Skip to content

HDtDCS in Logopenic Variant PPA: Effects on Language and Neural Mechanisms

High-Definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (HD-tDCS) in Logopenic Variant Primary Progressive Aphasia (lvPPA): Effects on Language and Neural Mechanisms

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03805659
Enrollment
6
Registered
2019-01-16
Start date
2020-02-24
Completion date
2022-05-18
Last updated
2024-06-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Primary Progressive Aphasia

Keywords

Adult, Primary Progressive Aphasia, High-definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation, HD-tDCS, Language, Logopenic, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, MRI, Magnetoencephalography, MEG, Brain, Aphasia

Brief summary

This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a therapy called High-Definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (HD-tDCS) for the treatment of the language deficits experienced by people with a type of Primary Progressive Aphasia. This study uses a combination of brain imaging, language assessment, language training sessions, and HD-tDCS therapy as well as placebo therapy sessions.

Detailed description

The logopenic variant of Primary Progressive Aphasia (lvPPA) is an untreatable neurodegenerative disorder that is often referred to as the 'language form' of Alzheimer's Disease (AD). Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) has emerged as a safe and potentially effective tool that appears to enhance language production when delivered during language training. This technology provides a critical opportunity to conduct disease intervention. In this study, the investigators will test the hypothesis that High-Definition tDCS (HD-tDCS) will improve performance on language tasks by increasing functional connectivity and by regulating abnormal neuronal oscillatory patterns. The rationale for this project is that a determination of the therapeutic efficacy and the associated neural mechanisms of HD-tDCS in lvPPA is likely to offer a scientific framework whereby new stimulation parameters, conditions, and target sites can be deciphered. This study will test the hypothesis that HD-tDCS will improve performance on language tasks by increasing functional connectivity and by regulating abnormal neuronal oscillatory patterns. The language performance and functional connectivity changes will be determined in a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled crossover manner, in which a stimulation of up to 2mA in the targeted cortical tissue or sham is administered to 20 lvPPA subjects age 45 years and older. The order of treatments is counterbalanced in a within-subject crossover design. In brief, study participants will receive sham during one treatment period and stimulation during the other treatment period.

Interventions

DEVICEHD-tDCS

High-Dose transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

DEVICESham

Sham sessions (no electric current)

Sponsors

Medical College of Wisconsin
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

An unblinded member of the study team will randomize participants to the treatment conditions. Study Group assignment will be based on random number generation (in blocks of 4) followed by the creation of numbered envelopes. Participants and the study team members involved in language training, tDCS delivery, and assessment of outcomes will be blind to the treatment received.

Intervention model description

This is a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial in which stimulation or sham will be administered to 20 subjects over the age of 45 years, with the order of treatments counterbalanced in a within-subject crossover design. Stimulation and sham sessions last 20 minutes and occur for 10 days over a 2-week period.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
45 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosed with language variant Primary Progressive Aphasia (lvPPA) subtype, defined as either clinical lvPPA or imaging-supported lvPPA in accordance with the most recent diagnostic criteria (Mesulam., 2001; Gorno-Tempini et al., 2011). * Fluent in English. * 45 years of age or older. * Structural brain MRI performed within 3 years prior to enrollment.

Exclusion criteria

* Severe cognitive, auditory or visual impairments that would preclude cognitive testing. * Presence of major untreated or unstable psychiatric disease. * A chronic medical condition that is not treated or is unstable. * The presence of cardiac stimulators or pacemakers. * Any metal implants in the skull * Contraindications to MRI * History of seizures * History of dyslexia or other developmental learning disabilities.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Determine Changes in Language Performance After Stimulation SessionsLanguage performance was assessed before and after 2-week intervention and during washout periodsLanguage performance as assessed at baseline and post-stimulation procedure

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Determine the Resting State Language Network-level Changes in Left TPC Functional Connectivity.Language network resting state changes were assessed before and after 2-week intervention and during washout periodsLanguage network resting state changes after stimulation procedure
Determine the Neuronal Frequency Distribution and Connectivity Measures Associated With the Left TPC as Assessed by MEG.Resting-state neuronal frequencies and synchronizations changes were assessed before and after 2-week intervention and during washout periodsResting-state neuronal frequencies and synchronizations changes after stimulation procedure

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

6 patients were screened for eligibility between 02/24/2020 and 05/18/2022.

Pre-assignment details

5 of 6 subjects were randomized. 1 subject withdrew themselves prior to starting baseline procedures.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
HD-tDCS, Then Sham
Subjects receive High Dose transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (HD-tDCS) lasting 20 minutes at an electric current intensity of up to 2mA in the left posterior temporo-parietal cortex (TPC). Stimulation sessions are delivered once a day (QD) for a total of 10 sessions over 2 weeks (Monday-Friday). After a washout period of 16 weeks, subjects receive Sham sessions (no electric current) once a day (QD) for a total of 10 sessions over 2 weeks (Monday-Friday). HD-tDCS: High-Dose transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Sham: Sham sessions (no electric current)
2
Sham, Then HD-tDCS
Subjects receive Sham sessions (no electric current) once a day (QD) for a total of 10 sessions over 2 weeks (Monday-Friday). After a washout period of 16 weeks, subjects receive High Dose transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (HD-tDCS) lasting 20 minutes at an electric current intensity of up to 2mA in the left posterior temporo-parietal cortex (TPC). Stimulation sessions are delivered once a day (QD) for a total of 10 sessions over 2 weeks (Monday-Friday). HD-tDCS: High-Dose transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Sham: Sham sessions (no electric current)
3
Total5

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject01

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicHD-tDCS, Then ShamSham, Then HD-tDCSTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
1 Participants2 Participants3 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Age, Continuous70.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.49
66.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.06
67.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.17
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
2 Participants3 Participants5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
2 Participants3 Participants5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
2 participants3 participants5 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
1 Participants2 Participants3 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 40 / 4
other
Total, other adverse events
2 / 41 / 4
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 40 / 4

Outcome results

Primary

Determine Changes in Language Performance After Stimulation Sessions

Language performance as assessed at baseline and post-stimulation procedure

Time frame: Language performance was assessed before and after 2-week intervention and during washout periods

Population: No data were collected for this outcome measure.

Secondary

Determine the Neuronal Frequency Distribution and Connectivity Measures Associated With the Left TPC as Assessed by MEG.

Resting-state neuronal frequencies and synchronizations changes after stimulation procedure

Time frame: Resting-state neuronal frequencies and synchronizations changes were assessed before and after 2-week intervention and during washout periods

Population: No data were collected for this outcome measure.

Secondary

Determine the Resting State Language Network-level Changes in Left TPC Functional Connectivity.

Language network resting state changes after stimulation procedure

Time frame: Language network resting state changes were assessed before and after 2-week intervention and during washout periods

Population: No data were collected for this outcome measure.

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026