Skip to content

TRANSLATE: Transgender and Gender Nonconforming Individuals' Access to Healthcare

Understanding and Reducing Health Disparities Faced by Transgender and Gender Non-conforming (TGNC) Individuals in Cleveland Through TGNC-Directed Advocacy

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03808883
Enrollment
49
Registered
2019-01-18
Start date
2019-02-01
Completion date
2020-12-10
Last updated
2024-08-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Gender Identity

Keywords

Barriers to Healthcare Access, Participatory Action Research, Cultural Competency

Brief summary

Transgender and gender nonconforming (TGNC) individuals face a number of health disparities, many of which can be tied to a lack of access to or use of primary care. Stigma and misunderstanding make simple doctor's visits into ordeals only worth enduring for the most serious of problems. This project addresses those issues by enlisting TGNC people as experts on their own experience. TGNC individuals will form a year-long cohort that will form the basis for this research. Collectively, they will define the scope of challenges faced when seeking healthcare, what medical advocacy training they desire, and how to address groups of healthcare providers and staff. Healthcare providers, including MDs, nurses, and Physicians Assistants (PAs), will attend two facilitated sessions with the TGNC cohort to meet as peers with knowledge exchanged in both directions. Similar meetings will occur with clinic staff, as TGNC individuals have expressed how stigma begins from the moment they call a medical office. Our hypothesis is that when TGNC individuals are given the tools to navigate the healthcare system and the ability to speak with medical professionals as peers, rather than patients, through a participatory action research design they will be better able to access appropriate care through increased confidence and mutual support. The complementary hypothesis for medical providers is that direct interaction with a variety of TGNC individuals who articulate their needs will decrease stigma and increase comfort when treating TGNC people as patients. As a partnership between academic, medical, and community institutions, this project has the potential to directly impact the lives of TGNC individuals who participate and indirectly impact others served by the LGBT Center. This proposal works on three levels: 1) at the academic level - an assessment of participatory action research as an intervention to decrease health disparities, 2) at the individual level - the potential for individuals to increase personal knowledge and skills, and 3) at the institutional level - as actors within the TGNC community develop relationships with individual healthcare providers, medical clinics and activist groups and community partners and educational institutions are concurrently forming networks that will have positive, although probably more diffuse, impact on TGNC individuals as these institutions come together to support TGNC health care.

