Skip to content

Multimodal Analysis and Electroretinogram in VKH From Acute Onset - Part I

Multimodal Analysis and Electroretinogram in VKH From Acute Onset - a Prospective Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03811366
Enrollment
12
Registered
2019-01-22
Start date
2011-06-01
Completion date
2017-01-31
Last updated
2025-04-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Choroid Disease, Inflammation, Uveomeningoencephalitic Syndrome, Visual Impairment

Brief summary

Patients with acute onset Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada disease (VKHD) were prospectively included in this study. They were systematically followed with clinical, posterior segment imaging exams and full-field electroretinogram during a minimum 24-month of follow-up. All patients were treated with 3-day methylprednisolone pulse therapy followed by 1mg/day oral prednisone with a slow tapper during a median of 13 months. Non-steroidal immunosuppressive therapy (IMT) was introduced in cases of refractory disease or in cases of prednisone intolerance. Outcome measured by full-field electroretinogram was analyzed and patient was grouped as electroretinogram stable or electroretinogram worsening. Clinical data was analyzed in these two electroretinogram-based groups.

Detailed description

Consecutive patients with acute onset VKHD were included and followed for a minimum 24-month as Part I of an ongoing prospective long-term study on VKHD. The main purpose was to understand the course of clinical and subclinical choroidal inflammation in patients receiving early and high-dose corticosteroid followed by high-dose oral prednisone and a very slow tapper. All patients were followed with clinical and posterior segment imaging (PSI) exams, i.e. fundus picture, fluorescein angiography, indocyanine green angiography and enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography, at inclusion, 1st month, and thereof every three months. Full-field electroretinogram was performed at inclusion, 1st month, and thereof every six months. Flare was defined as appearance or increase/worsening of inflammatory signs after the initial six-month from disease onset during the predefined treatment protocol. Inflammatory signs were cells in anterior chamber, macular edema; subclinical inflammatory signs were mainly those observed by PSI exams. Scotopic full-field electroretinogram results between 12 and 24 month were the main outcome. Clinical data was analyzed in the full-field electroretinogram-based groups.

Interventions

DRUGCorticosteroid monotherapy

Patients will receive corticosteroid monotherapy as a pulsetherapy (1000mg/ day for 3 days) followed by oral corticosteroid.

Sponsors

University of Sao Paulo
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

All patients were treated with a standard high-dose corticosteroid

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* clinical diagnosis of Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada disease * acute onset with no previous treatment

Exclusion criteria

* non-acute VKHD * media opacities

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Median Values of ERG Scotopic Parameters at 12-monthassessed at 12-monthFull-field electroretinogram (ERG) scotopic parameters were evaluated at 12 -month (scotopic parameters: amplitude of scotopic a and b wave, amplitude of maximum scotopic a and b wave, oscillatory potential).
Median Values of ERG Scotopic Parameters at 24-monthassessed at 24-monthFull-field electroretinogram (ERG) scotopic parameters were evaluated at 24 -month (scotopic parameters: amplitude of scotopic a and b wave, amplitude of maximum scotopic a and b wave, oscillatory potential).
Variation (Worsening or Improvement) Between 24 and 12 Months of ERG Scotopic Parameters Comparing 24 and 12-months12 and 24-monthsFull-field electroretinogram (ERG) scotopic parameters at 12 and 24 months were compared (scotopic parameters: amplitude of scotopic a and b wave, amplitude of maximum scotopic a and b wave, oscillatory potential). The worsening of the ERG parameters was defined as a value reduction of ≥ 30 % in any these scotopic ERG parameters at month 12 and month 24. We report the change between the (value at month 24/ the value at month 12)\*100.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Perivascular Leakage on Fluorescein Angiography6 to 24 months after disease onsetPerivascular leakage was observed as an increase in hyperfluorescence around retinal vasculature over time on FA exam at midperiphery.
Choroidal Neovascularization6 to 24 months after disease onsetChoroidal neovascularization was diagnosed when increasingly localized hyperfluorescence at the posterior pole is detected on FA or a hyperreflective subretinal lesion associated with sub or intraretinal fluid on OCT.
Recurrence or Worsening of Cells in Anterior Chamber6 to 24 months from disease onset.Evaluation of anterior chamber (AC) cells was performed at visits 6 months, 12 months, 18 months and 24 months from disease onset, according to the Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature´s classification of anterior chamber cells. (Am J Ophthalmol, 2005) Any step increase (fluctuation), when comparing sequential dates of follow up (e.g 6 and 12 months) were considered as one episode of clinical worsening in AC cells
Ocular Hypertension6 to 24 months after disease onsetOcular hypertension was defined as an intraocular pressure (IOP) above 21mmHg
Cataract6 to 24 months after disease onsetCataract was defined as any lens opacification greater than nuclear or cortical 2+/4 or subcapsular 1+/4
Increase in the Score of Dark Dots on Indocyanine Green Angiography6 to 24 months from disease onsetDark dots scores had a maximum value of 8, any increase of 0.5 after 6 months from disease onset will be considered (Int Ophthalmo 2010) Dark dots Score based on pattern of distribution (Sparse/ Numerous) Minimum: 0 (better outcome) Maximum: 8 (worse outcome)
Change in Subfoveal Choroidal Thickness on Enhanced Depth Optical Coherence Tomography6 to 24 months from disease onsetIncrease of 30% or more in choroidal thickness EDI in consecutive exams on horizontal scan

