Skip to content

Contact: Developing New Clinical Management Strategies

Developing New Clinical Management Strategies for Antidepressant Treatments

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03812588
Enrollment
29
Registered
2019-01-23
Start date
2019-01-30
Completion date
2021-08-01
Last updated
2022-04-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Major Depressive Disorder

Brief summary

The goal of this study is to develop new methods of administering antidepressant medications that will result in improved drug/placebo separation in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) and enhanced medication response in open clinical treatment. The highly intensive, weekly visit schedule followed in most antidepressant RCTs radically differs from how antidepressant medications are prescribed in standard clinical practice and is believed to be a major reason why the majority of studies submitted to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) fail to show a significant difference between medication and placebo. Moreover, a one size fits all approach to psychopharmacologic management (i.e., weekly visits for all patients) does not take into account differences between patients that may predispose some individuals to respond positively to frequent follow-up visits, while others may respond negatively or not at all. Clinic visits comprise multiple components that may be therapeutic for depression, including activating patients' behavior, exposing them to medical procedures, permitting social interactions with research staff, and providing supportive meetings with clinicians. Two independent meta-analyses have associated more frequent study visits with increased antidepressant and placebo response as well as decreased separation between medication and placebo. Despite the high costs and potential disadvantages of weekly follow-up visits for patients receiving antidepressant medication, this clinical management strategy has not been studied prospectively to date. It is unknown whether weekly follow-up visits are needed to ensure treatment compliance and patient safety in clinical trials and to what degree contacts with clinicians influence medication and placebo response.

Detailed description

This study utilizes a 2 x 2, double-blind, acute, prospective design randomizing adult outpatients with MDD to Research Frequency Management (RFM, weekly study visits) vs. Community Frequency Management (CFM, every 4 weeks study visits) and antidepressant medication vs. placebo. Specifying visit frequency as the independent variable in this study has the distinct advantages of being easily operationalized for research purposes avoiding a priori assumptions about which components of study visits influence antidepressant and placebo response (i.e., behavioral activation vs. doctor-patient relationship vs. medical procedures). Close monitoring of all subjects will be assured by telephone evaluations of individuals randomized to CFM at intervals between monthly visits, and additional study contacts will be scheduled as necessary to maintain patient safety (all extra-protocol contacts will be recorded and included as a variable in outcome analyses). Additionally, subjects will be characterized extensively on clinical, demographic, and psychological measures to pilot the study assessment battery and search for predictor variables influencing the effects of contact frequency on medication and placebo response.

Interventions

DRUGEscitalopram

Escitalopram is a Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor (SSRI) medication that appears to help with symptoms of depression by increasing the availability of specific chemicals in the brain.

DRUGPlacebo

A placebo (or dummy pill) is an inert (inactive) substance, typically a tablet, capsule or other dose form that does not contain an active drug ingredient.

Sponsors

University of Haifa
CollaboratorOTHER
New York State Psychiatric Institute
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

\- Inclusion Criteria Method of Ascertainment 1. Men and women aged 18-75 years 1. Clinical interview 2. Diagnosis with Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM) V Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) 2. Clinical interview, Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-V 3. 24-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD) score ≥ 16 and ≤ 28; 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD) score \< 25 3. HRSD by trained rater 4. Capable of providing informed consent and complying with study procedures 4. Clinical interview 5. Using appropriate contraceptive method if woman of child-bearing age and not currently pregnant 5. Clinical interview

Exclusion criteria

1. Current comorbid Axis I DSM V disorder other than Mild Substance Use Disorder, Adjustment Disorder, Anxiety Disorder or Personality Disorder 1. Clinical interview, SCID 2. Diagnosis of Moderate to Severe Substance Use Disorder within the past 12 months 2. Clinical interview, SCID, Urine tox 3. present or past history of psychosis, psychotic disorder, mania, or bipolar disorder 3. Clinical interview, SCID 4. baseline HRSD 24-item score \> 28 or HRSD suicide item \> 2 or baseline HRSD 17-item score ≥ 25 4. HRSD by trained rater 5. History of allergic or adverse reaction to escitalopram, or non-response to adequate trial of escitalopram (at least 4 weeks at dose of 20mg) during the current episode 5. Clinical interview 6. Current treatment with psychotherapy, antidepressants, antipsychotics, or mood stabilizers 6. Clinical interview 7. CGI-Severity score of 6 or greater at baseline 7. CGI based on Clinical interview 8. Acute, severe, or unstable medical illness 8. Clinical interview, Physical Exam, Screening Labs

