Skip to content

A Study of LY3375880 in Adults With Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis

A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 2 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of LY3375880 in Adult Subjects With Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis: The ADmIRe Study

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03831191
Acronym
ADmIRe
Enrollment
136
Registered
2019-02-05
Start date
2019-02-12
Completion date
2020-02-27
Last updated
2021-04-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Atopic Dermatitis

Keywords

eczema, atopic eczema

Brief summary

The reason for this study is to see if the study drug LY3375880 is safe and effective in adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD).

Interventions

Administered SC

DRUGPlacebo

Administered SC

Sponsors

Eli Lilly and Company
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Participants must have diagnosis of AD \>= 12 months according to the American Academy of Dermatology criteria. * Participants must have moderate to severe AD at screening and randomization. * Participants must have inadequate response to topical medications within 6 months of screening (or history of intolerance).

Exclusion criteria

* Participants must not have concurrent treatment with topical or systemic treatments for AD.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants Achieving Validated Investigator's Global Assessment for AD (vIGA-AD) of 0 or 1 With a ≥2 Point ImprovementWeek 16vIGA-AD measures participants' overall severity of their atopic dermatitis (AD), based on a static, numeric 5 point scale from 0 (clear) to 4 (severe). Higher scores indicate greater severity.The score is based on an overall assessment of the degree of erythema, papulation/induration, oozing/crusting, and lichenification. Non-responder imputation (NRI) method was used to impute missing data.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants Achieving SCORing Atopic Dermatitis 75 (SCORAD-75)Week 16The SCORAD index uses the rule of nines to assess disease extent (head and neck 9%; upper limbs 9% each; lower limbs 18% each; anterior trunk 18%; back 18%; and genitals 1%). It evaluates 6 clinical characteristics to determine disease severity: (1) erythema, (2) edema/papulation, (3) oozing/crusts, (4) excoriation, (5) lichenification, and (6) dryness on a scale of 0 to 3 (0=absence, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe). The SCORAD index also assesses subjective symptoms of pruritus and sleep loss in the last 72 hours on visual analogue scales (VAS) of 0 to 10 where 0 is no itch or sleep loss and 10 is worst imaginable itch or sleep loss. These 3 aspects: extent of disease, disease severity, and subjective symptoms combine to give a score between 0(no disease) and 103 (severe disease). Higher scores indicate greater severity.Non-responder imputation (NRI) method was used to impute missing data.
Percentage of Participants Achieving vIGA-AD of 0Week 16vIGA-AD measures participants overall severity of their atopic dermatitis (AD), based on a static, numeric 5 point scale from 0 (clear) to 4 (severe). Higher scores indicate greater severity. The score is based on an overall assessment of the degree of erythema, papulation/induration, oozing/crusting, and lichenification. Non-responder imputation (NRI) method was used to impute missing data.
Mean Change From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) ScoreBaseline, Week 16EASI assesses objective physician estimates of 2 dimensions of atopic dermatitis-disease extent and clinical signs-by scoring the extent of disease(percentage of skin affected: 0= 0%;1 =1-9%; 2 =10-29%;3 = 30-49%;4 = 50-69%;5 = 70-89%;6 = 90-100%) and the severity of 4 clinical signs (erythema,edema/papulation,excoriation,and lichenification) each on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = none, absent; 1 =mild; 2 = moderate; 3=severe) at 4 body sites(head and neck,trunk,upper limbs,and lower limbs).Half scores are allowed.Each body site will have a score that ranges from 0 to 72,and the final EASI score will be obtained by weight-averaging these 4 scores.Hence,the final EASI score will range from 0 to 72(severe) for each time point.Higher scores indicate greater severity.Least Squares Mean(LS Means) were calculated using mixed model repeated measures(MMRM) with treatment,region, baseline disease severity,visit,treatment-by-visit-interaction,baseline and baseline-by-visit-interaction as fixed effects.
Percentage of Participants Achieving Eczema Area and Severity Index 75 (EASI-75)Week 16EASI assesses objective physician estimates of 2 dimensions of atopic dermatitis - disease extent and clinical signs - by scoring the extent of disease (percentage of skin affected: 0 = 0%; 1 = 1-9%; 2 = 10-29%; 3 = 30-49%; 4 = 50-69%; 5 = 70-89%; 6 = 90-100%) and the severity of 4 clinical signs (erythema, edema/papulation, excoriation, and lichenification) each on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = none, absent; 1 = mild; 2 = moderate; 3 = severe) at 4 body sites (head and neck, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs). Half scores are allowed. Each body site will have a score that ranges from 0 to 72, and the final EASI score will be obtained by weight-averaging these 4 scores. Hence, the final EASI score will range from 0 to 72 (severe) for each time point. A higher score represented greater disease severity.The EASI75 is defined as a ≥ 75% improvement from baseline in the EASI score. Non-responder imputation (NRI) method was used to impute missing data.
Percentage of Participants Achieving vIGA-AD of 0 or 1 With a >=2-point Improvement at Week 52Week 52vIGA-AD measures participants overall severity of their atopic dermatitis (AD), based on a static, numeric 5 point scale from 0 (clear) to 4 (severe). Higher scores indicate greater severity. The score is based on an overall assessment of the degree of erythema, papulation/induration, oozing/crusting, and lichenification. Non-responder imputation (NRI) method was used to impute missing data.
Pharmacokinetics (PK): Area Under the Concentration Versus Time Curve at a Steady State (AUCτ,ss) of LY3375880Induction Period: Pre-dose, Day 0, Day 7, Day 14, Day 28, Day 56, Day 112 Post-dose; Maintenance Period:Predose, Day 168; Day 252, Day 364 Post-dosePharmacokinetics (PK): Area Under the Concentration Versus Time Curve at a steady state (AUCτ,ss) of LY3375880. The PK model was fit using all quantifiable concentrations that were collected in the study (i.e., from the induction and maintenance periods).
Mean Change From Baseline in SCORADBaseline, Week 16The SCORAD index uses the rule of nines to assess disease extent (head and neck 9%;upper limbs 9% each;lower limbs 18% each;anterior trunk 18%;back 18%;and genitals 1%).It evaluates 6 clinical characteristics to determine disease severity: (1)erythema,(2)edema/papulation, (3)oozing/crusts,(4) excoriation,(5) lichenification, and (6) dryness on a scale of 0 to 3(0=absence,1=mild,2=moderate,3=severe).The SCORAD index also assesses subjective symptoms of pruritus and sleep loss in the last 72 hours on visual analogue scales(VAS) of 0 to 10 where 0 is no itch or sleep loss and 10 is worst imaginable itch or sleep loss.These 3 aspects: extent of disease,disease severity,and subjective symptoms combine to give a score between 0(no disease) and 103(severe disease).Higher scores indicate greater severity. LS Means were calculated using a MMRM model with treatment,region,baseline disease severity,visit, treatment-by-visit-interaction,baseline and baseline-by-visit-interaction as fixed effects.

