Skip to content

Comparing the Effects of Three Different Dressings on the Cutaneous Response of Sacral Skin

Comparing the Effects of Three Different Dressings on the Cutaneous Response to Pressure and Shear of Sacral Skin: an Exploratory Crossover Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03815240
Enrollment
12
Registered
2019-01-24
Start date
2019-02-08
Completion date
2019-07-23
Last updated
2020-05-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pressure Ulcer Prevention

Keywords

Pressure Ulcer Prevention, Preventive Dressings

Brief summary

Skin functional parameters such as erythema or stratum corneum hydration have been successfully used in PU prevention research. These parameters are able to discriminate effects of different loading intensities and to measure PU preventive device performance. The overall aim of this study is to measure the effects of Mepilex® Border Sacrum Dressing on the skin structure and function during mechanical loading compared to (1) no dressing, (2) ALLEVYN Life Sacrum Dressing and (3) Optifoam® Gentle Liquitrap Sacrum Dressing.

Detailed description

Pressure ulcers (PUs) are severe and unwanted cutaneous lesions and subcutaneous wounds caused by prolonged skin and underlying soft tissue deformation. In the supine position they predominantly occur near to bony prominences, like at the sacral area. The cornerstone of PU prevention is repositioning, early mobilization and the use of special support surfaces. In addition, empirical evidence suggests that the application of preventive dressings on PU predilection sites helps to prevent PU development. Skin functional parameters such as erythema or stratum corneum hydration have been successfully used in PU prevention research. These parameters are able to discriminate effects of different loading intensities and to measure PU preventive device performance. Recently it could be shown that there are associations between structural and functional skin changes at the sacral area during loading. The overall aim of this study is to measure the effects of Mepilex® Border Sacrum Dressing on the skin structure and function during mechanical loading compared to no dressing, ALLEVYN Life Sacrum and Optifoam® Gentle Liquitrap Sacrum. The procedure of one visit will be as follows: After a skin acclimatization time of 30 minutes baseline measurements and Cyanoacrylate Skin Surface (CSSS)-stripping will be performed. Then a randomization envelope will be opened and the corresponding dressing will be applied or the skin will be left uncovered. The subject will then lie in supine position on a standard hospital mattress for a loading period of 3.5 hours. Every 30 minutes the head of the bed will be elevated to 45° for five minutes. During these five minutes, the participants will be instructed to bend their knees and to drag the feet repeatedly forth and back 10 times in order to simulate shear forces. The whole exercise will be done six times, after 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5 and 3 hours. After 3.5 hours loading time in supine position the subjects will move into prone position. The dressing (if present) will be removed and all skin measurements and CSSS-stripping will be conducted again. The subjects will come back for another three times completing the remaining interventions. At the end, each volunteer will have received all three types of dressings once and once no dressing. In between, there are at least 3 weeks to prevent possible carry over effects.

Interventions

no dressing at sacrum

OTHERMepilex® Border Sacrum

adhesive sacrum dressing

OTHERALLEVYN Life Sacrum

adhesive sacrum dressing

OTHEROptifoam® Gentle Sacrum

adhesive sacrum dressing

Sponsors

Charite University, Berlin, Germany
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
65 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Healthy female volunteers * 65 to 80 years * Body Mass Index 18.5 to 29.9 kg/m2 * Non-smoker of at least one year (including electronic-cigarettes) * Informed consent * Being free of any clinical dermatosis in the investigational area * Intact sacral skin without scars * Skin phototype I, II, or III (according to Fitzpatrick) * No regular use of leave-on products on the sacral skin * Willing and able to fulfil the study requirements

Exclusion criteria

* Disability to maintain in supine or prone Position * Acute diseases * Known hyper-sensibility or allergy to the study product or any of its ingredients * Extensive UV exposure 4 weeks before study inclusion * Use of topical treatment on the investigational areas or systemic Treatment within the 4 past weeks (topical hyaluronan, anti-inflammatory drugs, corticoids, retinoids, NSIDS etc.) that would interfere with assessment and/or investigational treatments * Medical history of skin cancer * History of established Diabetes mellitus, cardiac or renal insufficiency, COPD * Chronic inflammatory skin disorders such as atopic dermatitis, psoriasis, lichen planus * Participation in another study 4 weeks prior to study start