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression 24-Item Scale to Study Completion (8 Weeks)Up to 8 WeeksScale for depressive symptoms administered by trained rater. The Hamilton is the standard measure of depression severity for clinical trials of antidepressants and was chosen as the primary outcome measure over other depression rating scales to ensure compatibility of study results with our meta-analyses and ongoing studies of expectancy. The scoring is based on the first 24 items of the Hamilton. Sum of the scores of the first 24 items (range from 0 to 74): 0-7 = NORMAL 8-13 = Mild Depression 14-18 = Moderate Depression 19-22 = Severe Depression \>=23 = Very Severe Depression

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale 14-item ScaleUp to 8 WeeksScale for anxiety symptoms administered by trained rater. The Hamilton Anxiety is a standard measure of anxiety severity in pharmacotherapy studies that has been shown to have acceptable reliability and validity in studies of depressed patients. Each item is scored on a scale of 0 (not present) to 4 (severe), with a total score range of 0-56, where \<17 indicates mild severity, 18-24 mild to moderate severity and 25-30 moderate to severe.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline Clinical Global ImpressionsUp to 8 WeeksScales developed to measure the clinician's view of subjects' global functioning before and after initiating a study medication. The Clinical Global Impressions correlates well with other standard outcome measures for depression (e.g., HRSD), is sensitive to change in antidepressant trials, and offers clinically understandable anchor points. 7-point scale: 0 = Not assessed 4 = Moderately ill 1 = Normal, not at all ill 5 = Markedly ill 2 = Borderline mentally ill 6 = Severely ill 3 = Mildly ill 7 = Among the most extremely ill patients

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

In total, 29 subjects were enrolled. Of the 29 enrolled, 4 subjects did not continue in the study after enrolling. These 4 subjects did not appear for their randomization visit at which they would have been assigned to a study arm. Thus, 29 patients enrolled and 25 patients started.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Clinical Frequency Management: Placebo
Study visits monthly (Week 0, 4, and 8), with phone visits every other week (Week 2 and 6). Double-blind, placebo-controlled treatment with escitalopram 10mg/day, raised to 20mg/day, if non-responders at week 4. If they respond, will be treated in a 3-month Continuation Phase with monthly site visits. Placebo: A placebo (or dummy pill) is an inert (inactive) substance, typically a tablet, capsule or other dose form that does not contain an active drug ingredient.
5
Research Frequency Management: Placebo
Weekly study visits, treatment with double-blind, placebo controlled escitalopram 10 mg/day, raised to 20mg/day at week 4 if non-responders. If they respond, will be treated in a 3-month Continuation Phase with monthly site visits. Placebo: A placebo (or dummy pill) is an inert (inactive) substance, typically a tablet, capsule or other dose form that does not contain an active drug ingredient.
7
Clinical Frequency Management: Escitalopram
Study visits monthly (Week 0, 4, and 8), with phone visits every other week (Week 2 and 6). Double-blind, placebo-controlled treatment with escitalopram 10mg/day, raised to 20mg/day, if non-responders at week 4. If they respond, will be treated in a 3-month Continuation Phase with monthly site visits. Escitalopram: Escitalopram is a Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor (SSRI) medication that appears to help with symptoms of depression by increasing the availability of specific chemicals in the brain.
5
Research Frequency Management: Escitalopram
Weekly study visits, treatment with double-blind, placebo controlled escitalopram 10 mg/day, raised to 20mg/day at week 4 if non-responders. If they respond, will be treated in a 3-month Continuation Phase with monthly site visits. Escitalopram: Escitalopram is a Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor (SSRI) medication that appears to help with symptoms of depression by increasing the availability of specific chemicals in the brain.
8
Total25

