Skip to content

Comparison of Erector Spinae Plane Block With PECS II Block in Patients Undergoing Breast Cancer Surgery

Comparison of Erector Spinae Plane Block With PECS II Block in Patients Undergoing Breast Cancer Surgery:a Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Withdrawn
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03811262
Enrollment
0
Registered
2019-01-22
Start date
2022-01-01
Completion date
2023-01-31
Last updated
2022-05-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anesthesia, Local, Breast Cancer

Keywords

PECS, ESP, RCT

Brief summary

Backgroung:Regional anesthesia in breast surgery is of paramount importance to reduce pain in perioperative period. PECS II block is an interfascial block that has been used widely as regional anesthesia technique in breast surgery. ESP block is a novel interfascial block proposed in 2016 by Forero. Several reports used this technique in breast surgery to provide analgesia but to date no studies comparing these technique exists. Our hypotesis is that this two technique are equally able to provide analgesia in breast surgery. Study type: RCT, single blind.

Interventions

PROCEDUREESP BLOCK

local anesthetic will be injected between transverous process and erector spinae muscle

PROCEDUREPECS BLOCK

local anesthetic will be injected between pectoralis minor and pectoralis major (10 ml) and between pectoralis minor and serratus (20 ml)

Sponsors

University of Padova
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

ESP block and PECS block will be executed by an anesthesiologist that will not follow the patient during the surgery. Anesthesiologist responsible for the surgery will be not aware of the block executed on the patient Anesthesiologist and surgeon responsible for postoperative therapy will be not aware of the block executed on the patient

Intervention model description

This is a single-centre, prospective; double blinded randomised interventional clinical trial. Patients will be randomly allocated to group PECS or ESP using a closed envelope technique. Group PECS will receive PECS II block as described by Blanco using 30 ml Levobupivacaine 0.25% Group ESP will receive ESP block as described by forero using 30 ml Levobupivacaine 0.25% at T5 level. Blocks will be executed after general anesthesia induction. All partecipants will receive Fentanyl 2 mcg/kg and Propofol 2 mg/kg for induction. Anesthesia will be mantained with Propofol to obtain a BIS level between 40-50. Patients will receive Fentanyl 33 mcg whenever blood pressure and/or hear rate raise more than 20% from baseline after surgical stimulation. At the end of the surgery patients will receive acetominophen 1 g. postoperative therapy: acetominophen 1g/8hr and ketoprofen 100 mg/12hr. Patients will receive 2 mg Morphine whenever a NRS \> 3.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Mastectomy program with axillary clearence

Exclusion criteria

* bilateral surgery

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Intraoperative Fentanyl consumptionIntraoperativeIntraoperative fentanyl dose (mcg) difference between ESP group and PECS group.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
NRS at 12 hourtwelth postoperative hourNRS (0-10) difference at twelth postoperative hour between ESP group and PECS group
NRS at 24 hourtwentyfourth postoperative hourNRS (0-10) difference at twentyfourth postoperative hour between ESP group and PECS group
Patient satisfaction at 24 hourpostoperative period (24h)Patient satisfaction (0-10) difference regarding anesthesia management at twentyfourth postoperative hour between ESP group and PECS group
Time to first opioid consumption in the postoperative periodpostoperative period (24h)Time (minutes) to first opioid consumption in the postoperative period
NRS at 6 hoursixth postoperative hourNRS (0-10) difference at sixth postoperative hour between ESP group and PECS group
Nausea and vomit incidencepostoperative period (24h)Incidence of nausea and vomiting in postoperative period
Other complication incidencepostoperative period (24h)Incidence of other complcations linked to anesthesia in postoperative period
Intraoperative Fentanyl consumption(mcg/kg/h)IntraoperativeIntraoperative fentanyl dose (mcg/kg/h) difference between ESP group and PECS group.
Postoperative morphine consumptionpostoperative period (24h)postoperative morphine dose (mg) difference between ESP group and PECS group.

Countries

Italy

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026