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Interleukin IL-1alpha Concentration From BaselineChange from baseline after 3.5 hours loading period at visit 1 (Day 0), visit 2 (not before 3 weeks after visit 1), visit 3 (not before 3 weeks after visit 2), visit 4 (not before 3 weeks after visit 3).Based on Cyanoacrylate Skin Surface (CSSS)-Stripping, corneocytes was collected in order to analyse changes regarding interleukin IL-1alpha concentrations.
Change in Average Roughness (Rz) From BaselineChange from baseline after 3.5 hours loading period at visit 1 (Day 0), visit 2 (not before 3 weeks after visit 1), visit 3 (not before 3 weeks after visit 2), visit 4 (not before 3 weeks after visit 3).The Visioscan VC 98 camera (Courage and Khazaka Electronic GmbH) was used to capture images of the sacrum. The special LED UV light source with diffuser provides sharp, very high resolution images of the skin surface (255 grey levels representing different depths). The grey level distribution allows the calculation of different roughness parameters to quantitatively describe the skin surface.
Change in Arithmetic Average Roughness (Ra) From BaselineChange from baseline after 3.5 hours loading period at visit 1 (Day 0), visit 2 (not before 3 weeks after visit 1), visit 3 (not before 3 weeks after visit 2), visit 4 (not before 3 weeks after visit 3).The Visioscan VC 98 camera (Courage and Khazaka Electronic GmbH) was used to capture images of the sacrum. The special LED UV light source with diffuser provides sharp, very high resolution images of the skin surface (255 grey levels representing different depths). The grey level distribution allows the calculation of different roughness parameters to quantitatively describe the skin surface.
Change in Maximum Roughness (Rmax) From BaselineChange from baseline after 3.5 hours loading period at visit 1 (Day 0), visit 2 (not before 3 weeks after visit 1), visit 3 (not before 3 weeks after visit 2), visit 4 (not before 3 weeks after visit 3).The Visioscan VC 98 camera (Courage and Khazaka Electronic GmbH) was used to capture images of the sacrum. The special LED UV light source with diffuser provides sharp, very high resolution images of the skin surface (255 grey levels representing different depths). The grey level distribution allows the calculation of different roughness parameters to quantitatively describe the skin surface.
Change in Skin Surface Temperature From BaselineChange from baseline after 3.5 hours loading period at visit 1 (Day 0), visit 2 (not before 3 weeks after visit 1), visit 3 (not before 3 weeks after visit 2), visit 4 (not before 3 weeks after visit 3).A skin thermometer based on infrared technique (Courage and Khazaka Electronic GmbH) was used to measure the skin surface temperature at the sacrum
Change in Stratum Corneum Hydration (SCH) From BaselineChange from baseline after 3.5 hours loading period at visit 1 (Day 0), visit 2 (not before 3 weeks after visit 1), visit 3 (not before 3 weeks after visit 2), visit 4 (not before 3 weeks after visit 3).Corneometer CM 825 (Courage and Khazaka Electronic GmbH) was used to measure the stratum corneum hydration (SCH) at the sacrum in arbitrary units (AU) (range 0-120 AU). Lower values represent reduced skin hydration in the upper skin layer. The measurement is based on capacitance measurement of a dielectric medium. The change in the dielectric constant due to skin surface hydration by capacitance differences of a precision capacitor is measured.
Change in Erythema Index (EI) From BaselineChange from baseline after 3.5 hours loading period at visit 1 (Day 0), visit 2 (not before 3 weeks after visit 1), visit 3 (not before 3 weeks after visit 2), visit 4 (not before 3 weeks after visit 3).Mexameter MX18 (Courage and Khazaka Electronic GmbH) was used to measure the Erythema index at the sacrum. This device uses specific wavelengths (the intensity of the reflected red (λ = 660 nm) and green (λ = 568 nm) lights) to measure the absorption capacity of the skin (specifically the content of hemoglobin in the skin) and presents values from 0 to 999. Lower values represent less redness.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time Until First Reporting of Sacral PainSacral pain was assessed from baseline up until 3.5 hours loading period at visit 1 (Day 0), visit 2 (not before 3 weeks after visit 1), visit 3 (not before 3 weeks after visit 2), visit 4 (not before 3 weeks after visit 3).Time from baseline until the subject reported pain at sacrum
Change in Erythema Score From BaselineChange from baseline after 3.5 hours loading period at visit 1 (Day 0), visit 2 (not before 3 weeks after visit 1), visit 3 (not before 3 weeks after visit 2), visit 4 (not before 3 weeks after visit 3).Erythema was assessed by visual inspection. A metric scale will be used: 0 = none 1 = mild (slight reddening), 2 = moderate (distinct redness), 3 = severe (strong redness, dark red)
Occurence of Sacral PainCaptured from baseline until the end of the loading period after 3.5 hours at visit 1 (Day 0), visit 2 (not before 3 weeks after visit 1), visit 3 (not before 3 weeks after visit 2), visit 4 (not before 3 weeks after visit 3).The occurrence of pain (yes/no)

