Skip to content

Small Bowel Obstruction and Surgery

Nasogastric Tube After Small Bowel Obstruction Surgery is Not Mandatory: a Retrospective Cohort Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03826251
Enrollment
190
Registered
2019-02-01
Start date
2014-01-01
Completion date
2018-06-01
Last updated
2019-02-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Small Intestine Obstruction

Brief summary

Postoperative management after small bowel obstruction (SBO) surgery is not consensual and better knowledge of risk factors for postoperative morbidity could help to add evidence of the feasibility of enhanced recovery programs (ERPs). In elective surgery, ERPs have shown a significant benefit for the patient but this is not performed routinely in emergency surgery due to the difficulty to avoid postoperative nasogastric tube. The aim was to identify risk factors for postoperative morbidity and for nasogastric tube (NGT) replacement after SBO surgery.

Interventions

PROCEDURENasogastric tube removal

Nasogastric tube was removed immediately after surgery

Sponsors

University Hospital, Angers
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 99 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Surgical management of Small bowel obstruction due to adhesions

Exclusion criteria

* obstruction not caused by single band adhesion * matted adhesions, or if they were less than 18 years old

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
postoperative morbiditywithin 30 daysmorbidity classified according to Dindo Clavien classification

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Nasogastric tube replacementwithin 30 daysnasogastric tube replacement after removal

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026