Skip to content

A Study to Assess the Safety, Efficacy, and Pharmacokinetics of Miricorilant (CORT118335) in Obese Adults With Schizophrenia or Bipolar Disorder Treated With Antipsychotic Medications

A Phase 2, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study Evaluating the Safety, Efficacy, and Pharmacokinetics of Miricorilant (CORT118335) in Obese Adult Patients With Schizophrenia or Bipolar Disorder and Recent Weight Gain While Taking Antipsychotic Medications (GRATITUDE)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03818256
Acronym
GRATITUDE
Enrollment
71
Registered
2019-01-28
Start date
2019-12-04
Completion date
2022-07-06
Last updated
2024-09-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Antipsychotic-induced Weight Gain (AIWG)

Keywords

Antipsychotic-induced weight gain (AIWG), Obesity, Weight Gain, Mental disorders, Schizophrenia, Risperidone, Quetiapine, Olanzapine, Bipolar Disorder

Brief summary

This phase 2, double blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study is to assess the safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of miricorilant (CORT118335) in obese adults with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder treated with antipsychotic medications.

Detailed description

This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study that will assess the safety, efficacy, and PK of miricorilant in obese patients with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder who are currently taking oral or injectable atypical antipsychotic medication. Patients who meet the criteria for the Study CORT118335-876 will be randomized on Day 1 to receive 600 mg miricorilant or placebo for 12 weeks.

Interventions

Miricorilant 600 mg (6 X 100 mg tablets) for once-daily oral dosing

DRUGPlacebo

Placebo tablets for once-daily oral dosing

Sponsors

Corcept Therapeutics
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Double Blind

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Have a diagnosis of schizophrenia or bipolar disorder * Are currently taking oral or injectable atypical antipsychotic medication (except clozapine) and must have documented weight gain while on these medications * Must be on a stable dose of medication for 1 month prior to Screening * Are able to successfully complete placebo tablet swallow test * Have a BMI ≥30 kg/m\^2.

Exclusion criteria

* Have a history of a medical condition affecting body weight (eg, poorly controlled hyper- or hypothyroidism; eating disorder such as anorexia, bulimia, or binge eating; or polycystic ovary syndrome) * Have poorly controlled diabetes mellitus * Have poorly controlled hypertension * Have a history of symptomatic hypotension * Have a history of orthostatic hypotension.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 12 for 600 mg Miricorilant Versus PlaceboBaseline Day 1 and Week 12
Number of Patients With One or More Treatment-emergent Adverse EventsUp to Follow-up Visit (Week 16)
Number of Patients With One or More Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse EventsUp to Follow-up Visit (up to Week 16)
Number of Patients With One or More Treatment-emergent Adverse Events Leading to Early Study DiscontinuationUp to Follow-up Visit (up to Week 16)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in HOMA-IR at Week 12Baseline Day 1 and Week 12HOMA-IR = \[fasting plasma glucose (mg/dL) X fasting insulin (µU/mL)\]/405. HOMA-IR is a method to evaluate insulin sensitivity. The HOMA-IR score should be ≤1.0 to be considered normal. A score \>1.9 indicates early insulin resistance and a score \>2.9 indicates significant insulin resistance.
Change From Baseline in Waist-to-hip Ratio at Week 12Baseline Day 1 and Week 12Waist-to-hip ratio compares the circumference of the waist to the circumference of the hips. The ratio is calculated by dividing the waist measurement by the hip measurement, using the same units of measurement for both. A waist-to-hip ratio \<0.95 in men and \<0.80 in women is considered healthy.
Percentage of Patients Achieving More Than or Equal to 5% Weight LossBaseline Day 1 to Week 12

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Miricorilant 600 mg
Patients who meet the entry criteria will be randomized to receive 600 mg miricorilant for 12 weeks. Miricorilant: Miricorilant 600 mg (6 X 100 mg tablets) for once-daily oral dosing
35
Placebo
Patients who meet the entry criteria will be randomized to receive placebo for 12 weeks. Placebo: Placebo tablets for once daily oral dosing
36
Total71

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event31
Overall StudyGaining weight without prohibited medication vyvanse10
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up05
Overall StudyNon-compliant with investigational product10
Overall StudyNot reporting for scheduled visits10
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject22