Countries

Germany

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The study took place at the Clinical Research Center for Hair and Skin Science in Berlin, Germany from January 2019 to July 2019 and involved 12 healthy female volunteers

Participants by arm

ArmCount
no Dressing, Mepilex, Allevyn, Optifoam (in Different Order)
Cross-over study. Each of the 12 participants received each intervention once (no dressing, Mepilex® Border Sacrum, ALLEVYN Life Sacrum, Optifoam® Gentle Sacrum)
12
Total12

Baseline characteristics

Characteristicno Dressing, Mepilex, Allevyn, Optifoam (in Different Order)
Age, Continuous72.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.2
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
12 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Germany
12 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
12 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 120 / 120 / 120 / 12
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 120 / 120 / 120 / 12
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 120 / 120 / 120 / 12

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Arithmetic Average Roughness (Ra) From Baseline

The Visioscan VC 98 camera (Courage and Khazaka Electronic GmbH) was used to capture images of the sacrum. The special LED UV light source with diffuser provides sharp, very high resolution images of the skin surface (255 grey levels representing different depths). The grey level distribution allows the calculation of different roughness parameters to quantitatively describe the skin surface.

Time frame: Change from baseline after 3.5 hours loading period at visit 1 (Day 0), visit 2 (not before 3 weeks after visit 1), visit 3 (not before 3 weeks after visit 2), visit 4 (not before 3 weeks after visit 3).

Population: Cross-over study. Each of the 12 participants received each intervention once (total number is 12).

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
no Dressing (A)Change in Arithmetic Average Roughness (Ra) From Baseline-0.8 micrometre
Mepilex (B)Change in Arithmetic Average Roughness (Ra) From Baseline-0.3 micrometre
Allevyn (C)Change in Arithmetic Average Roughness (Ra) From Baseline0.5 micrometre
Optifaom (D)Change in Arithmetic Average Roughness (Ra) From Baseline-4.5 micrometre
Primary

Change in Average Roughness (Rz) From Baseline

The Visioscan VC 98 camera (Courage and Khazaka Electronic GmbH) was used to capture images of the sacrum. The special LED UV light source with diffuser provides sharp, very high resolution images of the skin surface (255 grey levels representing different depths). The grey level distribution allows the calculation of different roughness parameters to quantitatively describe the skin surface.

Time frame: Change from baseline after 3.5 hours loading period at visit 1 (Day 0), visit 2 (not before 3 weeks after visit 1), visit 3 (not before 3 weeks after visit 2), visit 4 (not before 3 weeks after visit 3).

Population: Cross-over study. Each of the 12 participants received each intervention once (total number is 12).

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
no Dressing (A)Change in Average Roughness (Rz) From Baseline-0.8 micrometre
Mepilex (B)Change in Average Roughness (Rz) From Baseline-1 micrometre
Allevyn (C)Change in Average Roughness (Rz) From Baseline-0.8 micrometre
Optifaom (D)Change in Average Roughness (Rz) From Baseline-6.3 micrometre
Primary

Change in Erythema Index (EI) From Baseline

Mexameter MX18 (Courage and Khazaka Electronic GmbH) was used to measure the Erythema index at the sacrum. This device uses specific wavelengths (the intensity of the reflected red (λ = 660 nm) and green (λ = 568 nm) lights) to measure the absorption capacity of the skin (specifically the content of hemoglobin in the skin) and presents values from 0 to 999. Lower values represent less redness.