Countries

Brazil

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Date of recruitment: June, 2011 through January, 2017 Location: Ophthalmology service -Hospital das Clínicas da Universidade São Paulo

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Corticosteroid Monotherapy
All patients in the acute phase will be treated with corticosteroid monotherapy, unless presents a contraindication or persistence/ recurrence of inflammation with regressive corticosteroid monotherapy. Treatment protocol includes a three-day course of intravenous methylprednisolone (1000 mg per day) followed by a high dose of oral prednisone (1.0 mg/kg/day) with a slow tapering with dose equal or less than 0.1mg/kg/day after 10 months. The prednisone dose is scheduled to be reduced in a 0.1 mg/kg-step ladder until it reaches 0.3 mg/kg (i.e. for an individual with 60 kg, dose would be 20 mg): from 1 to 0.8 mg/kg every two to three weeks; at 0.7 mg/kg for 4 weeks; at 0.6 mg/kg for two to three weeks; from 0.5 mg/kg every 4 weeks; from 0.3 to 0.15 mg/kg every 6 weeks; and 0.1 mg/kg, 0.075 mg/kg and 0.05 mg/kg for 8 weeks each. prednisolone and prednisone
12
Total12

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCorticosteroid Monotherapy
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
1 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
1 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
10 Participants
Age, Continuous31 years
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
11 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Brazil
12 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
10 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
2 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 12
other
Total, other adverse events
6 / 12
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 12

Outcome results

Primary

Median Values of ERG Scotopic Parameters at 12-month

Full-field electroretinogram (ERG) scotopic parameters were evaluated at 12 -month (scotopic parameters: amplitude of scotopic a and b wave, amplitude of maximum scotopic a and b wave, oscillatory potential).

Time frame: assessed at 12-month

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Corticosteroid MonotherapyMedian Values of ERG Scotopic Parameters at 12-monthScotopic b amplitude201 microvolts
Corticosteroid MonotherapyMedian Values of ERG Scotopic Parameters at 12-monthMaximum scotopic a amplitude210 microvolts
Corticosteroid MonotherapyMedian Values of ERG Scotopic Parameters at 12-monthMaximum scotopic b amplitude508 microvolts
Corticosteroid MonotherapyMedian Values of ERG Scotopic Parameters at 12-monthOscillatory potential92 microvolts
Corticosteroid MonotherapyMedian Values of ERG Scotopic Parameters at 12-monthPhotopic a amplitude42 microvolts
Corticosteroid MonotherapyMedian Values of ERG Scotopic Parameters at 12-monthPhotopic B amplitude202 microvolts
Corticosteroid MonotherapyMedian Values of ERG Scotopic Parameters at 12-monthFlicker52 microvolts
p-value: <0.001generalized estimated equation
Primary

Median Values of ERG Scotopic Parameters at 24-month

Full-field electroretinogram (ERG) scotopic parameters were evaluated at 24 -month (scotopic parameters: amplitude of scotopic a and b wave, amplitude of maximum scotopic a and b wave, oscillatory potential).

