Skip to content

Optimizing Viral Load Suppression in Kenyan Children on Antiretroviral Therapy

Optimizing Viral Load Suppression in Kenyan Children on Antiretroviral Therapy

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03820323
Acronym
Opt4Kids
Enrollment
704
Registered
2019-01-29
Start date
2019-03-07
Completion date
2020-12-31
Last updated
2024-04-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic HIV Infection

Brief summary

Among nearly 1 million HIV-infected children receiving antiretroviral treatment (ART), as many as 40% of those living in resource limited settings have not achieved virologic suppression. Kenya, a The Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS) fast-track and The U.S. President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) priority country, has an estimated 98,000 children aged 0-14 years living with HIV. Virologic suppression is achieved by only 65% of Kenyan children on ART translating to only 38% of the final UNAIDS 90-90-90 goal for population-level viral suppression. Feasible, scalable and cost-effective approaches to maximizing durability of first-line ART and ensuring viral load (VL) suppression in HIV-infected children are urgently needed. This pilot study will evaluate two critical components related to viral suppression in children via: 1) Point-of-care (POC) VL testing (Aim 1) and 2) targeted drug resistance mutation (DRM) testing (Aim 2) among children on first-line ART at three facilities within a PEPFAR-funded HIV care and treatment program in Kenya. The hypotheses are: 1) viral suppression rates will be higher among children with access to POC VL testing and time to suppression shorter compared to children with standard VL testing and 2) DRM testing will shorten time to viral suppression and that the investigators will observe high levels of 1st line antiretroviral DRMs among children on ART without viral suppression. This proposal directly addresses the urgent need to find interventions to maximize viral suppression among children on ART and achieve the UNAIDS 90-90-90 goals.

Detailed description

The study design will be a randomized, controlled study to pilot the use of POC VL and DRM testing in children aged 1-14 years on first-line ART. Children enrolling at each site will be randomized 1:1 to two study arms. Standard of Care Arm: Participants in the Standard-of-Care (SOC) control arm will receive the standard-of-care VL and DRM testing based on the existing Kenyan national guidelines. VL testing will be 6 months after ART initiation (then every 3 months if unsuppressed, otherwise every 12 months) with DRM testing only if failing second-line ART. Children who have a high lab-based HIV VL (≥1,000 copies/mL) will receive intensive adherence counseling and be asked to return to the clinic in 3 months for repeat HIV VL testing. If the HIV VL remains high (≥1,000 copies/mL), the children will be managed per Kenya national guidelines. Intervention Arm: Children in the intervention arm will undergo POC VL testing every 3 months for a total of 12 months. Targeted DRM testing will include DRM testing for each child on the first detection of lack of viral suppression (VL \> 1000 copies/mL) and in children newly initiating ART. The investigators will follow the viral outcomes 12 months after the implementation of POC VL testing and compare VL suppression rates, defined as VL \<1000 copies/mL by the Kenyan national guidelines, among intervention vs. control arms, accounting for pre-intervention VL suppression rates. The primary outcome for Aim 1 is rates of viral suppression (defined as VL \<1000 copies/mL) at 12 months after POC VL testing implementation at the three facilities. The secondary outcome for Aim 1 is time to viral suppression among those children without viral suppression at their 1st POC VL testing or newly initiating ART after POC VL testing implementation. In Aim 2, the investigators intend to evaluate the impact of targeted HIV DRM testing on viral suppression in the intervention arm only. The investigators will also explore how sociodemographic, behavioral, clinical, and facility factors may be contributing to the DRM patterns they observe.

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTPOC VL and targeted DRM testing.

Point-of-care Viral Load Testing will be done to ensure that providers and caregivers receive the results with in 24 hours study. Targeted DRM testing will be performed during the initiation of ART and when viremia (VL\>1000 copies/mL) is detected.

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTSOC VL testing

SOC VL testing is done at 6 months after ART initiation then every 3 months if unsuppressed, otherwise every 12 months. DRM testing is conducted only if failing 2nd line ART.