Time frame: Change from baseline after 3.5 hours loading period at visit 1 (Day 0), visit 2 (not before 3 weeks after visit 1), visit 3 (not before 3 weeks after visit 2), visit 4 (not before 3 weeks after visit 3).

Population: Cross-over study. Each of the 12 participants received each intervention once (total number is 12).

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
no Dressing (A)Change in Erythema Index (EI) From Baseline29 arbitrary units
Mepilex (B)Change in Erythema Index (EI) From Baseline7 arbitrary units
Allevyn (C)Change in Erythema Index (EI) From Baseline41 arbitrary units
Optifaom (D)Change in Erythema Index (EI) From Baseline4 arbitrary units
Primary

Change in Interleukin IL-1alpha Concentration From Baseline

Based on Cyanoacrylate Skin Surface (CSSS)-Stripping, corneocytes was collected in order to analyse changes regarding interleukin IL-1alpha concentrations.

Time frame: Change from baseline after 3.5 hours loading period at visit 1 (Day 0), visit 2 (not before 3 weeks after visit 1), visit 3 (not before 3 weeks after visit 2), visit 4 (not before 3 weeks after visit 3).

Population: Cross-over study. Each of the 12 participants received each intervention once (total number is 12).

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
no Dressing (A)Change in Interleukin IL-1alpha Concentration From Baseline1.1 picogramme/microgramme
Mepilex (B)Change in Interleukin IL-1alpha Concentration From Baseline-0.1 picogramme/microgramme
Allevyn (C)Change in Interleukin IL-1alpha Concentration From Baseline1.3 picogramme/microgramme
Optifaom (D)Change in Interleukin IL-1alpha Concentration From Baseline1.3 picogramme/microgramme
Primary

Change in Maximum Roughness (Rmax) From Baseline

The Visioscan VC 98 camera (Courage and Khazaka Electronic GmbH) was used to capture images of the sacrum. The special LED UV light source with diffuser provides sharp, very high resolution images of the skin surface (255 grey levels representing different depths). The grey level distribution allows the calculation of different roughness parameters to quantitatively describe the skin surface.

Time frame: Change from baseline after 3.5 hours loading period at visit 1 (Day 0), visit 2 (not before 3 weeks after visit 1), visit 3 (not before 3 weeks after visit 2), visit 4 (not before 3 weeks after visit 3).

Population: Cross-over study. Each of the 12 participants received each intervention once (total number is 12).

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
no Dressing (A)Change in Maximum Roughness (Rmax) From Baseline-0.5 micrometre
Mepilex (B)Change in Maximum Roughness (Rmax) From Baseline-1.8 micrometre
Allevyn (C)Change in Maximum Roughness (Rmax) From Baseline-1.3 micrometre
Optifaom (D)Change in Maximum Roughness (Rmax) From Baseline-8.0 micrometre
Primary

Change in Skin Surface Temperature From Baseline

A skin thermometer based on infrared technique (Courage and Khazaka Electronic GmbH) was used to measure the skin surface temperature at the sacrum

Time frame: Change from baseline after 3.5 hours loading period at visit 1 (Day 0), visit 2 (not before 3 weeks after visit 1), visit 3 (not before 3 weeks after visit 2), visit 4 (not before 3 weeks after visit 3).

Population: Cross-over study. Each of the 12 participants received each intervention once (total number is 12).

