Skip to content

Comparative Effectiveness of Financial Incentives and Nudges to Reduce Cellphone Use While Driving Among UBI Auto Policy Holders

Comparative Effectiveness of Financial Incentives and Smartphone-based Nudges to Reduce Cellphone Use While Driving Among Auto Insurance Policy Holders With Usage Based Insurance Policies

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03833219
Enrollment
2108
Registered
2019-02-06
Start date
2019-05-07
Completion date
2020-08-30
Last updated
2020-09-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Automobile Accident

Keywords

distracted driving automobile, behavioral economics, usage-based insurance, auto insurance, automobile, smartphone application

Brief summary

The investigators are proposing an experiment to help a national auto insurance company test behavioral economic strategies to reduce the amount of time policy holders actively use their cell phone while driving. Interventions include financial incentives, social comparison, and nudges, and survey data will also be collected. Data collected from this internal trial will be shared with the Penn research team and analyzed

Interventions

BEHAVIORALWeekly feedback

Send push notification reporting user's handheld phone use while driving compared to distribution for driver cohort (age, geographic area) each week.

BEHAVIORALEnd of intervention period incentive

Notify participant about potential incentive at the end of the intervention period, but do not provide weekly feedback about performance.

BEHAVIORALLoss-framed weekly incentive

Send push notification reporting user's handheld phone use while driving compared to distribution for driver cohort (age, geographic area) each week. Pay participant weekly according to where they fall on the distribution each week.

Sponsors

U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
University of Pennsylvania
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
FACTORIAL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
16 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Progressive Snapshot Users with policy activated within recruitment period * Progressive Snapshot policy holder in one of the following states and regions: MI, PA, TX, FL, TN, OR, GA, NE, OK, OH, MT, MO, NV, CT, WI, MD, KY, MN, NH, NJ, AZ, ME, LA, SC, CO, MS, IN, IA, AL, ND, UT, RI, WV, WY, IL, AR, DE, KS, SD, NM, VT, ID, and the District of Columbia * Has an email address

Exclusion criteria

* Progressive Snapshot Mobile App not updated to enable push notifications * Customer's residential address is in a state in which phone use while driving is factored into insurance rating * Customer's Snapshot Mobile App does not collect trip data with all sensors active * Customer in Snapshot program for \< 30 days or more \> 70 days

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Seconds of active phone use per hour of driving150 daysPercentage of driving time engaging in active handheld phone use (also measured as seconds of distracted driving/hour of driving)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Seconds of passive phone use per hour of driving150 daysSeconds of passive handheld, non-call use per hour of driving
Hard breaking events per 100 miles150 daysnotifications turned off, drop out of study, app uninstall
Hard acceleration events per 100 miles150 daysHard acceleration events per 100 miles

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 18, 2026