Intracerebral Hemorrhage, Ischemic Stroke, Traumatic Brain Injury
Conditions
Keywords
TBI, stroke, ICH, AIS, decision aid, shared decision making, neurocritical care, SABI, surrogate
Brief summary
Severe acute brain injury (SABI), including large artery acute ischemic stroke, intracerebral hemorrhage, and severe traumatic brain injury continue to be the leading cause of death and disability in adults in the U.S. Due to concerns for a poor long-term quality of life, withdrawal of mechanical ventilation and supportive medical care with transition to comfort care is the most common cause of death in SABI, but occurs at a highly variable rate (for example in Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) 45-89%). Decision aids (DAs) are shared decision-making tools which have been successfully implemented and validated for many other diseases to assist difficult decision making. The investigators have developed a pilot DA for goals-of-care decisions for surrogates of SABI patients. This was developed through qualitative research using semi-structured interviews in surrogate decision makers of TBI patients and physicians. The investigators now propose to pilot-test a DA for surrogates of SABI patients in a feasibility trial.
Detailed description
Severe acute brain injury (SABI), including large artery acute ischemic stroke, intracerebral hemorrhage, and severe traumatic brain injury continue to be the leading cause of death and disability in adults in the U.S, accounting for more than 200,000 of the acute brain injury-related deaths in the U.S. annually. Patients with SABI are critically ill and most commonly require mechanical ventilation and supportive medical care with artificial nutrition to ensure survival. However, due to concerns for a poor long-term quality of life, withdrawal of mechanical ventilation and supportive medical care with transition to comfort care is by far the most common cause of death in SABI but occurs at a highly variable rate (for example in TBI 45-90%) at different trauma centers. Shared decision making is a collaborative process that enhances patients' and surrogates' understanding about prognosis, encourages them to actively weigh the risks and benefits of a treatment, and to match them to patient preferences, thereby decreasing decisional conflict and improving decision quality and health related outcomes. Decision aids (DAs) are shared decision-making tools which have been successfully implemented and validated for many other diseases to assist difficult decision making. No DA currently exists for goals-of-care decisions in SABI. Such a patient- and family-centered DA has the potential to improve decision-making for SABI patients by ensuring proxies receive consistent, evidence-based prognostication while also addressing patients' preferences and values. The investigators have developed a pilot DA for goals of care decisions by surrogates of SABI patients using qualitative research using semi-structured interviews in surrogate decision makers of TBI patients and physicians, followed by an iterative feedback process with feedback by surrogates, physicians, and other stakeholders (ICU nurses). The investigators now propose to pilot-test a DA for surrogates of SABI patients in a feasibility trial.
Interventions
OTHERDecision Aid
Shared-decision making tool
Sponsors
Yale University
University of Florida
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
University of Massachusetts, Worcester
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE
Intervention model description
Open-label, usual-care-controlled feasibility trial comparing decision aid intervention prior to the goals-of-care family meeting to standard of care (no intervention prior to family meeting).
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* ≥18 years of age; no upper age limit * Documented health care proxy or legal next of kin of admitted SABI patient with traumatic brain injury, intracerebral hemorrhage or acute ischemic stroke. * ≥3 days after insult (stabilization period); clinical team may ask study team to wait longer if clinically indicated * SABI patient remains critically ill after 3 days defined as: either intubated and mechanically ventilated, or unable to swallow, needing feeding tube beyond hospital discharge (even if not intubated) * Surrogate is physically present in ICU to receive decision aid and participate in planned family meeting in person (not over phone)
Exclusion criteria
* Devastating SABI near death * Patient will be extubated and pass swallow evaluation (as deemed by clinical team) * Surrogate is non-English speaking and no interpreter available to translate decision aid (no available validated, translated decision aid version) * Surrogate is illiterate
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Recruitment | From date of approaching surrogate decision maker for consent until the date of the first documented goals-of-care family meeting, assessed up to 1 month after admission. | Consent rate |
| Participation | 1-36 hours after family meeting | Proportion of participants who read decision aid and completed worksheet |
