Chronic Pain
Conditions
Keywords
Quantitative sensory testing
Brief summary
To establish the sensory profile of patients using quantitative sensory testing (QST) and questionnaires as well as the level of sensitisation using temporal summation and diffuse noxious inhibitory control paradigms in all patients undergoing a chronic pain intervention at Barts Health NHS Trust. Primary objective- To identify the phenotype of responders and non-responders to a chronic pain intervention using QST sensory profile as well as the sensitisation paradigms. Secondary objective- To establish the correlation between sensory profile, and sensitisation parameters as well as other measures of chronic pain as per Initiative on Methods, Measurement and Pain Assessment in clinical trials (IMMPACT) recommendation. Common interventions performed at Barts Health NHS Trust includes Neuromodulation, targeted epidural steroid and/or radiofrequency treatment, 8% Capsaicin patch and pharmacological interventions such as anti-neuropathic agent and opioids.
Interventions
PROCEDUREQuantitative sensory testing
Quantitative sensory testing
Sponsors
Barts & The London NHS Trust
Study design
Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
• Male and female patients between the age of 18-80 years who have a lumbar radiculopathy who have not undergone any spinal surgery. * Minimum baseline pain rating of 50mm on a 100mm NRS in the painful area * Chronic pain of at least 6 months * Subject satisfies standard criteria in the study centre for SCS implantation and the NICE 159 criteria for management of intractable neuropathic pain. * Subject satisfies standard criteria in the study centre for ONS implantation and the NICE 452 criteria for intractable chronic migraine. * Patients who have given their written informed consent. * Patient is able and willing to comply with study procedures and follow up schedule.
Exclusion criteria
• Any inclusion criteria not met * Female patients of childbearing age who is or plans on becoming pregnant during the course of the study * Patients who have undergone radiofrequency or injection therapy at or on a target neural structure (DRG) during the past 90 days * Patients with diabetes or any underlying neurological condition. * Patients known to have a condition that in the investigator's judgment precludes participation in the study. * Patients who have received an investigational drug or have used an investigational device in the 30 days preceding to study entry
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| • To identify the phenotype of responders and non-responders to a chronic pain intervention using QST sensory profile as well as the sensitisation paradigms. | QST changes at 4 weeks is taken as primary objective. | This is assessed by comparing and reporting any change in QST results before and after the intervention. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| • To establish the correlation between sensory profile and sensitisation parameters as well as other measures of chronic pain as per Initiative on Methods, Measurement and Pain Assessment in clinical trials (IMMPACT) recommendation • | 2 weeks 3, 6 months and one year | QST changes |
| The effect on functionality and quality of life following chronic pain intervention | 2 weeks and 3, 6 months and 1 year. | QST changes |
| Whether central sensitisation can be used as a bedside biomarker to predict outcome after interventions for chronic pain (i.e. the more centrally sensitised the more superior improvement from treatment) | 2 weeks and 3, 6 months and 1 year | QST changes |
Countries
United Kingdom
Outcome results
None listed