Skip to content

Comparison Of Videolaryngoscopes In Double Lumen Tube

Comparison Of Storz C-Mac® D Blade Videolaryngoscope With McGrath® X3 Blade Videolaryngoscope In Double Lumen Tube Patients

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03826706
Acronym
D&Xblade
Enrollment
50
Registered
2019-02-01
Start date
2019-02-15
Completion date
2019-04-10
Last updated
2019-02-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Double Lumen Tube, One-lung Ventilation, Videolaryngoscopy

Keywords

Videolaryngoscopy, Double lumen tube, One-lung ventilation

Brief summary

Along with the technological advances in medicine, videolaryngoscope is the most commonly preferred technique for intubation with double lumen tube. The use of Storz C-MAC D Blade and McGrath MAC X3 Blade videolaryngoscope were compared in intubation of single lung ventilation patients who underwent chest surgery in terms of duration of intubation, hemodynamic response and intubation-induced complications.

Detailed description

It is very important for anesthesiologists to evaluate and make the airway safe in order to start and continue surgical operations. Endotracheal intubation has many important reasons such as ensuring airway control safely during surgical procedure, increasing the depth of anesthesia, need interventions for surgical or anesthetic complications, reduction of dead space, reduction of respiratory effort and prevention of aspiration risk. Videolaryngoscope, developed in recent years and beginning to take place in the algorithms, facilitate difficult airway management and hence intubation. The use of videolaryngoscope in patients with intubation such as double lumen tube, has been frequently reported in the literature. McGrath videolaryngoscope has a high-resolution video camera, a length-adjustable angle blade, and a light source at the tip of the blade. At the same time, the C-MAC videolaryngoscope is another advanced videolaryngoscope with a better quality video and camera system and improves the performance of videolaryngoscope with some technological changes. In this prospective controlled clinical study, the purpose is to compare C-MAC videolaryngoscope with D blade and McGrath MAC videolaryngoscope with X3 blade in respect to duration of intubation, haemodynamic response, and adverse events associated with intubation of patients undergoing lung surgery.

Interventions

DEVICEC-MAC Videolaryngoscope D blade

C-MAC videolaryngoscope D blade An intubating device that is used for endotracheal intubation. Endotracheal intubation was applied by anesthesiologist with C-MAC videolaryngoscope.

DEVICEMcGrath MAC Videolaryngoscope X3 blade

McGrath MAC videolaryngoscope X blade An intubating device that is used for endotracheal intubation. Endotracheal intubation was applied by anesthesiologist with McGrath MAC videolaryngoscope.

Sponsors

Inonu University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SCREENING
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* American Society of Anesthesiology score III, * 18-65 years, * BMI\> 40 * Patients who was intubated with double lumen tube.

Exclusion criteria

* American Society of Anesthesiology IV, * Under 18 years, * Over 65 years, * Under BMI\<40 * Obstetric patients, * Uncontrolled cerebrovascular disease, * Patients who refused written informed consent forms

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to intubationFrom beginning of holding videolaryngoscope to seeing two meaningful end-tidal carbon dioxide levels up to 3 minutesTime to intubation was defined as the time from when the anesthesiologist picked up the videolaryngoscope to when the anesthesiologist successfully placed the endotracheal tube through the vocal cords

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Heart RateFrom beginning of Anesthesia induction to 5th minutes of intubationHeart Rate
Mean Arterial PressureAt beginning of Anesthesia induction, 1st, 2nd, 3th and 5th minutes of intubationMean Arterial Pressure
Adverse EventsDuring the first 24 hour postoperativelyBleeding in the mouth, edema in the mouth, burst of intubation tube cuff, external laryngeal press, presence of head position change, laryngospasm, hypoxia, hoarseness, throat ache

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026