| Retention | 3 months | Number of participants who complete follow-up |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| AIS/Intracerebral Hemorrhage (ICH)/Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) knowledge test | Baseline and 1-36 hours after family meeting | Medical knowledge about the goals-of-care decision in SABI will be assessed using the medical knowledge test, which was adapted to 17 questions about goals-of-care and SABI, all of which are addressed in the decision aid. The % correct will be calculated. |
| Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) | Baseline,1-36 hours after family meeting, and 3-months | is a 14-item, two-domain (depression, anxiety) instrument with reliability and validity among ICU surrogates, which is recommended by consensus guidelines for the prospective measurement of psychological distress among ICU surrogates. Each of the 14 questions are scored between 0 (not at all) and 3 (most of the time), and summed up for a total HADS score, which ranges from 0 to 42, with higher scores indicating worse symptoms. Total HADS 0-7 =normal, 8-10 borderline abnormal, 11-21=abnormal, indicating high anxiety and depression. |
| Impact of Events Scale-revised | Baseline,1-36 hours after family meeting, and 3-months | is a is a validated 15-item instrument, measuring post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms. Total score is the sum of all questions and ranges from 0 to 88, with higher scores indicating worse PTSD symptoms. |
| Quality of Communications Scale | 1-36 hours after family meeting | is a is a validated 17-item patient-centered instrument widely used in the ICU to assess surrogates' satisfaction of clinician communication about treatments and understanding treatment decisions. It ranges between 0 (poor) to 10 (absolutely perfect). Total score is the sum of all questions and ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better communication. |
| Patient-Perceived Centeredness of Care Scale | 1-36 hours after family meeting | is a is a validated 14-item, 4-point Likert scale based test. Its version adapted to surrogates has shown responsiveness in a recent trial of a nurse-driven communication intervention for surrogates in the ICU. It ranges between 1 (very well) to 4 (not at all), and median score is calculated from all questions. Median scores range from 1 to 4, with lower scores indicating more patient- and family-centered care. |
| Clinician-surrogate concordance scale score | Baseline and 1-36 hours after family meeting | measures prognostic concordance between ICU clinicians and surrogates. Participants from both groups will independently estimate numerically a SABI patient's 6-month survival and return to independence. Concordance is calculated as the absolute value of the difference in prognosis between the surrogate and the clinician, and, therefore, can range from 0 (no concordance) to 100 (full concordance). |
| Total number of goals-of-care family meetings | 1-36 hours after family meeting | Investigators will sum up the total number of goals-of-care meetings at the patient's ICU discharge. |
| Patient's survival status | 3-months after goals of care decision | Investigators will record whether the patient is dead or alive. |
| Patient's Glasgow Outcome Scale | 3-months after goals of care decision | The Glasgow Outcome Score (GOS) is a validated 5-point scale given to traumatic brain injury or other brain injury patients at some point in their recovery. It is a very general assessment of the general functioning of the person who suffered a head injury or other neurological injury. It ranges from 1-5 (higher scores indicating better functional status): 1=death, 2=Vegetative State, 3=Severely Disabled (conscious but the patient requires others for daily support due to disability), 4=Moderately Disabled (the patient is independent but disabled), 5=Good Recovery (the patient has resumed most normal activities but may have minor residual problems). |
| Patient's modified Rankin Scale | 3-months after goals of care decision | is a validated scale that measures the degree of disability or dependence in the daily activities of people who have suffered a stroke or other causes of neurological disability. It ranges from 0 (no symptoms at all) to 6 (death). |
| Surrogate Decision Regret Scale | 3-months after goals of care decision | is a validated scale that measures distress or remorse after a health care decision with high internal consistency. It asks 5 questions and provides a 5-point Likert scale. It ranges between 1 (strongly agree) to 5 (strongly disagree). |
| Cumulative duration of the goals-of-care family meetings | 1-36 hours after family meeting | Investigators will track the duration of each goals-of-care meeting. At the patient's ICU discharge, investigators will sum up the cumulative duration of all goals-of-care meetings \[minutes\]. |
| Decision Self-Efficacy Scale | 1-36 hours after family meeting | is a validated scale that measures self-confidence in making an informed choice using a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (not at all confident) to 4 (very confident). |
| Decisional Conflict Scale | 1-36 hours after family meeting | is a validated scale that measures the personal perception of choosing an option and factors contributing to choice uncertainty. It is a 16-item, 5-item Likert scale with sub-scores for uncertainty, feeling informed, values clarity, decision support and effective decision-making. It ranges from 0 (strongly agree) to 4 (strongly disagree). |
Countries
United States
Outcome results
None listed