Detailed description

RESEARCH QUESTION: Do interactive dialogues between trans and gender nonconforming (TGNC) - trained in health literacy and advocacy - and healthcare providers and staff seeking cultural competency around TGNC primary care result in 1) more confidence on the part of TGNC in navigating the healthcare system, 2) more confidence on the part of providers in responding to the needs of TGNC patients, (sub question - is there a measurable difference between types of providers' responses to trainings, i.e., medical doctors compared to nurse practitioners) 3) person-to-person networks between the two populations resulting in ongoing, sustainable dialogue, 4) TGNC individuals prepared to train other TGNC in a peer-to-peer role to act as advocates on behalf of the TGNC population within the healthcare system, all of which ultimately result in increased access to and use of primary care services and reduce the health disparities faced by TGNC individuals? SIGNIFICANCE: The LGBTQ+ community has historically acted on its own behalf out of necessity, including for the push to remove homosexuality as a mental disorder from the The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) and reframing the HIV/AIDS conversation and demanding research. Our project, driven by TGNC people's interests and advocacy, falls within this tradition of advocacy from inside the community. Our project aims to improve quality of life by addressing health disparities faced by TGNC individuals and by developing a self-sustained space to teach self-advocacy skills to navigate the healthcare system. The LGBT Community Center of Greater Cleveland (The LGBT Center) is in the process of hiring a new Youth Program Coordinator who will be responsible for the project management of this program. The ideal candidate will bring both professional and personal experience of working within the TGNC community and an interest in research. TRANS in the CLE Conference, convened in October of 2017, had more than 130 attendees, 26 presenters, and 15 workshops. The LGBT Center regularly hosts the Queer Youth Initiative, serving an average of 100 people a month between the ages of 11 and 20. A majority of those individuals identify as transgender, non-binary, or gender nonconforming. This demonstrates both the significant presence of TGNC individuals in Cleveland and the LGBT Center's ability to reach this population. INNOVATION: This project places TGNC community members and The LGBT Center in position to lead the direction of the research project, to gain research and health advocacy skills themselves, and the ability to form a cohort that will continue to operate beyond this pilot project. In Cleveland, TGNC affirming services are available at the Pride Network at MetroHealth, Cleveland Clinic's Center for LGBT Care, and University Hospital's navigator program. ECHO community partners receive technical assistance from experts in the field, but these are not necessarily informed by TGNC community input. Almost no other academic program is asking TGNC people what issues to prioritize, and no other program in the Cleveland area, to our knowledge. TGNC individuals are often research subjects and not recognized as experts themselves. Alpert's online survey asks LGBTQ+ individuals what they feel doctors should say and do, but the interaction is still mediated through an academic expert. The intervention closest to what is proposed is the Transgender Law's Organizing for Transgender Healthcare: A Guide for Community Clinic Organizing and Activism, which defines transgender health care as culturally appropriate primary health care, including access to sex-specific and transition-related procedures. In a case study in Los Angeles, a group of trans men formed an advocacy group (C3) that engaged with two community clinics to improve the clinics' cultural competency, medical forms, outreach materials, protocols for accessing hormones, and the referral process. This project is being proposed by cisgender women but is designed to be driven by TGNC individuals as partners and advocates navigating the healthcare system. In comparison to the model of C3 in Los Angeles, this project is innovative in that it calls for a sustained dialogue between the TGNC cohort and the health care providers and reaches a cross-section of practitioners from clinics that provide primary care. METHODS: Over the course of the grant year, each step of the project is divided into three month portions. The first quarter will be dedicated to recruiting and forming a cohort of TGNC individuals, drawn mostly from the LGBT Center's extensive contact lists and centrality within the TGNC population. The investigators plan on recruiting 20 individuals to ensure the study meets the minimum retention of 12 subjects throughout the study needed for qualitative saturation, and individuals between 14-18 years of age will be able to participate with guardian permission. Interested individuals will fill out applications to identify their interests and ability to commit to the project and will allow us to create a cohort that reflects the diversity of the TGNC community in Cuyahoga County, including gender identity, types of gender-affirmative care required (including whether or not someone is considering, in the process of, or completed physical transition), racial and ethnic identity, age (over 14), and socio-economic class. Upon accepting the invitation to participate, each member of the cohort will complete a pretest that will elicit data on their experiences in the healthcare system, their knowledge of basic and transgender-specific medical terminology, their familiarity with healthcare providers in Cuyahoga County, and the likelihood of seeking care under a number of conditions (acute, chronic, moderate, severe). The investigators expect this to take one month. The following two months will consist of meeting as a cohort twice a month. The first two meetings will be dedicated to understanding the group's collective experiences with health care, what they would like to see change, and what strategies can be used to accomplish those ends. The investigators recognize that TGNC people come from a variety of backgrounds and each will bring their own strengths, networks, and perspectives to the table which will allow us to make full use of the indigenous expertise of the group. In consultation with the Nursing School of CWRU, the investigators will develop a health literacy training that meets the expressed needs of the cohort and Jesse Honsky will present it during the 3rd meeting. The goal here is not to provide all possible health education but rather to arm the cohort with the skills and language to empower them to act as advocates on their own behalf when navigating the healthcare system. The final meeting (the 4th) in this first quarter will be with a trained facilitator (Shemariah Arki) who will, under the direction of the TGNC cohort, plan a series of three interactive dialogues between the TGNC cohort and the healthcare providers. By meeting with the TGNC cohort first, without the healthcare providers, the TGNC cohort will have the opportunity to ensure the dialogues are designed to meet their objectives. Individual healthcare practitioners and medical staff will be recruited during the first quarter from the aforementioned clinics. The investigators will recruit at least twelve providers and twelve staff members. In the second quarter, the investigators will conduct a pretest that will collect data on attitudes towards TGNC individuals, TGNC-specific healthcare concerns, depth and breadth of referral networks for TGNC providers. Once the healthcare provider group is solidified, the LGBT Center will host three evening meetings (once per month) with the trained facilitator wherein TGNC individuals lead a conversation about what they see as barriers to their care, how they would like to be treated, and what they want healthcare providers to know about them as people. The first two meetings will be with healthcare practitioners and the final meeting will be medical staff so that the meetings can be more specific and without the interference of power dynamics within the provider groups. During this second quarter, the TGNC cohort will continue to meet on its own once a month to debrief from meetings, respond to what they have learned so far, and possibly refine the strategies for future meetings with healthcare providers as the series goes forward. At the end of the three months of dialogue, each participant, from both the TGNC cohort and healthcare provider, will be given a post-test to measure changes in attitude, practice, and knowledge. Participants will also have the opportunity to engage in a reflective interview. The third quarter will diverge onto two different paths: the LGBT Center project coordinator will continue to engage with the cohort as they shift into the role of peer educators and advocates with other members of the TGNC community that interact at the LGBT Center. Luminais will conduct follow-up interviews with any TGNC cohort member that notifies the researchers that they have sought medical care and with any healthcare provider that notifies the researchers that they have had a clinical interaction with a TGNC individual. The investigators will not be seeking any protected medical information or the identity of patients, in the case of healthcare providers, but rather a discussion of the ease or difficulty in communication, levels of comfort, and comparison with other interactions in general. Throughout the process, both Luminais and the LGBT Center coordinator will be engaged in participant observation and keep detailed field notes on all the meetings. All interviews will be transcribed; interviews and field notes will be coded with a priori codes derived from the literature on reducing health disparities and TGNC-specific health care by a research assistant. Pre- and post-tests will be analyzed to determine the success of facilitated dialogue in improving confidence and knowledge by both the TGNC cohort and the healthcare providers, and depending on sample size, the investigators will determine if there are any statistically significant changes. This analysis and write up will encompass the last quarter of the project.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALTGNC Directed Advocacy Meetings