Sponsors

National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
CollaboratorNIH
Kenya Medical Research Institute
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Colorado, Denver
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Washington
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
DOUBLE (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Investigators and those conducting the analysis will be blinded to arm allocation

Intervention model description

Randomized control trial of two study arms

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
1 Years to 14 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Children aged 1-14 years living with HIV (documented HIV positive) * On first-line ART per Kenyan National Guideline or * Newly initiating ART

Exclusion criteria

* On second-line, third-line, or non-standard first-line ART

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Viral Suppression12 months after enrollmentViral Load \<1000 copies/mL at 12 months after enrollment

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Virological Suppression at 12 Months Among Children Newly Initiating ART or Initially Virologically Unsuppressed12 months post enrollmentAmong children newly initiating ART or initially virologically unsuppressed, we then evaluated the virological suppression status at 12 months post-enrollment.
Number of Participants Who Underwent POC VL TestingEvery 3 months within the 12 months study periodThe number of children undergoing VL testing within each group (POC VL testing or SOC VL testing) at the scheduled intervals.
Turn-around Time for the VL Testing ResultsEvery 3 months within the 12 months study periodThe time it takes for viral load results to be received by health care providers and participants.
Number of Children With Any or Major Drug Resistance Mutations (DRMs)12 months post enrollmentThe number of children tested for DRMs with any or major mutations within each class of HIV drugs.

Countries

Kenya

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The study was conducted in Kisumu County, western Kenya, with the second-highest prevalence of pediatric HIV infections in Kenya. The study was implemented at five low-resource, high-HIV burden public sector facilities from March 2019 to December 2020. We chose the study facilities to leverage existing POC technologies, specifically the GeneXpert® platform.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Standard of Care
Participants in the Standard-of-Care control arm will receive laboratory based VL testing based on the existing Kenyan national guidelines by routine clinical staff (not study staff). DRM testing is usually done if there is a failing 2nd line ART regimen based on the current Kenyan guideline. SOC VL testing: SOC VL testing is done at 6 months after ART initiation then every 3 months if unsuppressed, otherwise every 12 months. DRM testing is conducted only if failing 2nd line ART.
355
Intervention
POC VL and targeted DRM testing. POC VL and targeted DRM testing.: Point-of-care Viral Load Testing will be done to ensure that providers and caregivers receive the results with in 24 hours study. Targeted DRM testing will be performed during the initiation of ART and when viremia (VL\>1000 copies/mL) is detected.
349
Total704

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyDeath21
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up21
Overall StudyMissed 12-month visit2214
Overall StudyTerminated03
Overall StudyTransferred out1311
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject16

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicInterventionStandard of CareTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
349 Participants355 Participants704 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Continuous9 years9 years9 years
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
349 Participants355 Participants704 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
349 Participants355 Participants704 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Kenya
349 Participants355 Participants704 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
184 Participants160 Participants344 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
165 Participants195 Participants360 Participants
Virological suppression at enrollment
No (viral load >=1000 copies per mL)
38 Participants39 Participants77 Participants
Virological suppression at enrollment
No viral load recorded or missing
49 Participants42 Participants91 Participants
Virological suppression at enrollment
Yes (viral load <1000 copies per mL)
262 Participants274 Participants536 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
2 / 3551 / 349
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 3550 / 349
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 3550 / 349

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants With Viral Suppression

Viral Load \<1000 copies/mL at 12 months after enrollment

Time frame: 12 months after enrollment

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Standard of CareNumber of Participants With Viral Suppression289 participants
InterventionNumber of Participants With Viral Suppression283 participants
p-value: 0.5595% CI: [0.94, 1.03]Modified Poisson regression
Secondary

Number of Children With Any or Major Drug Resistance Mutations (DRMs)

The number of children tested for DRMs with any or major mutations within each class of HIV drugs.

