comparator

Conventional physiotherapy in addition to flossing without tension

Sponsors

University of Jaén
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Patients will be allocated to intervention (flossing) or control group (conventional physiotherapy) using a randomized list of allocated numbers generated by a computer program. Opaque envelope will contain the patients allocation while outcome assessors, care provider and principal investigator will be blinded to the allocation process.

Intervention model description

Randomized controlled trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Elbow pain for at least 6 weeks and satisfy the widely accepted diagnostic criteria of lateral epicondylalgia. * Diagnostic criteria are pain over the lateral humeral epicondyle that is provoked by gripping activities. * Reduced grip strength and increased sensitivity to manual palpation over the lateral epicondyle. * Pain with stretching or contraction of the wrist extensor muscles.

Exclusion criteria

* Upper limb fractures, surgery or concomitant disease. * Red flags presence. * Mental disorders.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient-related Tennis Elbow Questionnaire changeAt baseline, after 1 week and after 4 week.Self reported questionnaire ranged from 0 to 150 with greater scores associated with severe disability.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Numeric rating scale changeAt baseline, after 1 week and after 4 week.10 point rating scale of pain where 0 is associated with no pain and 10 with greatest pain.
Pressure Pain Threshold changeAt baseline, after 1 week and after 4 week.Determine the pain free pression with a validated instrument

Countries

Spain

Contacts

Primary ContactDavid Cruz-Diaz, PhD
dcruz@ujaen.es953213408

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026