Series of 18 meetings with TGNC cohort, including 3 facilitated dialogues with the healthcare participants, to articulate barriers to access and to enter into dialogue with medical providers and staff.

BEHAVIORALFacilitated Dialogues between TGNC Cohort and Healthcare Participants

Healthcare Participants attend a facilitated dialogue with the TGNC cohort. 3 total facilitated dialogues were held, but each healthcare participant attends only 1 session.

Sponsors

LGBT Community Center of Greater Cleveland
CollaboratorOTHER
MetroHealth Medical Center
CollaboratorOTHER
Case Western Reserve University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
14 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

TGNC Inclusion Criteria: * self-identify as transgender or gender nonconforming * fluent English speaker * above the age of 14 years old TGNC

Exclusion criteria

* non-fluent English speaker * below the age of 14 years old * does not identify as transgender or gender nonconforming Healthcare Participants Inclusion Criteria: * Currently employed as a medical provider or medical staff * At least 18 years old * fluent English speaker Healthcare Participants

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Knowledge of TGNC Individuals of Total Number of Locations to Receive Medical Care in Cleveland KnownBaseline and 11 monthsTGNC participants were asked pre and post-intervention to name all the hospitals they knew of where they could received medical care. Mean and range are reported. This measure was unreliable as participants, when asked in the post survey to name locations for healthcare, were not given those they had identified in the pre-intervention survey, so some participants actually decreased the number they named. Additionally, growth from this measure is mean growth of the group, not a mean of the sum of individual's growth.
Change From Baseline in Knowledge of TGNC Cohort About Transgender and Gender Nonconforming Medical IssuesBaseline and 11 monthsTGNC Cohort Participants were asked to respond with their agreement with the following statement: I am knowledgeable about how being transgender or gender non-conforming impacts my health. Response options were 1=Disagree Strongly, 2=Disagree, 3=Neutral, 4=Agree, and 5=Agree Strongly. Change was measured as month 11 minus baseline score, and higher scores represented the better outcome.
Change From Baseline in Knowledge of Healthcare Participants About Transgender and Gender Nonconforming Medical IssuesBaseline and 24 hoursHealthcare Participants were asked to respond with their agreement with the following statement: I know about medical issues that affect transgender and gender nonconforming patients. Response options were 1=Disagree Strongly, 2=Disagree, 3=Neutral, 4=Agree, and 5=Agree Strongly. Because healthcare providers only participated in one facilitated dialogue, baseline was measured prior to the dialogue, and post measures were administered the day after the dialogue. Change was measured as post score- baseline score, and higher scores represented the better outcome.
Change From Baseline in Attitude of TGNC Individuals Towards Navigating Their Interactions With Healthcare Providers.Baseline and 11 monthsTGNC Individuals were asked to respond with their agreement with the following two statements: 1. I am able to navigate the healthcare system easily, and 2. I know how to express my concerns about my health and well-being to healthcare providers. Response options were 1=Disagree Strongly, 2-=Disagree, 3=Neutral, 4=Agree and 5=Strongly agree. For these questions, a higher score indicated confident attitude in handling their healthcare needs. Change from Baseline to 11 months was measured.
Change in Attitude of Medical Providers Towards Transgender Issues.Baseline and 24 hours.Healthcare Participants were asked to respond with their agreement with the following statement: I am comfortable advocating for transgender and gender non-conforming people's right to access respectful and appropriate health care in the place where I practice. Response Options were 1=Disagree Strongly, 2=Disagree, 3=Neutral, 4=Agree, and 5=Agree Strongly, with a higher score indicating a more positive attitude towards transgender issues. Change was measured by subtracting the providers' responses after participation in a facilitated dialogue with TGNC participants from their scored response prior to participating in the dialogue.
Qualitative Shift in Confidence of TGNC Individuals in Seeking Medical Care After the Intervention.Interview at 11 months.Percentage of TGNC individuals expressing key themes related to shift of confidence of TGNC Individuals to seek medical care following the intervention.
