Skip to content

Independent Housing and Support for People With Severe Mental Illness

Independent Housing and Support for People With Severe Mental Illness: Randomized Controlled Trial vs. Observational Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03815604
Enrollment
143
Registered
2019-01-24
Start date
2019-04-01
Completion date
2023-04-30
Last updated
2023-11-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Severe Mental Disorder

Keywords

Psychiatric Rehabilitation, Supported Housing, Residential Care

Brief summary

Background: Adequate and stable housing conditions are fundamental for the psychiatric rehabilitation of individuals with severe mental illness (SMI). A common approach in psychiatric rehabilitation relies on a continuum of residential services that aims at enabling the person with SMI to live eventually independently. Current state of research, however, shows clearly that most persons in question remain in residential care settings or other treatment as usual conditions (RCS/TAU). The Independent Housing and Support (IHS) scheme is a new model that aims at direct placement in an independent accommodation in the community. Support is provided according to individual needs in a permanent housing situation without time limit. Up to now, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate the effectiveness of IHS have only been conducted with homeless populations in North America. The purpose of the present study is to evaluate IHS compared to traditional RCS/TAU for non-homeless persons with severe mental illness. With this study, the investigators aim at demonstrating that IHS is not inferior to RCS/TAU. The rationale for utilizing a non-inferiority approach is based on the current state of research and on research that has shown strong preferences for IHS against RCS/TAU by people with SMI. Methods: As the preference issue makes RCTs in housing research difficult the investigators will use a specific time window in Zurich that allows conducting a RCT due to a scarcity of IHS settings and will combine the RCT with a comparative observational study in Berne where IHS is already well-established. At the Zurich site, a RCT compares the effects of living with IHS against living in residential care. At the Berne site, an observational study design (OSD) will be applied in connection with the same types of housing as in Zurich. Propensity scoring will be utilized to minimize the risk of bias in the OSD. A number of N=56 eligible subjects in Zurich and N=112 subjects (due to specific requirements for propensity scoring) in Berne complying with the inclusion criteria will be recruited and allocated to intervention and control groups according to the site-specific study designs. Recruitment period will last 21 months.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALIndependent Housing and Support (IHS)

Direct placement of people with SMI in an independent accommodation in the community, usually in a flat rented by the service user. Support is provided by a coach according to individual needs in a permanent housing situation without time limit.

BEHAVIORALResidential Care Settings and other Treatment as Usual (RCS/TAU)

Placement in a common residential home or supportive housing setting with the aim to gain psycho-social stability before being able to maintain independent housing.

Sponsors

University of Zurich
CollaboratorOTHER
Swiss National Science Foundation
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Bern
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

As the preference issue makes RCTs in housing research difficult the investigators will use a specific time window in Zurich that allows conducting an RCT due to a scarcity of IHS settings and will combine the RCT with a comparative observational study in Berne where IHS is already well-established. The investigators intend to directly compare the outcomes of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) with a study in an observational study design (OSD). Here, the investigators utilize the hypothesis that the OSD will provide similar results as the RCT.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Primary mental disorder according to ICD-10-categories * Age 18 to 65 years * Ability to communicate in German language * Ability to give informed consent * Written informed consent as documented by signature * Ability to take medication if indicated * Willingness to handle out of pocket expenses or established assistance by custodian/guardian

Exclusion criteria

* Severe learning disability, intoxication, delirium, dementia * Participants lacking capacity * Indication for hospital treatment due to acute symptomatology at admission * Acute endangerment of self or others