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicResearch Frequency Management: PlaceboClinical Frequency Management: EscitalopramClinical Frequency Management: PlaceboResearch Frequency Management: EscitalopramTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
2 Participants4 Participants1 Participants3 Participants10 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
5 Participants0 Participants4 Participants5 Participants14 Participants
Age, Continuous58 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.26
58.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 22.95
55.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.4
60 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.77
58.32 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.91
Clinical Global Impressions Severity4 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0
4 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0
4 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.71
4 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.54
4 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.41
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
7 Participants4 Participants5 Participants7 Participants23 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale 14-item Scale9.57 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.15
11.4 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.22
10.2 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.27
9.62 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.83
10.08 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.96
Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression20.4 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.07
19.6 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.65
18 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.53
20.8 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.43
19.88 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.68
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
3 Participants2 Participants1 Participants3 Participants9 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants2 Participants1 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
3 Participants3 Participants2 Participants4 Participants12 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
7 Participants5 Participants5 Participants8 Participants25 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
4 Participants3 Participants4 Participants4 Participants15 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
3 Participants2 Participants1 Participants4 Participants10 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 50 / 70 / 50 / 8
other
Total, other adverse events
2 / 56 / 71 / 56 / 8
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 50 / 70 / 51 / 8

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression 24-Item Scale to Study Completion (8 Weeks)

Scale for depressive symptoms administered by trained rater. The Hamilton is the standard measure of depression severity for clinical trials of antidepressants and was chosen as the primary outcome measure over other depression rating scales to ensure compatibility of study results with our meta-analyses and ongoing studies of expectancy. The scoring is based on the first 24 items of the Hamilton. Sum of the scores of the first 24 items (range from 0 to 74): 0-7 = NORMAL 8-13 = Mild Depression 14-18 = Moderate Depression 19-22 = Severe Depression \>=23 = Very Severe Depression

Time frame: Up to 8 Weeks

Population: Two CFM, Placebo, two RFM, Placebo, and two CFM, Escitalopram participants did not complete the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression at Week 8, and so their change from baseline Hamilton Rating scale for Depression score could not be calculated.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Clinical Frequency Management: PlaceboChange From Baseline Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression 24-Item Scale to Study Completion (8 Weeks)1.33 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.51
Research Frequency Management: PlaceboChange From Baseline Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression 24-Item Scale to Study Completion (8 Weeks)11.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.04
Clinical Frequency Management: EscitalopramChange From Baseline Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression 24-Item Scale to Study Completion (8 Weeks)5.33 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.65
Research Frequency Management: EscitalopramChange From Baseline Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression 24-Item Scale to Study Completion (8 Weeks)9.25 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.21
p-value: 0.292Regression, Linear
Secondary

Change From Baseline Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale 14-item Scale

Scale for anxiety symptoms administered by trained rater. The Hamilton Anxiety is a standard measure of anxiety severity in pharmacotherapy studies that has been shown to have acceptable reliability and validity in studies of depressed patients. Each item is scored on a scale of 0 (not present) to 4 (severe), with a total score range of 0-56, where \<17 indicates mild severity, 18-24 mild to moderate severity and 25-30 moderate to severe.

Time frame: Up to 8 Weeks

Population: Two CFM, Placebo, two RFM, Placebo, and three CFM, Escitalopram participants did not complete the Hamilton Anxiety at Week 8, and so their change from baseline Hamilton Anxiety score could not be calculated.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Clinical Frequency Management: PlaceboChange From Baseline Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale 14-item Scale3.67 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.52
Research Frequency Management: PlaceboChange From Baseline Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale 14-item Scale4.40 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.22
Clinical Frequency Management: EscitalopramChange From Baseline Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale 14-item Scale6.50 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.95
Research Frequency Management: EscitalopramChange From Baseline Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale 14-item Scale3.37 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.98
Other Pre-specified

Change From Baseline Clinical Global Impressions

Scales developed to measure the clinician's view of subjects' global functioning before and after initiating a study medication. The Clinical Global Impressions correlates well with other standard outcome measures for depression (e.g., HRSD), is sensitive to change in antidepressant trials, and offers clinically understandable anchor points. 7-point scale: 0 = Not assessed 4 = Moderately ill 1 = Normal, not at all ill 5 = Markedly ill 2 = Borderline mentally ill 6 = Severely ill 3 = Mildly ill 7 = Among the most extremely ill patients

Time frame: Up to 8 Weeks

Population: Two CFM, Placebo, two RFM, Placebo, and two CFM, Escitalopram participants did not complete the CGI at Week 8, and so their change from baseline CGI score could not be calculated.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Clinical Frequency Management: PlaceboChange From Baseline Clinical Global Impressions1.00 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.73
Research Frequency Management: PlaceboChange From Baseline Clinical Global Impressions1.20 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.84
Clinical Frequency Management: EscitalopramChange From Baseline Clinical Global Impressions0.67 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.15
Research Frequency Management: EscitalopramChange From Baseline Clinical Global Impressions1.50 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.31

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026