Qualitative Shift in Confidence of Medical Provider in Providing Culturally Competent Medical Care to TGNC Individuals After the Intervention.Interview within one day following the facilitated dialogueThe number of medical providers expressing themes illustrating a shift in confidence with their ability to provide culturally competent medical care in structured interview following the facilitated dialogue with members of the TGNC participant group.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
TGNC Cohort
Transgender and gender non-conforming (TGNC) identifying individuals. TGNC Directed Advocacy Meetings: Series of 18 community meetings with TGNC individuals, 3 of which were facilitated dialogues with health professionals to articulate barriers to access and to enter into dialogue with medical providers and staff.
20
Healthcare Participants
Healthcare Providers and staff who participated in a facilitated dialogue with the TGNC Cohort. The Translate Study held three facilitated dialogue sessions with both the TGNC Cohort and Healthcare Participants, identified as physicians, nurse practitioners, registered nurses, students, physician assistants, and non-provider staff positions. Each Healthcare Participant only attended one of the three sessions.
29
Total49

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyDid not complete pre test or post test survey43
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject20

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTGNC CohortTotalHealthcare Participants
Ability to Navigate Healthcare System
Agree
5 Participants5 Participants
Ability to Navigate Healthcare System
Disagree
4 Participants4 Participants
Ability to Navigate Healthcare System
Neutral
6 Participants6 Participants
Ability to Navigate Healthcare System
No response
2 Participants2 Participants
Ability to Navigate Healthcare System
Strongly Agree
3 Participants3 Participants
Ability to Navigate Healthcare System
Strongly Disagree
0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Continuous27.82 years32.74 years37.65 years
Comfort in Advocating for Respectful and Appropriate Healthcare
Agree
10 Participants10 Participants
Comfort in Advocating for Respectful and Appropriate Healthcare
Agree Strongly
11 Participants11 Participants
Comfort in Advocating for Respectful and Appropriate Healthcare
Disagree
2 Participants2 Participants
Comfort in Advocating for Respectful and Appropriate Healthcare
Disagree Strongly
0 Participants0 Participants
Comfort in Advocating for Respectful and Appropriate Healthcare
Neutral
6 Participants6 Participants
Comfort in Advocating for Respectful and Appropriate Healthcare
No Response
0 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
19 Participants48 Participants29 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Knowledge of How to Express Health and Well-being Concerns
Agree
8 Participants8 Participants
Knowledge of How to Express Health and Well-being Concerns
Agree Strongly
6 Participants6 Participants
Knowledge of How to Express Health and Well-being Concerns
Disagree
2 Participants2 Participants
Knowledge of How to Express Health and Well-being Concerns
Disagree Strongly
0 Participants0 Participants
Knowledge of How to Express Health and Well-being Concerns
Neutral
3 Participants3 Participants
Knowledge of How to Express Health and Well-being Concerns
No Response
1 Participants1 Participants
Knowledge of transgender and gender nonconforming medical issues
Agree
7 Participants18 Participants11 Participants
Knowledge of transgender and gender nonconforming medical issues
Disagree
4 Participants11 Participants7 Participants
Knowledge of transgender and gender nonconforming medical issues
Neutral
1 Participants5 Participants4 Participants
Knowledge of transgender and gender nonconforming medical issues
No response
1 Participants4 Participants3 Participants
Knowledge of transgender and gender nonconforming medical issues
Strongly Agree
7 Participants11 Participants4 Participants
Knowledge of transgender and gender nonconforming medical issues
Strongly Disagree
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
2 Participants5 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
6 Participants7 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
2 Participants5 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
10 Participants32 Participants22 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
20 Participants49 Participants29 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Non-binary/unlabeled
4 Participants6 Participants2 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Transmen/male
6 Participants9 Participants3 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Transwoman/female
10 Participants34 Participants24 Participants
Total Number of Locations to Receive Medical Care Known by TGNC participants3.36 locations3.35 locations