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Social Functioning Scale (SFS)Change from baseline (T0) to 24 months (T3)The SFS is a self-rating questionnaire and will be used to assess changes in participant's social inclusion in terms of the following subscales: 1) social engagement/withdrawal, 2) interpersonal behavior, 3) independence-performance, 4) independence-competence, 5) recreation, 6) pro-social activities, and 7) employment/occupation. The SFS includes 76 items in a varying answer format. In 68 items, participants are asked to answer on a 4-point Likert scale. The total-score ranges from 0 to 135 with higher score indicating better social inclusion.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF)Change from baseline (T0) to 24 months (T3)The GAF is a scale rated by key worker and will be used to assess changes in participant's functioning. Illness severity is rated as a single item based on psychopathology and functioning on a 1 to 100 scale with higher score as indicator for better functioning.
Manchester Short Assessment of Quality of Life (MANSA)Change from baseline (T0) to 24 months (T3)The MANSA is an interview and will be used to assess changes in participant's quality of life. It consists of three sections with total 25 items: 1) personal details, consistent over time (date of birth, gender, diagnosis), 2) personal details, potentially varying over time and to be redocumented if change has occurred (education, employment, income, state benefits, living situation, people the participant lives with, type of residence), and 3) 16 questions that are asked every time. Four of the section three questions are termed objective and are to be answered with yes/no. Twelve of the section three questions are called subjective and ask for answering participant's satisfaction on a 7-point Likert scale. The final score will be computed by averaging the 12 individual items with higher score indicates higher quality of life.
Symptom Check List (SCL-K-9)Change from baseline (T0) to 24 months (T3)The SCL-K-9 is a questionnaire and will be used to assess changes in participant's mental state on a 5-point Likert scale, including items from all of the nine subscales of the original SCL-90-R: 1) depression, 2) anxiety, 3) somatization, 4) phobic fear, 5) obsessive-compulsive, 6) psychoticism, 7) social insecurity, 8) paranoid thinking, 9) hostility. The total-score ranges from 0 to 36 with lower score indicating better mental states.
Diagnoses according to International Classification of Diseases 10 (ICD-10 diagnoses)The diagnoses will be assessed at baseline (T0) and after 24 months (T3)Clinical records
Health of the Nation Outcome Scales (HoNOS)Change from baseline (T0) to 24 months (T3)The HoNOS will be used to assess changes in participant's functioning. It will be rated by key worker on a 5-point Likert scale in terms of the following items: 1) aggression, 2) self-harm, 3) substance use, 4) cognitive dysfunction, 5) physical disability, 6) hallucinations and delusions, 7) depression, 8) other symptoms, 9) personal relationships, 10) overall functioning, 11) residential problems, 12) occupational problems. The summed-up total-score ranges from 0 to 48 with lower score indicating better functioning.
Oxford Capabilities Questionnaire - Mental Health (OxCAP)Change from baseline (T0) to 24 months (T3)The OxCAP is a questionnaire and will be used to assess changes in participant's capabilities that covers the following domains of functioning and welfare based on 16 items to answer on a 5-point Likert scale: 1) life, 2) bodily health, 3) bodily integrity, 4) senses, imagination and thought, 5) emotions, 6) practical reason, 7) affiliation, 8) species, 9) play, and 10) control over one's environment. The initial index total-score ranges from 16 to 80 and is converted into a standardised 0 to 100 final score with higher score indicating better capabilities.
Important life events, measured with a single itemImportant life events will be assessed at baseline (T0), after 6 months (T1), 12 months (T2), and after 24 months (T3)Important Life Events for the last six months (at baseline) or since the last assessment, respectively. Free text with subsequent coding
Social SupportChange from baseline (T0) to 24 months (T3)A self-generated questionnaire will be used to measure changes in participant's social and living support. The questionnaire consists of 24 items to be answered on a 5-point Likert scale. Total score rages from 24 to 120 with higher score indicating higher support.
Camberwell Assessment of Need Short Appraisal Schedule (CANSAS)Change from baseline (T0) to 24 months (T3)The CANSAS is an interview and will be used to assess changes in participant's needs in 22 health and social domains on a 3-point Likert scale (no problem; met need; unmet need). For interpretation, the met and unmet needs each will be summed-up.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Independent Housing and Support for people with mental disorders - Fidelity Scale [Selbstbestimmtes Wohnen mit Unterstützung für Menschen mit psychischen Beeinträchtigungen - Modelltreue Skala (SeWo-Psych)]Model Fidelity will be assessed in months 1-3 and again in month 45.The SeWo-Psych is an interview and will be used to assess model fidelity of the residential rehabilitation service Independent Housing and Support (IHS) to be conducted with heads of rehabilitation services. The 32 items are to be answered on a 5-point Likert scale, with higher score indicating higher fidelity. Score will be summed up to a total-score.
