Skip to content

Utilizing Text Messaging to Improve Vehicle Safety Among At-Risk Young Adults

Utilizing Text Messaging to Improve Vehicle Safety Among At-Risk Young Adults

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03833713
Acronym
SaVE
Enrollment
218
Registered
2019-02-07
Start date
2019-09-26
Completion date
2021-11-22
Last updated
2024-08-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Risk Reduction

Keywords

text message, behavioral intervention, motor vehicle

Brief summary

The Safe Vehicle Engagement (SaVE) trials are 3 parallel randomized clinical trials that aim to determine the impact of text messaging (SMS) vehicle safety interventions vs. weekly SMS vehicle safety self-monitoring alone on seat belt use, distracted driving and drink driving among young adults identified in the emergency department (ED) with risky vehicle behaviors.

Detailed description

The investigators propose to conduct 3 related randomized, controlled, parallel group, assessor-blind, superiority trials of 6-week text message interventions vs. SMS vehicle safety self-monitoring in young adult participants with risky vehicle behaviors. A total of 500 adult participants will be enrolled: 300 into Cohort 1 (seat belt); 100 into Cohort 2 (distracted driving); 100 into Cohort 3 (drink driving). Each SMS intervention will be designed to target a single risk behavior. The study is powered to show a difference of 15% in the percentage of subjects reporting seat belt use at week 8. Other cohort trials (i.e. distracted driving, drink driving) and outcomes will be exploratory.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALSMS Dialogue

Once-weekly SMS dialogue sessions or micro-interventions and use behavior change techniques (BCTs) including self-monitoring with performance feedback and goal support

BEHAVIORALSMS Assessments

Once-weekly SMS assessments of motor vehicle risks

Sponsors

University of Pennsylvania
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Pittsburgh
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
TRIPLE (Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

Prospective, randomized, 2-arm (intervention vs. control)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 25 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1\) Adult participant (age ≥ 18 years & ≤25 years) 1. Cohort 1: Any vehicle trip in past 2 weeks where individual reports not using a seat belt 2. Cohort 2: Any vehicle trip in past 2 weeks where individual reports phone was used to type while driving and car was moving 3. Cohort 3: Any vehicle trip in past 2 weeks where individual reports driving a vehicle within 2 hours after consuming 2 or more drinks

Exclusion criteria

1. Member of a protected population (prisoner) 2. Unable to provide informed consent 3. No plan to drive and/or ride in a vehicle in the next month 4. Non-English speaking 5. No personal mobile phone or planning on changing phone in next 3 months

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Seat Belt UseWeek 8Participant count reporting always using a seat belt over past 2 weeks

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Feasibility of RecruitmentBaselinePercentage of ED patients who screen positive
Measure of Intervention Acceptability2 weeks to 8 weeksPercentage of ED patients enrolled in the Intervention arm who complete at least 50% of the SMS assessments during the intervention period
Seat Belt UseWeek 14Participant count reporting always using a seat belt over past 2 weeks

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
SMS Intervention
Once-weekly automated SMS dialogue sessions or micro-interventions and use behavior change techniques including self-monitoring with performance feedback and goal support SMS Dialogue: Once-weekly SMS dialogue sessions or micro-interventions and use behavior change techniques (BCTs) including self-monitoring with performance feedback and goal support
110
SMS Assessments
Once-weekly SMS assessments related to their target risk behavior without receiving any feedback or goal support SMS Assessments: Once-weekly SMS assessments of motor vehicle risks
108
Total218

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSMS AssessmentsTotalSMS Intervention
Age, Continuous21.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2
21.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.1
21.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.2
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
2 Participants9 Participants7 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
35 Participants72 Participants37 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
8 Participants13 Participants5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
3 Participants13 Participants10 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
60 Participants111 Participants51 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
71 Participants139 Participants68 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
37 Participants79 Participants42 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 1100 / 108
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 1100 / 108
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 1100 / 108

Outcome results

Primary

Seat Belt Use

Participant count reporting always using a seat belt over past 2 weeks

Time frame: Week 8

Population: 158 participants completed the 8-week follow-up and thus were included in outcome analyses.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
SMS InterventionSeat Belt Use34 Participants
SMS AssessmentsSeat Belt Use15 Participants
Secondary

Feasibility of Recruitment

Percentage of ED patients who screen positive

Time frame: Baseline

Population: Reported less than always seat belt use in the past 2 weeks either as a driver or passenger and met other enrollment criteria

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
SMS InterventionFeasibility of Recruitment218 Participants
Secondary

Measure of Intervention Acceptability

Percentage of ED patients enrolled in the Intervention arm who complete at least 50% of the SMS assessments during the intervention period

Time frame: 2 weeks to 8 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
SMS InterventionMeasure of Intervention Acceptability56 Participants
SMS AssessmentsMeasure of Intervention Acceptability59 Participants
Secondary

Seat Belt Use

Participant count reporting always using a seat belt over past 2 weeks

Time frame: Week 14

Population: 140 participants completed the 14-week follow-up and thus were included in outcome analyses.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
SMS InterventionSeat Belt Use32 Participants
SMS AssessmentsSeat Belt Use20 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 11, 2026