Skip to content

Physiology, Imaging and Modeling of Essential Tremor

Physiology, Imaging and Modeling of Deep Brain Stimulation for Essential Tremor

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03811405
Enrollment
12
Registered
2019-01-22
Start date
2021-04-01
Completion date
2025-06-01
Last updated
2026-09-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dystonia, Essential Tremor, Parkinson Disease

Keywords

Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS), ventralis intermedius nucleus (VIN), implantable pulse generator (IPG), Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI)

Brief summary

This project aims to investigate novel ways to deliver brain stimulation to Essential Tremor (ET) patients by introducing software changes to their existing devices. The study team aims to investigate safety and efficacy of these new stimulation parameters in patients with ET.

Detailed description

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a neuromodulatory therapy that is effective in a subset of well selected essential tremor (ET) patients. However, as many as 1/5 of patients may initially improve, but then steadily worsen following the operation. The investigators developed a technique to study a variety of alternative stimulation methods without the use of an invasive repeat surgical intervention. The electrophysiological effects of non-conventional DBS differ from traditional DBS, however the physiological differences in the setting of human tremor remain largely unknown. This study plans to explore gaps in knowledge of neuromodulation and will collect and contribute essential information to the underlying mechanism of action of DBS. The hypothesis of this project centers around active biphasic stimulation providing a wider therapeutic window and a lower adverse event profile as compared to conventional DBS.

Interventions

DEVICEActive biphasic pulse stimulation---Home Settings

During this visit, the DBS implantable pulse generator (IPG) will be loaded with a temporary custom firmware to allow implementation of active biphasic pulse stimulation.

DEVICEActive biphasic pulse stimulation---VIN Biphasic

During this visit, the DBS implantable pulse generator (IPG) will be loaded with a temporary custom firmware to allow implementation of active biphasic pulse stimulation.

DEVICEActive biphasic pulse stimulation---Stimulator Off

During this visit, the DBS implantable pulse generator (IPG) will be loaded with a temporary custom firmware to allow implementation of active biphasic pulse stimulation.

Sponsors

University of Florida
Lead SponsorOTHER
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)
CollaboratorNIH
Medtronic
CollaboratorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Masking description

Each of the 3 interventions will be videotaped for blinded motor score assessment by an independent rater.

Intervention model description

Patients with chronically implanted DBS devices for ET who experience progressive worsening of tremor symptoms over time.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Existing unilateral or bilateral VIN DBS for ET, non-demented (MMSE\>24), and must have a documented suboptimal tremor suppression on two successive visits (compared to the baseline post-operative improvement at 6 months following ET DBS surgery). For bilateral cases, the most affected tremor side will be studied.

Exclusion criteria

* No diagnosis of Essential Tremor

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Fiber Activation Threshold From Stimulation With ET DBS4 hoursThe study team will use computer simulation and virtual reconstruction of the brain from pre-operative MRI data to calculate the fiber activation threshold for the duration that each subject is on the home settings versus the biphasic settings. The investigators will assess the feasibility of the patterns to address the worsening of ET that may occur in 20% or more of the ET population. No fiber activation threshold data was collected for the DBS OFF state since the system was not active.
Home Settings DBS Versus Active Biphasic Pulse DBS Settings4 hoursThe investigators will compare the degree of tremor suppression from the home settings versus active biphasic DBS. The degree of tremor will be quantified by the Fahn-Tolosa-Marin Tremor Rating Scale (sum of motor score parts A and B; range 0 - 116). A higher Tremor Rating Scale score is associated with more severe motor symptoms. The clinical metrics represent the change from DBS OFF to the active arm (either home settings or biphasic VIN) after 4 hours of stimulation

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Tremor Motor Physiology4 hourEssential tremor motor physiology will be recorded by the Kinesia ONE accelerometer system. The Kinesia ONE system utilizes a wireless, wearable motion sensor and portable transducer to translate movement metrics into a tremor severity score ranging from 0 (no symptoms) to 4 (severe symptoms). In this study, the reported tremor severity score represents motor function captured after 4 hours of active DBS - under either the participants' home settings or the VIN biphasic configuration.
Gait Impairment - Step Length4 hoursEssential tremor's effect on gait will be assessed by the GAITRite system. Patients will walk along a GAITRite floor mat to have the various gait parameters such as step length measured. The GAITRite system translates movement metrics into an objective kinematic score. In this study, the reported kinematic scores represent motor function captured after 4 hours of active DBS - under either the participants' home settings or the VIN biphasic configuration.
Gait Impairment - Stride Length4 hoursEssential tremor's effect on gait will be assessed by the GAITRite system. Patients will walk along a GAITRite floor mat to have the various gait parameters such as stride length measured. The GAITRite system translates movement metrics into an objective kinematic score. In this study, the reported kinematic scores represent motor function captured after 4 hours of active DBS - under either the participants' home settings or the VIN biphasic configuration.
Gait Impairment - Step Time4 hoursEssential tremor's effect on gait will be assessed by the GAITRite system. Patients will walk along a GAITRite floor mat to have the various gait parameters such as step time measured. The GAITRite system translates movement metrics into an objective kinematic score. In this study, the reported kinematic scores represent motor function captured after 4 hours of active DBS - under either the participants' home settings or the VIN biphasic configuration.
Gait Impairment - Gait Cycle Time4 hoursEssential tremor's effect on gait will be assessed by the GAITRite system. Patients will walk along a GAITRite floor mat to have the various gait parameters such as gait cycle time measured. The GAITRite system translates movement metrics into an objective kinematic score. In this study, the reported kinematic scores represent motor function captured after 4 hours of active DBS - under either the participants' home settings or the VIN biphasic configuration.

Countries

United States

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORJoshua K Wong, MD

Univeristy of Florida

Baseline characteristics

Characteristic
Age, Continuous71.1 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.7
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
12 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
12 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
7 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
5 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 60 / 6
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 60 / 6
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 60 / 6

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Sep 4, 2026