Skip to content

Mechanisms of EPO-induced Hypertension

Mechanisms of Erythropoietin Induced Hypertension

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03810911
Acronym
EPIC
Enrollment
27
Registered
2019-01-22
Start date
2021-01-04
Completion date
2025-07-31
Last updated
2025-12-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Kidney Disease, Blood Pressure, Anemia

Keywords

Flow mediated dilatation

Brief summary

The investigators hypothesize that compared to untreated controls, erythropoietin (EPO) therapy in anemic patients with chronic kidney disease will raise diastolic blood pressure (BP). The magnitude of increase in diastolic BP at 12 weeks after treatment will be related to two factors. First, endothelial dysfunction and worsening of endothelial function from baseline to 4 weeks and second, the change of forearm blood flow in response to breathing oxygen and the change in this measure from baseline to 4 weeks. Study procedures include fasting blood draws, ambulatory blood pressure, urine collection, and forearm blood flow tests. The study hopes to accrue 160 subjects.

Detailed description

Hypertension is a common but frequently overlooked and underreported adverse effect of erythropoietin (EPO) therapy. Recent trials have noted substantial cardiovascular risks associated with normalization of hemoglobin. The risk of strokes is strongly related to poorly controlled hypertension. Blood pressure was not measured the way it usually is in hypertension trials, so the investigators cannot be completely confident that the risk of strokes in this large randomized trial was not related to EPO-induced hypertension. New therapies, such as hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) stabilizers are on the horizon but it remains to be seen whether these new drugs would have a lower or a higher risk for hypertension compared to EPO. Accordingly, understanding the mechanism of EPO-induced hypertension is urgent. The investigators hypothesize that compared to untreated controls, EPO therapy in anemic patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) will raise diastolic blood pressure. The magnitude of increase in diastolic BP at 12 weeks after treatment will be related to endothelial dysfunction and worsening of endothelial function from baseline to 4 weeks. If the investigators understood the time course, the magnitude, and the mechanisms of EPO-induced hypertension (EIH) the investigators will better be able to design studies to compare the vascular effects of EPO and HIF stabilizers in the future. Thus, this study has the potential of improving the investigators' understanding of a common side effect of EPO by precisely quantifying the magnitude of BP change, its effects on endothelial function, and discovering the biomarkers of these adverse effects. Thus, the investigators can in the future robustly compare these effects of EPO with HIF stabilizers. This study is innovative because it will focus on the potential mechanisms by which EPO induces an increase in BP. The time-course and magnitude of change in BP will be assessed using the gold-standard measurement of 24 hour ambulatory BP recordings. The more frequent clinic BP recordings using validated methods will better allow us to track changes in BP over time. The investigators' lab is uniquely qualified to carry out these experiments due to a large experience with such types of studies. The investigators will examine endothelial function using a reference method -- that of flow-mediated dilatation -- which is established in the investigators' laboratory. The investigators will directly test the hypothesis whether endothelial function is responsible for the BP increase.

Interventions

Used to treat anemia. In the group labeled no intervention, the intervention is simply delayed 12 weeks after randomization as noted in the description.

Sponsors

VA Office of Research and Development
Lead SponsorFED

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SEQUENTIAL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Masking description

The groups are randomized not the study drug. The groups will be known by both the participant and the investigator.

Intervention model description

All subjects will receive darbepoetin during the study. One group, the immediate start group, will receive the drug the day of randomization. The other group, the delayed start group, will receive the drug 12 weeks later.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Stage 3 or 4 chronic kidney disease * Controlled hypertension with 24 hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring less than 140/90 mmHg at baseline and treatment with at least 1 antihypertensive medication * Hemoglobin between 8 and 10 g/dL * No treatment with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESA) within 3 previous months

Exclusion criteria

* Need for packed red blood cells (RBC) transfusion in the previous 2 months * Myocardial infarction, stroke or hospitalization for heart failure in the past 2 months * In the assessment of the investigator, have hematologic, inflammatory, infectious, or other conditions that might interfere with the erythropoietic response