Time frame: 12 months post enrollment

Population: Of 120 samples in the intervention group in which we requested a DRM test, 13 (11%) failed to amplify. We are not able to elucidate reasons why five of the samples in the Standard of Care group were selected for DRM testing or why three of the five requested DRM tests were not performed successfully.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Standard of CareNumber of Children With Any or Major Drug Resistance Mutations (DRMs)Any DRM2 participants
Standard of CareNumber of Children With Any or Major Drug Resistance Mutations (DRMs)NRTI1 participants
Standard of CareNumber of Children With Any or Major Drug Resistance Mutations (DRMs)NNRTI2 participants
Standard of CareNumber of Children With Any or Major Drug Resistance Mutations (DRMs)Protease Inhibitor1 participants
Standard of CareNumber of Children With Any or Major Drug Resistance Mutations (DRMs)Any major DRM2 participants
Standard of CareNumber of Children With Any or Major Drug Resistance Mutations (DRMs)Major NRTI1 participants
Standard of CareNumber of Children With Any or Major Drug Resistance Mutations (DRMs)Major NNRTI2 participants
Standard of CareNumber of Children With Any or Major Drug Resistance Mutations (DRMs)Major protease Inhibitor1 participants
InterventionNumber of Children With Any or Major Drug Resistance Mutations (DRMs)Major protease Inhibitor9 participants
InterventionNumber of Children With Any or Major Drug Resistance Mutations (DRMs)Any DRM107 participants
InterventionNumber of Children With Any or Major Drug Resistance Mutations (DRMs)Any major DRM91 participants
InterventionNumber of Children With Any or Major Drug Resistance Mutations (DRMs)NRTI61 participants
InterventionNumber of Children With Any or Major Drug Resistance Mutations (DRMs)Major NNRTI88 participants
InterventionNumber of Children With Any or Major Drug Resistance Mutations (DRMs)NNRTI88 participants
InterventionNumber of Children With Any or Major Drug Resistance Mutations (DRMs)Major NRTI61 participants
InterventionNumber of Children With Any or Major Drug Resistance Mutations (DRMs)Protease Inhibitor9 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Who Underwent POC VL Testing

The number of children undergoing VL testing within each group (POC VL testing or SOC VL testing) at the scheduled intervals.

Time frame: Every 3 months within the 12 months study period

Population: Of note, during the 6- and 9-month study visits, COVID-19 related restrictions in travel and routine care greatly affected our ability to obtain samples for VL testing leading to varying numbers analyzed per month.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Standard of CareNumber of Participants Who Underwent POC VL Testing3 months185 participants
Standard of CareNumber of Participants Who Underwent POC VL Testing9 months143 participants
Standard of CareNumber of Participants Who Underwent POC VL Testing6 months131 participants
Standard of CareNumber of Participants Who Underwent POC VL Testing12 months135 participants
Standard of CareNumber of Participants Who Underwent POC VL Testing0 months167 participants
InterventionNumber of Participants Who Underwent POC VL Testing12 months286 participants
InterventionNumber of Participants Who Underwent POC VL Testing0 months349 participants
InterventionNumber of Participants Who Underwent POC VL Testing3 months301 participants
InterventionNumber of Participants Who Underwent POC VL Testing6 months177 participants
InterventionNumber of Participants Who Underwent POC VL Testing9 months186 participants
Secondary

Turn-around Time for the VL Testing Results

The time it takes for viral load results to be received by health care providers and participants.

Time frame: Every 3 months within the 12 months study period

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Standard of CareTurn-around Time for the VL Testing Results15 days
InterventionTurn-around Time for the VL Testing Results1 days
Secondary

Virological Suppression at 12 Months Among Children Newly Initiating ART or Initially Virologically Unsuppressed

Among children newly initiating ART or initially virologically unsuppressed, we then evaluated the virological suppression status at 12 months post-enrollment.

Time frame: 12 months post enrollment

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Standard of CareVirological Suppression at 12 Months Among Children Newly Initiating ART or Initially Virologically Unsuppressed42 Participants
InterventionVirological Suppression at 12 Months Among Children Newly Initiating ART or Initially Virologically Unsuppressed36 Participants
p-value: 0.2895% CI: [0.66, 1.13]Modified Poission regression

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 25, 2026