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 200 / 29
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 200 / 29
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 200 / 29

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in Attitude of TGNC Individuals Towards Navigating Their Interactions With Healthcare Providers.

TGNC Individuals were asked to respond with their agreement with the following two statements: 1. I am able to navigate the healthcare system easily, and 2. I know how to express my concerns about my health and well-being to healthcare providers. Response options were 1=Disagree Strongly, 2-=Disagree, 3=Neutral, 4=Agree and 5=Strongly agree. For these questions, a higher score indicated confident attitude in handling their healthcare needs. Change from Baseline to 11 months was measured.

Time frame: Baseline and 11 months

Population: Only the TGNC (n=14) were asked these questions at baseline (pre-intervention) and 11 months (post-intervention).

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
TGNC CohortChange From Baseline in Attitude of TGNC Individuals Towards Navigating Their Interactions With Healthcare Providers.I am able to navigate the healthcare system easilyDisagree Strongly0 Participants
TGNC CohortChange From Baseline in Attitude of TGNC Individuals Towards Navigating Their Interactions With Healthcare Providers.I am able to navigate the healthcare system easilyDisagree3 Participants
TGNC CohortChange From Baseline in Attitude of TGNC Individuals Towards Navigating Their Interactions With Healthcare Providers.I am able to navigate the healthcare system easilyNeutral1 Participants
TGNC CohortChange From Baseline in Attitude of TGNC Individuals Towards Navigating Their Interactions With Healthcare Providers.I am able to navigate the healthcare system easilyAgree6 Participants
TGNC CohortChange From Baseline in Attitude of TGNC Individuals Towards Navigating Their Interactions With Healthcare Providers.I am able to navigate the healthcare system easilyAgree Strongly4 Participants
TGNC CohortChange From Baseline in Attitude of TGNC Individuals Towards Navigating Their Interactions With Healthcare Providers.I am able to navigate the healthcare system easilyNo response0 Participants
TGNC CohortChange From Baseline in Attitude of TGNC Individuals Towards Navigating Their Interactions With Healthcare Providers.I know how to express my concerns about my health and well-being to healthcare providers.Disagree Strongly0 Participants
TGNC CohortChange From Baseline in Attitude of TGNC Individuals Towards Navigating Their Interactions With Healthcare Providers.I know how to express my concerns about my health and well-being to healthcare providers.Disagree1 Participants
TGNC CohortChange From Baseline in Attitude of TGNC Individuals Towards Navigating Their Interactions With Healthcare Providers.I know how to express my concerns about my health and well-being to healthcare providers.Neutral5 Participants
TGNC CohortChange From Baseline in Attitude of TGNC Individuals Towards Navigating Their Interactions With Healthcare Providers.I know how to express my concerns about my health and well-being to healthcare providers.Agree2 Participants
TGNC CohortChange From Baseline in Attitude of TGNC Individuals Towards Navigating Their Interactions With Healthcare Providers.I know how to express my concerns about my health and well-being to healthcare providers.Agree Strongly6 Participants
TGNC CohortChange From Baseline in Attitude of TGNC Individuals Towards Navigating Their Interactions With Healthcare Providers.I know how to express my concerns about my health and well-being to healthcare providers.No response0 Participants
Primary

Change From Baseline in Knowledge of Healthcare Participants About Transgender and Gender Nonconforming Medical Issues

Healthcare Participants were asked to respond with their agreement with the following statement: I know about medical issues that affect transgender and gender nonconforming patients. Response options were 1=Disagree Strongly, 2=Disagree, 3=Neutral, 4=Agree, and 5=Agree Strongly. Because healthcare providers only participated in one facilitated dialogue, baseline was measured prior to the dialogue, and post measures were administered the day after the dialogue. Change was measured as post score- baseline score, and higher scores represented the better outcome.