Time frame: assessed at 24-month

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Corticosteroid MonotherapyMedian Values of ERG Scotopic Parameters at 24-monthFlicker54 microvolts
Corticosteroid MonotherapyMedian Values of ERG Scotopic Parameters at 24-monthScotopic b amplitude189 microvolts
Corticosteroid MonotherapyMedian Values of ERG Scotopic Parameters at 24-monthMaximum scotopic a amplitude189 microvolts
Corticosteroid MonotherapyMedian Values of ERG Scotopic Parameters at 24-monthMaximum scotopic b amplitude484 microvolts
Corticosteroid MonotherapyMedian Values of ERG Scotopic Parameters at 24-monthOscillatory potential114 microvolts
Corticosteroid MonotherapyMedian Values of ERG Scotopic Parameters at 24-monthPhotopic a amplitude43 microvolts
Corticosteroid MonotherapyMedian Values of ERG Scotopic Parameters at 24-monthPhotopic B amplitude186 microvolts
Primary

Variation (Worsening or Improvement) Between 24 and 12 Months of ERG Scotopic Parameters Comparing 24 and 12-months

Full-field electroretinogram (ERG) scotopic parameters at 12 and 24 months were compared (scotopic parameters: amplitude of scotopic a and b wave, amplitude of maximum scotopic a and b wave, oscillatory potential). The worsening of the ERG parameters was defined as a value reduction of ≥ 30 % in any these scotopic ERG parameters at month 12 and month 24. We report the change between the (value at month 24/ the value at month 12)\*100.

Time frame: 12 and 24-months

Population: One patient had an eye classified as ERG stable group and the other eye as ERG worsening group thus the sum of both groups exceed the total 12 participants

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Corticosteroid MonotherapyVariation (Worsening or Improvement) Between 24 and 12 Months of ERG Scotopic Parameters Comparing 24 and 12-monthsMaximum scotopic b amplitude2.8 percentage of change on ERG parameters
Corticosteroid MonotherapyVariation (Worsening or Improvement) Between 24 and 12 Months of ERG Scotopic Parameters Comparing 24 and 12-monthsPhotopic a amplitude0 percentage of change on ERG parameters
Corticosteroid MonotherapyVariation (Worsening or Improvement) Between 24 and 12 Months of ERG Scotopic Parameters Comparing 24 and 12-monthsMaximum scotopic a amplitude7 percentage of change on ERG parameters
Corticosteroid MonotherapyVariation (Worsening or Improvement) Between 24 and 12 Months of ERG Scotopic Parameters Comparing 24 and 12-monthsPhotopic b amplitude2.4 percentage of change on ERG parameters
Corticosteroid MonotherapyVariation (Worsening or Improvement) Between 24 and 12 Months of ERG Scotopic Parameters Comparing 24 and 12-monthsOscillatory potential5.9 percentage of change on ERG parameters
Corticosteroid MonotherapyVariation (Worsening or Improvement) Between 24 and 12 Months of ERG Scotopic Parameters Comparing 24 and 12-monthsFlicker6.2 percentage of change on ERG parameters
Corticosteroid MonotherapyVariation (Worsening or Improvement) Between 24 and 12 Months of ERG Scotopic Parameters Comparing 24 and 12-monthsScotopic b amplitude9.5 percentage of change on ERG parameters
ERG Worsening GroupVariation (Worsening or Improvement) Between 24 and 12 Months of ERG Scotopic Parameters Comparing 24 and 12-monthsFlicker-6.9 percentage of change on ERG parameters
ERG Worsening GroupVariation (Worsening or Improvement) Between 24 and 12 Months of ERG Scotopic Parameters Comparing 24 and 12-monthsScotopic b amplitude-32.9 percentage of change on ERG parameters
ERG Worsening GroupVariation (Worsening or Improvement) Between 24 and 12 Months of ERG Scotopic Parameters Comparing 24 and 12-monthsMaximum scotopic a amplitude-21.4 percentage of change on ERG parameters
ERG Worsening GroupVariation (Worsening or Improvement) Between 24 and 12 Months of ERG Scotopic Parameters Comparing 24 and 12-monthsMaximum scotopic b amplitude-10.8 percentage of change on ERG parameters
ERG Worsening GroupVariation (Worsening or Improvement) Between 24 and 12 Months of ERG Scotopic Parameters Comparing 24 and 12-monthsOscillatory potential-47.1 percentage of change on ERG parameters
ERG Worsening GroupVariation (Worsening or Improvement) Between 24 and 12 Months of ERG Scotopic Parameters Comparing 24 and 12-monthsPhotopic a amplitude-5 percentage of change on ERG parameters
ERG Worsening GroupVariation (Worsening or Improvement) Between 24 and 12 Months of ERG Scotopic Parameters Comparing 24 and 12-monthsPhotopic b amplitude-13.6 percentage of change on ERG parameters
Secondary

Cataract

Cataract was defined as any lens opacification greater than nuclear or cortical 2+/4 or subcapsular 1+/4

Time frame: 6 to 24 months after disease onset

Population: One patient had an eye classified as ERG stable group and the other eye as ERG worsening group thus the sum of both groups exceed the total 12 participants

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Corticosteroid MonotherapyCataract5 eyes
ERG Worsening GroupCataract0 eyes
p-value: 0.272Fisher Exact
Secondary

Change in Perivascular Leakage on Fluorescein Angiography

Perivascular leakage was observed as an increase in hyperfluorescence around retinal vasculature over time on FA exam at midperiphery.