Client Sociodemographic and Service Receipt Inventory - adapted (CSSRI-EU); Question 1The CSSRI-EU will be assessed at baseline (T0), after 6 months (T1), 12 months (T2), and after 24 months (T3)The CSSRI-EU is an interview and will be used to assess participant's specific sociodemographic details and service utilization. The first question records the participants' main source of income: Salary, pension, social benefits, family support, other. No score will be calculated.
Housing First Fidelity ScaleComparability to HF-Programs will be assessed in months 1-3 and again in month 45.The Housing First Fidelity Scale is a 38-item interview assessing model fidelity in Housing First (HF) Programs asking for the following subscales on a 5-point Likert scale: 1) housing choice and structure, 2) separation of housing and clinical services, 3) service philosophy, 4) service array, and 5) program structure. It will be assessed to enhance comparability of IHS in Switzerland with HF-Programs. Items were answered by heads of each rehabilitation service on a 5-point Likert scale, with higher score representing higher similarity with HF-Programs.
Client Sociodemographic and Service Receipt Inventory - adapted (CSSRI-EU); Question 2The CSSRI-EU will be assessed at baseline (T0), after 6 months (T1), 12 months (T2), and after 24 months (T3)The CSSRI-EU is an interview and will be used to assess participant's specific sociodemographic details and service utilization. The second question asks for the net income in Swiss Francs.
Client Sociodemographic and Service Receipt Inventory - adapted (CSSRI-EU); Question 3The CSSRI-EU will be assessed at baseline (T0), after 6 months (T1), 12 months (T2), and after 24 months (T3)The CSSRI-EU is an interview and will be used to assess participant's specific sociodemographic details and service utilization. The third question asks the whereabouts in recent six months (own apartment, with partner, with family, being homeless, other). No score will be calculated.
Client Sociodemographic and Service Receipt Inventory - adapted (CSSRI-EU); Question 4The CSSRI-EU will be assessed at baseline (T0), after 6 months (T1), 12 months (T2), and after 24 months (T3)The CSSRI-EU is an interview and will be used to assess participant's specific sociodemographic details and service utilization. The fourth question asks for any health care utilization for physical health problems (inpatient/outpatient). The format for each answer is 1/0. No score will be calculated.
Client Sociodemographic and Service Receipt Inventory - adapted (CSSRI-EU); Question 5The CSSRI-EU will be assessed at baseline (T0), after 6 months (T1), 12 months (T2), and after 24 months (T3)The CSSRI-EU is an interview and will be used to assess participant's specific sociodemographic details and service utilization. The fifth question asks for any health care utilization for mental health problems (inpatient/outpatient). The format for each answer is 1/0. No total or mean score will be calculated.
Client Sociodemographic and Service Receipt Inventory - adapted (CSSRI-EU); Question 6The CSSRI-EU will be assessed at baseline (T0), after 6 months (T1), 12 months (T2), and after 24 months (T3)The CSSRI-EU is an interview and will be used to assess participant's specific sociodemographic details and service utilization. The sixth question asks for any intake of psychotropic medication. No score will be calculated.
Client Sociodemographic and Service Receipt Inventory - adapted (CSSRI-EU); Question 7The CSSRI-EU will be assessed at baseline (T0), after 6 months (T1), 12 months (T2), and after 24 months (T3)The CSSRI-EU is an interview and will be used to assess participant's specific sociodemographic details and service utilization. The seventh question asks for any contact with the criminal justice services. No score will be calculated.
Client Sociodemographic and Service Receipt Inventory - adapted (CSSRI-EU); Question 8The CSSRI-EU will be assessed at baseline (T0), after 6 months (T1), 12 months (T2), and after 24 months (T3)The CSSRI-EU is an interview and will be used to assess participant's specific sociodemographic details and service utilization. The eighth question asks for any internet access. No score will be calculated.
Client Sociodemographic and Service Receipt Inventory - adapted (CSSRI-EU); Question 9The CSSRI-EU will be assessed at baseline (T0), after 6 months (T1), 12 months (T2), and after 24 months (T3)The CSSRI-EU is an interview and will be used to assess participant's specific sociodemographic details and service utilization. The ninth question asks for any other support utilized in the past six months (daycare, workshops, vocational rehabilitation, integration services, self-help groups, other). No score will be calculated.
Mean number and duration of contacts with service user in IHSContact frequency and duration will be assessed at baseline (T0), after 6 months (T1), 12 months (T2), and after 24 months (T3)Activity recording with medical tariff (TARMED) reimbursement tool

Countries

Switzerland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 27, 2026