Time frame: Baseline and 24 hours

Population: The Healthcare Participants measurement occurred at the start and within 24 hours after the end of their facilitated dialogue with the TGNC Cohort (one 2 hour intervention).

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
TGNC CohortChange From Baseline in Knowledge of Healthcare Participants About Transgender and Gender Nonconforming Medical IssuesDisagree0 Participants
TGNC CohortChange From Baseline in Knowledge of Healthcare Participants About Transgender and Gender Nonconforming Medical IssuesAgree0 Participants
TGNC CohortChange From Baseline in Knowledge of Healthcare Participants About Transgender and Gender Nonconforming Medical IssuesNeutral0 Participants
TGNC CohortChange From Baseline in Knowledge of Healthcare Participants About Transgender and Gender Nonconforming Medical IssuesAgree Strongly0 Participants
TGNC CohortChange From Baseline in Knowledge of Healthcare Participants About Transgender and Gender Nonconforming Medical IssuesDisagree Strongly0 Participants
Healthcare ParticipantsChange From Baseline in Knowledge of Healthcare Participants About Transgender and Gender Nonconforming Medical IssuesAgree Strongly6 Participants
Healthcare ParticipantsChange From Baseline in Knowledge of Healthcare Participants About Transgender and Gender Nonconforming Medical IssuesDisagree Strongly0 Participants
Healthcare ParticipantsChange From Baseline in Knowledge of Healthcare Participants About Transgender and Gender Nonconforming Medical IssuesDisagree2 Participants
Healthcare ParticipantsChange From Baseline in Knowledge of Healthcare Participants About Transgender and Gender Nonconforming Medical IssuesNeutral3 Participants
Healthcare ParticipantsChange From Baseline in Knowledge of Healthcare Participants About Transgender and Gender Nonconforming Medical IssuesAgree15 Participants
Primary

Change From Baseline in Knowledge of TGNC Cohort About Transgender and Gender Nonconforming Medical Issues

TGNC Cohort Participants were asked to respond with their agreement with the following statement: I am knowledgeable about how being transgender or gender non-conforming impacts my health. Response options were 1=Disagree Strongly, 2=Disagree, 3=Neutral, 4=Agree, and 5=Agree Strongly. Change was measured as month 11 minus baseline score, and higher scores represented the better outcome.

Time frame: Baseline and 11 months

Population: Both the TGNC Cohort and the Healthcare Participant change from baseline in knowledge was measured using the similar question and same scale. TGNC cohort measurement occurred at the first and last date of the TGNC led advocacy meetings (baseline and 11 months later) and the Healthcare Participants measurement occurred at the start and end of their facilitated dialogue with the TGNC Cohort (one 2 hour intervention).

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
TGNC CohortChange From Baseline in Knowledge of TGNC Cohort About Transgender and Gender Nonconforming Medical IssuesDisagree1 Participants
TGNC CohortChange From Baseline in Knowledge of TGNC Cohort About Transgender and Gender Nonconforming Medical IssuesAgree2 Participants
TGNC CohortChange From Baseline in Knowledge of TGNC Cohort About Transgender and Gender Nonconforming Medical IssuesNeutral6 Participants
TGNC CohortChange From Baseline in Knowledge of TGNC Cohort About Transgender and Gender Nonconforming Medical IssuesAgree Strongly4 Participants
TGNC CohortChange From Baseline in Knowledge of TGNC Cohort About Transgender and Gender Nonconforming Medical IssuesDisagree Strongly1 Participants
Healthcare ParticipantsChange From Baseline in Knowledge of TGNC Cohort About Transgender and Gender Nonconforming Medical IssuesAgree Strongly0 Participants
Healthcare ParticipantsChange From Baseline in Knowledge of TGNC Cohort About Transgender and Gender Nonconforming Medical IssuesDisagree Strongly0 Participants
Healthcare ParticipantsChange From Baseline in Knowledge of TGNC Cohort About Transgender and Gender Nonconforming Medical IssuesDisagree0 Participants
Healthcare ParticipantsChange From Baseline in Knowledge of TGNC Cohort About Transgender and Gender Nonconforming Medical IssuesNeutral0 Participants
Healthcare ParticipantsChange From Baseline in Knowledge of TGNC Cohort About Transgender and Gender Nonconforming Medical IssuesAgree0 Participants
Primary

Change in Attitude of Medical Providers Towards Transgender Issues.