Time frame: 6 to 24 months after disease onset

Population: One patient had an eye classified as ERG stable group and the other eye as ERG worsening group thus the sum of both groups exceed the total 12 participants

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_UNITS)
Corticosteroid MonotherapyChange in Perivascular Leakage on Fluorescein Angiography9 eyes
ERG Worsening GroupChange in Perivascular Leakage on Fluorescein Angiography4 eyes
Comparison: Change in perivascular leakage in ERG-stable and ERG- worsening groups.p-value: 0.936Generalized estimated equation
Secondary

Change in Subfoveal Choroidal Thickness on Enhanced Depth Optical Coherence Tomography

Increase of 30% or more in choroidal thickness EDI in consecutive exams on horizontal scan

Time frame: 6 to 24 months from disease onset

Population: One patient had an eye classified as ERG stable group and the other eye as ERG worsening group thus the sum of both groups exceed the total 12 participants

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_UNITS)
Corticosteroid MonotherapyChange in Subfoveal Choroidal Thickness on Enhanced Depth Optical Coherence Tomography8 eyes
ERG Worsening GroupChange in Subfoveal Choroidal Thickness on Enhanced Depth Optical Coherence Tomography4 eyes
Secondary

Choroidal Neovascularization

Choroidal neovascularization was diagnosed when increasingly localized hyperfluorescence at the posterior pole is detected on FA or a hyperreflective subretinal lesion associated with sub or intraretinal fluid on OCT.

Time frame: 6 to 24 months after disease onset

Population: One patient had an eye classified as ERG stable group and the other eye as ERG worsening group thus the sum of both groups exceed the total 12 participants

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Corticosteroid MonotherapyChoroidal Neovascularization2 eyes
ERG Worsening GroupChoroidal Neovascularization1 eyes
p-value: 0.853Generalized estimated equation
Secondary

Increase in the Score of Dark Dots on Indocyanine Green Angiography

Dark dots scores had a maximum value of 8, any increase of 0.5 after 6 months from disease onset will be considered (Int Ophthalmo 2010) Dark dots Score based on pattern of distribution (Sparse/ Numerous) Minimum: 0 (better outcome) Maximum: 8 (worse outcome)

Time frame: 6 to 24 months from disease onset

Population: One patient had an eye classified as ERG stable group and the other eye as ERG worsening group thus the sum of both groups exceed the total 12 participants

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Corticosteroid MonotherapyIncrease in the Score of Dark Dots on Indocyanine Green Angiography17 eyes
ERG Worsening GroupIncrease in the Score of Dark Dots on Indocyanine Green Angiography5 eyes
p-value: 0.478generalized estimated equation
Secondary

Ocular Hypertension

Ocular hypertension was defined as an intraocular pressure (IOP) above 21mmHg

Time frame: 6 to 24 months after disease onset

Population: One patient had an eye classified as ERG stable group and the other eye as ERG worsening group thus the sum of both groups exceed the total 12 participants

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Corticosteroid MonotherapyOcular Hypertension7 eyes
ERG Worsening GroupOcular Hypertension5 eyes
p-value: 0.983Generalized estimated equation with bino
Secondary

Recurrence or Worsening of Cells in Anterior Chamber

Evaluation of anterior chamber (AC) cells was performed at visits 6 months, 12 months, 18 months and 24 months from disease onset, according to the Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature´s classification of anterior chamber cells. (Am J Ophthalmol, 2005) Any step increase (fluctuation), when comparing sequential dates of follow up (e.g 6 and 12 months) were considered as one episode of clinical worsening in AC cells

Time frame: 6 to 24 months from disease onset.

Population: One patient had an eye classified as ERG stable group and the other eye as ERG worsening group thus the sum of both groups exceed the total 12 participants

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_UNITS)
Corticosteroid MonotherapyRecurrence or Worsening of Cells in Anterior Chamber8 eyes
ERG Worsening GroupRecurrence or Worsening of Cells in Anterior Chamber0 eyes
Comparison: Recurrence or worsening of cells in anterior chamber in ERG-stable and ERG worsening group.p-value: 0.054Fisher Exact

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026