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Diastolic Blood Pressure in EPO Treated Patients Compared to Delayed Start ControlsBaseline to 12 weeksIn the delayed start group (the control group), the investigators will measure the change in diastolic blood pressure from 0 weeks to 12 weeks compared to the change in diastolic BP from 0 to 12 weeks in the immediate start group.
Within Group Change in Diastolic Blood Pressure in the Delayed Start Group12 to 24 weeks compared to baseline to 12 weeksWithin group change in diastolic blood pressure from 12 weeks to 24 weeks compared to change in diastolic blood pressure from baseline to 12 weeks in the delayed start group

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Worsened Hypertension Status in Delayed Start Group Participants When They Were Not on EPO Compared to When They Were on EPObaseline to 12 weeks vs 12 weeks to 24 weeksWorsening of hypertension at any time point will be defined as either an increase in blood pressure medication, an increase in seated clinic diastolic blood pressure by greater than or equal to 10 mmHg or systolic blood pressure increase of greater than or equal to 20 mmHg. Within-group change in hypertension status from 12 weeks to 24 weeks will be compared to the control period of 0 weeks to 12 weeks in the delayed start group.
Change in Systolic Blood Pressure in EPO Treated Patients Compared to Delayed Start ControlsBaseline to 12 weeksIn the delayed start group (the control group), the investigators will measure the change in systolic blood pressure change from 0 weeks to 12 weeks compared to the change in systolic BP from 0 to 12 weeks in the immediate start group.
Change in Urine Albumin to Urine Creatinine Ratio in the Delayed Start GroupBaseline to 16 weeks, baseline to 20 weeks, and baseline to 24 weeksChange in urine albumin to urine creatinine ratio in the delayed start group baseline to 16 weeks (which is 4 weeks of exposure to darbepoetin), from baseline to 20 weeks (8-week exposure), and from baseline to 24 weeks (12-week exposure)
Change in Endothelial Function in Those Treated With EPO Compared to the Waitlisted GroupBaseline to 4 weeksThe investigators used the high-resolution ultrasound of brachial artery to assess flow-mediated dilatation (FMD). FMD measures the dilation of blood vessels in response to increased blood flow and is the reference standard for assessing endothelial function. The mean percentage change in endothelial function of those treated with EPO were compared to that of the delayed start group. The hypothesis being tested is that EPO will cause impairment in endothelial function.
Number of Participants With Worsened Hypertension Status in Immediate Start Group Compared to Delayed Start ControlsBaseline to 12 weeksWorsening of hypertension at any time point will be defined as either an increase in blood pressure medication, an increase in seated clinic diastolic blood pressure by greater than or equal to 10 mmHg or systolic blood pressure increase of greater than or equal to 20 mmHg. Between-group change in hypertension status from baseline to 12 weeks will be compared in the immediate start and delayed start groups.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Between 18 December 2020, and 22 September 2023, 1699 individuals were assessed for study eligibility. These individuals were screened, 4398 times for a mean of 2.6 times per person. In all, 281 (17%) were noted to be potentially eligible, of which, 157 (56%) agreed to come for a consent visit.

Pre-assignment details

65 individuals (41%) consented, of which, 27 (42%) were enrolled in the trial and underwent randomization stratified by the level of albuminuria (KDIGO stage A1, A2, or A3). 16 were assigned to waitlisted and 11 to immediate start group. In each of the two groups, two patients did not complete the study. The most common reason for randomization failure was either Hgb out of range (39%) or ambulatory BP out of range (39%). The trial was stopped because of inability to reach target sample size.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Early Start
Participants given study drug immediately at randomization
11
Delayed Start
Participants given study drugs 12 weeks after randomization
16
Total27

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyDeath11
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject11