Healthcare Participants were asked to respond with their agreement with the following statement: I am comfortable advocating for transgender and gender non-conforming people's right to access respectful and appropriate health care in the place where I practice. Response Options were 1=Disagree Strongly, 2=Disagree, 3=Neutral, 4=Agree, and 5=Agree Strongly, with a higher score indicating a more positive attitude towards transgender issues. Change was measured by subtracting the providers' responses after participation in a facilitated dialogue with TGNC participants from their scored response prior to participating in the dialogue.

Time frame: Baseline and 24 hours.

Population: Only Healthcare Participants were asked this question.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Healthcare ParticipantsChange in Attitude of Medical Providers Towards Transgender Issues.Disagree Strongly0 Participants
Healthcare ParticipantsChange in Attitude of Medical Providers Towards Transgender Issues.Disagree1 Participants
Healthcare ParticipantsChange in Attitude of Medical Providers Towards Transgender Issues.Neutral1 Participants
Healthcare ParticipantsChange in Attitude of Medical Providers Towards Transgender Issues.Agree10 Participants
Healthcare ParticipantsChange in Attitude of Medical Providers Towards Transgender Issues.Agree Strongly14 Participants
Healthcare ParticipantsChange in Attitude of Medical Providers Towards Transgender Issues.No response0 Participants
Primary

Change in Knowledge of TGNC Individuals of Total Number of Locations to Receive Medical Care in Cleveland Known

TGNC participants were asked pre and post-intervention to name all the hospitals they knew of where they could received medical care. Mean and range are reported. This measure was unreliable as participants, when asked in the post survey to name locations for healthcare, were not given those they had identified in the pre-intervention survey, so some participants actually decreased the number they named. Additionally, growth from this measure is mean growth of the group, not a mean of the sum of individual's growth.

Time frame: Baseline and 11 months

Population: Only TGNC participants who completed pre and post intervention surveys were included.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
TGNC CohortChange in Knowledge of TGNC Individuals of Total Number of Locations to Receive Medical Care in Cleveland Known3.79 locations
Primary

Qualitative Shift in Confidence of Medical Provider in Providing Culturally Competent Medical Care to TGNC Individuals After the Intervention.

The number of medical providers expressing themes illustrating a shift in confidence with their ability to provide culturally competent medical care in structured interview following the facilitated dialogue with members of the TGNC participant group.

Time frame: Interview within one day following the facilitated dialogue

Population: This was a qualitative interview and analysis was for only the 8 healthcare participants who agreed to the structured interviews following the intervention in structured interviews.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TGNC CohortQualitative Shift in Confidence of Medical Provider in Providing Culturally Competent Medical Care to TGNC Individuals After the Intervention.Expressing confidence in structured interview6 percentage of hc participants
TGNC CohortQualitative Shift in Confidence of Medical Provider in Providing Culturally Competent Medical Care to TGNC Individuals After the Intervention.Expressing no confidence in structured interview2 percentage of hc participants
Primary

Qualitative Shift in Confidence of TGNC Individuals in Seeking Medical Care After the Intervention.

Percentage of TGNC individuals expressing key themes related to shift of confidence of TGNC Individuals to seek medical care following the intervention.

Time frame: Interview at 11 months.

Population: Amongst the 8 TGNC participants who agreed to be interviewed following the intervention, a key theme in the qualitative evaluation was a sense of personal growth in confidence regarding speaking up both inside and outside of healthcare settings.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
TGNC CohortQualitative Shift in Confidence of TGNC Individuals in Seeking Medical Care After the Intervention.8 Participants
Healthcare ParticipantsQualitative Shift in Confidence of TGNC Individuals in Seeking Medical Care After the Intervention.0 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026