Countries

Argentina, Austria, Canada, Czechia, France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Puerto Rico, Spain, United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Responders are participants who achieved a 50% reduction in the Eczema Area and Severity Index score \[EASI-50\] response, regardless of whether rescue therapy had been initiated during induction period. Participants did not receive 300 mg because the trial was stopped early.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo
Induction Period: Participants received placebo administered SC Q4W.
33
50 mg LY3375880
Induction Period: Participants received 50 mg LY3375880 administered SC Q4W.
35
150 mg LY3375880
Induction Period: Participants received 150 mg LY3375880 administered SC Q4W.
34
600 mg LY3375880
Induction Period: Participants received 600 mg LY3375880 administered SC Q4W.
34
Total136

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004FG005FG006FG007FG008FG009FG010FG011FG012FG013FG014
Induction Period (16 Weeks)Adverse Event213400000000000
Induction Period (16 Weeks)Lack of Efficacy230000000000000
Induction Period (16 Weeks)Pregnancy001000000000000
Induction Period (16 Weeks)Protocol Violation000200000000000
Induction Period (16 Weeks)Sponsor Decision000100000000000
Induction Period (16 Weeks)Study Terminated by Sponsor1215161300000000000
Induction Period (16 Weeks)Withdrawal by Subject721300000000000
Maintenance Period (36 Weeks)Lost to Follow-up000000000000001
Maintenance Period (36 Weeks)Study Terminated by Sponsor000045248147116
Maintenance Period (36 Weeks)Withdrawal by Subject000000000000002