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicEarly StartTotalDelayed Start
Age, Customized
Age - years (SD)
74.6 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6
74.9 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8
75.1 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.3
Albuminuria category (A1-A3)
A1 -- n (%)
4 Participants9 Participants5 Participants
Albuminuria category (A1-A3)
A2 -- n (%)
5 Participants13 Participants8 Participants
Albuminuria category (A1-A3)
A3 -- n (%)
2 Participants5 Participants3 Participants
Antihypertensive drugs -- n (SD)3.5 Drugs
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.2
3.2 Drugs
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.2
3 Drugs
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.2
Baseline clinic blood pressure
Clinic diastolic blood pressure -- mmHg (SD)
58.5 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.1
57.2 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.4
55.4 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.6
Baseline clinic blood pressure
Clinic systolic blood pressure -- mmHg (SD)
125.1 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 22.1
124.4 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.5
123.2 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.8
Baseline eGFR -- mL/min/1.73m^2 (SD)38.6 mL/min/1.73m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.7
37.1 mL/min/1.73m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.9
36 mL/min/1.73m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.9
Baseline UACR -- mg/g creatinine median (25th-75th)39 mg/g56 mg/g79 mg/g
Clinic heart rate -- beats per minute (SD)71 beats per minutes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8
68 beats per minutes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9
65 beats per minutes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10
Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) category (G1-G5)
G2 -- n (%)
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) category (G1-G5)
G3a -- n (%)
5 Participants8 Participants3 Participants
Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) category (G1-G5)
G3b -- n (%)
4 Participants10 Participants6 Participants
Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) category (G1-G5)
G4 -- n (%)
2 Participants8 Participants6 Participants
Hemoglobin -- g/dL (SD)9.4 g/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.6
9.4 g/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.6
9.5 g/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.7
Medical History
Coronary revascularization -- n (%)
4 Participants10 Participants6 Participants
Medical History
Diabetes -- n (%)
8 Participants17 Participants9 Participants
Medical History
Heart failure hospitalization -- n (%)
5 Participants10 Participants5 Participants
Medical History
Myocardial infarction -- n (%)
2 Participants6 Participants4 Participants
Medical History
Stroke -- n (%)
1 Participants2 Participants1 Participants
Nature of antihypertensive drugs
ACE inhibitors or ARBs -- n (%)
7 Participants13 Participants6 Participants
Nature of antihypertensive drugs
Alpha blockers -- n (%)
5 Participants8 Participants3 Participants
Nature of antihypertensive drugs
Beta blockers -- n (%)
7 Participants21 Participants14 Participants
Nature of antihypertensive drugs
Dihydropyridine Ca channel blockers -- n (%)
6 Participants15 Participants9 Participants
Nature of antihypertensive drugs
K sparing diuretics -- n (%)
2 Participants5 Participants3 Participants
Nature of antihypertensive drugs
Loop diuretics -- n (%)
5 Participants9 Participants4 Participants
Nature of antihypertensive drugs
Nondihydropyridine Ca channel blockers -- n (%)
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Nature of antihypertensive drugs
Thiazide diuretics -- n (%)
4 Participants8 Participants4 Participants
Nature of antihypertensive drugs
Vasodilators -- n (%)
1 Participants6 Participants5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Self stated race
Black
1 Participants8 Participants7 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Self stated race
White
10 Participants19 Participants9 Participants
Serum ferritin -- ng/mL (25th-75th percentile)110 ng/mL95 ng/mL91 ng/mL
Sex: Female, Male
Female
1 Participants5 Participants4 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
10 Participants22 Participants12 Participants
Transferrin saturation -- percent (SD)21 %
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.8
23 %
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.3
24.2 %
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.5
Weight -- kg (SD)99.3 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.7
92.9 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 22.9
88.5 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 24.5

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
2 / 270 / 16
other
Total, other adverse events
6 / 277 / 16
serious
Total, serious adverse events
8 / 275 / 16

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Diastolic Blood Pressure in EPO Treated Patients Compared to Delayed Start Controls

In the delayed start group (the control group), the investigators will measure the change in diastolic blood pressure from 0 weeks to 12 weeks compared to the change in diastolic BP from 0 to 12 weeks in the immediate start group.

