Skip to content

Treatment of Varicose Veins With the ELVeS® Radial® 2ring Slim Fiber. Are There Limitations?

Treatment of Varicose Veins With the ELVeS® Radial® 2ring Slim Fiber. Are There Limitations?

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03810677
Enrollment
150
Registered
2019-01-22
Start date
2019-04-15
Completion date
2021-03-08
Last updated
2021-05-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Varicose Veins

Brief summary

This study aims to prove that the ELVeS® Radial® 2ring slim fiber is safe and effective in endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) of varicose veins, with a reliable durability by evaluating procedural details/outcomes, clinical success, anatomic success, pain, post-operative adverse events and re-interventions.

Interventions

DEVICEELVeS® Radial® 2ring slim fiber

Device for endovenous laser ablation manufactured by Biolitec AG company (ELVeS system) - diode laser with a wavelength of 1470 nm

Sponsors

Biolitec AG
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
be Medical
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Patient is at least 18 years old. 2. Patient must sign and date the informed consent form prior to treatment. 3. Presence of unilateral or bilateral primary symptomatic varicose veins (CEAP grade ≥ C2). 4. Patient has an insufficient Great Saphenous Vein (GSV), with or without laser ablation of anterior accessory saphenous vein (AASV), posterior accessory saphenous vein (PASV), and/or Small Saphenous Vein (SSV), with venous symptoms (valve incompetence), suitable for endovenous laser ablation (EVLA). 5. Maximum diameter of the to be treated veins is ≤ 14mm.

Exclusion criteria

1. Current deep vein thrombosis. 2. Acute superficial thrombosis. 3. Mean diameter of the to be treated veins \> 14mm. 4. Tortuous or very superficial veins considered unsuitable for laser treatment. 5. Recurrent varicose veins. 6. Pregnancy. 7. Coagulopathy or bleeding disorders. 8. Contraindications to the use of general or regional anesthesia.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Anatomic successat 1 month follow-updefined as occlusion of the treated veins and lack of reflux objectified with duplex ultrasonography

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Procedural characteristicsat index-procedureDetails concerning the index-procedure
Pain scoring using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS)dischargeThe VAS scale contains a 0 - 100 grading with 0 equaling no pain and 100 equaling the worst conceivable pain. The patient is asked to select the number on the scale that corresponds to the worst level of pain he/she experiences. Pain is classified into mild (1 - 30 mm), moderate (31 - 60 mm) and severe (61 - 100 mm). Absence of pain is defined as VAS = 0.
Clinical success, defined as an objective improvement of clinical outcome after treatment, measured with the Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS)at 1 month follow-upThe VCSS includes 9 hallmarks of venous disease, each scored on a severity scale from 0 to 3.
Post-operative adverse eventsat 1 week follow-upnumbness, persistent bruising, skin loss or ulceration, hematoma, infection, bleeding, deep venous thrombosis, etc.
Re-interventionsat 1 week follow-upincluding reason for re-intervention and description of treatment

Countries

Belgium

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 8, 2026