Baseline characteristics

Characteristic50 mg LY3375880150 mg LY3375880Placebo600 mg LY3375880Total
Age, Continuous37.70 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16
39.50 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.94
37.00 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.98
36.80 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.84
37.80 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.6
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
11 Participants9 Participants9 Participants8 Participants37 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
14 Participants14 Participants12 Participants16 Participants56 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
10 Participants11 Participants12 Participants10 Participants43 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
14 Participants10 Participants11 Participants12 Participants47 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants2 Participants0 Participants3 Participants6 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants0 Participants4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
19 Participants20 Participants19 Participants19 Participants77 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Argentina
3 Participants5 Participants5 Participants4 Participants17 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Austria
4 Participants1 Participants0 Participants2 Participants7 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Canada
0 Participants3 Participants0 Participants1 Participants4 Participants
Region of Enrollment
France
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants0 Participants4 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Hungary
0 Participants3 Participants1 Participants1 Participants5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Italy
1 Participants1 Participants1 Participants3 Participants6 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Japan
11 Participants10 Participants10 Participants10 Participants41 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Spain
0 Participants3 Participants0 Participants1 Participants4 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
15 Participants7 Participants14 Participants12 Participants48 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
16 Participants17 Participants11 Participants14 Participants58 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
19 Participants17 Participants22 Participants20 Participants78 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
EG006
affected / at risk
EG007
affected / at risk
EG008
affected / at risk
EG009
affected / at risk
EG010
affected / at risk
EG011
affected / at risk
EG012
affected / at risk
EG013
affected / at risk
EG014
affected / at risk
EG015
affected / at risk
EG016
affected / at risk
EG017
affected / at risk
EG018
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 330 / 350 / 340 / 330 / 40 / 50 / 20 / 40 / 80 / 10 / 40 / 80 / 10 / 10 / 90 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 0
other
Total, other adverse events
7 / 339 / 3512 / 3412 / 331 / 44 / 51 / 21 / 42 / 81 / 11 / 43 / 80 / 10 / 12 / 90 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 0
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 330 / 350 / 342 / 330 / 41 / 50 / 20 / 40 / 80 / 10 / 40 / 80 / 10 / 10 / 90 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 0

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants Achieving Validated Investigator's Global Assessment for AD (vIGA-AD) of 0 or 1 With a ≥2 Point Improvement

vIGA-AD measures participants' overall severity of their atopic dermatitis (AD), based on a static, numeric 5 point scale from 0 (clear) to 4 (severe). Higher scores indicate greater severity.The score is based on an overall assessment of the degree of erythema, papulation/induration, oozing/crusting, and lichenification. Non-responder imputation (NRI) method was used to impute missing data.

Time frame: Week 16

Population: Induction Period: All randomized participants who completed or discontinued the study prior to study termination by the sponsor.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving Validated Investigator's Global Assessment for AD (vIGA-AD) of 0 or 1 With a ≥2 Point Improvement9.5 Percentage of participants
50 mg LY3375880Percentage of Participants Achieving Validated Investigator's Global Assessment for AD (vIGA-AD) of 0 or 1 With a ≥2 Point Improvement5.0 Percentage of participants
150 mg LY3375880Percentage of Participants Achieving Validated Investigator's Global Assessment for AD (vIGA-AD) of 0 or 1 With a ≥2 Point Improvement5.9 Percentage of participants
600 mg LY3375880Percentage of Participants Achieving Validated Investigator's Global Assessment for AD (vIGA-AD) of 0 or 1 With a ≥2 Point Improvement4.8 Percentage of participants
p-value: 0.63895% CI: [0.04, 6.81]Regression, Logistic
p-value: 0.77395% CI: [0.05, 8.76]Regression, Logistic
p-value: 0.67195% CI: [0.05, 7.26]Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score

EASI assesses objective physician estimates of 2 dimensions of atopic dermatitis-disease extent and clinical signs-by scoring the extent of disease(percentage of skin affected: 0= 0%;1 =1-9%; 2 =10-29%;3 = 30-49%;4 = 50-69%;5 = 70-89%;6 = 90-100%) and the severity of 4 clinical signs (erythema,edema/papulation,excoriation,and lichenification) each on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = none, absent; 1 =mild; 2 = moderate; 3=severe) at 4 body sites(head and neck,trunk,upper limbs,and lower limbs).Half scores are allowed.Each body site will have a score that ranges from 0 to 72,and the final EASI score will be obtained by weight-averaging these 4 scores.Hence,the final EASI score will range from 0 to 72(severe) for each time point.Higher scores indicate greater severity.Least Squares Mean(LS Means) were calculated using mixed model repeated measures(MMRM) with treatment,region, baseline disease severity,visit,treatment-by-visit-interaction,baseline and baseline-by-visit-interaction as fixed effects.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 16

Population: Induction Period: All randomized participants who had a baseline and at least one post-baseline EASI value.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score-11.45 score on a scaleStandard Error 4.68
50 mg LY3375880Mean Change From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score-4.90 score on a scaleStandard Error 4.3
150 mg LY3375880Mean Change From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score-5.89 score on a scaleStandard Error 4.55
600 mg LY3375880Mean Change From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score-7.87 score on a scaleStandard Error 4.02
p-value: 0.3195% CI: [-6.36, 19.45]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.39395% CI: [-7.5, 18.63]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.56495% CI: [-8.91, 16.08]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in SCORAD

