Skip to content

GnRH Agonist Versus hCG Trigger in Ovulation Induction With Intrauterine Insemination.

GnRH Agonist Versus hCG Trigger in Ovulation Induction With Intrauterine Insemination: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03825445
Enrollment
197
Registered
2019-01-31
Start date
2016-04-01
Completion date
2017-06-30
Last updated
2019-01-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Ovulation Induction

Keywords

GnRH agonist trigger, hCG trigger, ovulation induction

Brief summary

This study aims to compare clinical pregnancy rates (CPR) in patients who are administered either Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRHa) or human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) for ovulation trigger in intrauterine insemination (IUI) cycles. A prospective randomized comparative study was conducted at Hue University Hospital in Vietnam. Total of 197 infertile women were randomly assigned to receive either GnRHa trigger (n=98 cycles) or hCG trigger (n= 99 cycles) for ovulation trigger. Patients returned for ultrasound monitoring 24 hours after IUI to confirm ovulation. A clinical pregnancy was defined as the presence of gestational sac with fetal cardiac activity.

Detailed description

Study design A prospective randomized comparative study was conducted at Hue University Hospital in Vietnam from April 2016 to June 2017 in 197 infertile women undergoing IUI. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee at Hue University of Medicine and Pharmacy. Study population A total of 217 women were recruited into the sample at the first stage. Inclusion criteria were women with bilateral tubal patency, at least one follicle ≥ 18mm in diameter on the day of trigger, and men with more than five millions total motile sperm after preparation. Only the first cycles of IUI were studied and there were 197 infertile women who obtained at least 1 mature follicle at the first cycle were included in analysis. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either GnRHa trigger (n=98 cycles) or hCG trigger (n= 99 cycles) for ovulation trigger. Intervention All patients included in the study were subjected to complete history and physical. Patients with a history of abnormal menstrual cycles (amenorrhea, oligomenorrhea) underwent ovarian stimulation. Stimulation was started on cycle day eight with 75 IU Menogon (Ferring Pharm Co, Switzerland) daily. Ultrasound monitoring was required after every 2-3 days of stimulation and adjustments to dose and duration were tailed according the patient's response. Ovulation was triggered when at least one and no more than 3 follicles reached ≥18mm in diameter. Patients were then randomly assigned to receive either two doses of GnRH-a (Fertipeptil 0.1mg x 2 vial; Ferring Pharm Co, Switzerland) or hCG (Pregnyl 5000IU; Organon Pharm Co, Nertheland) for ovulation trigger. IUI was then performed with sperm preparation by radiant centrifugation 36 hours after the trigger. Luteal phase support with progesterone 200mg daily (Utrogestan; Besins Health Care Com, Belgium) was started in the day of IUI. Assessment of outcomes Patients returned for ultrasound monitoring 24 hours after IUI to confirm ovulation which is determined by the accumulation of free fluid in peritoneum at Douglas sac and disappearance of the previous mature follicles. Serum β-human chorionic gonadotropin (βhCG) was collected 14 days after insemination. A biochemical pregnancy was defined by βhCG concentration \> 25 mIU/ml (Shapphire 350; Cork Com, Ireland). Two weeks after a positive βhCG test, the patient returned for an ultrasound appointment. A clinical pregnancy was defined as the presence of gestational sac with fetal cardiac activity.

Interventions

DRUGGnRHa (Fertipeptil 0.1mg)

Two doses of GnRH-a (Fertipeptil 0.1mg x 2 vial) for ovulation trigger after ovarian stimulation for IUI.

DRUGhCG (Pregnyl 5000IU)

hCG (Pregnyl 5000IU) for ovulation trigger after ovarian stimulation for IUI.

Sponsors

Hue University of Medicine and Pharmacy
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Masking description

Odd even rule

Intervention model description

A prospective randomized comparative study was conducted at Hue University Hospital in Vietnam. Total of 197 infertile women were randomly assigned to receive either GnRHa trigger (n=98 cycles) or hCG trigger (n= 99 cycles) for ovulation trigger. Patients returned for ultrasound monitoring 24 hours after IUI to confirm ovulation.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 45 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Infertile women who were indicated for IUI cycles * bilateral tubal patency * at least one follicle ≥ 18mm in diameter on the day of trigger, and * men with more than five millions total motile sperm after preparation. * Only the first cycles of IUI were studied

Exclusion criteria

* No mature follicle * Disagree to be enrolled

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The effectiveness of GnRHa versus hCG in ovulation induction14 monthsTo compare the ovulation rate of patients who were triggered with GnRHa versus hCG in patients undergoing either natural cycle or controlled ovarian stimulation with gonadotropins and IUI.
The effectiveness of GnRHa versus hCG in pregnancy rate14 monthsTo compare the pregnancy rate of patients who were triggered with GnRHa versus hCG in patients undergoing either natural cycle or controlled ovarian stimulation with gonadotropins and IUI.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026