Time frame: Baseline to 12 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Early StartChange in Diastolic Blood Pressure in EPO Treated Patients Compared to Delayed Start Controls1.4 mmHg
Delayed StartChange in Diastolic Blood Pressure in EPO Treated Patients Compared to Delayed Start Controls-0.5 mmHg
Primary

Within Group Change in Diastolic Blood Pressure in the Delayed Start Group

Within group change in diastolic blood pressure from 12 weeks to 24 weeks compared to change in diastolic blood pressure from baseline to 12 weeks in the delayed start group

Time frame: 12 to 24 weeks compared to baseline to 12 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Early StartWithin Group Change in Diastolic Blood Pressure in the Delayed Start Group-1.9 mmHg
Delayed StartWithin Group Change in Diastolic Blood Pressure in the Delayed Start Group3.2 mmHg
Secondary

Change in Endothelial Function in Those Treated With EPO Compared to the Waitlisted Group

The investigators used the high-resolution ultrasound of brachial artery to assess flow-mediated dilatation (FMD). FMD measures the dilation of blood vessels in response to increased blood flow and is the reference standard for assessing endothelial function. The mean percentage change in endothelial function of those treated with EPO were compared to that of the delayed start group. The hypothesis being tested is that EPO will cause impairment in endothelial function.

Time frame: Baseline to 4 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Early StartChange in Endothelial Function in Those Treated With EPO Compared to the Waitlisted Group0.9 percentage of endothelial function
Delayed StartChange in Endothelial Function in Those Treated With EPO Compared to the Waitlisted Group-1.2 percentage of endothelial function
Secondary

Change in Systolic Blood Pressure in EPO Treated Patients Compared to Delayed Start Controls

In the delayed start group (the control group), the investigators will measure the change in systolic blood pressure change from 0 weeks to 12 weeks compared to the change in systolic BP from 0 to 12 weeks in the immediate start group.

Time frame: Baseline to 12 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Early StartChange in Systolic Blood Pressure in EPO Treated Patients Compared to Delayed Start Controls2 mmHg
Delayed StartChange in Systolic Blood Pressure in EPO Treated Patients Compared to Delayed Start Controls-3.6 mmHg
Secondary

Change in Urine Albumin to Urine Creatinine Ratio in the Delayed Start Group

Change in urine albumin to urine creatinine ratio in the delayed start group baseline to 16 weeks (which is 4 weeks of exposure to darbepoetin), from baseline to 20 weeks (8-week exposure), and from baseline to 24 weeks (12-week exposure)

Time frame: Baseline to 16 weeks, baseline to 20 weeks, and baseline to 24 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Early StartChange in Urine Albumin to Urine Creatinine Ratio in the Delayed Start Group22 percentage change in UACR from baseline
Delayed StartChange in Urine Albumin to Urine Creatinine Ratio in the Delayed Start Group22 percentage change in UACR from baseline
24 Weeks (12-week Darbepoetin Exposure)Change in Urine Albumin to Urine Creatinine Ratio in the Delayed Start Group35 percentage change in UACR from baseline
Secondary

Number of Participants With Worsened Hypertension Status in Delayed Start Group Participants When They Were Not on EPO Compared to When They Were on EPO

Worsening of hypertension at any time point will be defined as either an increase in blood pressure medication, an increase in seated clinic diastolic blood pressure by greater than or equal to 10 mmHg or systolic blood pressure increase of greater than or equal to 20 mmHg. Within-group change in hypertension status from 12 weeks to 24 weeks will be compared to the control period of 0 weeks to 12 weeks in the delayed start group.

Time frame: baseline to 12 weeks vs 12 weeks to 24 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Early StartNumber of Participants With Worsened Hypertension Status in Delayed Start Group Participants When They Were Not on EPO Compared to When They Were on EPO7 Participants
Delayed StartNumber of Participants With Worsened Hypertension Status in Delayed Start Group Participants When They Were Not on EPO Compared to When They Were on EPO7 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Worsened Hypertension Status in Immediate Start Group Compared to Delayed Start Controls

Worsening of hypertension at any time point will be defined as either an increase in blood pressure medication, an increase in seated clinic diastolic blood pressure by greater than or equal to 10 mmHg or systolic blood pressure increase of greater than or equal to 20 mmHg. Between-group change in hypertension status from baseline to 12 weeks will be compared in the immediate start and delayed start groups.

Time frame: Baseline to 12 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Early StartNumber of Participants With Worsened Hypertension Status in Immediate Start Group Compared to Delayed Start Controls3 Participants
Delayed StartNumber of Participants With Worsened Hypertension Status in Immediate Start Group Compared to Delayed Start Controls7 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026