Skip to content

Using the Norm Range to Predict the Effect of Food Portion Size Reductions on Compensation Over 5 Days

Using the Norm Range to Predict the Effect of Food Portion Size Reductions on Compensation

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03811210
Enrollment
39
Registered
2019-01-22
Start date
2018-02-06
Completion date
2018-12-10
Last updated
2019-01-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Portion Size

Brief summary

Reducing food portion size is a potential strategy to reduce energy intake. However it is unclear at what point consumers compensate for reductions in portion size by increasing energy intake from other items. This could result in no overall benefit of reducing food portion sizes. The investigators tested the hypothesis that reductions to the portion size of components of a main meal will only result in significant compensatory eating when the reduced portion size is no longer visually perceived as 'normal'. In a crossover experiment, participants were served different sized portions during lunch and dinner over 5 days: a 'large-normal', a 'small-normal', and a 'smaller than normal' portion. Intake from all other meal components consumed in the laboratory were measured.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALportion size

Smaller than normal portion size - the intervention is the main meal component size perceived as 'smaller than normal' that participants are provided with during lunch and dinner in the laboratory. Small-normal portion size - the intervention is the main meal component size perceived as 'small-normal' that participants are provided with during lunch and dinner in the laboratory. Large-normal portion size - the intervention is the main meal component size perceived as 'large-normal' that participants are provided with during lunch and dinner in the laboratory.

Sponsors

Medical Research Council
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
University of Liverpool
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* willing to consume the test foods * BMI between 22.5 - 32.5

Exclusion criteria

* food allergies, intolerances or specific dietary requirements (including being vegetarian or vegan) * history of eating disorders * taking medication which affected appetite * participated in a portion size studies in the past 12 months, or in dieting or weight loss trials in the past 4 weeks

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Acute compensatory energy intakeImmediate (within single meal occasion)Energy intake from main meal components that are not varied by portion size
Total meal energy intakeImmediate (within single meal occasion)Energy intake from all main meal components (including those that are and are not varied by portion size)
Total daily energy intakeOver 5 x full daysEnergy intake from all foods consumed, including those provided in the laboratory and those self-reported

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Moderate-vigorous physical activityOver 5 x full daysModerate-vigorous physical activity (recorded using accelerometer device)
Discretionary Leisure-time physical activityOver 5 x full daysDiscretionary Leisure-time physical activity (recorded with self-report measure International Physical Activity Questionnaire)
AppetiteOver 5 x full days (measured before and after each meal occasion)Hunger and fullness sensations before and after laboratory-based meals (self-reported on visual analog scales anchored at 0 'not at all' to 100 'extremely')

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 19, 2026