The SCORAD index uses the rule of nines to assess disease extent (head and neck 9%;upper limbs 9% each;lower limbs 18% each;anterior trunk 18%;back 18%;and genitals 1%).It evaluates 6 clinical characteristics to determine disease severity: (1)erythema,(2)edema/papulation, (3)oozing/crusts,(4) excoriation,(5) lichenification, and (6) dryness on a scale of 0 to 3(0=absence,1=mild,2=moderate,3=severe).The SCORAD index also assesses subjective symptoms of pruritus and sleep loss in the last 72 hours on visual analogue scales(VAS) of 0 to 10 where 0 is no itch or sleep loss and 10 is worst imaginable itch or sleep loss.These 3 aspects: extent of disease,disease severity,and subjective symptoms combine to give a score between 0(no disease) and 103(severe disease).Higher scores indicate greater severity. LS Means were calculated using a MMRM model with treatment,region,baseline disease severity,visit, treatment-by-visit-interaction,baseline and baseline-by-visit-interaction as fixed effects.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 16

Population: Induction Period: All randomized participants who had a baseline and at least one post-baseline SCORAD value.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in SCORAD-19.27 score on a scaleStandard Error 5.92
50 mg LY3375880Mean Change From Baseline in SCORAD-11.66 score on a scaleStandard Error 5.72
150 mg LY3375880Mean Change From Baseline in SCORAD-16.94 score on a scaleStandard Error 6.03
600 mg LY3375880Mean Change From Baseline in SCORAD-12.75 score on a scaleStandard Error 5.3
p-value: 0.35695% CI: [-8.82, 24.05]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.78395% CI: [-14.64, 19.3]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.41495% CI: [-9.4, 22.43]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving Eczema Area and Severity Index 75 (EASI-75)

EASI assesses objective physician estimates of 2 dimensions of atopic dermatitis - disease extent and clinical signs - by scoring the extent of disease (percentage of skin affected: 0 = 0%; 1 = 1-9%; 2 = 10-29%; 3 = 30-49%; 4 = 50-69%; 5 = 70-89%; 6 = 90-100%) and the severity of 4 clinical signs (erythema, edema/papulation, excoriation, and lichenification) each on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = none, absent; 1 = mild; 2 = moderate; 3 = severe) at 4 body sites (head and neck, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs). Half scores are allowed. Each body site will have a score that ranges from 0 to 72, and the final EASI score will be obtained by weight-averaging these 4 scores. Hence, the final EASI score will range from 0 to 72 (severe) for each time point. A higher score represented greater disease severity.The EASI75 is defined as a ≥ 75% improvement from baseline in the EASI score. Non-responder imputation (NRI) method was used to impute missing data.

Time frame: Week 16

Population: Induction Period: All randomized participants who completed or discontinued the study prior to study termination by the sponsor.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving Eczema Area and Severity Index 75 (EASI-75)19.0 Percentage of Participants
50 mg LY3375880Percentage of Participants Achieving Eczema Area and Severity Index 75 (EASI-75)15.0 Percentage of Participants
150 mg LY3375880Percentage of Participants Achieving Eczema Area and Severity Index 75 (EASI-75)23.5 Percentage of Participants
600 mg LY3375880Percentage of Participants Achieving Eczema Area and Severity Index 75 (EASI-75)0.0 Percentage of Participants
p-value: >0.99995% CI: [-27.2, 19.9]Fisher Exact
p-value: >0.99995% CI: [-20.7, 30.8]Fisher Exact
p-value: 0.10795% CI: [-40, 0.2]Fisher Exact
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving SCORing Atopic Dermatitis 75 (SCORAD-75)

The SCORAD index uses the rule of nines to assess disease extent (head and neck 9%; upper limbs 9% each; lower limbs 18% each; anterior trunk 18%; back 18%; and genitals 1%). It evaluates 6 clinical characteristics to determine disease severity: (1) erythema, (2) edema/papulation, (3) oozing/crusts, (4) excoriation, (5) lichenification, and (6) dryness on a scale of 0 to 3 (0=absence, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe). The SCORAD index also assesses subjective symptoms of pruritus and sleep loss in the last 72 hours on visual analogue scales (VAS) of 0 to 10 where 0 is no itch or sleep loss and 10 is worst imaginable itch or sleep loss. These 3 aspects: extent of disease, disease severity, and subjective symptoms combine to give a score between 0(no disease) and 103 (severe disease). Higher scores indicate greater severity.Non-responder imputation (NRI) method was used to impute missing data.

