Skip to content

The Role of High-flow Nasal Cannula Therapy in the Treatment of Acute Carbon Monoxide Poisoning

High-flow Nasal Cannula Therapy in the Treatment of Acute Carbon Monoxide Poisoning

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03818841
Enrollment
96
Registered
2019-01-28
Start date
2019-02-01
Completion date
2022-02-01
Last updated
2019-02-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Carbon Monoxide Poisoning

Brief summary

The aim of the study is to test whether oxygen therapy delivered through high-flow nasal cannula devices in patients admitted to the emergency department for acute carbon monoxide poisoning is superior to the non-rebreathing oxygen face mask therapy with a 15 L/minute oxygen flow (currently the first-line therapy), in terms of reduction of carboxyhemoglobin (COHb) concentration and delayed neurological sequelae incidence.

Interventions

DEVICEHigh-flow nasal cannula device

Patients will be randomly allocated to this treatment

DEVICENon-rebreathing oxygen mask group

Patients will be randomly allocated to this treatment

Sponsors

Università degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale Amedeo Avogadro
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Randomised controlled trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age v 18 years * Carbon monoxide intoxication as major problem leading to emergency department admission * Carboxyhemoglobin (COHb) concentration 10% at the time of enrolment

Exclusion criteria

* Age \< 18 years * Glasgow coma scale ≤ 13 * Refusal to give consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
COHb reduction at 90 minutes90 minutesPatients in the High-flow nasal cannula group and patients in the non-rebreathing oxygen mask group will be compared in terms of COHb reduction at 90 minutes. The hypothesis is that in patients treated with high flow nasal cannula the reduction in COHb at 90 minutes will be significantly different compared to patients treated with non-rebreathing oxygen mask.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Variation in the incidence of delayed neurologic sequelae6 weeksPatients in the High-flow nasal cannula group and patients in the non-rebreathing oxygen mask group will be compared in terms of incidence and severity of delayed neurologic syndrome. At the time of discharge from the emergency department, each enrolled patient will undergo neurocognitive testing. Six weeks after discharge, a follow-up visit for each patient will be performed which will include neurocognitive testing and a functional magnetic resonance imaging, in order to determine the presence of delayed neurologic sequelae. Patients in the two groups of treatment will be subsequently compared.
Variation in serum lactate concentration6 weeksPatients in the High-flow nasal cannula group and patients in the non-rebreathing oxygen mask group will be compared in terms of serum lactate variations. In particular, serum lactate levels will be evaluated at different time points, in order to test whether different treatments lead to different kinetic.
Variation in serum troponin concentration6 weeksPatients in the High-flow nasal cannula group and patients in the non-rebreathing oxygen mask group will be compared in terms of troponin concentration variations. In particular, serum troponin levels will be evaluated at different time points, in order to test whether different treatments lead to different kinetic.
Variation in S100B levels concentration6 weeksPatients in the High-flow nasal cannula group and patients in the non-rebreathing oxygen mask group will be compared in terms of serum protein S100B variations. In particular, protein S100B will be evaluated at different time points, in order to test whether different treatments lead to different protein kinetic.

Countries

Italy

Contacts

Primary ContactLuigi M Castello, MD
luigi.castello@med.uniupo.it+3903213733097
Backup ContactFrancesco Gavelli, MD
francesco.gavelli@uniupo.it

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026