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlaceboTotalMiricorilant 600 mg
Age, Continuous47.5 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.78
45.7 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.24
43.9 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.5
Body weight107.69 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 25.41
109.02 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 22.79
110.39 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.01
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
9 Participants16 Participants7 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
27 Participants55 Participants28 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR)8.463 HOMA-IR score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.27
8.577 HOMA-IR score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.24
8.687 HOMA-IR score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.71
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
16 Participants29 Participants13 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
20 Participants41 Participants21 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
36 participants71 participants35 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
20 Participants39 Participants19 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
16 Participants32 Participants16 Participants
Waist-to-hip ratio0.967 Ratio
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.1
0.999 Ratio
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.18
1.032 Ratio
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.24

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 350 / 36
other
Total, other adverse events
12 / 355 / 36
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 351 / 36

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 12 for 600 mg Miricorilant Versus Placebo

Time frame: Baseline Day 1 and Week 12

Population: The Efficacy Evaluable Population was patients who received ≥4 weeks of study drug and had body weight assessed at Baseline and on Week 12.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Miricorilant 600 mgChange From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 12 for 600 mg Miricorilant Versus Placebo-0.98 kgStandard Error 0.414
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 12 for 600 mg Miricorilant Versus Placebo-1.08 kgStandard Error 0.415
p-value: 0.851195% CI: [-1.03, 1.24]Mixed Models Analysis
Primary

Number of Patients With One or More Treatment-emergent Adverse Events

Time frame: Up to Follow-up Visit (Week 16)

Population: The Safety Population included patients who received ≥1 dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Miricorilant 600 mgNumber of Patients With One or More Treatment-emergent Adverse Events16 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Patients With One or More Treatment-emergent Adverse Events18 Participants
Primary

Number of Patients With One or More Treatment-emergent Adverse Events Leading to Early Study Discontinuation

Time frame: Up to Follow-up Visit (up to Week 16)

Population: The Safety Population included patients who received ≥1 dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Miricorilant 600 mgNumber of Patients With One or More Treatment-emergent Adverse Events Leading to Early Study Discontinuation3 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Patients With One or More Treatment-emergent Adverse Events Leading to Early Study Discontinuation1 Participants
Primary

Number of Patients With One or More Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events

Time frame: Up to Follow-up Visit (up to Week 16)

Population: The Safety Population included patients who received ≥1 dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Miricorilant 600 mgNumber of Patients With One or More Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Patients With One or More Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events1 Participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline in HOMA-IR at Week 12

HOMA-IR = \[fasting plasma glucose (mg/dL) X fasting insulin (µU/mL)\]/405. HOMA-IR is a method to evaluate insulin sensitivity. The HOMA-IR score should be ≤1.0 to be considered normal. A score \>1.9 indicates early insulin resistance and a score \>2.9 indicates significant insulin resistance.

Time frame: Baseline Day 1 and Week 12

Population: The Efficacy Evaluable Population was patients who received ≥4 weeks of study drug and had HOMA-IR assessed at Baseline and on Week 12.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Miricorilant 600 mgChange From Baseline in HOMA-IR at Week 121.080 HOMA-IR score
PlaceboChange From Baseline in HOMA-IR at Week 120.890 HOMA-IR score
p-value: 0.928595% CI: [-2.86, 2.78]Wilcoxon rank-sum test
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Waist-to-hip Ratio at Week 12

Waist-to-hip ratio compares the circumference of the waist to the circumference of the hips. The ratio is calculated by dividing the waist measurement by the hip measurement, using the same units of measurement for both. A waist-to-hip ratio \<0.95 in men and \<0.80 in women is considered healthy.

Time frame: Baseline Day 1 and Week 12

Population: The Efficacy Evaluable Population was patients who received ≥4 weeks of study drug and had hip and waist measurements at Baseline and on Week 12.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Miricorilant 600 mgChange From Baseline in Waist-to-hip Ratio at Week 120.008 RatioStandard Error 0.0092
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Waist-to-hip Ratio at Week 120.001 RatioStandard Error 0.0091
p-value: 0.566995% CI: [-0.018, 0.033]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Percentage of Patients Achieving More Than or Equal to 5% Weight Loss

Time frame: Baseline Day 1 to Week 12

Population: The Efficacy Evaluable Population was patients who received ≥4 weeks of study drug and had baseline and ≥1 body weight measurement taken on or after Week 4.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Miricorilant 600 mgPercentage of Patients Achieving More Than or Equal to 5% Weight Loss2 Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Patients Achieving More Than or Equal to 5% Weight Loss3 Participants
p-value: 0.816995% CI: [0.15, 4.474]Regression, Logistic

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026