Time frame: Week 16

Population: Induction Period: All randomized participants who completed or discontinued the study prior to study termination by the sponsor.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving SCORing Atopic Dermatitis 75 (SCORAD-75)4.8 Percentage of participants
50 mg LY3375880Percentage of Participants Achieving SCORing Atopic Dermatitis 75 (SCORAD-75)5.0 Percentage of participants
150 mg LY3375880Percentage of Participants Achieving SCORing Atopic Dermatitis 75 (SCORAD-75)0.0 Percentage of participants
600 mg LY3375880Percentage of Participants Achieving SCORing Atopic Dermatitis 75 (SCORAD-75)0.0 Percentage of participants
p-value: >0.99995% CI: [-18.1, 19.3]Fisher Exact
p-value: >0.99995% CI: [-22.7, 14.1]Fisher Exact
p-value: >0.99995% CI: [-22.7, 11.2]Fisher Exact
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving vIGA-AD of 0

vIGA-AD measures participants overall severity of their atopic dermatitis (AD), based on a static, numeric 5 point scale from 0 (clear) to 4 (severe). Higher scores indicate greater severity. The score is based on an overall assessment of the degree of erythema, papulation/induration, oozing/crusting, and lichenification. Non-responder imputation (NRI) method was used to impute missing data.

Time frame: Week 16

Population: Induction Period: All randomized participants who completed or discontinued the study prior to study termination by the sponsor.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving vIGA-AD of 00.0 Percentage of participants
50 mg LY3375880Percentage of Participants Achieving vIGA-AD of 00.0 Percentage of participants
150 mg LY3375880Percentage of Participants Achieving vIGA-AD of 00.0 Percentage of participants
600 mg LY3375880Percentage of Participants Achieving vIGA-AD of 00.0 Percentage of participants
95% CI: [0, 0]
95% CI: [0, 0]
95% CI: [0, 0]
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving vIGA-AD of 0 or 1 With a >=2-point Improvement at Week 52

vIGA-AD measures participants overall severity of their atopic dermatitis (AD), based on a static, numeric 5 point scale from 0 (clear) to 4 (severe). Higher scores indicate greater severity. The score is based on an overall assessment of the degree of erythema, papulation/induration, oozing/crusting, and lichenification. Non-responder imputation (NRI) method was used to impute missing data.

Time frame: Week 52

Population: Maintenance Period: All randomized participants who had a \>=2-point improvement at Week 52.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving vIGA-AD of 0 or 1 With a >=2-point Improvement at Week 520.0 Percentage of participants
50 mg LY3375880Percentage of Participants Achieving vIGA-AD of 0 or 1 With a >=2-point Improvement at Week 520.0 Percentage of participants
150 mg LY3375880Percentage of Participants Achieving vIGA-AD of 0 or 1 With a >=2-point Improvement at Week 520.0 Percentage of participants
600 mg LY3375880Percentage of Participants Achieving vIGA-AD of 0 or 1 With a >=2-point Improvement at Week 520.0 Percentage of participants
600 mg LY3375880Percentage of Participants Achieving vIGA-AD of 0 or 1 With a >=2-point Improvement at Week 520.0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Pharmacokinetics (PK): Area Under the Concentration Versus Time Curve at a Steady State (AUCτ,ss) of LY3375880

Pharmacokinetics (PK): Area Under the Concentration Versus Time Curve at a steady state (AUCτ,ss) of LY3375880. The PK model was fit using all quantifiable concentrations that were collected in the study (i.e., from the induction and maintenance periods).

Time frame: Induction Period: Pre-dose, Day 0, Day 7, Day 14, Day 28, Day 56, Day 112 Post-dose; Maintenance Period:Predose, Day 168; Day 252, Day 364 Post-dose

Population: All randomized participants who received LY3375880 in induction and maintenance period who had evaluable PK data. Participants did not received 300 mg because the trial was stopped early.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPharmacokinetics (PK): Area Under the Concentration Versus Time Curve at a Steady State (AUCτ,ss) of LY33758804450 Nanograms*hour per millilitre (ng*h/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 80.2
50 mg LY3375880Pharmacokinetics (PK): Area Under the Concentration Versus Time Curve at a Steady State (AUCτ,ss) of LY337588011200 Nanograms*hour per millilitre (ng*h/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 41.9
150 mg LY3375880Pharmacokinetics (PK): Area Under the Concentration Versus Time Curve at a Steady State (AUCτ,ss) of LY337588049000 Nanograms*hour per millilitre (ng*h/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 40.5

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026