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
no Dressing (A)Change in Skin Surface Temperature From Baseline3.1 °C
Mepilex (B)Change in Skin Surface Temperature From Baseline3.8 °C
Allevyn (C)Change in Skin Surface Temperature From Baseline3.0 °C
Optifaom (D)Change in Skin Surface Temperature From Baseline3.3 °C
Primary

Change in Stratum Corneum Hydration (SCH) From Baseline

Corneometer CM 825 (Courage and Khazaka Electronic GmbH) was used to measure the stratum corneum hydration (SCH) at the sacrum in arbitrary units (AU) (range 0-120 AU). Lower values represent reduced skin hydration in the upper skin layer. The measurement is based on capacitance measurement of a dielectric medium. The change in the dielectric constant due to skin surface hydration by capacitance differences of a precision capacitor is measured.

Time frame: Change from baseline after 3.5 hours loading period at visit 1 (Day 0), visit 2 (not before 3 weeks after visit 1), visit 3 (not before 3 weeks after visit 2), visit 4 (not before 3 weeks after visit 3).

Population: Cross-over study. Each of the 12 participants received each intervention once (total number is 12).

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
no Dressing (A)Change in Stratum Corneum Hydration (SCH) From Baseline7.0 arbitrary units
Mepilex (B)Change in Stratum Corneum Hydration (SCH) From Baseline4.4 arbitrary units
Allevyn (C)Change in Stratum Corneum Hydration (SCH) From Baseline5.9 arbitrary units
Optifaom (D)Change in Stratum Corneum Hydration (SCH) From Baseline7.3 arbitrary units
Secondary

Change in Erythema Score From Baseline

Erythema was assessed by visual inspection. A metric scale will be used: 0 = none 1 = mild (slight reddening), 2 = moderate (distinct redness), 3 = severe (strong redness, dark red)

Time frame: Change from baseline after 3.5 hours loading period at visit 1 (Day 0), visit 2 (not before 3 weeks after visit 1), visit 3 (not before 3 weeks after visit 2), visit 4 (not before 3 weeks after visit 3).

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
no Dressing (A)Change in Erythema Score From Baselineno erythema9 Participants
no Dressing (A)Change in Erythema Score From Baselinemoderate erythema0 Participants
no Dressing (A)Change in Erythema Score From Baselinemild erythema3 Participants
Mepilex (B)Change in Erythema Score From Baselineno erythema6 Participants
Mepilex (B)Change in Erythema Score From Baselinemoderate erythema0 Participants
Mepilex (B)Change in Erythema Score From Baselinemild erythema6 Participants
Allevyn (C)Change in Erythema Score From Baselinemild erythema6 Participants
Allevyn (C)Change in Erythema Score From Baselineno erythema5 Participants
Allevyn (C)Change in Erythema Score From Baselinemoderate erythema1 Participants
Optifaom (D)Change in Erythema Score From Baselineno erythema5 Participants
Optifaom (D)Change in Erythema Score From Baselinemoderate erythema2 Participants
Optifaom (D)Change in Erythema Score From Baselinemild erythema5 Participants
Secondary

Occurence of Sacral Pain

The occurrence of pain (yes/no)

Time frame: Captured from baseline until the end of the loading period after 3.5 hours at visit 1 (Day 0), visit 2 (not before 3 weeks after visit 1), visit 3 (not before 3 weeks after visit 2), visit 4 (not before 3 weeks after visit 3).

Population: Cross-over study. Each of the 12 participants received each intervention once (total number is 12).

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
no Dressing (A)Occurence of Sacral Pain0 Participants
Mepilex (B)Occurence of Sacral Pain0 Participants
Allevyn (C)Occurence of Sacral Pain0 Participants
Optifaom (D)Occurence of Sacral Pain0 Participants
Secondary

Time Until First Reporting of Sacral Pain

Time from baseline until the subject reported pain at sacrum

Time frame: Sacral pain was assessed from baseline up until 3.5 hours loading period at visit 1 (Day 0), visit 2 (not before 3 weeks after visit 1), visit 3 (not before 3 weeks after visit 2), visit 4 (not before 3 weeks after visit 3).

Population: Cross-over study. Each of the 12 participants received each intervention once (total number is 12).

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
no Dressing (A)Time Until First Reporting of Sacral PainNA minutes
Mepilex (B)Time Until First Reporting of Sacral PainNA minutes
Allevyn (C)Time Until First Reporting of Sacral PainNA minutes
Optifaom (D)Time Until First Reporting of Sacral PainNA minutes

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026