Skip to content

The Effect of Surfactant Dose on Outcomes in Preterm Infants With RDS

The Effect of Surfactant Dose on Outcomes in Preterm Infants With Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03808402
Acronym
OPTI-SURF
Enrollment
2973
Registered
2019-01-17
Start date
2018-10-26
Completion date
2024-03-30
Last updated
2025-05-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia, Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Keywords

Surfactant, Less Invasive Surfactant Administration, Mechanical Ventilation

Brief summary

A prospective observational study using de-identified data from the Neonatal Network Research Database (NNRD) supplemented by additional information on dose, method of surfactant administration and dosing frequency to assess whether the dose and method of administration of surfactant given to preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) affects neonatal outcomes.

Detailed description

The rationale for this study is the clinical relevance of understanding whether surfactant dose affects neonatal outcomes in infants with RDS who are treated in the immediate postnatal period. In a research environment, the dose of surfactant is rigorously controlled, usually administered at a dose of 100mg/kg or 200mg/kg. In clinical practice, clinicians more frequently follow the 'whole vial dosing' approach, where a full vial is given aiming to get as close as possible to the desired dose. Reasons for whole vial use include reduction of waste and administration of surfactant shortly after birth where an infant's weight is unknown. It is unclear whether whole vial dosing leads to under-dosing or over-dosing and whether either situation affects outcomes. Information regarding the dose of surfactant delivered, and the method of administration, are not currently routinely recorded in the UK. The primary objective of the study is to compare two dosing groups (100-130 mg/kg and 170-200 mg/kg) in terms of the proportions of infants who require mechanical ventilation within four days of birth.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

The Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust
CollaboratorOTHER
Imperial College London
CollaboratorOTHER
Chiesi UK
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* \<37 weeks gestational age Requiring surfactant for Respiratory Distress Syndrome Record of birth weight available Born after study initiation

Exclusion criteria

* 37 weeks gestation age or above Parental opt-out

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Need for mechanical ventilationDay 3 to 4 of lifeSurvival without mechanical ventilation (excluding days 1 and 2 of life)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
SurvivalTo study completion, an average of 2 years
Number of doses of surfactantTo study completion, an average of 2 years
Total cumulative dose of surfactant (excluding the first dose)To study completion, an average of 2 years
Survival with no respiratory supportOn postnatal day 28
Duration of respiratory support (days)To study completion, an average of 2 years
Two-year developmental outcomesTwo yearsAs measured by Bailey's Score
Survival with no oxygen requirementTo study completion, an average of 2 years
Duration of mechanical ventilation (days)To study completion, an average of 2 years

Other

MeasureTime frame
Effect of dose on need for mechanical ventilation on days 3 and 4 (excluding days 1 and 2)Day 3 to 4 of life
Effect of method of administration on need for mechanical ventilation on days 3 and 4 (excluding days 1 and 2)Day 3 to 4 of life

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 17, 2026