Major Depressive Disorder, Major Depressive Episode, Treatment Resistant Depression
Conditions
Keywords
botulinumtoxin, botox, depression, geriatric depression, depression in older adults, depression in the elderly, old age depression
Brief summary
The effectiveness of glabellar injection of botulinum toxin type A (BTA) in treating depression has not yet been investigated in elderly patients. The study aims in addressing the question if glabellar injection of BTA is effective in treating geriatric depression.
Detailed description
Feedback from facial expressions is known to influence emotional experience. Treatment of muscles involved in facial expression of sadness, anger or anxiety with botulinumtoxin showed a quick, strong and sustained improvement in the symptoms of depression. As considerable proportion of patients do not sufficiently respond to existing treatment options. Especially in the elderly current treatments show limited response or are associated with side effects. Injections with BTA are considered as a very safe treatment without lasting side effects. The aim of the study is to investigate effectiveness of BTA in treating major depression in the elderly in a cross-over designed, placebo-controlled manner.
Interventions
glabellar injections with botulinum toxin A
glabellar injections with sodium chloride
Sponsors
Study design
Intervention model description
placebo controlled, randomized, cross-over
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Clinically relevant depressive symptoms ( defined as MADRS \> 12)
Exclusion criteria
cognitive deficits that impair the participant´s ability to provide written informed consent severe depression MADRS \>34 suicidality treatment with more than 3 psychotropic medications recent changes (4 weeks) in current psychotropic medication previous treatment with study drug active substance abuse bipolar disorder schizophrenia unstable medical condition usage of warfarin or NOAC bleeding disorder known hypersensitivity to study drog or any of the excipients of the formulation myasthenia gravis or Eaton Lambert syndrome presence of infection at the proposed injection sites
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Severity og depressive symptoms, response to treatment | 16 weeks | Response to treatment, as defined as a 50% or greater decrease in Montgomery Aasberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) from baseline Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale The Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) is a ten-item diagnostic questionnaire to measure the severity of depressive episodes in patients with mood disorders. Higher MADRS score indicates more severe depression, and each item yields a score of 0 to 6. The overall score ranges from 0 to 60.\[4\] The questionnaire includes questions on the following symptoms 1. Apparent sadness 2. Reported sadness 3. Inner tension 4. Reduced sleep 5. Reduced appetite 6. Concentration difficulties 7. Lassitude 8. Inability to feel 9. Pessimistic thoughts 10. Suicidal thoughts Usual cutoff points are: 0 to 6 - normal /symptom absent 7 to 19 - mild depression 20 to 34 - moderate depression \>34 - severe depression. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| remission | 16 weeks | remission rate, as defined by a Montgomery Aasberg Depression Rating Scale MADRS score of 10 or lower |
| severity of depressive symptoms, self-rated Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) | 16 weeks | severity of depressive symptoms, self-rated Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) In the Geriatric Depression Scale, questions are answered yes or no. A five-category response set is not utilized in order to ensure that the scale is simple enough to be used when testing ill or moderately cognitively impaired individuals, for whom a more complex set of answers may be confusing, or lead to inaccurate recording of responses. The scale consists of 30 yes/no questions. Each question is scored as either 0 or 1 points. The following general cutoff may be used to qualify the severity: normal 0-9, mild depressives 10-19, severe depressives 20-30. |
| quality of life, as assessed with QOL-AD | 16 weeks | quality of life, as assessed with the questionnaire QOL-AD Use of the QOL-AD for measuring quality of life in people with dementia Scoring instructions for QOL-AD: Points are assigned to each item as follows:poor=1,fair=2,good=3,excellent=4. The total score is the sum of all 13 items. |
| safety/tolerability | 16 weeks | Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, as assessed by number in registration of AE/SAE |