Skip to content

Dry Pleurodesis With Talcum and Afatinib is Used to Treat Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma

New Method of Treatment for Thoracoscopy or Bronchoscopy by Suspension of Fine Powder of Talcum and Afatinib is Used in Patients With Positive Mutation of EGFR in Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma (NSCLC)

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03827070
Acronym
DPTA
Enrollment
12
Registered
2019-02-01
Start date
2019-03-05
Completion date
2023-07-21
Last updated
2023-04-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Non Small Cell Lung Cancer

Keywords

Afatinib, Talcum powder, Thoracoscopy, Pleurodesis, BIBW2992

Brief summary

In non-small cell lung cancer and metastases in the pleural cavity, pathological effusion is formed. Currently, the most common and effective method of obliteration of the pleural cavity is pleurodesis with talcum powder. Talc, when it surface of the pleura, causes chemical inflammation that leads to the soldering of the lungs and chest wall. As a result, the liquid ceases to accumulate. The addition of a therapeutic dose of afatinib to talc not only blocks effusion into the pleural cavity, but also reduces tumor and metastatic processes.

Detailed description

The proposed procedure for dry pleurodesis consists of one stage. Talc is introduced into the pleural cavity in several ways: * Drainage - a tube is inserted into the pleural cavity through a puncture in the chest, and then a pasty talcum is delivered into the cavity, which spreads through the cavity during the change of the patient's body position. * Talcum powder - under the control of thoracoscopy, dry talc is blown into the pleural cavity of the patient, which allows him to evenly distribute and significantly increases the effectiveness of the procedure. In this Clinical Trial investigators will use the method of thoracoscopy - the blow in of talcum powder and therapeutic dose of Afatinib. Before injection, a suspension of talc and afatinib is subjected to the procedure of pharmaceutical mixing. The operation is well tolerated by participants and lasts no more than 30 minutes. The effectiveness of the method is 90%.

Interventions

DRUGAfatinib

Used Afatinib particles of which had an average size of 22 μm and a volume concentration of small particles (\<5 μm) - only 19%

Used Talcum powder particles of which had an average size of 24.5 μm and a volume concentration of small particles (\<5 μm) - only 11%

Sponsors

Center Trials & Treatment
CollaboratorOTHER
Center Trials & Treatment Europe
Lead SponsorNETWORK

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Masking description

None (Open Label)

Intervention model description

Single Group Assignment

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
21 Years to 40 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Non-small cell lung cancer with positive mutation of EGFR verified * Malignant pleural effusion * Recurrent pleural effusion * Complete lung expansion (\> 80%) after puncture emptying confirmed by chest radiography. * Karnofsky index \> 50 * Agreed to participate in the study and sign an Informed Consent

Exclusion criteria

* Radiotherapy not earlier than 3 months before the pleurodesis procedure * Previous surgeries on the same hemitorace * Thrombocytopenia or coagulation disorders * Trapped lung syndrome * Patients with estimated life expectancy \< 4-8 weeks * Pleural or active systemic infection

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The effectiveness of the procedure of dry pleurodesis through a thoracoscopeup to 90 daysEvaluation of the effectiveness of the dry pleurodesis procedure in combination with talc and afatinib with the introduction of a powder suspension through a thoracoscope. The assessment is performed by CT (computed tomography) of each participant twice: 30 days from the day of the procedure and 90 days later.

Countries

Georgia

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026